RESUMEN
Mounting evidence indicates that community health workers (CHWs) contribute to improved behavioral and health outcomes and reductions in health disparities. We provide an overview (based on grantee reports and community action plans) that describe CHW contributions to 22 Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) programs funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 2007 to 2012, offering additional evidence of their contributions to the effectiveness of community public health programs. We then highlight how CHWs helped deliver REACH U.S. community interventions to meet differing needs across communities to bridge the gap between health care services and community members, build community and individual capacity to plan and implement interventions addressing multiple chronic health conditions, and meet community needs in a culturally appropriate manner. The experience, skills, and success gained by CHWs participating in the REACH U.S. program have fostered important individual community-level changes geared to increase health equity. Finally, we underscore the importance of CHWs being embedded within these communities and the flexibility they offer to intervention strategies, both of which are characteristics critical to meeting needs of communities experiencing health disparities. CHWs served a vital role in facilitating and leading changes and will continue to do so.
Asunto(s)
Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Competencia Cultural , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Salud de las Minorías , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Creación de Capacidad/métodos , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/educación , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Despite significant advances in prevention, Mexican American women continue to experience disparities related to cervical cancer and access to current and relevant health information. To address this disparity a community-campus partnership initiated an outreach program to Latinas in Arizona as one part of an integrated approach. Promotoras (community health workers) provided the leadership in the development of a curriculum to (a) train promotoras on cervical cancer, (b) meet informational needs of community members, (c) address relevant social determinants of heath, and (d) promote access to health care. The purpose of this article is to describe the community-based participatory approach used in the development of the curriculum. Specifically, the article describes the leadership of promotoras, the curriculum development, and the use of continual feedback to inform the quality control. To address cervical cancer disparities for Mexican American women, the Pima County Cervical Cancer Prevention Partnership used principles of community-based participatory action.
Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Educación en Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Arizona , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Redes Comunitarias , Competencia Cultural , Curriculum , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Desarrollo de Programa , Control de CalidadRESUMEN
Diabetes health disparities among Hispanic populations have been countered with federally funded health promotion and disease prevention programs. Dissemination has focused on program adaptation to local cultural contexts for greater acceptability and sustainability. Taking a broader approach and drawing on our experience in Mexican American communities at the U.S.-Mexico Border, we demonstrate how interventions are adapted at the intersection of multiple cultural contexts: the populations targeted, the community- and university-based entities designing and implementing interventions, and the field team delivering the materials. Program adaptation involves negotiations between representatives of all contexts and is imperative in promoting local ownership and program sustainability.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Americanos Mexicanos , Arizona/epidemiología , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Salud de la Familia/etnología , Educación en Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Humanos , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mortality at the United States-Mexico border is twice the national average. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasingly diagnosed among children and adolescents. Fragmented services and scarce resources further restrict access to health care. Increased awareness of the incidence of disease and poor health outcomes became a catalyst for creating community-based coalitions and partnerships with the University of Arizona that focused on diabetes. CONTEXT: Five partnerships between the communities and the University of Arizona were formed to address these health issues. They began with health promotion as their goal and were challenged to add policy and environmental change to their objectives. Understanding the meaning of policy in the community context is the first step in the transition from program to policy. Policy participation brings different groups together, strengthening ties and building trust among community members and community organizations. METHODS: Data on progress and outcomes were collected from multiple sources. We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) 2010 Community Change Model as the capacity-building and analytic framework for supporting and documenting the transition of coalitions from program to policy. CONSEQUENCES: Over 5 years, the coalitions made the transition, in varying degrees, from a programmatic focus to a policy planning and advocacy focus. The coalitions raised community awareness, built community capacity, encouraged a process of "change in change agents," and advocated for community environmental and policy shifts to improve health behaviors. INTERPRETATION: The five coalitions made environmental and policy impacts by engaging in policy advocacy. These outcomes indicate the successful, if not consistently sustained, transition from program to policy. Whether and how these "changes in change agents" are transferable to the larger community over the long term remains to be seen.
Asunto(s)
Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Federación para Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Planificación Social , Arizona , Emigración e Inmigración , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , México/etnología , Innovación Organizacional , Formulación de Políticas , UniversidadesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Interactive Systems Framework (ISF), a guide for translational research, encourages the balancing of traditional research and community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches. OBJECTIVES: This paper focuses on the challenges, solutions, and lessons learned in applying the ISF to our translational research project. METHODS: A community-campus partnership translated evidence-based screening guidelines on sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and depression into culturally relevant educational materials. Community health workers (CHWs) disseminated the information through a cross-over design to Hispanic women in Pima County, Arizona. Challenges, solutions, and lessons learned were identified throughout this process. LESSONS LEARNED: We identified challenges in the areas of research design, and in the ISF systems of prevention synthesis and translation, prevention support, and prevention delivery. We successfully negotiate solutions between the scientific and local community that resulted in acceptable compromises for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The model presented by the ISF is difficult to achieve, but we offer concrete solutions to community members and scientists to move toward that ideal.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Depresión/prevención & control , Hispánicos o Latinos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Adulto , Anciano , Arizona , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Estudios Cruzados , Depresión/etnología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Negociación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/etnologíaRESUMEN
The REACH Su Comunidad Consortium worked with 10 communities to address disparities in access to healthy food and physical activity opportunities among Hispanic populations through policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) strategies. Community health workers took leadership roles in the implementation of PSE strategies in partnership with local multisector coalitions. This article describes the role of community health workers in PSE change, the technical and professional development support provided to the REACH Su Comunidad Communities, and highlights professional development needs of community health workers engaging in PSE strategies.