Cutaneous vasculitis and granulomatous hepatitis as paradoxical adverse events of Infliximab.

Biological agents revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory arthropathies. Paradoxical adverse events (PAEs) are rare immunological side effects caused by such agents. The authors report concurrent presentation of two rare PAEs of tumor-necrosis-factor alpha inhibitors (iTNFa) - cutaneous vasculitis and granulomatous hepatitis - in a patient with psoriatic arthritis treated with infliximab and briefly discuss aspects of diagnosis, pathophysiology and management of such events in light of the available evidence.

Chikungunya arthritis - should we expect it to become more common in Portuguese rheumatology?

Chikungunya virus is known to cause acute disease characterized by fever, rash, myalgias, conjunctivitis and arthritis, having potential to cause chronic musculoskeletal disease, namely persistent arthritis. The area of spread of the virus in the world has been increasing and the migratory flows make the occurrence of Chikungunya induced chronic arthritis more and more scattered. Data regarding the experience of Portuguese rheumatology centres in identifying and treating chronic ChikV induced arthritis are not available. The authors describe the diagnosis and treatment aspects of three cases of "imported" Chikungunya induced chronic arthritis, briefly discuss its approach in the light of current knowledge and alert to the possibility this situation may become more prevalent in the Portuguese rheumatology setting.

Salivary gland ultrasound findings are associated with clinical and serologic features in primary Sjögren's syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVE: Salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) has been applied in the diagnosis of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). To investigate the association of SGUS findings with clinical and analytical features of pSS patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 54 pSS patients underwent SGUS evaluation. The parenchymal homogeneity of bilateral parotid and submandibular glands was graded using a score of 0 (normal) to 4 (gross inhomogeneity). Patients were classified into two groups according to the highest SGUS score obtained. The grades 1 and 2 were considered to be normal and grades 3 and 4 to represent pathological SGUS findings. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Nineteen of 54 patients had pathological SGUS findings. These were associated with higher ESSDAI and positivity for rheumatoid factor and anti-SSB antibody. Anti-SSB antibody was strongly and independently associated with pathological US findings in the salivary gland of pSS patients. CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence that salivary gland ultrasound is linked to clinical and autoimmunity profile in pSS and confirm what has been reported in the literature. SGUS represents a useful imaging tool for diagnostic and prognostic of pSS.

Are we overlooking osteoarthritis? - A comparative study of pain, function and quality of life in patiens with hand osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently regarded by patients and health care providers as a normal consequence of ageing and a minor condition. In contrast, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a pathological condition that usually requires prolonged treatment and regular Rheumatology follow-up. Pain and physical limitations are hallmarks of both conditions and some previous studies suggest that OA and RA may have a similar burden for both groups of patients although those works usually do not take into account the inflammatory activity of RA. With this work, the authors compare levels of pain, physical disability and health-related quality of life in patients with primary hand osteoarthritis (hOA) and with RA - active disease (aRA) or in remission (rRA). The results show that hOA may have similar or even higher burden of pain than RA even with clinically relevant inflammatory activity in hand joints. Rather than suggesting that OA could be as severe as RA (or more or less severe), this brief study highlights OA as a cause of severe pain, which should lead us to try to achieve better symptom control for these patients and encourage rheumatologists to endeavor efforts to perform more studies in the field of OA.

Positive affect as a predictor of adherence in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The study was conducted in order to investigate adherence in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), correlating it with other variables such as affect and self-esteem. Seventy-eight patients with RA between 20 and 81 years of age were evaluated. Patients were assessed for Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Measures of Patient Adherence, Rosenberg self-esteem scale and Short Portuguese version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the therapeutic compliance and age, disease activity, disability, GPA, self-esteem, affect and inflammatory parameters. An independent T-test was used to evaluate differences in adherence within gender. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine associations between adherence and marital status, education level and employment status. A linear regression model was adjusted with stepwise data entry to determine predictors of therapeutic compliance. Patients had a mean age of 57 years and disease duration of 12.8 years. We observed higher levels of adherence in patients with higher self-esteem (r= 0.343, p<0.05) and positive affect (r= 0.345, p<0.01). The adjusted linear regression model allowed the identification of positive affect as a RA patient's adherence predictor (R = 0.347, p<0.05). In our study, high levels of self-reported adherence in RA patients were found. Positive affect seems to be an important determinant of therapeutic adherence in RA patients. These results suggest a relevant role of psychosocial aspects in therapeutic compliance and outcome, which should alert physicians to the need of an holistic approach of the patient.

Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - 2016 update.

OBJECTIVE: To update the recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. METHODS: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on literature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting, the 7 recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication and the level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was anonymously assessed using an online survey. RESULTS: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching of biological therapies in patients with axSpA. In total, seven recommendations were produced. The first recommendation is a general statement indicating that biological therapy is not a first-line drug treatment option and should only be used after conventional treatment has failed. The second recommendation is also a general statement about the broad concept of axSpA adopted by these recommendations that includes both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA. Recommendations 3 to 7 deal with the definition of active disease (including the recommended threshold of 2.1 for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] or the threshold of 4 [0-10 scale] for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), conventional treatment failure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the first-line drug treatment), assessment of response to treatment (based on an ASDAS improvement  of at least 1.1 units or a BASDAI improvement of at least 2 units [0-10 scale] or at least 50%), and strategy in the presence of an inadequate response (where switching is recommended) or in the presence of long-term remission (where a process of biological therapy optimization can be considered, either a gradual increase in the interval between doses or a decrease of each dose of the biological therapy). CONCLUSION: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with axSpA should be treated with biological therapies. They cover a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.

Portuguese recommendations for the use of methotrexate in rheumatic diseases - 2016 update.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the most commonly prescribed disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug. Moreover, it is also used as an adjuvant drug in patients under biologic therapies, enhancing the efficacy of biologic agents. OBJECTIVES: To review the literature and update the Portuguese recommendations for the use of MTX in rheumatic diseases first published in 2009. METHODS: The first Portuguese guidelines for the use of MTX in rheumatic diseases were published in 2009 and were integrated in the multinational 3E Initiative (Evidence Expertise Exchange) project. The Portuguese rheumatologists based on literature evidence and consensus opinion formulated 13 recommendations. At a national meeting, the recommendations included in this document were further discussed and updated. The document resulting from this meeting circulated to all Portuguese rheumatologists, who anonymously voted online on the level of agreement with the updated recommendations. RESULTS: Results presented in this article are mainly in accordance with previous guidelines, with some new information regarding hepatitis B infection during MTX treatment, pulmonary toxicity monitoring, hepatotoxicity management, association with hematologic neoplasms, combination therapy and tuberculosis screening during treatment. CONCLUSION: The present recommendations combine scientific evidence with expert opinion and attained desirable agreement among Portuguese rheumatologists. The regular update of these recommendations is essential in order to keep them a valid and useful tool in daily practice.

PORTUGUESE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE USE OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPIES IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS--2015 UPDATE.

OBJECTIVE: To update recommendations for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology (SPR). METHODS: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on literature evidence and consensus opinion. At a national meeting the 16 recommendations included in this document were discussed and updated. The level of agreement among Portuguese Rheumatologists was assessed using an online survey. A draft of the full text of the recommendations was then circulated and suggestions were incorporated. A final version was again circulated before publication. RESULTS: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching biological therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Specific recommendations were developed for several disease domains: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis and dactylitis. CONCLUSION: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with PsA should be treated with biological therapies. They cover a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.