RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Millions of people are exposed to landscape fire smoke (LFS) globally, and inhalation of LFS particulate matter (PM) is associated with poor respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes. However, how LFS affects respiratory and cardiovascular function is less well understood. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the pathophysiologic effects of representative LFS airway exposure on respiratory and cardiac function and on asthma outcomes. METHODS: LFS was generated using a customized combustion chamber. In 8-week-old female BALB/c mice, low (25 µg/m3, 24-hour equivalent) or moderate (100 µg/m3, 24-hour equivalent) concentrations of LFS PM (10 µm and below [PM10]) were administered daily for 3 (short-term) and 14 (long-term) days in the presence and absence of experimental asthma. Lung inflammation, gene expression, structural changes, and lung function were assessed. In 8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice, low concentrations of LFS PM10 were administered for 3 days. Cardiac function and gene expression were assessed. RESULTS: Short- and long-term LFS PM10 airway exposure increased airway hyperresponsiveness and induced steroid insensitivity in experimental asthma, independent of significant changes in airway inflammation. Long-term LFS PM10 airway exposure also decreased gas diffusion. Short-term LFS PM10 airway exposure decreased cardiac function and expression of gene changes relating to oxidative stress and cardiovascular pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: We characterized significant detrimental effects of physiologically relevant concentrations and durations of LFS PM10 airway exposure on lung and heart function. Our study provides a platform for assessment of mechanisms that underpin LFS PM10 airway exposure on respiratory and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Material Particulado , Humo , Animales , Femenino , Humo/efectos adversos , Asma/fisiopatología , Asma/etiología , Masculino , Ratones , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Pulmón/inmunología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Incendios Forestales , Modelos Animales de EnfermedadRESUMEN
Asthma during pregnancy is associated with a range of adverse perinatal outcomes. It is also linked to increased rates of neurodevelopmental conditions in the offspring. We aimed to assess whether fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO)-based asthma management during pregnancy improves child developmental and behavioural outcomes compared to usual care. The Breathing for Life Trial was a randomised controlled trial that compared FENO-based asthma management during pregnancy to usual care. Participants were invited to the developmental follow-up, the Breathing for Life Trial - Infant Development study, which followed up infants at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcomes were measured in infants at 12 months using the Bayley-III: Cognitive, Language and Motor composite scores. Secondary outcomes included Bayley-III social-emotional and adaptive behaviour scores, autism likelihood and sensory and temperament outcomes. The exposure of interest was the randomised intervention group. Two hundred and twenty-two infants and their 217 participating mothers were recruited to the follow-up; 107 mothers were in the intervention group and 113 were in the control group. There was no evidence of an intervention effect for the primary outcomes: Bayley-III cognitive (mean = 108.9 control, 108.5 intervention, p = 0.93), language (mean = 95.9 control, 95.6 intervention, p = 0.87) and motor composite scores (mean = 97.2 control, 97.9 intervention, p = 0.25). Mean scores for secondary outcomes were also similar among infants born to control and FENO group mothers, with few results reaching p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In this sample, FENO-guided asthma treatment during pregnancy did not improve infant developmental outcomes in the first year of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ACTRN12613000202763. WHAT IS KNOWN: ⢠Maternal asthma during pregnancy has been associated with increased rates of neurodevelopmental conditions in offspring, including intellectual disability and autism. WHAT IS NEW: ⢠This is the first study to examine how managing asthma during pregnancy via a FENO-guided algorithm or usual care affects infant developmental and behavioural outcomes. While the results of the study showed no impact of the intervention, and therefore do not support the integration of FENO-based management of asthma in antenatal settings for optimal infant development, they do send a positive message about the implications of active asthma management during pregnancy on infant developmental outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Desarrollo Infantil , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Temperamento , Humanos , Femenino , Asma/terapia , Embarazo , Lactante , Desarrollo Infantil/fisiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Masculino , Adulto , Prueba de Óxido Nítrico Exhalado Fraccionado/métodos , Trastorno Autístico , Óxido Nítrico/análisis , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición PrenatalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Discontinuation of, and non-adherence to, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthma treatment is a significant issue in pregnancy. This study characterized beliefs about medicines in pregnant women with asthma and investigated associations with ICS adherence. METHODS: Pregnant women with relatively mild asthma (n = 302) were grouped according to ICS use and self-reported adherence (≥80% doses taken). They completed questions about dislike of asthma medications and the validated Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), which consists of ten questions about asthma medicines ("necessity" questions about maintaining health, or "concern" questions about adverse effects), and eight general medicine questions, scored on five-point Likert scales. The Necessity Concerns differential (N-C) was calculated, with positive scores indicating that the patient perceives the benefits of medicines to outweigh the risks. RESULTS: ICS was used by 87 (29%) women, with 49 (56%) self-reporting adherence. Of the 22% who disliked taking asthma medications during pregnancy, 20% had the belief that the medication was unsafe. ICS users had a significantly higher BMQ necessity score and higher necessity-concern differential score than nonusers; when adjusted for covariates, ICS non-adherence was associated with a lower necessity score (p = 0.015). Women adherent to ICS were more likely to agree to "my health at present depends on my asthma medication" compared to non-adherent ICS users. CONCLUSIONS: ICS non-adherence was not associated with having relatively more concerns about asthma medicines; however, ICS users were more likely to perceive that the benefits of medication use outweighed any risks. Interventions to improve asthma medication adherence in pregnancy are needed.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Masculino , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Administración por Inhalación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide is a marker of airway inflammation. Air pollution induces airway inflammation and oxidative stress. Little is known about the impact of air pollution on exhaled nitric oxide in young infants. METHODS: The Breathing for Life Trial recruited pregnant women with asthma into a randomised controlled trial comparing usual clinical care versus inflammometry-guided asthma management in pregnancy. Four hundred fifty-seven infants from the Breathing for Life Trial birth cohort were assessed at six weeks of age. Exhaled nitric oxide was measured in unsedated, sleeping infants. Its association with local mean 24-h and mean seven-day concentrations of ozone, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, ammonia, particulate matter less than 10 µm (PM10) and less than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) in diameter was investigated. The air pollutant data were sourced from local monitoring sites of the New South Wales Air Quality Monitoring Network. The association was assessed using a 'least absolute shrinkage and selection operator' (LASSO) approach, multivariable regression and Spearman's rank correlation. RESULTS: A seasonal variation was evident with higher median exhaled nitric oxide levels (13.6 ppb) in warmer months and lower median exhaled nitric oxide levels (11.0 ppb) in cooler months, P = 0.008. LASSO identified positive associations for exhaled nitric oxide with 24-h mean ammonia, seven-day mean ammonia, seven-day mean PM10, seven-day mean PM2.5, and seven-day mean ozone; and negative associations for eNO with seven-day mean carbon monoxide, 24-h mean nitric oxide and 24-h mean sulfur dioxide, with an R-square of 0.25 for the penalized coefficients. These coefficients selected by LASSO (and confounders) were entered in multivariable regression. The achieved R-square was 0.27. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of young infants of asthmatic mothers, exhaled nitric oxide showed seasonal variation and an association with local air pollution concentrations.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Asma , Óxido Nítrico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Amoníaco , Monóxido de Carbono , Inflamación , Óxido Nítrico/análisis , Ozono , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/análisis , Dióxido de AzufreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide in exhaled air (eNO) is used as a marker of type 2 immune response-induced airway inflammation. We aimed to investigate the association between eNO and bronchiolitis incidence and respiratory symptoms in infancy, and its correlation with eosinophil protein X (EPX). METHODS: We followed up infants at 6 weeks of age born to mothers with asthma in pregnancy and measured eNO during natural sleep using a rapid response chemiluminescense analyser (CLD88; EcoMedics), collecting at least 100 breaths, interpolated for an expiratory flow of 50 mL/s. EPX normalised to creatinine was measured in urine samples (uEPX/c). A standardised questionnaire was used to measure symptoms in first year of life. Associations were investigated using multiple linear regression and robust Poisson regression models. RESULTS: eNO levels were obtained in 184 infants, of whom 125/184 (68%) had 12 months questionnaire data available and 51/184 (28%) had uEPX/c measured. Higher eNO was associated with less respiratory symptoms during the first 6 weeks of life (n=184, ß-coefficient: -0.49, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.04, p=0.035). eNO was negatively associated with uEPX/c (ß-coefficient: -0.004, 95% CI -0.008 to -0.001, p=0.021). Risk incidence of bronchiolitis, wheeze, cold or influenza illness and short-acting beta-agonist use significantly decreased by 18%-24% for every unit increase in eNO ppb. CONCLUSION: Higher eNO levels at 6 weeks of age may be a surrogate for an altered immune response that is associated with less respiratory symptoms in the first year of life.