Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(6): 538-546, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299930

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative hypertension frequently occurs after surgery for congenital heart disease. Given safety concerns when using calcium channel blockers in infants along with the cost and side-effect profile of nitroprusside, we retrospectively assessed our experience of using nicardipine and nitroprusside for postoperative blood pressure control in infants who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease. We also investigated the cost difference between the medications. DESIGN: This study was a single-center retrospective, pre-post chart review of patients who had surgery for congenital heart disease between 2016 and 2020. The primary aim was a noninferiority comparison of achievement of blood pressure goal at 1-hour post-initiation of an antihypertensive agent. Secondary comparisons included achievement of blood pressure goal at 2 hours after medication initiation, Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS), and blood transfusion, crystalloid volume, and calcium needs. SETTING: Academic quaternary-care center. PATIENTS: Infants under 1 year old who required treatment for hypertension with nitroprusside ( n = 71) or nicardipine ( n = 52) within 24 hours of surgery for congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We failed to identify any difference in proportion of patients that achieved blood pressure control at 1-hour after medication initiation (nitroprusside 52% vs. nicardipine 54%; p = 0.86), with nicardipine noninferior to nitroprusside within a 15% margin. Of patients who did not achieve control at 1-hour post-medication initiation, receiving nicardipine was associated with blood pressure control at 2 hours post-medication initiation (79% vs. 38%; p = 0.003). We also failed to identify an association between antihypertensive types and mean VIS scores, blood transfusion volumes, crystalloid volumes, and quantities of calcium administered. Index cost of using nitroprusside was 16 times higher than using nicardipine, primarily due to difference in wholesale cost. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience of achieving blood pressure control in infants after surgery for congenital heart disease (2016-2020), antihypertensive treatment with nicardipine was noninferior to nitroprusside. Furthermore, nicardipine use was significantly less expensive than nitroprusside. Our contemporary practice is therefore to use nicardipine in preference to nitroprusside.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Hipertensión , Nicardipino , Nitroprusiato , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Nicardipino/uso terapéutico , Nicardipino/administración & dosificación , Nicardipino/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nitroprusiato/uso terapéutico , Nitroprusiato/administración & dosificación , Nitroprusiato/economía , Lactante , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Recién Nacido , Antihipertensivos/economía , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/economía , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Vasodilatadores/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA