Associations of Cognitive Function and Education Level With All-Cause Mortality in Adults on Hemodialysis: Findings From the COGNITIVE-HD Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: In the general population, cognitive impairment is associated with increased mortality, and higher levels of education are associated with lower risks for cognitive impairment and mortality. These associations are not well studied in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis and were the focus of the current investigation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult hemodialysis patients treated in 20 Italian dialysis clinics. EXPOSURES: Patients' cognitive function across 5 domains (memory, attention, executive function, language, and perceptual-motor function), measured using a neuropsychological assessment comprising 10 tests; and patients' self-reported years of education. OUTCOME: All-cause mortality. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Nested multivariable Cox regression models were used to examine associations of cognition (any domain impaired, number of domains impaired, and global function score from principal components analysis of unadjusted test scores) and education with mortality and whether there were interactions between them. RESULTS: 676 (70.6%) patients participated, with a median age of 70.9 years and including 38.8% women. Cognitive impairment was present in 79.4% (527/664; 95% CI, 76.3%-82.5%). During a median follow-up of 3.3 years (1,874 person-years), 206 deaths occurred. Compared to no cognitive impairment, adjusted HRs for mortality were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.07-2.93) for any impairment, 1.48 (95% CI, 0.82-2.68) for 1 domain impaired, 1.88 (95% CI, 1.01-3.53) for 2 domains, and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.14-3.55) for 3 to 5 domains. The adjusted HR was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.51-0.92) per standard deviation increase in global cognitive function score. Compared with primary or lower education, adjusted HRs were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.53-1.20) for lower secondary and 1.13 (95% CI, 0.80-1.59) for upper secondary or higher. The cognition-by-education interaction was not significant (P=0.7). LIMITATIONS: Potential selection bias from nonparticipation and missing data; no data for cognitive decline; associations with education were not adjusted for other socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment is associated with premature mortality in hemodialysis patients. Education does not appear to be associated with mortality.

Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in adult hemodialysis patients: the COGNITIVE-HD study.

Background: Mounting evidence indicates an increased risk of cognitive impairment in adults with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis, but the extent and pattern of deficits across the spectrum of cognitive domains are uncertain. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 676 adult hemodialysis patients from 20 centers in Italy, aiming to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment across five domains of learning and memory, complex attention, executive function, language and perceptual-motor function. We assessed cognitive function using a neuropsychological battery of 10 tests and calculated test and domain z-scores using population norms (age or age/education). We defined cognitive impairment as a z-score ≤ -1.5. Results: Participants' median age was 70.9 years (range 21.6-94.1) and 262 (38.8%) were women. Proportions of impairment on each domain were as follows: perceptual-motor function 31.5% (150/476), language 41.2% (273/662), executive function 41.7% (281/674), learning and memory 42.2% (269/638), complex attention 48.8% (329/674). Among 474 participants with data for all domains, only 28.9% (n = 137) were not impaired on any domain, with 25.9% impaired on a single domain (n = 123), 17.3% on two (n = 82), 13.9% on three (n = 66), 9.1% on four (n = 43) and 4.9% (n = 23) on all five. Across patients, patterns of impairment combinations were diverse. Conclusions: In conclusion, cognitive impairment is extremely common in hemodialysis patients, across numerous domains, and patients often experience multiple deficits simultaneously. Clinical care should be tailored to meet the needs of patients with different types of cognitive impairment and future research should focus on identifying risk factors for cognitive decline.

Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. SETTING: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider in Europe and South America. PARTICIPANTS: 2748 adults treated in haemodialysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with overall care. Secondary outcomes included patient experiences of individual aspects of dialysis care. RESULTS: 2145 (78.1%) adults responded to the questionnaire. Fewer than half (46.5% (95% CI 44.5% to 48.6%)) rated their overall care as excellent. Global perceptions of care were uninfluenced by most respondent characteristics except age and depressive symptoms; older respondents were less critical of their care (adjusted OR for excellent rating 1.44 (1.01 to 2.04)) and those with depressive symptoms were less satisfied (0.56 (0.44 to 0.71)). Aspects of care that respondents most frequently ranked as excellent were staff attention to dialysis vascular access (54% (52% to 56%)); caring of nurses (53% (51% to 55%)); staff responsiveness to pain or discomfort (51% (49% to 53%)); caring, helpfulness and sensitivity of dialysis staff (50% (48% to 52%)); and ease of reaching dialysis staff by telephone (48% (46% to 50%)). The aspects of care least frequently ranked as excellent were information provided when choosing a dialysis modality (23% (21% to 25%)), ease of seeing a social worker (28% (24% to 32%)), information provided about dialysis (34% (32% to 36%)), accuracy of information from nephrologist (eg, about prognosis or likelihood of a kidney transplant; 37% (35% to 39%)) and accuracy of nephrologists' instructions (39% (36% to 41%)). CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis patients are least satisfied with the complex aspects of care. Patients' expectations for accurate information, prognosis, the likelihood of kidney transplantation and their options when choosing dialysis treatment need to be considered when planning healthcare research and practices.