Surgeon and Hospital Factors Associated With Outcomes in the New York State Database.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to explore the relationship between various surgeon-related and hospital-level characteristics and clinical outcomes among patients requiring cardiac surgery. METHODS: We searched the New York State Cardiac Data Reporting System for all coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve cases between 2015 and 2017. The data were analyzed without dichotomization. RESULTS: Among CABG/valve surgeons, case volume was positively correlated with years in practice (P = 0.002) and negatively correlated with risk-adjusted mortality ratio (P = 0.014). For CABG and CABG/valve surgeons, our results showed a negative association between teaching status and case volume (P = 0.002, P = 0.018). Among CABG surgeons, hospital teaching status and presence of cardiothoracic surgery residency were inversely associated with risk-adjusted mortality ratio (P = 0.006, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: There is a complex relationship between case volume, teaching status, and surgical outcomes suggesting that balance between academics and volume is needed.

Comparative Outcomes of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-analysis and Parametric Extrapolation of Clinical Trials.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to pool randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and extrapolate pooled time-to-event data to compare long-term outcomes. METHODS: An electronic database search was performed for RCTs comparing SAVR with TAVR. The most current longest follow-up data for each RCT were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Survival data were pooled for Kaplan-Meier analysis as well as parametric modeling with extrapolation. RESULTS: Seven RCTs comprising 7774 patients were included. Mean valve gradient at 5 y was comparable between SAVR [11 mmHg (3.7; 18.3)] and TAVR [8.1 mmHg (1.9; 14.3)] (P = 0.38). TAVR had a higher mean valve area at 30 d, 1 y, and 2 y [1.68 cm2 (1.22; 2.13) versus 1.8 cm2 (1.35; 2.25), P = 0.02]. SAVR had a higher freedom from any paravalvular leak at 30 d and 1 y [86% (81; 90) versus 39% (36; 41), P < 0.01]. All-cause death was lower in the SAVR group at 5 y [39% (29; 50) versus 43% (31; 57), P < 0.01]. Although no differences were seen between SAVR and TAVR in the pooled Kaplan-Meier analysis of all-cause mortality and composite of all-cause mortality or stroke, parametric modeling with extrapolation showed significant divergence for both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled all-cause mortality as well as pooled composite of all-cause mortality or stroke indicated better survival with SAVR at 5 y. Long-term parametric extrapolation also indicated superior survival with SAVR.

Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery for Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) adversely affects long-term survival; however, isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery has been rarely performed due to high operative mortality. In addition, the previous literature included heterogeneous TR etiologies. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate early and long-term outcomes of isolated TV surgery for functional TR. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies. Baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, and clinical outcomes were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included seven studies. Pooled analyses showed that 68% (35, 89) of patients had preoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter, and 58% (11, 94) had a history of left-sided valve surgery. Seventy-three percent (65, 80) of patients had at least one physical exam finding of right-sided heart failure, and 57% (44, 69) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. TV replacement was more common than repair. In TV replacement, bioprosthetic valve (39%, 13, 74) was more common than mechanical prosthesis (22%, 18, 26). The early mortality rate was 7%. Twenty percent of patients required a permanent pacemaker postoperatively. The overall 1- and 5-year survival rates were 84.5 and 69.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: More than half of the patients who underwent isolated TV surgery for functional TR had undergone left-sided valve surgery and had significant heart failure symptoms at the time of surgery. Further studies on the surgical indication for concomitant TV surgery at the time of left-sided valve surgery and the appropriate timing of surgery for isolated functional TR are needed to improve survival.

