RESUMEN
Single ventricle physiology (SVP) is used to describe any congenital heart lesion that is unable to support independent pulmonary and systemic circulations. Current treatment strategies rely on a series of palliation surgeries that culminate in the Fontan physiology, which relies on the single functioning ventricle to provide systemic circulation while passively routing venous return through the pulmonary circulation. Despite significant reductions in early mortality, the presence of atrioventricular valve (AVV) regurgitation is a key predictor of heart failure in these patients. We sought to evaluate the biomechanical changes associated with the AVV in SVP physiologies. Left and right ventricles were sutured onto patient-derived 3D-printed mounts and mounted into an ex vivo systemic heart simulator capable of reproducing Norwood, Glenn, Fontan and Late Fontan physiologies. We found that the tricuspid anterior leaflet experienced elevated maximum force, average force, and maximum yank compared to the posterior and septal leaflets. Between physiologies, maximum yank was greatest in the Norwood physiology relative to the Glenn, Fontan, and Late Fontan physiologies. These contrasting trends suggest that long- and short-term mechanics of AVV failure in single ventricle differ and that AVV interventions should account for asymmetries in force profiles between leaflets and physiologies.
Asunto(s)
Procedimiento de Fontan , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Válvulas Cardíacas , Ventrículos CardíacosRESUMEN
We sought to understand how leaflet forces change in response to annular dilation and leaflet tethering (LT) in single ventricle physiology. Explanted fetal bovine tricuspid valves were sutured onto image-derived annuli and ventricular mounts. Control valves (CON) were secured to a size-matched hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS)-type annulus and compared to: (1) normal tricuspid valves secured to a size-matched saddle-shaped annulus, (2) HLHS-type annulus with LT, (3) HLHS-type annulus with annular dilation (dilation valves), or (4) a combined disease model with both dilation and tethering (disease valves). The specimens were tested in a systemic heart simulator at various single ventricle physiologies. Leaflet forces were measured using optical strain sensors sutured to each leaflet edge. Average force in the anterior leaflet was 43.2% lower in CON compared to normal tricuspid valves (P < 0.001). LT resulted in a 6.6% increase in average forces on the anterior leaflet (P = 0.04), 10.7% increase on the posterior leaflet (P = 0.03), and 14.1% increase on the septal leaflet (P < 0.001). In dilation valves, average septal leaflet forces increased relative to the CON by 42.2% (P = 0.01). In disease valves, average leaflet forces increased by 54.8% in the anterior leaflet (P < 0.001), 37.6% in the posterior leaflet (P = 0.03), and 79.9% in the septal leaflet (P < 0.001). The anterior leaflet experiences the highest forces in the normal tricuspid annulus under single ventricle physiology conditions. Annular dilation resulted in an increase in forces on the septal leaflet and LT resulted in an increase in forces across all 3 leaflets. Annular dilation and LT combined resulted in the largest increase in leaflet forces across all 3 leaflets.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neo-aortic pulmonary autografts often experience root dilation and valve regurgitation over time. This study seeks to understand the biomechanical differences between aortic and neo-aortic pulmonary roots using a heart simulator. METHODS: Porcine aortic, neo-aortic pulmonary, and pulmonary roots (n = 6) were mounted in a heart simulator (parameters: 100 mm Hg, 37 °C, 70 cycles per minute, 5.0 L/min cardiac output). Echocardiography was used to study root distensibility (percentage change in luminal diameter between systole and diastole) and valve function. Leaflet motion was tracked with high-speed videography. After 30 min in the simulator, leaflet thickness (via cryosectioning), and multiaxial modulus (via lenticular hydrostatic deformation testing) were obtained. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between aortic and neo-aortic pulmonary leaflet motion, including mean opening velocity (218 vs 248 mm/s, P = .27) or mean closing velocity (116 vs 157 mm/s, P = .12). Distensibility was similar between aortic (8.5%, 1.56 mm) and neo-aortic pulmonary (7.8%, 1.12 mm) roots (P = .59). Compared to virgin controls, native pulmonic roots exposed to systemic pressure for 30 min had reduced leaflet thickness (630 vs 385 µm, P = .049) and a reduced Young's modulus (3,125 vs 1,089 kPa, P = .077). In contrast, the aortic roots exposed to pressure displayed no significant difference in aortic leaflet thickness (1,317 vs 1,256 µm, P = .27) or modulus (5,931 vs 3,631 kPa, P = .56). CONCLUSIONS: Neo-aortic pulmonary roots demonstrated equivalence in valve function and distensibility but did experience changes in biomechanical properties and morphology. These changes may contribute to long-term complications associated with the Ross procedure.