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Óxido Nítrico , Pruebas Respiratorias , Bronquiolitis/epidemiología , Creatinina , Neurotoxina Derivada del Eosinófilo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Embarazo , Ruidos Respiratorios/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Asthma exacerbations in pregnancy are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. We aimed to determine whether fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F ENO)-based asthma management improves perinatal outcomes compared to usual care. METHODS: The Breathing for Life Trial was a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted in six hospital antenatal clinics, which compared asthma management guided by F ENO (adjustment of asthma treatment according to exhaled nitric oxide and symptoms each 6-12â weeks) to usual care (no treatment adjustment as part of the trial). The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal events (preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), perinatal mortality or neonatal hospitalisation) assessed using hospital records. Secondary outcomes included maternal asthma exacerbations. Concealed random allocation, stratified by study site and self-reported smoking status was used, with blinded outcome assessment and statistical analysis (intention to treat). RESULTS: Pregnant women with current asthma were recruited; 599 to the control group (608 infants) and 601 to the intervention (615 infants). There were no significant group differences for the primary composite perinatal outcome (152 (25.6%) out of 594 control, 177 (29.4%) out of 603 intervention; OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.94-1.56; p=0.15), preterm birth (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.78-1.68), SGA (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.68), perinatal mortality (OR 3.62, 95% CI 0.80-16.5), neonatal hospitalisation (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.89-1.72) or maternal asthma exacerbations requiring hospital admission or emergency department presentation (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.69-2.05). CONCLUSION: F ENO-guided asthma pharmacotherapy delivered by a nurse or midwife in the antenatal clinic setting did not improve perinatal outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Nacimiento Prematuro , Lactante , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Humanos , Óxido Nítrico , Espiración , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , RespiraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for asthma management contain a consensus recommendation that inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose should not be stepped down in pregnancy. However, this is not consistent with consumer preferences and pharmacological principles to minimize medication exposure during pregnancy. We investigated exacerbations after changes to ICS and long acting beta agonist (LABA) therapy in pregnant women with asthma. METHODS: Pregnant women (n = 220) were recruited to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where maintenance treatment was adjusted monthly based on either symptoms (control group), or fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO, to alter ICS) and symptoms (to alter LABA, FeNO group). Exacerbations were monitored prospectively. RESULTS: ICS were used by 137 (62.3%) women at some time during pregnancy. ICS dose remained unchanged in 16 women (11.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-18%), increased in 37 women (27%, 95%CI 20-35%), decreased in 34 women (24.8%, 95%CI 18%-33%), or both increased and decreased in 50 women (36.5%, 95%CI 29-45%). Exacerbations occurred within 14 days of ICS step-down in 11 women (13%, 95%CI 7.5%-22%). This was not significantly different from exacerbations occurring within 14 days of step-up, in 7 women (8.1%, 95%CI 4%-16%, P = 0.294). There were no differences between management groups. Exacerbations occurred within 14 days of step-down in 14.7% (95%CI 7%-30%) of women in the control group, and in 12% (95%CI 6%-24%) of women in the FENO group. CONCLUSIONS: ICS step-down could be considered when eosinophilic inflammation or symptoms are low, and may be a useful management approach for women, doctors, and midwives wishing to minimize ICS exposure during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Maternal asthma often complicates pregnancy and is linked with poorer quality of life. Additionally, individuals with asthma are at an increased risk of depression and anxiety. We examined whether asthma during pregnancy is related to parenting stress in the first year postpartum and if this relationship varies with level of asthma control. METHODS: This cohort survey-based study included mothers with (n = 157) and without (n = 79) asthma. Mothers with asthma participated in this study following participation in a randomized controlled trial of a novel asthma management strategy during pregnancy. Mothers completed the Parenting Stress Index - Short Form during the first 12 months postpartum. Mothers with asthma also completed the Asthma Control Questionnaire. RESULTS: Parenting stress did not differ between mothers with and without asthma. Additionally, for mothers with asthma, there were no differences in levels of parenting stress based on asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that mothers with asthma are not at an increased risk for excessive parenting stress. However, due to response and sampling bias, levels of parenting stress in asthmatic mothers may be underreported in our sample.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Responsabilidad Parental , Asma/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Calidad de Vida , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the physical and mental health impact of exposure to landscape fire smoke in women with asthma. This study examined the health impacts and information-seeking behaviours of women with asthma exposed to the 2019/2020 Australian fires, including women who were pregnant. METHODS: Women with asthma were recruited from the Breathing for Life Trial in Australia. Following the landscape fire exposure period, self-reported data were collected regarding symptoms (respiratory and non-respiratory), asthma exacerbations, wellbeing, quality of life, information seeking, and landscape fire smoke exposure mitigation strategies. Participants' primary residential location and fixed site monitoring was used to geolocate and estimate exposure to landscape fire-related fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 81 pregnant, 70 breastfeeding and 232 non-pregnant and non-breastfeeding women with asthma. Participants had a median daily average of 17 µg/m3 PM2.5 and 105 µg/m3 peak PM2.5 exposure over the fire period (October 2019 to February 2020). Over 80% of participants reported non-respiratory and respiratory symptoms during the fire period and 41% reported persistent symptoms. Over 82% reported asthma symptoms and exacerbations of asthma during the fire period. Half the participants sought advice from a health professional for their symptoms. Most (97%) kept windows/doors shut when inside and 94% stayed indoors to minimise exposure to landscape fire smoke. Over two in five (43%) participants reported that their capacity to participate in usual activities was reduced due to prolonged smoke exposure during the fire period. Participants reported greater anxiety during the fire period than after the fire period (mean (SD) = 53(13) versus 39 (13); p < 0.001). Two in five (38%) pregnant participants reported having concerns about the effect of fire events on their pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Prolonged landscape fire smoke exposure during the 2019/2020 Australian fire period had a significant impact on the health and wellbeing of women with asthma, including pregnant women with asthma. This was despite most women taking actions to minimise exposure to landscape fire smoke. Effective and consistent public health messaging is needed during landscape fire events to guard the health of women with asthma.
Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Australia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Given chronic disease is increasing among young women and unintended pregnancies among these women are associated with poor maternal and fetal outcomes, these women would benefit from effective preconception care. However, there is a lack of understanding of how these women use or don't use contraception to inform such interventions. This study examined patterns of contraceptive use among an Australian cohort of young women and investigated the influence of chronic disease on contraceptive use over time. METHODS: Using data from 15,244 young women from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (born 1989-1995), latent transition analysis was performed to identify distinct contraceptive patterns among women who were at risk of an unintended pregnancy. Multinomial mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the relationship between contraceptive combinations and chronic disease. RESULTS: Contraceptive use for women with cardiac and autoinflammatory diseases differed to women without chronic disease over the observation period. Compared to women without chronic disease using the pill, women with cardiac disease had double the odds of using 'other' contraception and condoms (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.34, 3.59) and a modest increase in the odds of using the combined oral contraceptive pill and condoms (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.03, 1.89). Compared to women without chronic disease who used the pill, women with autoinflammatory disease had increased odds of using LARC and condoms (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.04, 2.41), using 'other' contraception and condoms (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.11, 2.57), and using the combined oral contraceptive pill and condoms (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.09, 1.75). No differences in contraceptive patterns over the observation period were found for women with asthma or diabetes when compared to women without chronic disease. CONCLUSION: The findings identified a need for effective contraceptive counselling as part of routine chronic disease care and improved communication between health care providers and women with chronic disease to improve young women's contraceptive knowledge and agency in contraceptive choice, particularly for those with cardiac or autoinflammatory conditions. This may be the key to reducing high-risk unintended pregnancies among this vulnerable population.
