Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Hematol ; 83(9): 702-7, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18543343

RESUMEN

To identify the outcomes of prognostic factors of solitary plasmacytoma mainly treated with local radiotherapy (RT). The data were collected from 80 patients with solitary plasmacytoma (SP). Forty patients (50.0%) received radiotherapy (RT) alone while 38 of them (47.5%) were treated with surgery (S) and RT. The median radiation dose was 46 Gy (range 30-64). The median follow up was 2.41 years (range 0.33-12.33). Ten-year overall survival (OS) and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) were 73% and 94%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and multiple myeloma-free survival (MMFS) were 3.5 years and 4.8 years, respectively. On multivariate analyses, the favorable factors were radiotherapy dose of > or =50 Gy and RT + S for PFS and younger age for MMFS. For the patients with medullary plasmacytoma, the favorable factor was younger age for MMFS. RT at > or =50 Gy and RT + S may be favorable prognostic factors on PFS. Younger patients, especially with head-neck lesion and without pre-RT macroscopic tumor, seem to have the best outcome when treated with RT +/- S. Progression to MM remains as the main problem especially for older patients.


Asunto(s)
Plasmacitoma/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Plasmacitoma/mortalidad , Plasmacitoma/cirugía , Pronóstico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía/epidemiología
2.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 28: 2, 2009 Jan 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19128500

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze three-dimensional (3D) dosimetric data of conventional two-dimensional (2D) palliative spinal bone irradiation using different reference points and treatment plans with respect to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 50. METHODS: Forty-five simulation CT scans of 39 patients previously treated for thoraco-lumbar spinal bone metastases were used. Three different treatment plans were created: (1) single posterior field plans using the ICRU reference points (ICRUrps); (2) single posterior field plans using the International Bone Metastasis Consensus Working Party reference points (IBMCrps); (3) two opposed anterior-posterior (AP-PA) field plans using the ICRUrps. The intended dose range for planning target volume (PTV) was 90% to 110% of the prescribed dose for AP-PA field plans. Cumulative dose-volume histograms were generated for each plan, and minimum, maximum and mean doses to the PTV, medulla spinalis, esophagus and intestines were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean percentages of minimum, maximum and mean PTV doses +/- standard deviation were, respectively, 91 +/- 1.3%, 108.8 +/- 1.3% and 99.7 +/- 1.3% in AP-PA field plans; 77.3 +/- 2.6%, 122.2 +/- 4.3% and 99.8 +/- 2.6% in ICRUrp single field plans; and 83.7 +/- 3.3%, 133.9 +/- 7.1% and 108.8 +/- 3.3% in IBMCrp single field plans. Minimum doses of both single field plans were significantly lower (p < 0.001) while maximum doses were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than AP-PA field plans. Minimum, maximum and mean doses were higher in IBMCrp single field plans than in ICRUrp single field plans (p < 0.001). The mean medulla spinalis doses were lower in AP-PA field plans than single posterior field plans (p < 0.001). Maximum doses for medulla spinalis were higher than 120% of the prescribed dose in 22 of 45 (49%) IBMCrp single field plans. Mean esophagus and intestinal doses were higher (p < 0.001) in AP-PA field plans than single field plans, however, less than 95% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSION: In palliative spinal bone irradiation, 2D conventional single posterior field radiotherapy did not accomplish the ICRU Report 50 recommendations for PTV dose distribution, while the AP-PA field plans did achieve the intended dose ranges with a homogenous distribution and reasonable doses to the medulla spinalis, esophagus and intestines.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Óseas/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Columna Vertebral/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Radiometría
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA