Margin Width and Local Recurrence in Patients with Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: Optimal surgical margin width for patients with phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast remains debated. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of margin width on long-term local recurrence risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients with confirmed PT treated from 2008-2015. Margins were defined as positive (ink on tumor), narrow (no tumor at inked margin but < 10mm), or widely free (>/= 10mm). LR rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 117 female patients, histology included 55 (47%) benign, 29 (25%) borderline, and 33 (28%) malignant PT. Final margins were positive in 16 (14%), narrow in 32 (27%), widely free in 64 (55%), and unknown in 5 (4%) patients. Compared with margins > 10 mm, patients with positive and narrow margins had a higher LR risk [HR 10.57 (95% CI 2.48-45.02) and HR 5.66 (95% CI 1.19-26.99), respectively]. Among benign PTs, the 10-year LR-free rates were 100%, 94%, and 66% for widely negative, narrow, and positive margins, respectively (p = 0.056). For borderline/malignant PT, the 10-year LR-free rates were 93% and 57% for widely negative and narrow margins, respectively (p = 0.02), with no difference in LR between narrow and positive margin groups (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: For benign PTs, a margin of no ink on tumor appears sufficient to optimize local control. In patients with borderline or malignant PTs, achieving a wide surgical margin may remain important as narrower margins were associated with LR rates comparable to those with positive margins.

High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) After Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Although social vulnerability has been associated with worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes in other cancer types, these effects have not been characterized in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. This study evaluated the association of social vulnerability and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-institution cohort study of adult patients with primary and locally recurrent extremity or truncal soft tissue sarcoma undergoing resection between January 2016 and December 2021. The social vulnerability index (SVI) was measured on a low (SVI 1-39%, least vulnerable) to high (60-100%, most vulnerable) SVI scale. The association of SVI with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: The study identified 577 patients. The median SVI was 44 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-67), with 195 patients categorized as high SVI and 265 patients as low SVI. The median age, tumor size, histologic subtype, grade, comorbidities, stage, follow-up time, and perioperative chemotherapy and radiation utilization were similar between the high and low SVI cohorts. The patients with high SVI had worse OS (p = 0.07) and RFS (p = 0.016) than the patients with low SVI. High SVI was independently associated with shorter RFS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.54) but not with OS (HR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.84-2.56). CONCLUSION: High community-level social vulnerability appears to be independently associated with worse RFS for patients undergoing resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma. The effect of patient and community-level social risk factors should be considered in the treatment of patients with extremity sarcoma.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma patients on first-line systemic therapies: A single-institution cohort.

Background: Rhabdomyosarcomas are the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children, and pediatric alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) prognosis has improved based on cooperative studies. However, in adults, ARMS is significantly rarer, has poorer outcomes, and currently lacks optimal treatment strategies. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of an adult ARMS population with different front-line systemic chemotherapies and determine if any chemotherapy regimen is associated with improved survival. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of histologically confirmed fusion-positive ARMS patients over 18 years of age, who were treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) from 2004 to 2021 and received systemic chemotherapy. Descriptive clinical statistics were performed, including staging, front-line chemotherapy, multimodal therapy usage, response rates, and survival analyses. Results: 49 ARMS patients who received upfront chemotherapy were identified. Locoregional treatments included radiotherapy (RT) alone (29%, n = 14), surgery alone (10%, n = 5), or both (45%, n = 22). Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 3.6 years, and the overall response rate to systemic therapy was 89%. No chemotherapy regimen showed OS benefit, specifically analyzing the pediatric-based vincristine, actinomycin-D, cyclophosphamide (VAC) or adult-based vincristine, doxorubicin, ifosfamide (VDI) regimens, even when controlled for other clinical risk factors. Conclusion: In this single-center contemporary series, adult ARMS patient outcomes remain poor. There was no statistically significant OS difference in patients who did or did not receive adult or pediatric based ARMS regimens, although a high overall response rate to chemotherapy was seen across the entire cohort. Based on these observations, further randomized prospective studies are necessary to delineate which frontline chemotherapy regimen is most beneficial in this rare adult cancer.