Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AIDS Behav ; 18(10): 1913-23, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24699712

RESUMEN

Injection drug use is a leading transmission route of HIV and STDs, and disease prevention among drug users is an important public health concern. This study assesses cost-effectiveness of behavioral interventions for reducing HIV and STDs infections among injection drug-using women. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from societal and provider perspectives for randomized trial data and Bernoullian model estimates of infections averted for three increasingly intensive interventions: (1) NIDA's standard intervention (SI); (2) SI plus a well woman exam (WWE); and (3) SI, WWE, plus four educational sessions (4ES). Trial results indicate that 4ES was cost-effective relative to WWE, which was dominated by SI, for most diseases. Model estimates, however, suggest that WWE was cost-effective relative to SI and dominated 4ES for all diseases. Trial and model results agree that WWE is cost-effective relative to SI per hepatitis C infection averted ($109 308 for in trial, $6 016 in model) and per gonorrhea infection averted ($9 461 in trial, $14 044 in model). In sensitivity analysis, trial results are sensitive to 5 % change in WWE effectiveness relative to SI for hepatitis C and HIV. In the model, WWE remained cost-effective or cost-saving relative to SI for HIV prevention across a range of assumptions. WWE is cost-effective relative to SI for preventing hepatitis C and gonorrhea. WWE may have similar effects as the costlier 4ES.


Asunto(s)
Seropositividad para VIH/transmisión , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Seropositividad para VIH/economía , Seropositividad para VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/economía , Salud Pública , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/economía , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/economía , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Frotis Vaginal/economía , Salud de la Mujer/economía
2.
Glob Health Gov ; 3(2): 1-37, 2011 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24729828

RESUMEN

This review takes stock of the global health governance (GHG) literature. We address the transition from international health governance (IHG) to global health governance, identify major actors, and explain some challenges and successes in GHG. We analyze the framing of health as national security, human security, human rights, and global public good, and the implications of these various frames. We also establish and examine from the literature GHG's major themes and issues, which include: 1) persistent GHG problems; 2) different approaches to tackling health challenges (vertical, horizontal, and diagonal); 3) health's multisectoral connections; 4) neoliberalism and the global economy; 5) the framing of health (e.g. as a security issue, as a foreign policy issue, as a human rights issue, and as a global public good); 6) global health inequalities; 7) local and country ownership and capacity; 8) international law in GHG; and 9) research gaps in GHG. We find that decades-old challenges in GHG persist and GHG needs a new way forward. A framework called shared health governance offers promise.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA