Relapse rates after withdrawal of thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

PURPOSE: Withdrawal of thiopurines after remission is associated with an increased risk of relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, long-term data on thiopurine withdrawal is limited, especially from developing countries where the cost of long-term therapy poses a significant burden on patients. METHODS: Patients with IBD on thiopurine monotherapy for ≥ 4 months, who stopped thiopurines while in clinical remission and were not on any other immunomodulator or biologics at the time of withdrawal, were included in this retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Among 1093 patients with IBD on thiopurine monotherapy, 461 patients stopped thiopurine due to various reasons. Among these, 218 (ulcerative colitis (UC) = 179; Crohn's disease (CD) = 39) patients were in clinical remission and were continued on mesalamine. Overall, 36.7% (n = 80) relapsed after a median duration of 20 months (IQR: 9-49). Relapse rate was higher in UC than CD (39.7% vs 23%, p = 0.055). Cumulative probabilities of relapse were 17%, 34%, and 44% at the end of 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The relapse rate at 5 years was significantly lower in patients who had stopped azathioprine after 4 years of therapy (31% vs 54%, p = 0.007). On multi-variate cox regression analysis, male sex [HR: 1.6(1.0-2.6), p = 0.02] and short duration of therapy with thiopurines [HR: 1.02 (1.01-1.02), p = 0.004] before withdrawal were associated with increased risk of relapse. CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% patients with IBD in remission would relapse after 5 years of thiopurine withdrawal. Male sex and shorter treatment duration predict relapse. Treatment should be continued in patients who tolerate and maintain remission on long-term thiopurine.

Minimal risk of lymphoma and non-melanoma skin cancer despite long-term use of thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A longitudinal cohort analysis from northern India.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Thiopurines are widely used to maintain remission in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Reported effectiveness and tolerability rates have been variable across studies. There are only sparse data in Asian population regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of thiopurines. METHODS: Records of 5351 patients followed up at inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinic, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi from 2004 to 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Safety was evaluated in terms of long-term adverse events and development of malignancy. RESULTS: Of 5351 patients with IBD, 1093 who received thiopurine for > 3 months (UC = 788 [proctitis-1.9%, left-sided colitis-44.9%, & pancolitis-53.1%] & CD = 305 [inflammatory-42.6%, stricturing-46.9%, & fistulizing-10.5%]) were included (60.8%-male patients). Follow up and treatment duration on thiopurine were 7 (4-12) years and 39.4 ± 40.3 months, respectively, with 254 (23.2%) patients receiving thiopurines for more than 5 and 68 (6.2%) receiving for more than 10 years. Three hundred and fifty-nine (UC: 249 [31.6%]; CD: 110 [36.1%]; P = 0.1) patients developed adverse events; commonest was myelosuppression (23.4%) followed by gastrointestinal intolerance (3%), flu-like illness (1.7%), and arthralgia/myalgia (1.4%). Myelosuppression was the commonest cause of thiopurine withdrawal. No patient (including 254 patients on thiopurine for ≥ 5 years) developed lymphoma or non-melanoma skin cancer. The cumulative probability of staying free from adverse events in overall IBD cohort at 1, 2, and 5 years was 78.6%, 71.9%, and 68.4%, respectively, and this was comparable between UC and CD (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow up of patients with IBD from northern India on thiopurine monotherapy demonstrated minimal risk of development of lymphoma as well as non-melanoma skin cancer.

Thiopurines Have Sustained Long-term Effectiveness in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Which is Independent of Disease Duration at Initiation: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Thiopurines are viable option for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] in resource-limited countries. However, data on the effect of disease duration at thiopurines initiation on long-term effectiveness are limited. METHOD: We performed a propensity matched analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD]. Patients initiated on thiopurines early in the disease course [≤2 years] were compared with those started late [>2 years]. Effectiveness was defined as no requirement for hospitalisation, anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents, or surgery, and minimum steroid requirement [≤1 steroid course in 2 years] during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 988 [UC: 720, CD: 268] patients were included (male: 665 [60.8%], median age: 40 [32-51] years, median follow-up: 40 [19-81] months). Overall effectiveness at 5 and 10 years was 79% and 72% in UC, and 69% and 63% in CD, respectively. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in 5- and 10-year effectiveness between early and late thiopurine initiation groups either for UC [81% and 80% vs 82% and 74%; p = 0.92] or CD [76% and 66% vs 72% and 51%, p = 0.32]. Male sex for UC (negative: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI): 0.45-0.97; p = 0.03), and ileal involvement [positive: HR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.32-6.71; p = 0.008], steroid-dependent disease [positive: HR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.26-5.68; p = 0.01] and adverse events [negative: HR: 0.47, 95% CI:0.27-0.80; p = 0.005] for CD were predictors of thiopurine effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Thiopurines have sustained long-term effectiveness in both UC and CD. However, early thiopurine initiation had no better effect on long-term disease outcome compared with late initiation.