Perioperative Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Improve Major Outcomes of Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity-Adjusted Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to study the association of perioperative administration of renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing cardiac surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is controversial whether the perioperative RASi should be administered in HF patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A total of 2338 patients with HF and undergoing CABG and/or valve surgeries at multiple hospitals from 2001 to 2015 were identified from STS database. After adjustment using propensity score and instrumental variable, logistic regression was conducted to analyze the influence of preoperative continuation of RASi (PreRASi) on short-term in-hospital outcomes. Independent risk factors of 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and renal failure were analyzed by use of stepwise logistic regression. The effects of pre- and postoperative use of RASi (PostRASi) on long-term mortality were analyzed using survival analyses. Stepwise Cox regression was conducted to analyze the independent risk factors of 6-year mortality. The relationships of HF status and surgery type with perioperative RASi, as well as PreRASi-PostRASi, were also evaluated by subgroup analyses. RESULTS: PreRASi was associated with lower incidences of 30-day mortality [ P < 0.0001, odds ratio (OR): 0.556, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.405-0.763], stroke ( P =0.035, OR: 0.585, 95% CI: 0.355-0.962), renal failure ( P =0.007, OR: 0.663, 95% CI: 0.493-0.894). Both PreRASi ( P =0.0137) and PostRASi ( P =0.007) reduced 6-year mortality compared with the No-RASi groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and postoperative use of RASi was associated with better outcomes for the patients who have HF and undergo CABG and/or valve surgeries. Preoperative continuation and postoperative restoration are warranted in these patients.

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices associated survival awaiting heart and heart-kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) technology has translated to better outcomes for patients on CF-LVAD support as a bridge-to-transplant. However, data are lacking regarding the subset of CF-LVAD patients with renal failure awaiting simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (HKTx). We sought to better understand the characteristics and outcomes of patients in this group. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was used to identify adult patients listed for heart transplant (HTx) or HKTx from January 1, 2009 to March 31, 2017. Patients were followed from time on waitlist to either removal from waitlist or transplantation. Demographic and clinical data for HTx and HKTx patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed waitlist and post-transplant survival. For waitlisted patients, both death and removal from the waitlist due to deteriorating medical condition were considered events. RESULTS: Overall, 26 638 patients registered for transplant were analyzed. 25 111 (94%) were listed for HTx, and 1527 (6%) for HKTx. 7683 (29%) patients listed for HTx had CF-LVAD support. For those listed for HKTx, 441 (28%) underwent dialysis alone, 256 (17%) had CF-LVAD support alone, and 85 (6%) were treated with both CF-LVAD and dialysis. 15 567 (58%) underwent HTx, and 621 (2%) underwent HKTx. In these groups, post-transplant survival was similar (p = 0.06). Patients listed for HKTx treated with both dialysis and CF-LVAD had significantly worse waitlist survival compared to HKTx recipients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Post-transplant survival is comparable between HTx and HKTx, and early survival is similar between HTx patients and those listed for HTx with CF-LVAD support. However, outcomes on the waitlist for HKTx in CF-LVAD patients on dialysis is significantly worse compared to HKTx recipients. This highlights the need to better account for this patient population when allocating organs.

Outcomes of percutaneous temporary biventricular mechanical support: a systematic review.

Percutaneous biventricular assist devices (BiVAD) are a recently developed treatment option for severe cardiogenic shock. This systematic review sought to identify indications and outcomes of patients placed on percutaneous BiVAD support. An electronic search was performed to identify all appropriate studies utilizing a percutaneous BiVAD configuration. Fifteen studies comprising of 20 patients were identified. Individual patient survival and outcomes data were combined for statistical analysis. All 20 patients were supported with a microaxial LVAD, 12/20 (60%) of those patients were supported with a microaxial (RMA) right ventricular assist device (RVAD), and the remaining 8/20 (40%) patients were supported with a centrifugal extracorporeal RVAD (RCF). All patients presented with cardiogenic shock, and of these, 12/20 (60%) presented with a non-ischemic etiology vs 8/20 (40%) with ischemic disease. For the RMA group, RVAD support was significantly longer [RMA 5 (IQR 4-7) days vs RCF 1 (IQR 1-2) days, p = 0.03]. Intravascular hemolysis post-BiVAD occurred in three patients (27.3%) [RMA 3 (33.3%) vs RCF 0 (0%), p = 0.94]. Five patients received a durable left ventricular assist device, one patient received a total artificial heart, and one patient underwent a heart transplantation. Estimated 30-day mortality was 15.0%, and 78.6% were discharged alive. Both strategies for percutaneous BiVAD support appear to be viable options for severe cardiogenic shock.

