Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 21(3): 362-377, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28059603

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a mastery learning (ML) versus a time-based (TB) BLS course for the acquisition and retention of BLS knowledge and skills in laypeople. METHODS: After ethics approval, laypeople were randomized to a ML or TB BLS course based on the American Heart Association (AHA) Heartsaver course. In the ML group, subjects practiced and received feedback at six BLS stations until they reached a pre-determined level of performance. The TB group received a standard AHA six-station BLS course. All participants took the standard in-course BLS skills test at the end of their course. BLS skills and knowledge were tested using a high-fidelity scenario and knowledge questionnaire upon course completion (immediate post-test) and after four months (retention test). Video recorded scenarios were assessed by two blinded, independent raters using the AHA skills checklist. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects were included in analysis (23ML;20TB). For primary outcome, subjects' performance did not change after four months, regardless of the teaching modality (TB from (median[IQR]) 8.0[6.125;8.375] to 8.5[5.625;9.0] vs. ML from 8.0[7.0;9.0] to 7.0[6.0;8.0], p = 0.12 for test phase, p = 0.21 for interaction between effect of teaching modality and test phase). For secondary outcomes, subjects acquired knowledge between pre- and immediate post-tests (p < 0.005), and partially retained the acquired knowledge up to four months (p < 0.005) despite a decrease between immediate post-test and retention test (p = 0.009), irrespectively of the group (p = 0.59) (TB from 63.3[48.3;73.3] to 93.3[81.7;100.0] and then 93.3[81.7;93.3] vs. ML from 60.0[46.7;66.7] to 93.3[80.0;100.0] and then 80.0[73.3;93.3]). Regardless of the group after 4 months, chest compression depth improved (TB from 39.0[35.0;46.0] to 48.5[40.25;58.0] vs. ML from 40.0[37.0;47.0] to 45.0[37.0;52.0]; p = 0.012), but not the rate (TB from 118.0[114.0;125.0] to 120.5[113.0;129.5] vs. ML from 119.0[113.0;130.0] to 123.0[102.0;132.0]; p = 0.70). All subjects passed the in-course BLS skills test. Pass/fail rates were poor in both groups at both the simulated immediate post-test (ML = 1/22;TB = 0/20; p = 0.35) and retention test (ML pass/fail = 1/22, TB pass/fail = 0/20; p = 0.35). The ML course was slightly longer than the TB course (108[94;117] min vs. 95[89;102] min; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There was no major benefit of a ML compared to a TB BLS course for the acquisition and four-month retention of knowledge or skills among laypeople.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/educación , Competencia Clínica/normas , Evaluación Educacional , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Retención en Psicología , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
2.
Cureus ; 15(5): e39715, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37398706

RESUMEN

Introduction The simulation of patient death remains controversial in simulation-based education. We investigated the effect of simulated patient death on learners' skill retention, stress levels, and emotions. Methods After ethics approval, we recruited residents at two Canadian universities. Participants were randomized to manage a simulated cardiac arrest ending with either the unexpected death (intervention group) or survival (control group) of the simulated patient (i.e., manikin). Three months later, all participants performed the same scenario but with the opposite outcome. Blinded video raters assessed participants' non-technical and technical crisis resource management (CRM) skills at both time points. Stress levels (represented by anxiety level, salivary cortisol concentration, and cognitive appraisal) and emotional valence were measured. Outcomes were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or generalized estimating equations as appropriate. Results The analysis included 46 participants (intervention: n=24; control: n=22). Simulated death neither affected retention of non-technical CRM skills (mean retention Ottawa Global Rating Scale score in the death group [29.4, 95% CI: 27.0, 31.8] versus control group [29.4, 95% CI: 26.8, 32.0; p=0.87]) nor technical CRM skills (mean retention task-specific checklist score in the manikin death group [11.8, 95% CI: 10.5, 13.0] versus the control group [12.5, 95% CI: 11.3, 13.7; p=0.69]). The simulated death had negative effects on participants' anxiety levels, cognitive appraisal, and emotions. Conclusion Simulated patient death did not affect the retention of non-technical or technical CRM skills but led to greater levels of short-term anxiety, stress, and negative emotions among learners.

3.
J Perinatol ; 42(4): 503-504, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34420042

RESUMEN

Understanding human behaviour is essential to the successful adoption of new technologies, and for the promotion of safer care. This requires capturing the detail of clinical workflows to inform the design of new human-technology interactions. We are interested particularly in the possibilities for touchless technologies that can decipher human speech, gesture and motion and allow for interactions that are free of contact. Here, we employ a new approach by installing a single 360° camera into a clinical environment to analyse touch patterns and human-environment interactions across a clinical team to recommend design considerations for new technologies with the potential to reduce avoidable touch.


Asunto(s)
Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Habla , Cuidados Críticos , Gestos , Humanos , Tacto
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 19398, 2021 09 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34588499

RESUMEN

Anaesthesia exposure to the developing nervous system causes neuroapoptosis and behavioural impairment in vertebrate models. Mechanistic understanding is limited, and target-based approaches are challenging. High-throughput methods may be an important parallel approach to drug-discovery and mechanistic research. The nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans is an ideal candidate model. A rich subset of its behaviour can be studied, and hundreds of behavioural features can be quantified, then aggregated to yield a 'signature'. Perturbation of this behavioural signature may provide a tool that can be used to quantify the effects of anaesthetic regimes, and act as an outcome marker for drug screening and molecular target research. Larval C. elegans were exposed to: isoflurane, ketamine, morphine, dexmedetomidine, and lithium (and combinations). Behaviour was recorded, and videos analysed with automated algorithms to extract behavioural features. Anaesthetic exposure during early development leads to persisting behavioural variation (in total, 125 features across exposure combinations). Higher concentrations, and combinations of isoflurane with ketamine, lead to persistent change in a greater number of features. Morphine and dexmedetomidine do not appear to lead to behavioural impairment. Lithium rescues the neurotoxic phenotype produced by isoflurane. Findings correlate well with vertebrate research: impairment is dependent on agent, is concentration-specific, is more likely with combination therapies, and can potentially be rescued by lithium. These results suggest that C. elegans may be an appropriate model with which to pursue phenotypic screens for drugs that mitigate the neurobehavioural impairment. Some possibilities are suggested for how high-throughput platforms might be organised in service of this field.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/métodos , Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Caenorhabditis elegans/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Isoflurano/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/administración & dosificación
5.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol ; 31(1): 163-165, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30767942

RESUMEN

The potential for long-term neurotoxic effects of anesthetics on the developing human brain has led to intensified research in this area. To date, the human evidence has been inconclusive, but a large body of animal evidence continues to demonstrate cause for concern. On April 14 and 15, 2018 the sixth biennial Pediatric Anesthesia and Neurodevelopmental Assessment (PANDA) study symposium was held at Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York. This symposium brought together clinicians and researchers and served as a platform to review preclinical and clinical data related to anesthesia and neurotoxicity in developing brains. The program participants included many active investigators in the field of anesthesia neurotoxicity as well as stakeholders from different backgrounds with the common interest of potential anesthetic neurotoxicity in children. The moderated poster session included presentations of preclinical animal research studies. These studies focused on defining the anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity phenotype, understanding the mechanism of injury and discovering potential inhibitors of neurotoxic effects.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestésicos/efectos adversos , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/inducido químicamente , Adolescente , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA