Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 208: 111110, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278495

RESUMEN

AIMS: The study aimed to evaluate blood flow (BF) and microvascular function in the forearm of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes at rest and after ischemia. Microvascular function plays a crucial role in regulating BF in peripheral tissues based on metabolic demand. METHODS: People with diabetes and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited. Brachial artery diameter and blood velocity were continuously measured at rest and after ischemia by an automatic tracking system. BF and vascular conductance were then calculated. RESULTS: Forty-nine people with diabetes and 49 controls were enrolled. BF at rest and after ischemia was significantly higher in people with diabetes than controls: Type 1, 243 ± 116 and 631 ± 233 ml/min; controls, 180 ± 106 and 486 ± 227 ml/min; Type 2, 332 ± 149 and 875 ± 293 ml/min; controls 222 ± 106 and 514 ± 224 ml/min. Vascular conductance was significantly higher in Type 2 than in controls at rest and after ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: People with diabetes exhibited significantly increased BF, with Type 2 also showing heightened vascular conductance. Activating metabolic pathways triggered by hyperglycemia may lead to distinct vascular redistribution, potentially impairing blood flow over time. These findings of the study underscore the importance of understanding overall vascular dynamics in diabetes and its implications for vascular health.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiología , Hemodinámica , Antebrazo/irrigación sanguínea , Arteria Braquial/fisiología , Isquemia , Vasodilatación/fisiología
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(16): e036275, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39119964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prespecified propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI -2.0% to 6.7%]; P=0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98-1.08]; P=0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.79]; P<0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24-hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%-28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89]; both P<0.001) and lower 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.90]; P=0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Puntaje de Propensión , Terapia Trombolítica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Administración Intravenosa , Medición de Riesgo , Quimioterapia Combinada , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Eur Stroke J ; : 23969873241255250, 2024 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved the efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aimed at evaluating effectiveness and safety of short-term DAPT in real-world, where treatment use is broader than in RCTs. METHODS: READAPT (REAl-life study on short-term Dual Antiplatelet treatment in Patients with ischemic stroke or Transient ischemic attack) (NCT05476081) was an observational multicenter real-world study with a 90-day follow-up. We included patients aged 18+ receiving short-term DAPT soon after ischemic stroke or TIA. No stringent NIHSS and ABCD2 score cut-offs were applied but adherence to guidelines was recommended. Primary effectiveness outcome was stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death due to vascular causes, primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding. Secondary outcomes were the type of ischemic and hemorrhagic events, disability, cause of death, and compliance to treatment. RESULTS: We included 1920 patients; 69.9% started DAPT after an ischemic stroke; only 8.9% strictly followed entry criteria or procedures of RCTs. Primary effectiveness outcome occurred in 3.9% and primary safety outcome in 0.6% of cases. In total, 3.3% cerebrovascular ischemic recurrences occurred, 0.2% intracerebral hemorrhages, and 2.7% bleedings; 0.2% of patients died due to vascular causes. Patients with NIHSS score ⩽5 and those without acute lesions at neuroimaging had significantly higher primary effectiveness outcomes than their counterparts. Additionally, DAPT start >24 h after symptom onset was associated with a lower likelihood of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world, most of the patients who receive DAPT after an ischemic stroke or a TIA do not follow RCTs entry criteria and procedures. Nevertheless, short-term DAPT remains effective and safe in this population. No safety concerns are raised in patients with low-risk TIA, more severe stroke, and delayed treatment start.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA