Anatomo-functional evaluation for management and surgical treatment of insular cavernous malformation: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Insular cavernous malformations (iCMs) are very rare vascular lesions. Their surgical management is challenging, due to their complex functional and vascular relationship. The continuous improvement of intra-operative tools and neuroimaging techniques has progressively enhanced the safety of iCM surgery. Nevertheless, the best surgical approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the potential role of an anatomo-functional classification to guide the iCMs' management. METHODS: The study included patients affected by iCMs and referred to the Senior Author (FA). All cases were divided in 2 groups, according to a mainly pial growth pattern (exophytic group) or a subcortical one (endophytic group). Endophytic iCM was further subdivided in 3 subgroups, based on the insular gyri involved. According to this classification, each patient underwent a specific additional neuroimaging investigation and surgical evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were included. In the surgical group, trans-sylvian (TS) approach was used in 6 patients with exophytic or Zone I endophytic iCMs. The transcortical (TC) approach with awake monitoring was used in 6 cases of Zone II endophytic vascular lesions. Both TS and trans-intraparietal sulcal (TIS) approach were used for 3 cases of Zone III endophytic iCM. At follow-up, 3 patients were fully recovered from a transient speech impairment while a permanent morbidity was observed in one case. CONCLUSIONS: ICMs represent a single entity with peculiar clinical and surgical aspects. The proposed iCM classification focuses on anatomical and functional concerns, aiming to suggest the best pre-operative work-up and the surgical evaluation.

Perioperative Pressure Injuries: A Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to investigate risk factors, incidence, and preventive strategies for perioperative pressure injuries (PIs). METHODS: The authors reviewed four databases for literature published from January 2001 to December 2017. Selected articles included primary quantitative studies with prospective, descriptive, and longitudinal design or randomized controlled trials that evaluated risk factors, incidence, and preventive strategies for perioperative PIs. The studies included were evaluated for methodological quality using the Edwards Method Score. The authors used a standardized extraction form to extract inclusion and exclusion criteria, participant demographics, methodology, PI risk instrument and classification systems, type of surgery and anesthesia, PI risk factors, incidence, preventive strategies, and outcomes evaluation. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 115 publications identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The risk assessment and PI classification instruments used differed in every study. Incidence of PI varied throughout the studies and was reduced by warming therapy and by a skin care intervention program. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are necessary to develop a standard risk assessment instrument and preventive strategies and to clarify some contradictions evident in the literature.

Posterior Petrous Meningiomas: Surgical Classification and Postoperative Outcomes in a Case Series of 130 Patients Operated via the Retrosigmoid Approach.

OBJECTIVE: A standardized definition and classification of primary posterior petrous meningiomas (PPMs) is lacking, with consequent challenges in comparing different case series. This study aimed to provide an anatomical description and classification of PPMs analyzing a homogeneous series of patients operated via the retrosigmoid approach. METHODS: PPMs originate laterally to the petro-occipital fissure within the venous ring composed of the superior petrosal, sigmoid, inferior petrosal, and cavernous sinuses. We proposed a classification based on tumor site of origin, direction of growth relative to the internal acoustic meatus, and cranial nerves' displacement. Four types of PPMs were defined: retromeatal (type A), meatal (type B), premeatal (type C), and broad-based (type D). We performed a retrospective analysis of 130 consecutive patients with PPMs who underwent surgery as first-line treatment. RESULTS: The PPM classification predicted clinical presentation, postoperative morbidity, and resection rates. Headache, hydrocephalus, and cerebellar deficits were more common in type A (59.0%, 37.7%, 49.2%) and type D (66.7%, 66.7%, 33.3%). Hypoacusia/anacusia was more common in type B (87.5%), while trigeminal hypoesthesia/anesthesia was more common in type C (85.0%). After surgery, patients with type A and D PPMs were at higher risk to develop cerebellar deficits (11.5%-22.2%), whereas patients with type B and C PPMs presented with hypoacusia/anacusia (12.5%) and trigeminal deficits (10.0%), respectively. The near-total resection rate was higher in type A (91.8%), followed by types B (82.5%), C (80.0%), and D (77.8%) PPMs. CONCLUSIONS: The PPM surgical classification has an operative and prognostic relevance. In expert hands, the retrosigmoid approach represents a safe and effective approach to remove PPMs.

Canakinumab as treatment for COVID-19-related pneumonia: A prospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Canakinumab is an IL-1ß antibody that neutralises the activity of IL-1ß. This study examined the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with moderate COVID-19-related pneumonia. DESIGN: This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in duration of hospitalisation with adequate oxygen status. Forty-eight patients with moderate COVID-19-related pneumonia were asked to participate in the prospective case-control study: 33 patients (cases) signed informed consent and received canakinumab (Cohort 1) and 15 patients (Controls) refused to receive the experimental drug and received institutional standard of care (Cohort 2). RESULTS: Hospital discharge within 21 days was seen in 63% of patients in Cohort 1 vs. 0% in Cohort 2 (median 14 vs. 26 days, respectively; p < 0.001). There was significant clinical improvement in ventilation regimes following administration of canakinumab compared with Cohort 2 (Stuart-Maxwell test for paired data, p < 0.001). Patients treated with canakinumab experienced a significant increase in PaO2:FiO2 (p < 0.001) and reduction in lung damage by CT (p = 0.01), along with significant decreases in immune/inflammation markers that were not observed in Cohort 2. Only mild side-effects were seen in patients treated with canakinumab; survival at 60 days was 90.0% (95% CI 71.9-96.7) in patients treated with canakinumab and 73.3% (95% CI 43.6-89.1) for Cohort 2. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with canakinumab in patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia rapidly restored normal oxygen status, decreased the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and was associated with earlier hospital discharge and favourable prognosis versus standard of care.