Chronic disease is increasing among young women and unintended pregnancies among these women are associated with poor outcomes for both the mother and baby. To optimise outcomes, it is important for these women to plan pregnancies and use effective contraception until such time. However, there is a lack of understanding of how these women use or don't use contraception, particularly with respect to highly effective contraception. This study examined patterns of contraceptive use among an Australian cohort of young women (born 19891995) and investigated the influence of chronic disease on contraceptive use over time. We found differences in contraceptive use over time for women with cardiac disease and those with autoinflammatory diseases. Importantly, compared to women without chronic disease using the pill alone, women with cardiac disease had double the odds of using low efficacy contraception. While women with autoinflammatory disease were 69% more likely to use long-acting methods combined with condoms, these women were also 70% more likely to use low efficacy contraception, compared to women without chronic disease who used the pill only. Contraceptive patterns did not differ for women with asthma or diabetes from women without chronic disease. The findings identified a need for effective contraceptive counselling as part of routine chronic disease care and improved communication between health care providers and women with chronic disease to improve young women's contraceptive knowledge and contraceptive decision-making, particularly for those with cardiac or autoinflammatory conditions. This may be the key to reducing high-risk unintended pregnancies among this vulnerable population.
Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados , Australia/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Conducta Anticonceptiva , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Embarazo , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Asthma is one of the most common chronic health conditions experienced during pregnancy and is associated with numerous adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. AIMS: To better understand the confidence, evidence-based knowledge and guideline use among healthcare professionals around Australia commonly involved in providing antenatal care for women with asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed to maternity carers (obstetricians and midwives), primary carers (general practitioners and general practice nurses) and respiratory specialists (respiratory physicians and respiratory nurses). Self-reported confidence and use of clinical guidelines were recorded. Evidence-based knowledge was assessed with 13 questions relating to four clinical scenarios that covered recommendations from national and international guidelines. RESULTS: Primary carers and respiratory specialists were more confident in providing antenatal asthma care, more likely to use clinical guidelines and scored significantly higher in evidence-based knowledge of antenatal asthma management than maternity carers (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in evidence-based knowledge among healthcare professionals from metropolitan, regional and rural backgrounds. However, healthcare professionals who used clinical guidelines scored significantly higher than those who did not (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Greater utilisation of clinical guidelines could improve the evidence-based knowledge of maternity carers. However, the absence of antenatal asthma management in obstetric- and maternity-specific guidelines poses a potential barrier that needs to be addressed. Furthermore, the development of multidisciplinary antenatal clinics, staffed by respiratory nurses and/or physicians, could improve outcomes for pregnant women with asthma who are not undertaking shared care.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Médicos Generales , Asma/terapia , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Atención PrenatalRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Asthma in pregnancy is associated with respiratory diseases in the offspring. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if maternal asthma is associated with lung function in early life. METHODS: Data on lung function measured at 5-6 weeks of age were combined from two large birth cohorts: the Bern Infant Lung Development (BILD) and the Australian Breathing for Life Trial (BLT) birth cohorts conducted at three study sites (Bern, Switzerland; Newcastle and Sydney, Australia). The main outcome variable was time to reach peak tidal expiratory flow as a percentage of total expiratory time(tPTEF:tE%). Bayesian linear hierarchical regression analyses controlling for study site as random effect were performed to estimate the effect of maternal asthma on the main outcome, adjusting for sex, birth order, breast feeding, weight gain and gestational age. In separate adjusted Bayesian models an interaction between maternal asthma and sex was investigated by including an interaction term. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All 406 BLT infants were born to mothers with asthma in pregnancy, while 193 of the 213 (91%) BILD infants were born to mothers without asthma. A significant interaction between maternal asthma and male sex was negatively associated with tPTEF:tE% (intercept 37.5; estimate: -3.5; 95% credible interval -6.8 to -0.1). Comparing the model posterior probabilities provided decisive evidence in favour of an interaction between maternal asthma and male sex (Bayes factor 33.5). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal asthma is associated with lower lung function in male babies, which may have lifelong implications on their lung function trajectories and future risk of wheezing and asthma.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Cohorte de Nacimiento , Australia/epidemiología , Teorema de Bayes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Pulmón , Masculino , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Objective: We aimed to examine the prevalence and severity of psychological distress of women with asthma in both the prenatal and postnatal periods, and to determine whether asthmatic women with and without mental health problems differ in self-management, medications knowledge, and asthma symptoms.Methods: We assessed spirometry performance and asthma symptoms in 120 women (mean age 29.8 years) before 23 weeks gestation, as part of the Breathing for Life Trial (Trial ID: ACTRN12613000202763). Prenatal depression data was obtained from medical records. At 6 weeks postpartum, we assessed general health, self-reported asthma control, depression symptoms (with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale) and adaptive functioning (with the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment scales).Results: Twenty percent of our sample reported having a current mental health diagnosis, 14% reported currently receiving mental health care, while 47% reported having received mental health care in the past (and may/may not have received a diagnosis). The sample scored high on the Aggressive Behavior, Avoidant Personality, and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity scales. Poorer self-reported postnatal asthma control was strongly correlated with elevated somatic complaints, externalizing problems, antisocial personality problems, and greater withdrawal. Prenatal spirometry or asthma severity and control were largely not associated with measures of psychopathology.Conclusions: These findings indicate that pregnant women with asthma frequently report issues with psychopathology during the prenatal and postnatal periods, and that the subjective perception of asthma control may be more related to psychopathology than objective asthma measures. However, due to sample bias, these findings are likely to be understated.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Asma/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/psicología , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Automanejo/psicología , Automanejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Espirometría , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of asthma management in pregnancy was to determine the treatment decision differences between a symptom control algorithm and a fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO)-guided algorithm, and whether the approach was effective in non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA). METHODS: In this double-blind parallel group RCT, women with asthma were randomized prior to 22 weeks gestation to treatment adjustment according to a symptom control algorithm (control group), or a FENO-guided algorithm (inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose adjusted according to FENO with long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) added for uncontrolled symptoms). NEA was classified as baseline blood eosinophils <0.26 × 109 /L and FENO ≤29 ppb. Exacerbations requiring medical intervention were recorded. RESULTS: Among 220 non-smokers (n = 109 control, n = 111 FENO), 1006 treatment decisions were made, with significant group differences after the first and second algorithm applications. 53% of women had NEA. Treatment was better targeted to phenotype in the FENO group: ICS use increased in eosinophilic asthma (EA, 48-86%), while ICS/LABA increased in NEA (11-30%). Fewer women in the FENO group had exacerbations during pregnancy in NEA only (18.9% FENO vs 44% control, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The FENO algorithm was more effective in treating NEA, resulting in reduced exacerbations, compared to a symptom control algorithm. This was not the result of ICS overtreatment, since the benefits occurred at a lower median daily ICS dose. Two applications of the FENO-guided algorithm, one month apart, were sufficient to achieve beneficial effects in terms of asthma exacerbations, among pregnant women with asthma.