RESUMEN
AIM: To assess whether multiple switches between SAR341402 biosimilar insulin aspart (SAR-Asp) and the insulin aspart reference product (NovoLog; NN-Asp) leads to equivalent pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure compared with continuous use of NN-Asp in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study randomized (1:1) 210 subjects with T1D treated with once-daily insulin glargine U100 as basal insulin to four 4-week periods of alternating multiple daily injections of SAR-Asp and NN-Asp (NN-Asp for the first 4 weeks, SAR-Asp in the last 4 weeks; switching group) versus 16 weeks of continuous NN-Asp (non-switching group). At week 16, a single dose (0.15 U/kg) of SAR-Asp in the switching group (n = 95) or NN-Asp in the non-switching group (n = 105) was given in the morning before breakfast. Primary PK endpoints were area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of SAR-Asp versus NN-Asp after the single dose at week 16. RESULTS: The extent of PK exposure was similar between the two treatments (SAR-Asp in the switching group and NN-Asp in the non-switching group) at week 16, with point estimates of treatment ratios close to 1. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC treatment ratios were contained within 0.8-1.25. For Cmax in the primary analysis set, the upper confidence limit was 1.32. This was because of the profiles of three participants with implausible high values. A prespecified sensitivity analysis excluding implausible values showed results contained within 0.8-1.25. CONCLUSIONS: PK exposure of SAR-Asp (switching group) and reference NN-Asp (non-switching group) were similar, supporting interchangeability between these two insulin aspart products.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Adulto , Humanos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacocinética , Insulina/farmacocinética , Insulina Aspart/farmacocinética , Insulina Glargina/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the equivalence of immunogenicity, safety and efficacy of Gan & Lee (GL) Glargine (Basalin®; Gan & Lee Pharmaceutical) with that of the reference product (Lantus®) in adult participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This was a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, equivalence trial conducted across 57 sites. In total, 567 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo treatment with either GL Glargine or Lantus® for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants in each treatment arm who manifested treatment-induced anti-insulin antibodies (AIA). Secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety metrics, changes in glycated haemoglobin levels, and a comparative assessment of adverse events. Results were analysed using an equivalence test comparing the limits of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for treatment-induced AIA development to the prespecified margins. RESULTS: The percentages of participants positive for treatment-induced glycated haemoglobin by week 26 were similar between the GL Glargine (19.2%) and Lantus® (21.3%) treatment groups, with a treatment difference of -2.1 percentage points and a 90% CI (-7.6%, 3.5%) (predefined similarity margins: -10.7%, 10.7%). The difference in glycated haemoglobin was -0.08% (90% CI, -0.23, 0.06). The overall percentage of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the GL Glargine (80.1%) and Lantus® (81.6%) treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: GL Glargine was similar to Lantus® in terms of immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety, based on the current study.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hemoglobina Glucada , Hipoglucemiantes , Insulina Glargina , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/inmunología , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Insulínicos/sangre , Insulina Glargina/uso terapéutico , Insulina Glargina/efectos adversos , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of Gan & Lee insulin glargine (GL Glargine) with that of the originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, equivalence study. Five hundred seventy-six subjects with T1DM were randomized 1:1 to receive either GL Glargine or Lantus treatment for 26 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who developed treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody after baseline and up to visit week 26, which was evaluated using a country-adjusted logistic regression model. The study also compared the changes in glycated hemoglobin, and adverse events including hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The percentage of subjects positive for treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody by Week 26 was 25.8% in the GL Glargine treatment group and 25.3% in the Lantus treatment group, with a 90% confidence interval (-5.4, 6.5) of the difference in proportions that fell completely between the similarity margins (-11.3, 11.3). The least squares mean difference between treatment groups for changes in glycated hemoglobin was -0.08 (90% confidence interval: -0.23, 0.06), and the other immunogenicity and safety profiles were comparable. CONCLUSION: GL Glargine demonstrated similar immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety compared to Lantus over 26 weeks in patients with T1DM.