Cardiac transplantation after heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) presents a unique challenge in patients requiring orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). We sought to pool the existing evidence in a systematic review. METHODS: Electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies on OHT in patients with HIT. Patient-level data for 33 patients from 21 studies were extracted for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Median patient age was 51 [IQR 41, 55] years, with 75.8% (25/33) males. All patients had a clinical diagnosis of HIT, and anti-PF4/Heparin antibodies were positive in 87.9% (29/33). Median lowest reported platelet count was 46 × 109 /L [27.2, 73.5]. Intraoperatively, 61% (20/33) of patients were given unfractionated heparin (UFH), while 39% (13/33) were given alternative anticoagulants. The alternative agent subgroup required more antifibrinolytics [54% (7/13) vs 10% (2/20), P = .02] and clotting factors [69.2% (9/13) vs 15.0% (3/20), P < .01]. Perioperative thrombosis occurred more [53.8% (7/13) vs 0% (0/20, P < .01) in alternate agent subgroup. More patients in the alternate agent subgroup required post-operative transfusions [54% (7/13) vs 0% (0/20), P < .01]. Thirty-day mortality of 15.2% (5/33) was comparable between the subgroups. CONCLUSION: Heparin use during OHT may be associated with less adverse effects compared to use of other anticoagulants with no difference in 30-day mortality.

Assessing donor-recipient size metrics for heart transplant outcomes: UNOS database analysis.

STUDY: There is no widely accepted donor to recipient size-match metric to predict outcomes in cardiac transplant. The predictive ability of size-match metrics has not been studied when recipients are stratified by heart failure etiology. We sought to assess the performance of commonly used size metrics to predict survival after heart transplant, accounting for restrictive versus non-restrictive pathology. METHODS: The UNOS registry was queried from 2000 to 2017 for all primary isolated heart transplants. Donor-recipient ratios were calculated for commonly used size metrics and their association with survival was assessed using continuous, nonlinear analysis. RESULTS: 29 817 patients were identified. Height (P < .001), predicted heart mass (PHM) (P = .003), ideal body weight (IBW) (P < .001) and body mass index (BMI) (P = .003) ratios were significantly associated with survival, while weight and body surface area (BSA) ratios were not. When stratified, only BMI ratio retained significance for both restrictive (P = .051) and non-restrictive (P = .003) subsets. Recipients with restrictive etiology had increased risk of mortality with both a lower and higher BMI ratio. CONCLUSIONS: While many metrics show association with survival in the non-restrictive subset, BMI is the only metric that retains significance in the restrictive subset. Recipients with restrictive and non-restrictive etiologies of heart failure tolerate size mismatch differently.

Extracorporeal life support and cardiopulmonary bypass for central airway surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Major airway surgery can pose a complex problem to perioperative central airway management. Adjuncts to advanced ventilation strategies have included cardiopulmonary bypass, veno-arterial, or veno-venous extracorporeal life support. We performed a systematic review to assess the existing evidence utilizing these strategies. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted to identify studies written in English reporting the use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) during central airway surgery. Thirty-six articles consisting of 78 patients were selected and patient-level data were analyzed. RESULTS: Median patient age was 47 [IQR: 34-53] and 59.0% (46/78) were male. Indications for surgery included central airway or mediastinal cancer in 57.7% (45/78), lesion or injury in 15.4% (12/78), and stenosis in 12.8% (10/78). Support was initiated pre-operatively in 9.9% (7/71) and at the time of induction in 55.3% (42/76). It was most commonly used at the time of tracheal resection/repair [93.2% (68/73)], intubation of the tracheal stump [94.4% (68/72)], and re-anastomosis [94.2% (65/69)]; 13.7% (10/73) patients were supported post-operatively. The most commonly performed surgery was tracheal repair or resection in 70.3% (52/74). Median hospital stay was 12 [8, 25] days and in-hospital mortality was 7.9% (6/76). There was no significant difference in survival between the three groups (p = .54). CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation offers versatility in timing, surgical approach, and ECLS runtime that makes it a viable addition to the surgical armamentarium for treating complex central airway pathologies.

Tricuspid regurgitation associated with implantable electrical device insertion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) lead placement may worsen or result in tricuspid regurgitation (TR). While the association between lead placement and the incidence of TR has been established, current understanding of this problem remains incomplete. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to pool the existing evidence to better understand the occurrence and severity of TR associated with cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) insertion. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published from 2000 to 2018. Overall, 15 studies were selected for the analysis comprising 4019 patients with data reported on TR development following ICD or PPM lead placement. Demographic information, perioperative clinical variables, and clinical outcome measures, including pre and postoperative echocardiographic TR grade changes, were extracted and pooled for systematic review. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 69 years [95% CI: 64.62-73.59], and 63% [95% CI: 57-68] were male. Devices implanted included ICD in 57% [95%CI: 43-70] and PPM in 41% [95%CI: 31-52]. The most common indications for pacemaker implantation were sick sinus syndrome in 22% [95% CI: 22-37] and AV block in 21% [95%CI:12-34. The commonest indications for ICD implantation were primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Atrial fibrillation was present in 37% [95%CI: 28-46] and congestive heart failure in 15% [95%CI: 2-57]. Baseline distribution of TR grades were as follows: grade 0/1 TR in 89% [95%CI: 82-93], grade 2 TR in 8% [95%CI: 5-13], grade 3 TR in 2% [95%CI: 0-7] and grade 4 TR in 2% [95%CI: 1-4]. Post-procedure, grade 0/ 1 TR decreased to 68% [95% CI: 51-81] (p < 0.01), grade 2 TR increased to 21% [15-28] (p < 0.01), grade 3 TR increased to 13% [95%CI: 5-32] (p = 0.02), and grade 4 TR increased to 7% [95%CI: 5-9] (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: ICD and PPM lead placement is associated with increased TR post-procedure. Further studies are warranted to evaluate changes in TR grade in the long term.

Driveline damage and repair in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review.

With mounting time on continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support, patients occasionally sustain damage to the device driveline. Outcomes associated with external and internal driveline damage and repair are currently not well documented. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of driveline damage and its repair. Electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published over the past 20 years. Fifteen studies were selected for analysis comprising of 55 patients with CF-LVAD dysfunction due to driveline damage. Demographic and perioperative variables along with outcomes including survival rates were extracted and pooled for the systematic review. Most patients (53/55) were supported on HeartMate II LVAD (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). Internal damage was more commonly reported than external damage [69.1% (38/55) vs. 30.9% (17/55), P = .01]. Median time to driveline damage was 1.9 years [IQR 1.0, 2.5]. Most patients presented with a CF-LVAD alarm [94.5% (52/55)] and patients with internal driveline damage had a significantly higher rate of alarm activation compared to that observed for those with external damage [38/38 (100%) vs. 14/17 (82.4%), P = .04]. Patients with internal driveline dysfunction were more likely to experience component wear compared to those with external driveline dysfunction [10/38 (26.3%) vs. 0/17 (0%), P = .05]; 14.5% of patients (8/55) underwent external repair of the driveline, 5.5% (3/55) were treated with rescue tape, and 5.5% (3/55) were placed on an ungrounded cable, indicating a short-to-shield event had occurred. A total of 49.1% of patients (27/55) underwent CF-LVAD exchange, 5.5% (3/55) were weaned off the CF-LVAD to explant, and 5.5% (3/55) underwent emergent heart transplantation. The median length of hospital stay was 12 days [IQR 7, 12] and 30-day mortality rate was 14.5% (8/55). Driveline damage was more commonly reported at an internal location and despite being a well-recognized complication, mortality still appears high.

Continuous-flow LVAD exchange to a different pump model: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes.

