Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: ADVICE (Actual Data of Vomiting Incidence by Chemotherapy Evaluation) study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine the incidence of nausea and vomiting (CINV) after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), under medical practice conditions and the accuracy with which physicians perceive CINV. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients receiving MEC between April 2012 and May 2013 were included. Patients completed a diary of the intensity of nausea and number of vomiting episodes. Complete response and complete protection were assessed as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Of 261 patients included, 240 were evaluated. Median age was 64 years, 44.2 % were female and 11.2 % were aged less than 50 years; 95.3 % of patients received a combination of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) antagonist + corticosteroid as antiemetic treatment. Vomiting within 5 days of chemotherapy administration occurred in 20.8 %, nausea in 42 % and significant nausea in 23.8 % of patients. An increase in the percentage of patients with significant nausea (from 9.4 to 21.7 %) and vomiting (from 9.2 to 16.5 %) was observed from the acute to the delayed phase. Complete response was 84.2 % in the acute phase, 77 % in the late phase and 68.9 % in overall period. Complete protection was 79.5 % in the acute phase, 68.8 % in the late phase and 62.4 % throughout the study period. Physicians estimated prophylaxis would be effective for 75 % of patients receiving MEC, compared with 54.1 % obtained from patients' diary. CONCLUSION: Despite receiving prophylactic treatment, 31 % of patients did not achieve a complete response and 38 % complete protection. In general, nausea was worse controlled than vomiting. The results also showed the late phase was worse controlled than the acute phase in all variables. Healthcare providers overestimated the effectiveness of antiemetic prophylaxis.

Practical guidelines for dose individualization of anticancer targeted drugs.

For drugs such as anticancer agents every effort should be made to minimize inter-patient variability in drug exposure in order to maximize the benefit while maintaining an acceptable risk level of serious adverse effects. Anticancer drugs generally have a preferential route of elimination, either in urine or in bile and feces. In consequence, dose individualization to renal and liver function permits excessive toxicity to be avoided and expected therapeutic benefit to be achieved. However, less is known about the most appropriate starting doses of antineoplastic agents in these individuals. In this review, we discuss trials that have specifically assessed new targeted agents dosing strategies (mainly monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) in the setting of overt biochemical renal and liver dysfunction and we proportionate recommendations and practical guidelines for dose individualization.

Limited impact of palliative chemotherapy on survival in advanced solid tumours in patients with poor performance status.

AIM: Oncologists should carefully weigh up the risks and benefits of palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours (AST) and poor general status from the standpoint both of medical and ethical issues and of healthcare resources required. This study is intended to assess the impact on overall survival of palliative chemotherapy in patients with AST and admitted to hospital as a result of their poor ECOG status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 92 hospitalised patients with AST, ECOG 3-4, who were treated with palliative chemotherapy. Uni- and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted to determine the impact of clinical and disease variables (number of previous chemotherapy lines, presence of comorbidities, presentation of anorexia-cachexia syndrome, delirium, dyspnoea, ascitis, brain metastases, T-cell count, albumin, haemoglobin and LDH) on survival in this patient population. RESULTS: Mean age was 54 years (range 15-80). No chemotherapy had been given for advanced disease in 74%, 13% had received one line, 6% 2 lines and 7% ≥3 lines. Median survival, i.e., after initiation of chemotherapy to death, in these patients was 33 days (range 1-1390). The median of chemotherapy cycles was 1. In the multivariate analysis, no previous chemotherapy, and absence of anorexia-cachexia syndrome and of comorbidities was associated with significantly improved survival in patients. Forty-nine percent of patients died within 30 days of therapy, 28% died between days 30 and 90, and only 23% of patients lived longer than 90 days. Grade 3-4 toxicities mainly entailed blood disorders, namely anaemia 8%, neutropenia 13% and thrombocytopenia 8%. Six patients (5%) developed sepsis after therapy; of these, 3 died from this toxicity, 1 patient suffered cardiac toxicity, one patient leukoencephalopathy and 1 patient acute pulmonary thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: Palliative chemotherapy given to patients with AST and ECOG 3-4 with short life expectancy provided no benefit for survival. As a result, we may be over-treating these patients and contributing to poor-quality care.