RESUMEN
AIM: To assess the effects of once-weekly exenatide on 24-hour glucose control and variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes to once-weekly exenatide 2.0 mg or placebo. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed at baseline and weeks 4 and 10. The primary outcome was change in CGM-measured 24-hour mean glucose level. RESULTS: In the once-weekly exenatide (n = 60) and placebo (n = 56) groups (modified intention-to-treat population), the baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentrations were 8.2% and 8.0%, respectively, and the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration was 9.86 and 9.32 mmol/L, respectively. Once-weekly exenatide significantly (p < 0.001) reduced 24-hour mean glucose level versus placebo (week 4, -1.44 vs -0.29 mmol/L; week 10, -1.71 vs -0.17 mmol/L), with consistent control throughout the week. Once-weekly exenatide significantly reduced FPG and 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) levels versus placebo at week 4 (FPG, -1.65 vs -0.11 mmol/L; PPG, -1.79 vs -0.11 mmol/L) and week 10 (FPG, -2.32 vs -0.28 mmol/L; PPG, -2.46 vs -0.33 mmol/L). At week 10, once-weekly exenatide reduced the mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE; -0.84 vs 0.16 mmol/L) and standard deviation (s.d.) of mean glucose (-0.35 vs 0.04 mmol/L). By week 10, once-weekly exenatide-treated participants spent more time in euglycaemia (once-weekly exenatide, 77% vs placebo, 58%), less time in hyperglycaemia (22% vs 42%), and a similar time in hypoglycaemia (0.7% vs 0.3%). Common adverse events were injection-site nodule (once-weekly exenatide, 10.0% vs placebo, 0.0%), urinary tract infection (6.7% vs 8.9%) and nausea (6.7% vs 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In metformin-treated participants with type 2 diabetes, once-weekly exenatide significantly improved daily glucose control and reduced glycaemic variability at weeks 4 and 10, as shown by reductions in 24-hour glucose, FPG and PPG levels, MAGE and s.d., and increased time spent in euglycaemia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SAR341402 insulin aspart (SAR-Asp) is a rapid-acting insulin analog developed as an interchangeable biosimilar to the marketed insulin aspart reference product (NovoLog; NN-Asp). GEMELLI X was a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes with a biosimilar in line with the US Food and Drug Administration requirements for designation as an interchangeable biosimilar. This report assessed whether multiple switches between SAR-Asp and NN-Asp lead to equivalent safety and efficacy compared with continuous use of NN-Asp in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with multiple daily injections, using once-daily insulin glargine U100 (Lantus) as the basal insulin. METHODS: This open-label randomized (1:1), parallel-group, phase 3 trial compared four × four weeks of alternating use of individually titrated SAR-Asp and NN-Asp (NN-Asp for first four weeks, SAR-Asp in last four weeks; switching group) vs 16 weeks of continuous use of NN-Asp (nonswitching group). End points included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, adverse events, hypoglycemia, insulin dose, and change in efficacy parameters. RESULTS: Of the 210 patients randomized, 200 (95.5%) completed the trial. Patients assigned to switching group (n = 104) and nonswitching group (n = 106) showed similar safety and tolerability, including anti-insulin aspart antibody responses, adverse events, and hypoglycemia. At week 16, there was no relevant difference between switching vs nonswitching groups in the change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (least square [LS] mean difference = 0.05% [95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.13, 0.22]; 0.50 mmol/mol [-1.40, 2.39]), fasting plasma glucose (LS mean difference = 0.23 mmol/L [95% CI = -1.08, 1.53]; 4.12 mg/dL [-19.38, 27.62]), and changes in insulin dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Alternating doses of SAR-Asp and NN-Asp compared with continuous use of NN-Asp showed similar safety, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy in adults with T1D. This study supports interchangeability between SAR-Asp and NN-Asp in T1D management.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) is typically treated with lifelong supraphysiologic doses of glucocorticoids (GCs). Tildacerfont, a corticotropin-releasing factor type-1 receptor antagonist, may reduce excess androgen production, allowing for GC dose reduction. OBJECTIVE: Assess tildacerfont safety and efficacy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two Phase 2 open-label studies. PATIENTS: Adults with 21OHD. INTERVENTION: Oral tildacerfont 200 to 1000 mg once daily (QD) (nâ =â 10) or 100 to 200 mg twice daily (nâ =â 9 and 7) for 2 weeks (Study 1), and 400 mg QD (nâ =â 11) for 12 weeks (Study 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Efficacy was evaluated by changes from baseline at 8 am in adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), and androstenedione (A4) according to baseline A4â ≤â 2× upper limit of normal (ULN) or A4â >â 2× ULN. Safety was evaluated using adverse events (AEs) and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: In Study 1, evaluable participants with baseline A4â >â 2× ULN (nâ =â 11; 19-67 years, 55% female) had reductions from baseline in ACTH (-59.4% to -28.4%), 17-OHP (-38.3% to 0.3%), and A4 (-24.2% to -18.1%), with no clear dose response. In Study 2, participants with baseline A4â >â 2× ULN (nâ =â 5; 26-63 years, 40% female) had ~80% maximum mean reductions in biomarker levels. ACTH and A4 were normalized for 60% and 40%, respectively. In both studies, participants with baseline A4â ≤â 2× ULN maintained biomarker levels. AEs (in 53.6% of patients overall) included headache (7.1%) and upper respiratory tract infection (7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with 21OHD, up to 12 weeks of oral tildacerfont reduced or maintained key hormone biomarkers toward normal.
