Magnetic resonance imaging-guided core needle breast biopsies resulting in high-risk histopathologic findings: upstage frequency and lesion characteristics.

UNLABELLED: Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-guided breast biopsies yielding high-risk histopathologic features at a single institution found an overall upstage rate to malignancy of 14% at surgical excision. All upstaged lesions were associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia. Flat epithelial atypia and atypical lobular hyperplasia alone or with lobular carcinoma in situ were not associated with an upstage to malignancy. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study w as to determine the malignancy upstage rates and imaging features of high-risk histopathologic findings resulting from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided core needle breast biopsies. These features include atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed on all MRI-guided core needle breast biopsies at a single institution from June 1, 2007 to December 1, 2013 to select biopsies yielding high-risk histopathologic findings. The patient demographics, MRI lesion characteristics, and histopathologic features at biopsy and surgical excision were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 257 MRI-guided biopsies had been performed, and 50 yielded high-risk histopathologic features (19%). Biopsy site and surgical excision site correlation was confirmed in 29 of 50 cases. Four of 29 lesions (14%) were upstaged: 1 case to invasive ductal carcinoma and 3 cases to ductal carcinoma in situ. ADH alone had an overall upstage rate of 7% (1 of 14), mixed ADH/ALH a rate of 75% (3 of 4), ALH alone or with LCIS a rate of 0% (0 of 7), and FEA a rate of 0% (0 of 4). Only mixed ADH/ALH had a statistically significant upstage rate to malignancy compared with the other high-risk histopathologic subtypes combined. No specific imaging characteristics on MRI were associated with an upstage to malignancy on the statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided breast biopsies yielding high-risk histopathologic features were associated with an overall upstage to malignancy rate of 14% at surgical excision. All upstaged lesions were associated with ADH. FEA and ALH alone or with LCIS were not associated with an upstage to malignancy.

Short-term imaging follow-up of patients with concordant benign breast core needle biopsies: is it really worth it?

PURPOSE: Women with histologically proven concordant benign breast disease are often followed closely after biopsy for a period of two years, and they are considered to be at high-risk for cancer development. Our goal was to evaluate the utility of short-term (six-month) imaging follow-up and determine the incidence of breast cancer development in this population. METHODS: Retrospective review of concordant benign breast pathology was performed in 558 patients who underwent multimodality breast core biopsy. A total of 339 patients (60.7%) with 393 biopsies qualified for the study. The six-, 12-, and 24-month incidence rates of breast cancer development were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using the exact method binomial proportions. RESULTS: No cancer was detected in 285 of 339 patients (84.1%) returning for the six-month follow-up. No cancer was detected in 271 of 339 patients (79.9%) returning for the 12-month follow-up. Among 207 follow-up exams (61.1%) performed at 24 months, three patients were detected to have cancer in the ipsilateral breast (1.45% [95% CI, 0.30%-4.18%]) and two patients were detected to have cancer in the contralateral breast (0.97% [95% CI, 0.12%-3.45%]). Subsequent patient biopsy rate was 30 of 339 (8.85%, [95% CI, 6.05%-12.39%]). Three ipsilateral biopsies occurred as a sole result of the six-month follow-up of 285 patients (1.05%, [95% CI, 0.22%-3.05%]). CONCLUSION: Short-term imaging follow-up did not contribute to improved breast cancer detection, as all subsequent cancers were detected on annual mammography. Annual diagnostic mammography after benign breast biopsy may be sufficient.

Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening.

Breast cancer screening remains a subject of intense and, at times, passionate debate. Mammography has long been the mainstay of breast cancer detection and is the only screening test proven to reduce mortality. Although it remains the gold standard of breast cancer screening, there is increasing awareness of subpopulations of women for whom mammography has reduced sensitivity. Mammography also has undergone increased scrutiny for false positives and excessive biopsies, which increase radiation dose, cost, and patient anxiety. In response to these challenges, new technologies for breast cancer screening have been developed, including low-dose mammography, contrast-enhanced mammography, tomosynthesis, automated whole breast ultrasound, molecular imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. Here we examine some of the current controversies and promising new technologies that may improve detection of breast cancer both in the general population and in high-risk groups, such as women with dense breasts. We propose that optimal breast cancer screening will ultimately require a personalized approach based on metrics of cancer risk with selective application of specific screening technologies best suited to the individual's age, risk, and breast density.

Clinical and imaging surveillance following breast cancer diagnosis.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women worldwide. Women have a 1 in 8 lifetime risk of breast cancer. Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is the most common method of definitive treatment. Patients who previously have had to undergo mastectomy may be now eligible for BCT or a multitude of options for reconstruction, either immediate or delayed. Surveillance imaging after a breast cancer diagnosis is important because there is an increased risk of recurrence developing in patients, and early detection has been shown to improve survival. There is currently no consensus on a protocol for imaging the postoperative breast. In patients who have undergone mastectomy, detection of recurrence has mostly been via clinical symptoms and physical exam, often at a later stage. New imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), and positron emission mammography (PEM) are changing the way we image the postsurgical breast. MRI, coupled with physical exam and mammography, approaches 100% sensitivity and high specificity for the identification of recurrent disease. We present a review of major academic institutions' imaging protocols and discuss the advantages of including MRI in traditional mammographic and clinical exams.