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Eosinofilia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Algoritmos , Asma/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Pruebas Respiratorias , Método Doble Ciego , Eosinófilos , Femenino , Humanos , Fenotipo , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/metabolismo , Eosinofilia Pulmonar/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled severe asthma in children is burdensome and challenging to manage. This study aims to describe outcomes in children with uncontrolled severe asthma managed in a nurse-led severe asthma clinic (SAC). METHODS: This retrospective analysis uses data collected from children referred by a paediatric respiratory specialist to a nurse-led SAC for uncontrolled severe asthma between 2014 and 2019. The pre-clinical assessments included a home visit to assess modifiable factors that could be addressed to improve control. A comprehensive lung function analysis was conducted at each visit. Interventions were personalised and included biologic agents. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric, two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test, the parametric Student's t-test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty-three children with a median age of 12 years were seen once, and 16 were followed up. Compared to a non-asthmatic (NA) and asthmatic (A) age-matched cohort, children with severe asthma (SA) had a lower FEV1, and FVC% predicted before and after bronchodilator inhalation, and a higher mean Lung Clearance Index [LCI] (10.5 [SA] versus 7.3 [NA] versus 7.6 [A], p = 0.003). Almost 80% of children with SA had an abnormal LCI, and 48% had a reduced FEV1% at the first SAC visit. Asthma control and FEV1% predicted significantly improved at a follow-up visit, while LCI remained abnormal in the majority of children (83%). CONCLUSION: Over time, many children with severe asthma showed improved clinical outcomes and lung function while lung ventilation inhomogeneities persisted. Future appropriately controlled studies are required to determine if a nurse-led multidisciplinary SAC is associated with better outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Asma/fisiopatología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/enfermería , Australia , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espirometría , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)-based asthma management during pregnancy can significantly reduce asthma exacerbations in non-smoking pregnant women. The feasibility of implementing this strategy into antenatal care has not been explored. AIMS: To examine the feasibility of implementing FeNO-based asthma management into antenatal clinics in New South Wales (NSW) Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews with video elicitation were conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing antenatal care in one of two hospital-based antenatal clinics in NSW, Australia. The video shown demonstrated the use of the FeNO instrument and other aspects of the management strategy, in antenatal care. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: A total of 20 interviews were conducted with 15 midwives, four obstetricians, and one general practitioner. Two main themes and ten sub-themes arose: Getting a number (sub-themes: engaging, technically easy, objective, predictive, reassuring); and Resourcing (sub-themes: time and timing, systems, staff, education and cost). Comments included: 'It's easy, fast and effective' and 'the main barrier is time'. All HCPs felt capable of facilitating the FeNO-based management strategy, with appropriate education, and were willing to undertake this strategy, saying: ' it would be perfectly acceptable for a midwife or doctor to do it'; also, 'they don't necessarily need to see a physician, it's something that midwives would take on generally '. CONCLUSION: Participants in this study considered FeNO-based asthma management for pregnant women to be a feasible addition to antenatal care following appropriate provision of resources and education.
Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Óxido Nítrico/análisis , Atención Prenatal , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Espiración , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Partería , Nueva Gales del Sur , Embarazo , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate the prescription rate for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) decreases in early pregnancy, possibly increasing exacerbation risk. This could be related to non-adherence to prescribed asthma medication or medication cessation by the patient or doctor. ICS use during pregnancy has not previously been summarized in a systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the use of ICS during pregnancy among asthmatic women, specifically: (1) the prevalence of use, (2) changes of use during pregnancy compared with pre-pregnancy and (3) medication adherence among ICS users. METHODS: We systematically searched literature in Embase, MEDLINE, CINAL and Cochrane, using terms related to asthma, pregnancy and medication use. All English articles reporting ICS among pregnant women with asthma were included. Prevalence, changes in ICS use during pregnancy and ICS adherence were pooled using STATA (version 15.0, StataCorp USA). RESULTS: A total of 4237 references were retrieved in the initial search. Screening and review led to the inclusion of 52 articles for one or more aims (Aim 1: N = 45; Aim 2, N = 13; and Aim 3, N = 5). The pooled prevalence of ICS use during pregnancy was 41% (95%CI 36%-45%); 49% (95%CI 44%-55%) in Europe, 39% (95%CI 32%-47%) in Australia and 34% (95%CI 27%-41%) in North America. In eight prescription databases, ICS prescription rates lowered in the first trimester of pregnancy, compared with pre-pregnancy, increased in the second trimester and decreased in the third trimester. Five studies reported ICS adherence among pregnant women, using four measures of self-reported non-adherence. In two comparable studies, pooled ICS non-adherence was 40% (95%CI 36%-44%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ICS use among pregnant women with asthma is 41% and varies widely between countries and continents, and prescription rates for ICS change throughout pregnancy. More studies are needed to investigate ICS adherence during pregnancy in women with asthma.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Asma , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/inmunología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Respiratory virus-induced asthma exacerbations occur frequently during pregnancy and are associated with adverse outcomes for mother and child. Primary nasal epithelial cells (pNECs) provide a useful method to study immune responses in pregnancy. pNECs were obtained by nasal brushings from pregnant and non-pregnant women with and without asthma. pNECS were infected in vitro with major group Rhinovirus 43 (RV43) and seasonal influenza (H3N2). Following infection, pNECs showed measurable quantities of interferon (IFN)-λ, IL-1ß, IL-8, IP-10 and MIP1-α. pNECs provide a safe and effective method for studying respiratory epithelial cell responses during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Asma/inmunología , Inmunidad Celular/inmunología , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología , Rhinovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Células Cultivadas , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Mucosa Nasal/citología , Mucosa Nasal/virología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Picornaviridae/inmunología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Asthma affects up to 13% of pregnancies worldwide and has a varying and unpredictable clinical course during pregnancy. Pharmacological asthma treatment is recommended; however, studies show that some pregnant women with asthma cease their medication in early pregnancy. There is likely a large unmet disease burden arising from asthma in pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Antenatal and asthma guidelines lack sufficient information on asthma management in pregnant women, and implementation of the current guidelines seems inadequate. Prescription databases provide evidence of cessation of asthma medication during pregnancy on a population level. Population-based databases also provide evidence of rare adverse perinatal outcomes. The risk of childhood asthma in the offspring of women with asthma is reduced by adequate control of maternal asthma during pregnancy. Vitamin D sufficiency during pregnancy could also reduce the risk of childhood asthma. SUMMARY: The findings of this review demonstrate the need for improved asthma and antenatal guidelines regarding asthma management during pregnancy, and the need of adequate implementation of these guidelines. Furthermore, adequate asthma control during pregnancy is needed to reduce the risk of childhood asthma. To maintain asthma control, prepregnancy medication should be continued throughout pregnancy and adjusted according to the current treatment steps if required.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Prenatal , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/etiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/etiología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/prevención & control , Vitamina D/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Maternal asthma during pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of negative perinatal outcomes. However, little is known about the direct effects of maternal asthma on infant cognitive development. We examined the evidence for an impact of maternal asthma during pregnancy on cognitive and behavioral development of the child. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and manual search of the databases for all available studies until January 9th, 2018. STUDY SELECTIONS: Studies were deemed relevant if they included child cognitive and behavioral development as the outcome, with maternal asthma as the determinant of interest. RESULTS: Ten articles matched selection criteria. Some studies report that maternal asthma is associated with increased risk for autism and intellectual disability in children. However, these effects are small and are often eliminated when controlling for confounding variables. Other studies have found no association. The only prospective study found that well-managed asthma during pregnancy was not associated with negative developmental outcomes in children. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that the relationship between maternal asthma during pregnancy and poor developmental and behavioral outcomes of children is weak. Children of mothers with well-managed asthma during pregnancy have similar developmental trajectories to those born to healthy mothers. Prospective, longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these conclusions. Optimal asthma management is important in pregnancy as it may have longer term benefits for the health of the offspring. As the rate of asthma increases in the population, the implications of maternal asthma on child development will be of greater importance.