Despite improved outcomes of modern continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), device exchange is still needed for various indications. While the majority of CF-LVADs are exchanged to the same model, exchange to a different pump model is occasionally warranted. In this meta-analysis, we sought to consolidate the existing evidence to better elucidate the indications and outcomes in these cases. A comprehensive systematic search of adult patient cohorts who underwent CF-LVAD exchange to a different CF-LVAD model was performed. Study-level data from 10 studies comprising 98 patients were extracted and pooled for analysis. Mean patient age was 58 (95% CI: 48-65) and 81% were male. Indication for initial CF-LVAD was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 45% (34-57). Initial device was HeartMate II LVAD (HMII) in 93 (94.9%) and HeartWare HVAD (HW) in 5 (5.1%) patients. After mean CF-LVAD support time of 18.8 (15.2-22.4) months, exchange indications included thrombosis in 71% (43-89), infection in 21% (8-47) and device malfunction in 12% (7-21). HMII to HW exchange occurred in 53 (54.1%) patients, HMII to HeartMate III (HM3) in 32 (32.7%), and HM II to either HW or HM3 in 13 (13.2%) patients. Postoperatively, right ventricular assist device was required in 16% (8-32). Overall, 20% (8-40) of patients experienced a stroke, while HW patients had a significantly higher stroke incidence than HM3 patients (HW: 21% (8-47) vs. HM3: 5% (1-24), P < .01). Overall 30-day mortality was 10% (6-17), while HW had a significantly worse 30-day mortality than HM3 (HW: 13% (7-24) vs. HM3: 5% (1-24), P = .03). Following device exchange from a different CF-LVAD model, HM3 is associated with lower stroke and higher survival when compared to HW.

Survival outcomes of stenting outflow graft stenosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.

Stenosis in the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) outflow graft is caused by various factors. We discuss indications for percutaneous intervention of outflow graft complications and evaluate the use of this treatment in re-establishing adequate CF-LVAD flow. An electronic search was performed to identify all studies in the English literature reporting CF-LVAD outflow graft stenting. Twenty-one studies consisting of 26 patients were included. Patient-level data were extracted for statistical analysis. Median patient age was 59 years [45.8-67.0] and 65.4% (17/26) were male. 58.3% (14/24) of patients had HeartWare HVAD, 37.5% (9/24) had HeartMate II LVAD, and 4.2% (1/24) had HeartMate III LVAS. Median time from device placement to outflow graft stenting was 24.0 months [7.8-30.4]. 76.9% of patients (20/26) presented with heart failure. Complications of the CF-LVAD outflow graft included thrombosis in nine patients (34.6%), stenosis in nine patients (34.6%), kinking in three patients (11.5%), pseudoaneurysm in one patient (3.8%), external graft compression in one patient (3.8%), and bronchial-arterial fistula in one patient (3.6%). Immediate flow improvement occurred in 23/26 patients (88.5%), with the remaining 11.5% (3/26) requiring additional procedures. Pre- and post-intervention flows were 2.9 L/min [2.0-3.5] and 4.7 L/min [4.1-4.8] respectively (p = 0.01). Of patients, 96.2% (25/26) were discharged with a median time to discharge of 4 days [3.0-5.0]. The 30-day mortality was 6.7% (1/15). Overall mortality during the median follow-up of 90 days was 9.5% (2/21). Outflow graft stenting appears to effectively alleviate CF-LVAD outflow graft obstruction and is associated with low overall mortality.

Clinical implications of LDH isoenzymes in hemolysis and continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-induced thrombosis.

Pump-induced thrombosis continues to be a major complication of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), which increases the risks of thromboembolic stroke, peripheral thromboembolism, reduced pump flow, pump failure, cardiogenic shock, and death. This is confounded by the fact that there is currently no direct measure for a proper diagnosis during pump support. Given the severity of this complication and its required treatment, the ability to accurately differentiate CF-LVAD pump thrombosis from other complications is vital. Hemolysis measured by elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) enzyme levels, when there is clinical suspicion of pump-induced thrombosis, is currently accepted as an important metric used by clinicians for diagnosis; however, LDH is a relatively nonspecific finding. LDH exists as five isoenzymes in the body, each with a unique tissue distribution. CF-LVAD pump thrombosis has been associated with elevated serum LDH-1 and LDH-2, as well as decreased LDH-4 and LDH-5. Herein, we review the various isoenzymes of LDH and their utility in differentiating hemolysis seen in CF-LVAD pump thrombosis from other physiologic and pathologic conditions as reported in the literature.

