Exploring Factors Influencing Cervical Cancer Prevention Behaviors: Unveiling Perspectives of Conservative Muslim American Women in Virginia.

Understanding the complexities surrounding cervical cancer prevention methods and hesitancy among conservative Muslim American women is crucial in addressing health disparities. This qualitative study aimed to delve into the religious, behavioral, and socio-cultural factors influencing Muslim women's decisions regarding cervical cancer screening (CC-S) and HPV vaccination (HPV-V) in Virginia, USA. Through interviews with 10 Muslim women residing in Virginia, qualitative data were collected as part of a mixed-method cross-sectional study conducted between August and September 2021. Findings revealed that participants had limited knowledge about cervical cancer, CC-S, and HPV-V, with notable themes emerging, such as cultural influences, misconceptions, language barriers, and challenges posed by the intricate US healthcare system. Future research should focus on exploring these barriers to mitigate the impact of cervical cancer within the Muslim population.

Recruitment of African Americans into Cancer Clinical Research: Strategies and Outcomes.

This study utilized data from four cancer-focused research studies that recruited and retained African Americans. Strategies and outcomes across four cancer prevention and control studies were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to display participant characteristics. There were 712 African American (Black) participants of which 14.6% were males. Common strategies involved connecting with community stakeholders and identifying study champions. Study recruitment methods might not be generalizable to all populations of African Americans due to geographic locations, study protocols (e.g., risk reduction), target populations (i.e., eligibility criteria), and available resources. Many African Americans have a strong interest in cancer-related research as demonstrated by participation levels. Teams that connect with relevant stakeholders and include diverse teams may be useful to engage larger numbers of minorities in cancer control research to impact morbidity and mortality.

The Impact of Demographics and Comorbidities on Fall Incidence and Prevalence in Older Adults.

Introduction: Falls among older adults are more than mere accidents; they are a silent epidemic, profoundly impacting the health and well-being of millions of older adults worldwide. This study examines the incidence and prevalence of falls among individuals aged 65 and above, focusing on the influence of demographic factors and comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cancer, and obesity. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the TriNetX network at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) from 2019 to 2023. The study population included 16,400 individuals aged 65 and above who presented with fall-related trauma. Data on demographics, clinical diagnoses, procedures, and comorbid conditions were analyzed using descriptive statistics to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of falls. Results: The mean age of the study population was 77.3 years, with a higher proportion of females (60.97%) compared to males (39.02%). Despite the larger number of female participants, incidence and prevalence of falls were highest among individuals aged 65-69 years, and fall rates were notably higher among males compared to females. This suggests that while fewer in number, males in our study experienced falls more frequently. Patients with hypertension had the highest incidence proportion (56.67%) and prevalence (75.75%) among comorbid conditions. Conclusions: Falls among older adults are significantly influenced by demographic factors and comorbid conditions. Hypertension, in particular, is associated with the highest fall risk. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to manage comorbidities and reduce fall risks among older adult patients.

Memory Loss and Missteps: Investigating Fall Risks in Alzheimer's and Dementia Patients.

Background: Degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and dementia are significant health concerns among older adults in the United States, contributing substantially to the high incidence of falls in this population. This study aims to investigate the incidence and prevalence of falls among older adults diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and dementia and explore the association between these conditions and the occurrence of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 17,000 older adults aged 65 and above, arrived at the hospital with fall related injuries, obtained from the TriNetX network at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023. Data included demographic information, diagnosis codes (ICD-10), and details on falls, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and TBIs. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed using TriNetX analytical tools. Results: Older adults with Alzheimer's disease (incidence proportion: 3.11%, prevalence: 4.81%) and dementia (incidence proportion: 12.46%, prevalence: 17.06%) had a significantly higher incidence of falls compared to those without these conditions. Females showed a slightly higher incidence of falls than males. Logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with Alzheimer's disease had a reduced risk of TBIs (OR = 0.765, 95% CI: 0.588-0.996, p = 0.047), while those with unspecified dementia had an increased risk (OR = 1.161, 95% CI: 1.002-1.346, p = 0.047). Conclusions: Our study reveals a higher risk of falls and traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) in older adults with dementia compared to those with Alzheimer's disease. These findings underscore the need for targeted fall prevention strategies and educational programs for caregivers.

A randomized trial comparing the intraoperative durability of double-gloving with Biogel® surgical gloves to 3 comparators.

Objective: To determine and compare the intraoperative durability of 4 major surgical glove brands. Design Setting and Participants: This study is a randomized open-label clinical trial in which surgical gloves from 4 manufacturers are randomized to 5 surgical subspecialty study groups: (1) orthopedic surgery, (2) neurosurgery, (3) colorectal surgery, (4) trauma or acute general surgery, and (5) cardiac and plastic surgeries. The study was divided into 10 periods, with a cross-over design, and was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center. Participants were licensed and certified physicians, physicians-in-training, scrub nurses, or technicians working within the sterile field. Interventions: Participants from each study group were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 surgical glove manufacturer types and subsequently rotated through the other 3 glove brands such that each participant acted as their own control in the sequential cross-over design. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was to determine and compare the intraoperative failure rate of Biogel® Sterile Surgical undergloves against sterile surgical undergloves from 3 other manufacturers, both as a combined competitor group and individually. Results: There were no differences between brands with respect to the primary outcome of underglove intraoperative failures. Brand 1 wearers were slightly more likely to detect glove failures when they occurred. Conclusion: The durability of surgical gloves intraoperatively is similar across 4 major glove manufacturers. Detection of intraoperative failures is infrequent, though specific glove characteristics may promote enhanced detection. Recognition of glove perforations intraoperatively is important in the maintenance of a maximally sterile field. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03344354.

Muslim Women and Disparities in Cancer Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study.

Muslim women often find their religious customs at odds with their healthcare needs, such as regular gynecological check-ups and cervical cancer screenings, especially before marriage. Religious beliefs may also affect beliefs about gender roles, illness, and death, affecting seeking healthcare services. This retrospective study explored the differences in care-seeking related to cancer between Muslim women and the general female population at the Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States between 2010 and 2019. There were major differences in insurance status between the two cohorts. Muslim women were less likely to have government-sponsored health insurance and were much more likely to be uninsured than non-Muslim women. We also found that preventable female cancers were more prevalent among Muslim women than among non-Muslim women and was also diagnosed at more advanced stages.

Health disparities and equity in the era of COVID-19.

Over the last year, COVID-19 has emerged as a highly transmissible and lethal infection. As we address this global pandemic, its disproportionate impact on Black, Indigenous, and Latinx communities has served to further magnify the health inequities in access and treatment that persist in our communities. These sobering realities should serve as the impetus for reexamination of the root causes of inequities in our health system. An increased commitment to strategic partnerships between academic and nonacademic health systems, industry, local communities, and policy-makers may serve as the foundation. Here, we examine the impact of the recent COVID-19 pandemic on health care inequities and propose a strategic roadmap for integration of clinical and translational research into our understanding of health inequities.