Hepatitis B surface antigen serum level is associated with fibrosis severity in treatment-naïve, e antigen-positive patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is currently known about the association between serum HBsAg or HBV DNA levels and the severity of liver disease in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Therefore, we investigated these relationships in a large cohort of unselected, well-characterized, treatment-naïve CHB patients. METHODS: CHB patients were assessed at the Hôpital Beaujon in Paris, France, between 2000 and 2008. Serum samples and liver biopsies were obtained on the same day. HBsAg, HBV DNA, and HBV genotype were investigated using commercial diagnostic assays and liver histology was scored using the METAVIR system. RESULTS: 406 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in hepatitis B e antigen-positive (HBeAg[+]) patients showed strong correlation (r=0.44, p<0.0001), as did serum HBsAg levels and fibrosis severity (r=0.43, p<0.0001). HBeAg(+) patients with moderate to severe fibrosis exhibited significantly lower serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels compared with patients with no or mild fibrosis. Modeling analysis suggested a serum HBsAg cut-off of 3.85 logIU/ml would provide a theoretical sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 0-100), theoretical specificity of 86% (95% CI: 50-100), and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 67-100) in HBeAg(+) patients infected with HBV genotype B or C. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between low serum HBsAg levels and moderate to severe fibrosis in HBeAg(+) CHB patients. Furthermore, we described a serum HBsAg cut-off for the prediction of fibrosis severity in CHB patients infected with HBV genotype B or C.

Prediction of disease reactivation in asymptomatic hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients using baseline serum measurements of HBsAg and HBV-DNA.

UNLABELLED: Differentiating 'inactive carriers' (ICs) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from hepatitis B e antigen-negative (HBeAg[-]) patients in remission is challenging. We investigated whether serum-based monitoring of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV-DNA in asymptomatic HBeAg(-) patients could distinguish these groups. DESIGN: 129 HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients (HBV genotypes A-E) with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at baseline were classified after 1 year of follow-up as either IC (HBV-DNA ≤2000 IU/mL) or 'active carrier' (AC, HBV-DNA >2000 IU/mL) if they exhibited normal ALT throughout, or classified as 'reactivation patient' (RP) if they exhibited marked, transient increases in ALT and HBV-DNA. RESULTS: There were 64%, 18%, and 19% patients in the IC, AC, and RP groups, respectively. Combined HBsAg and HBV-DNA cutoffs (>1000 IU/mL and >200 IU/mL, respectively) differentiated RPs with 92% sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%. HBsAg sero-clearance was associated with baseline HBsAg <1000 IU/mL, annual decrease of ≥0.3 log IU/mL (NPV 95%: PPV 89%) and IFNL3 genotype CC. CONCLUSION: Applying combined HBsAg and HBV-DNA cutoffs to baseline measurements accurately differentiated RPs. These results suggest that HBsAg should be included in the monitoring of asymptomatic HBeAg(-) CHB patients.