The impact of orthodontic-surgical treatment on facial expressions-a four-dimensional clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this clinical trial was to compare facial expressions (magnitude, shape change, time, and symmetry) before (T0) and after (T1) orthognathic surgery by implementing a novel method of four-dimensional (4D) motion capture analysis, known as videostereophotogrammetry, in orthodontics. METHODS: This prospective, single-centre, single-arm trial included a total of 26 adult patients (mean age 28.4 years; skeletal class II: n = 13, skeletal class III: n = 13) with indication for orthodontic-surgical treatment. Two reproducible facial expressions (maximum smile, lip purse) were captured at T0 and T1 by videostereophotogrammetry as 4D face scan. The magnitude, shape change, symmetry, and time of the facial movements were analysed. The motion changes were analysed in dependence of skeletal class and surgical movements. RESULTS: 4D motion capture analysis was feasible in all cases. The magnitude of the expression maximum smile increased from 15.24 to 17.27 mm (p = 0.002), while that of the expression lip purse decreased from 9.34 to 8.31 mm (p = 0.01). Shape change, symmetry, and time of the facial movements did not differ significantly pre- and postsurgical. The changes in facial movements following orthodontic-surgical treatment were observed independently of skeletal class and surgical movements. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic-surgical treatment not only affects static soft tissue but also soft tissue dynamics while smiling or lip pursing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To achieve comprehensive orthodontic treatment plans, the integration of facial dynamics via videostereophotogrammetry provides a promising approach in diagnostics. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00017206.

Reliability of landmark identification for analysis of the temporomandibular joint in real-time MRI.

BACKGROUND: Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is essential for diagnosing and comprehending temporomandibular joint (TMJ) movements. Current methods for tracking and analysis require manual landmark placement on each acquisition frame. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of placing cephalometric landmarks in frames from a dynamic real-time TMJ MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four real-time MRIs of the right TMJ were taken during mandibular movement at ten frames per second. Seven dentists identified ten landmarks on two frames (intercuspal position-ICP-and maximum mouth opening-MMO) twice at a two-week interval, yielding 112 tracings. Six typical cephalometric measurements (angles and distances) were derived from these landmarks. The reliabilities of landmarks and measurements were evaluated using distance-based (dbICC), linear mixed effect model intraclass correlation (lmeICC), and standard ICC. RESULTS: The average inter-rater reliability for the landmarks stood at 0.92 (dbICC) and 0.93 (lmeICC). The intra-rater reliability scores were 0.97 and 0.98. Over 80% of the landmarks showed an ICC greater than 0.98 (inter-rater) and over 0.99 (intra-rater). The lowest landmark ICC was observed for the orbitale and the oblique ridge of the mandibular ramus. However, the cephalometric angle and distance measurements derived from these landmarks showed only moderate to good reliability, whereas the reliability in the frames with ICP was better than those with MMO. Measurements performed in the ICP frame were more reliable than measurements in the MMO frame. CONCLUSION: While dentists reliably localize isolated landmarks in real-time MRIs, the cephalometric measurements derived from them remain inconsistent. The better results in ICP than MMO are probably due to a more familiar jaw position. The higher error rate of the TMJ measurements in MMO could be associated with a lack of training in real-time MRI analysis in dentistry.

Impact of Shared Control Modalities on Performance and Usability of Semi-autonomous Prostheses.

Semi-autonomous (SA) control of upper-limb prostheses can improve the performance and decrease the cognitive burden of a user. In this approach, a prosthesis is equipped with additional sensors (e.g., computer vision) that provide contextual information and enable the system to accomplish some tasks automatically. Autonomous control is fused with a volitional input of a user to compute the commands that are sent to the prosthesis. Although several promising prototypes demonstrating the potential of this approach have been presented, methods to integrate the two control streams (i.e., autonomous and volitional) have not been systematically investigated. In the present study, we implemented three shared control modalities (i.e., sequential, simultaneous, and continuous) and compared their performance, as well as the cognitive and physical burdens imposed on the user. In the sequential approach, the volitional input disabled the autonomous control. In the simultaneous approach, the volitional input to a specific degree of freedom (DoF) activated autonomous control of other DoFs, whereas in the continuous approach, autonomous control was always active except for the DoFs controlled by the user. The experiment was conducted in ten able-bodied subjects, and these subjects used an SA prosthesis to perform reach-and-grasp tasks while reacting to audio cues (dual tasking). The results demonstrated that, compared to the manual baseline (volitional control only), all three SA modalities accomplished the task in a shorter time and resulted in less volitional control input. The simultaneous SA modality performed worse than the sequential and continuous SA approaches. When systematic errors were introduced in the autonomous controller to generate a mismatch between the goals of the user and controller, the performance of SA modalities substantially decreased, even below the manual baseline. The sequential SA scheme was the least impacted one in terms of errors. The present study demonstrates that a specific approach for integrating volitional and autonomous control is indeed an important factor that significantly affects the performance and physical and cognitive load, and therefore these should be considered when designing SA prostheses.