A lesson in humility: the added values of PET-MRI over PET-CT in detecting malignant hepatic lesions.

PURPOSE: The recent introduction of integrated PET-MRI systems into practice seems promising in oncologic imaging, and efforts are made to specify their added values. The current study evaluates the added values of PET-MRI over PET-CT in detecting active malignant hepatic lesions. METHODS: As part of an ongoing prospective study in our institution that assesses the added values of PET-MRI, subjects undergo PET-CT and subsequent PET-MRI after single radiotracer injection. The current study included 97 pairs of whole-body PET-CT and liver PET-MRI scans, of 61 patients (19/61 had ≥ 2 paired scans), all performed with [18F]FDG and interpreted as showing active malignant hepatic involvement. Primary malignancies were of colorectal/biliary/pancreatic/breast/other origins in 19/9/9/7/17 patients. Monitoring response to therapy was the indication in 86/97 cases. When PET-MRI detected additional malignant lesions over PET-CT, lesions size, their characteristics on PET-MRI, and the influence on the final report were recorded. RESULTS: In 37/97 (38.1%) cases, a total of 78 malignant lesions were identified on PET-MRI but not on PET-CT: 19 lesions (11 cases) were identified on PET of PET-MRI but not on PET of PET-CT; 37 lesions (14 cases) were small (≤ 0.8 cm) and identified on MRI only; 22 lesions (12 cases) were > 0.8 cm, had low/no [18F]FDG uptake, but were categorized as viable based on MRI. These 78 lesions caused major effect on final reports in 11/97 (11.3%) cases, changing reported response assessment category (10/86 cases) or defining malignant hepatic disease on staging/restaging scans (1/11 cases). CONCLUSION: PET-MRI offers several advantages over PET-CT in assessing the extent and response to therapy of malignant hepatic involvement. Additional malignant lesions detected on PET-MRI are attributed to superior PET performance (compared with PET of PET-CT), greater spatial resolution provided by MRI, and improved multi-parametric viability assessment. In around one-tenth of cases, findings identified on PET-MRI but not on PET-CT significantly change the final report's conclusion.

Comparison of White Blood Cell Scintigraphy, FDG PET/CT and MRI in Suspected Diabetic Foot Infection: Results of a Large Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) represent one of the most frequent and disabling morbidities of longstanding diabetes; therefore, early diagnosis is mandatory. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of white blood cell scintigraphy (WBC), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18F) FDG PET/CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in patients with suspected DFI. Images and clinical data from 251 patients enrolled by five centers were collected in order to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WBC, FDG, and MRI in diagnosing osteomyelitis (OM), soft-tissue infection (STI), and Charcot osteoarthropathy. In OM, WBC acquired following the European Society of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines was more specific and accurate than MRI (91.9% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.0001 and 86.2% vs. 67.1%, p = 0.003, respectively). In STI, both FDG and WBC achieved a significantly higher specificity than MRI (97.9% and 95.7% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.04 and p = 0.018, respectively). In Charcot, both MRI and WBC demonstrated a significantly higher specificity and accuracy than FDG (88.2% and 89.3% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.0009; 80.3% and 87.9% vs. 62.1%, p < 0.02, respectively). Moreover, in Charcot, WBC was more specific than MRI (89.3% vs. 88.2% p < 0.0001). Given the limitations of a retrospective study, WBC using EANM guidelines was shown to be the most reliable imaging modality to differentiate between OM, STI, and Charcot in patients with suspected DFI.