Right atrial versus right ventricular HeartWare HVAD position in patients on biventricular HeartWare HVAD support: A systematic review.

In patients with biventricular heart failure or refractory right heart failure following HeartWare HVAD placement, off-label placement of a right-sided HeartWare HVAD has been described both in the right ventricular (RV) and right atrial (RA) positions. We sought to evaluate and compare the outcomes of right-sided HeartWare HVAD using the RA versus RV approach. An electronic search was performed in the English literature to identify all reports of left- and right-heart support with HeartWare HVAD. Of the 1,288 articles identified, 13 articles with 56 cases met inclusion criteria. Patient-level data were extracted and analyzed. The median patient age was 52 years (IQR 33.0-59.0) and 40/50 (80.0%) were male. Overall, 21/56 patients (37.5%) had RA HVAD, while 35/56 (62.5%) had RV HVAD. Most underwent concomitant HVAD placement [RA: 17/21 (81.0%) vs. RV: 31/35 (88.6%), P = .69]. In those who did not, the median time between left and right HVAD was 10 days (IQR 7-14) for RA HVAD and 12 days (IQR 8-30) for RV HVAD (P = .77). The median time of support was 351 days (IQR 136-626) for RA HVAD compared to 135 days (IQR 61-244) for RV HVAD (P = .02). Pump thrombosis occurred at a similar rate [RA: 3/10 (30.0%) vs. RV: 6/20 (30.0%), P = 1], as did GI bleeding [RA: 10/35 (28.6%) vs. RV: 5/21 (23.8%), P = .94] during the follow-up time period. Kaplan-Meier analysis when censored for transplant showed higher survival with RA HVAD compared to RV HVAD (P = .036), with an estimated survival at 1 year of 91.7% (95% CI 77.3-100.0) in RA HVAD versus 66.2% (95% CI 48.9-89.6) for RV HVAD. RA HVAD appears to be a viable option for durable right-sided support with outcomes at least comparable to RV HVAD.

Ventricular arrhythmias following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are not uncommon after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. In this systematic review, we sought to identify the patterns of VA that occurred following CF-LVAD implantation and evaluate their outcomes. An electronic search was performed to identify all articles reporting the development of VA following CF-LVAD implantation. VA was defined as any episode of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or sustained (>30 seconds) ventricular tachycardia (VT). Eleven studies were pooled for the analysis that included 393 CF-LVAD patients with VA. The mean patient age was 57 years [95%CI: 54; 61] and 82% [95%CI: 73; 88] were male. Overall, 37% [95%CI: 19; 60] of patients experienced a new onset VA after CF-LVAD implantation, while 60% [95%CI: 51; 69] of patients had a prior history of VA. Overall, 88% of patients [95%CI: 78; 94] were supported on HeartMate II CF-LVAD, 6% [95%CI: 3; 14] on HeartWare HVAD, and 6% [95%CI: 2; 13] on other CF-LVADs. VA was symptomatic in 47% [95%CI: 28; 68] of patients and in 50% [95%CI: 37; 52], early VA (<30 days from CF-LVAD) was observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 7% [95%CI: 5; 11]. Mean follow-up was 22.9 months [95%CI: 4.8; 40.8], during which 27% [95%CI: 17; 39] of patients underwent heart transplantation. In conclusion, approximately a third of patients had new VA following CF-LVAD placement. VA in CF-LVAD patients is often symptomatic, necessitates treatment, and carries a worse prognosis.

Characteristics and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common adverse event after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. We sought to evaluate patterns of GIB development and related outcomes in CF-LVAD recipients. An electronic search was performed to identify all articles related to GIB in the setting of CF-LVAD implantation. A total of 34 studies involving 1087 patients were pooled for analysis. Mean patient age was 60 years (95% CI 57-64) and 24% (95% CI 21-28%) were female. The mean time from CF-LVAD implantation to the first GIB was 54 days (95% CI 24-84) with 40% (95% CI 34-45%) of patients having multiple episodes of GIB. Anemia was present in 75% (95% CI 41-93%) and the most common etiology of bleeding was arteriovenous malformations (36% [95% CI 24-50%]). The mean duration of follow-up was 14.6 months (95% CI 6.9-22.3) during which the all-cause mortality rate was 21% (95% CI 12-36%) and the mortality rate from GIB was 4% (95% CI 2-9%). Thromboembolic events occurred in 32% (95% CI 22-44%) of patients with an ischemic stroke rate of 16% (95% CI 3-51%) and a pump thrombosis rate of 8% (95%CI 3-22%). Heart transplantation was performed in 31% (95% CI 18-47%) of patients, after which 0% (95% CI 0-10%) experienced recurrent GIB. GIB is a major source of morbidity among CF-LVAD recipients. While death due to GIB is rare, cessation of anticoagulation during treatment increases the risk of subsequent thrombotic events. Heart transplant in these patients appears to reliably resolve the risk of future GIB.

Repair of ischemic ventricular septal defect with and without coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) following myocardial infarction (MI) is a relatively infrequent complication with high mortality. We sought to investigate the effect of concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) on outcomes following post-MI VSD repair. METHODS: Electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published from 2000 to 2018. Sixty-seven studies were selected for the analysis comprising 2174 patients with post-MI VSD. Demographic information, perioperative variables, and outcomes including survival data were extracted and pooled for systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Single-vessel disease was most common (47%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 42-52), left anterior descending coronary artery was the most commonly involved vessel (55%, 95% CI, 46-63), and anterior wall was the most commonly affected territory (57%, 95% CI, 51-63). Concomitant CABG was performed in 52% (95% CI, 46-57) of patients. Of these, infarcted territory was re-vascularized in 54% (95% CI, 23-82). A residual/recurrent shunt was present in 29% (95% CI, 24-34) of patients. Of these, surgical repair was performed in 35% (95% CI, 28-41) and transcatheter repair in 11% (95% CI, 6-21). Thirty-day mortality was 30% (95% CI, 26-35) in patients who had preoperative coronary angiogram, and 58% (95% CI, 43-71) in those who did not (P < .01). No significant survival difference observed between those who had concomitant CABG vs those without CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant CABG did not have a significant effect on survival following VSD repair. Revascularization should be weighed against the risks associated with prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass.

Single versus multi-drug antimicrobial surgical infection prophylaxis for left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Infection remains the Achilles heel of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. However, an optimal antimicrobial surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimen has not been established. This study evaluated the efficacy of a single-drug SIP compared to a multi-drug SIP on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing continuous-flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) and pulsatile LVAD (P-LVAD) implantation. An electronic search was performed to identify studies in the English literature on SIP regimens in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Identified articles were assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen articles with 1,311 (CF-LVAD: 888; P-LVAD: 423) patients were analyzed. Overall, 501 (38.0%) patients received single-drug SIP, whereas 810 (62.0%) received multi-drug SIP. Time to infection was comparable between groups. There was no significant difference in overall incidence of LVAD-specific infections [single-drug: 18.7% vs. multi-drug: 24.8%, P = 0.49] including driveline infections [single-drug: 14.1% vs. multi-drug: 20.8%, P = 0.37]. Compared to single-drug SIP, patients who received multi-drug SIP had a significantly lower survival rate [single-drug: 90.0% vs. multi-drug: 76.0%, P = 0.01] and infection-free survival rate [single-drug: 88.4% vs. multi-drug: 77.3%, P = 0.04] at 90 days. However, there were no significant differences in 1-year survival and 1-year infection-free survival between groups. No survival differences were observed in the CF-LVAD subset as well. This study demonstrated no additional advantage of a multi-drug compared to a single-drug regimen for SIP. Although there was a modest advantage in early survival among CF-LVAD and P-LVAD patients who received single-drug SIP, there were no significant differences in the 1-year survival and 1-year infection-free survival.