RESUMEN
A woman in her 40s known to have systemic lupus erythematosus presented with a maculopapular rash on her face, neck and chest following measles exposure. She had received a single-dose measles vaccine as a child in the 1970s and was therefore presumed to be immune, and thus not infectious. As a result, she was initially managed in an open bay. Measles virus IgM antibody in serum was undetectable; however, measles virus RNA was subsequently detected in throat swab by PCR, which is consistent with current infection. Measles is one of the most transmissible diseases in the world and cases are rising both in the UK and globally. Our case and literature review highlight the risk of vaccine failure in measles, especially in people who have not received two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. It also highlights the challenges in diagnosing measles in previously vaccinated individuals.
Asunto(s)
Sarampión , Humanos , Sarampión/prevención & control , Sarampión/diagnóstico , Femenino , Vacuna Antisarampión , Adulto , Virus del Sarampión/inmunología , Virus del Sarampión/aislamiento & purificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Vacunación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation (CI) has proven to be a highly effective method for rehabilitating individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. However, challenges persist, particularly in cases where CI failure necessitates re-implantation. This study aims to address the gap in understanding the knowledge and practices of audiologists in the UK regarding cochlear re-implantation through a comprehensive questionnaire survey. METHODS: A bespoke questionnaire was distributed to audiologists working with CI across the UK. The survey, which included multiple-choice items, open-text responses, and visual analogue scales, was made accessible via an online link shared through professional bodies, email groups, and social media platforms. RESULTS: The survey received 27 responses, predominantly from female audiologists (71.4%), with significant representation from London (28.6%) and the East of England (21.4%). A majority of respondents had over 16 years of CI experience (35.7%) and held a master's degree (60.7%). Key reasons for CI re-implantation included electrode failure (82.1%) and hermetic seal failure (60.7%). While respondents showed strong confidence in counselling (88.8%) and managing re-implanted devices (84.6%), there was a noted variation in opinions regarding the need for additional training in intraoperative measures. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights the current practices and training needs of UK audiologists in CI re-implantation. This underscores the importance of targeted training to fill knowledge gaps and improve clinical care during CI re-implantation, ultimately enhancing outcomes for both audiologists and CI recipients.