An Interprofessional Approach to Teaching Advocacy Skills: Lessons from an Academic Medical-Legal Partnership.

Medical students and educators recognize that preparing the next generation of health leaders to address seemingly intractable problems like health disparities should include advocacy training. Opportunities to acquire the knowledge and skills needed to effectively advocate at the policy level to promote systems-, community-, and population-level solutions are a critical component of such training. But formal advocacy training programs that develop and measure such skills are scarce. Even less common are interprofessional advocacy training programs that include legal and policy experts to help medical students learn such skills. This 2016-2017 pilot study started with a legislative advocacy training program for preclinical medical students that was designed to prepare them to meet with Capitol Hill representatives about a health justice issue. The pilot assessed the impact of adding an interprofessional education (IPE) dimension to the program, which in this case involved engaging law faculty and students to help the medical students understand and navigate the federal legislative process and prepare for their meetings. Results from the pilot suggest that adding law and policy experts to advocacy-focused training programs can improve medical students' advocacy knowledge and skills and increase their professional identity as advocates.

A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Hospital Participation in the Healthcare Equality Index.

ABSTRACT: Gender and sexual minority individuals experience higher rates of mistreatment and discrimination in healthcare compared with their non-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other nonheterosexual (LGBTQ+) peers. The Healthcare Equality Index (HEI) aims to create more inclusive environments and to provide metrics for quality improvement. Currently, only one adult hospital in the District of Columbia has earned the highest recognition from the HEI. Our institution is part of the same regional health system as this hospital, yet has never been evaluated by the HEI. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions surrounding the HEI at our institution to assess the feasibility of its participation. During the study period of July 2021 to June 2022, a total of 12 physicians, administrators, and educators from both hospitals and our affiliated school of medicine were interviewed. All participants expressed support after HEI requirements and improving inclusivity for LGBTQ+ patients. Participants at the other hospital cited unanimous support amongst hospital administrators as key for successful HEI implementation. Participants also mentioned cost, staff shortages, and the school of medicine's religious affiliation as potential barriers to this goal. Ultimately, hospital implementation of HEI guidelines is feasible despite shifting institutional priorities and resource limitations through greater stakeholder buy-in and streamlining a systemwide approach.

Leveraging Academic-Medical Legal Partnerships to Advance Health Justice.

Unmet legal needs contribute to housing, income, and food insecurity, along with other conditions that harm health and drive health inequity. Addressing health injustice requires new tools for the next generations of lawyers, doctors, and other healthcare professionals. An interprofessional group of co-authors argue that law and medical schools and other university partners should develop and cultivate Academic Medical-Legal Partnerships (A-MLPs), which are uniquely positioned to leverage service, education, and research resources, to advance health justice.

Weaning success among ventilator-dependent patients in a rehabilitation facility.

OBJECTIVES: To determine outcomes of difficult-to-wean, ventilator-dependent patients transferred from intensive care units to rehabilitation hospitals and to determine predictors of weaning success in such patients. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-five difficult-to-wean patients (55.2% men; 83.4% white; mean age +/- standard deviation, 65.8 +/- 16.4y) transferred to a rehabilitation facility between July 1994 and June 1996. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and clinical data, including variables identified previously as predictive of weaning success among highly selected populations. RESULTS: Patients' Gillespie categories (reason for ventilator dependency) included "other medical conditions" (eg, pneumonia, neurologic) in 42.1% of the cases, postoperative in 24.8%, previous lung disease (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease) in 15.2%, trauma in 11.7%, respiratory failure with multisystem failure in 3.4%, and uncomplicated acute lung injury (acute respiratory distress syndrome) in 2.8%. Of 145 patients, 50.3% were completely weaned, 4.8% were partially weaned, and 44.8% remained ventilator dependent. In a stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis, significant predictors of weaning success included white race (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4), serum albumin level (OR = 2.1g/dL), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level (OR = .97mg/dL); in addition, compared with postoperative patients, patients with "other medical conditions" (OR = .15) or previous lung disease (OR = .08) were less likely to be weaned (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = .76). Among 31 long-term survivors who were interviewed at least 6 months after discharge from the rehabilitation facility, 58.1% rated their health-related quality of life as good or better. CONCLUSIONS: Half of the patients admitted to a rehabilitation facility were weaned from their ventilators. Predictors of weaning success included race, BUN level, albumin level, and reason for ventilator dependency.