"Prevalence, Predictors, and Impact of Hepatic Steatosis in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study".

Background and Aims: There are no prospective studies evaluating effect of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). This prospective observational study assessed the prevalence of NAFLD, its predictors, and its effect on long-term outcomes in UC. Methods: Consecutive UC patients underwent transient elastography, body composition analysis, bone densitometry, anthropometry, and baseline demographic and subjective global assessment. NAFLD was diagnosed by controlled attenuation parameter of >260 dB/m. To evaluate predictors and outcomes, patients of UC with NAFLD (n = 29) were compared with age- and sex-matched patients of UC without NAFLD (n = 27). Results: Among 107 patients of UC (mean age-29 ± 10.6 years; males = 56%, median disease duration-48 [interquartile range: 24-84] months, left sided/pancolitis = 84%), 27% (n = 29) had NAFLD. Patients with body mass index (BMI) > 23 kg/m2 had higher proportion of NAFLD than with normal or low BMI (54.7% [23/42] vs 10% [5/50] vs 6.7% [1/15]). Patients with NAFLD had high BMI (P < 0.001), waist circumference, and fat mass (P < 0.001) but similar fat-free mass (P = 0.798) compared to patients without NAFLD. There was no difference in immunosuppressant and cumulative steroid exposure between two groups. Dietary parameters including daily energy, protein, fat, and carbohydrate intake were similar between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, high BMI was found to be predictive and low socioeconomic status as a protective factor of NAFLD. On long-term follow-up of three years, there was no difference in steroid, or biologic requirement, disease-related hospitalization, or composite of all three outcomes between two groups. Conclusion: The prevalence of NAFLD was found in nearly a quarter of patients of UC and was affected by metabolic parameters rather than disease activity.

Intravenous Albumin Infusion Does not Augment the Response Rate to a Combination of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition and Intravenous Steroids in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Overall, 30-40% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] fail intravenous [IV] steroids, requiring medical rescue therapy/colectomy. Low baseline albumin predicts steroid non-response, and exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN] has been shown to improve steroid response and albumin levels. Albumin infusion, due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, might further improve steroid response in ASUC, which was evaluated in the present study. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with ASUC were randomised in 1:1 ratio to either albumin + standard of care [SOC] + EEN [Albumin arm] or SOC + EEN [SOC arm], over January 2021-February 2023. Both arms received 5 days of EEN with 400 mg IV hydrocortisone/day. Patients in the Albumin arm were administered 5 days of 20% weight/volume [w/v] intravenous albumin [100 ml]. Primary outcome was first, steroid failure [need for rescue medical therapy or colectomy] and second, proportion of patients with adverse events. RESULTS: In all, 61 patients [albumin: 30, SOC: 31][mean age 31.6 ±â€…0.4 years, male 57.4%], were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable. There was no difference in steroid failure between Albumin and SOC arms (10/30 [33.33%] vs 13/31[41.94%], p = 0.49). No adverse events were reported with albumin infusions. Colectomy rate [10% vs 9.68%, p = 1], response to salvage medical therapy [88.89% vs 76.92%, p = 0.62] and median [interquartile range] duration of hospitalisation [10.5 [7-16] vs 10 [7-20], p = 0.43] were also comparable. The long-term composite outcome of colectomy and re-admission rates was numerically higher in the Albumin than the SOC arm [37.04% vs 17.86%, p > 0.05], although this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: There was no benefit of intravenous albumin infusion as an adjunct to IV steroids and EEN in patients with ASUC.