Asunto(s)
17-alfa-Hidroxiprogesterona/sangre , Hiperplasia Suprarrenal Congénita/tratamiento farmacológico , Hormona Adrenocorticotrópica/sangre , Androstenodiona/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Receptores de Hormona Liberadora de Corticotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Hiperplasia Suprarrenal Congénita/sangre , Hiperplasia Suprarrenal Congénita/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Introduction. Frequent colonoscopy screenings are critical for early diagnosis of colon cancer in patients with acromegaly. Case Presentations. We performed a retrospective analysis of the incidental diagnoses of colon cancer from the ACCESS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01995734). Colon cancer was identified in 2 patients (4.5%). Case 1 patient was a 36-year-old male with acromegaly who underwent transsphenoidal surgery to remove the pituitary adenoma. After surgery, the patient underwent routine colonoscopy screening, which revealed a 40 mm tubular adenoma in the descending colon. A T1N1a carcinoma was surgically removed, and 1 of 22 lymph nodes was positive for metastatic disease, leading to a diagnosis of stage 3 colon cancer. Case 2 patient was a 50-year-old male with acromegaly who underwent transsphenoidal surgery to remove a 2 cm pituitary adenoma. The patient reported severe cramping and lower abdominal pain, and an invasive 8.1 cm3 grade 2 adenocarcinoma with signet rings was identified in the ascending colon and removed. Of the 37 lymph nodes, 34 were positive for the presence of tumor cells, and stage 3c colon cancer was confirmed. Conclusion. Current guidelines for colonoscopy screening at the time of diagnosis of acromegaly and at appropriate follow-up intervals should be followed.
RESUMEN
Several studies suggest veterans have a higher prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection than nonveterans, possibly because of military exposures. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of anti-hepatitis C antibody and evaluate factors associated with infection among users of Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. Using a two-staged cluster sample, 1288 of 3863 randomly selected veterans completed a survey and underwent home-based phlebotomy for serological testing. Administrative and clinical data were used to correct the prevalence estimate for nonparticipation. The prevalence of antihepatitis C antibody among serology participants was 4.0% (95% CI, 2.6%-5.5%). The estimated prevalence in the population of Veterans Affairs medical center users was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.3%-7.5%) after correction for sociodemographic and clinical differences between participants and nonparticipants. Significant predictors of seropositivity included demographic factors, period of military service (e.g., Vietnam era), prior diagnoses, health care use, and lifestyle factors. At least one traditional risk factor (transfusion or intravenous drug use) was reported by 30.2% of all subjects. Among those testing positive for hepatitis C antibody, 78% either had a transfusion or had used injection drugs. Adjusting for injection drug use and nonparticipation, seropositivity was associated with tattoos and incarceration. Military-related exposures were not found to be associated with infection in the adjusted analysis. In conclusion, the prevalence of hepatitis C in these subjects exceeds the estimate from the general US population by more than 2-fold, likely reflecting more exposure to traditional risk factors among these veterans.