The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: resistance in vitro.

This article reviews resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam as an aspect of its primary pharmacology, linked thematically with recent reviews of the basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology of the combination (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52). In Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, single-step exposures to 8×  MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam yielded frequencies of resistance from <∼0.5 × 10-9 to 2-8 × 10-9, depending on the host strain and the ß-lactamase harboured. ß-Lactamase structural gene mutations mostly affected the avibactam binding site through changes in the Ω-loop: e.g. Asp179Tyr (D179Y) in KPC-2. Other mutations included ones proposed to reduce the permeability to ceftazidime and/or avibactam through changes in outer membrane structure, up-regulated efflux, or both. The existence, or otherwise, of cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other antibacterial agents was also reviewed as a key element of the preclinical primary pharmacology of the new agent. Cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other ß-lactam-based antibacterial agents was caused by MBLs. Mechanism-based cross-resistance was not observed between ceftazidime/avibactam and fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides or colistin. A low level of general co-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. For example, among 2821 MDR Klebsiella spp., 3.4% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 0.07% of 8177 non-MDR isolates. Much of this was caused by possession of MBLs. Among 1151 MDR, XDR and pandrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from the USA, 11.1% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 3.0% of 7452 unselected isolates. In this case, the decreased proportion susceptible was not due to MBLs.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: microbiology from clinical studies, and development of resistance during treatment.

As one of a series of thematically linked reviews of the primary pharmacology of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime/avibactam, this article reviews the microbiological findings in drug-exposed patients. Earlier articles in the series focused on basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52) and the development and mechanisms of resistance in vitro (J Antimicrob Chemother 2023: Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac449). In clinical trials of ceftazidime/avibactam, combined favourable microbiological responses for evaluable patients infected at baseline by susceptible Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 86.1% (851/988). The corresponding percent favourable among patients infected by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant pathogens was 58.8% (10/17), noting that the majority (15/17) of the resistant examples were P. aeruginosa. Microbiological response rates to comparator treatments in the same clinical trials ranged between 64% and 95%, depending on the type of infection and the analysis population. Uncontrolled case studies over a wide range of patients infected by antibiotic multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria have demonstrated that ceftazidime/avibactam can elicit microbiological clearance of ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible strains. In case studies where a matched cohort of patients had been treated with antibacterial agents other than ceftazidime/avibactam, microbiological outcomes were comparable between treatments, mostly being observationally more favourable for ceftazidime/avibactam (recognizing that numbers were too small for definitive superiority assessments). Development of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam during therapy is reviewed. The phenomenon has been reported multiple times, mostly in difficult-to-treat patients infected by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Molecular mechanisms, when determined, have frequently been observed previously in vitro, such as the 'Ω-loop' D179Y (Asp179Tyr) substitution found in KPC variant enzymes. In human volunteers exposed to therapeutic levels of ceftazidime/avibactam, faecal numbers of Escherichia coli, other enterobacteria, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, clostridia and Bacteroides spp. decreased. Clostridioides difficile was detected in the faeces, but this was of uncertain significance, because no unexposed controls were studied.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology.

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established ß-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent ß-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2341-52).

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vivo translational biology and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD).

This review describes the translational in vivo and non-clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) research that supported clinical trialling and subsequently licensing approval of ceftazidime/avibactam, a new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination aimed at the treatment of infections by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The review thematically follows on from the co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40). Avibactam protected ceftazidime in animal models of infection with ceftazidime-resistant, ß-lactamase-producing bacteria. For example, a single subcutaneous dose of ceftazidime at 1024 mg/kg yielded little effect on the growth of ceftazidime-resistant, blaKPC-2-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae in the thighs of neutropenic mice (final counts of 4 × 108 to 8 × 108 cfu/thigh). In contrast, co-administration of avibactam in a 4:1 ratio (ceftazidime:avibactam) was bactericidal in the same model (final counts of 2 × 104 to 3 × 104 cfu/thigh). In a rat abdominal abscess model, therapy with ceftazidime or ceftazidime/avibactam (4:1 w/w) against blaKPC-2-positive K. pneumoniae resulted in 9.3 versus 3.3 log cfu/abscess, respectively, after 52 h. With respect to PK/PD, in Monte Carlo simulations, attainment of unbound drug exposure targets (ceftazidime fT>8 mg/L and avibactam fT>1 mg/L, each for 50% of the dosing interval) for the labelled dose of ceftazidime/avibactam (2 and 0.5 g, respectively, q8h by 2 h IV infusion), including dose adjustments for patients with impaired renal function, ranged between 94.8% and 99.6% of patients, depending on the infection modelled.

Selecting the dosage of ceftazidime-avibactam in the perfect storm of nosocomial pneumonia.

PURPOSE: Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), among other indications. In the phase III REPROVE trial (NCT01808092), ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including VAP. As ceftazidime-avibactam was not studied in patients with NP prior to REPROVE, selecting an appropriate dosage regimen in the "perfect storm" of NP required careful consideration of potential determinants and confounders of response specific to the NP patient population. METHODS: This review describes the series of preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses that supported ceftazidime-avibactam dosage selection for patients with NP/VAP (2000/500 mg by 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h, adjusted for renal function). In parallel, important considerations for antibiotic dosage selection in patients with NP are highlighted, including adequate drug penetration into the lungs, the suitability of murine-derived plasma PK/PD targets, evaluation of MIC distributions against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with NP, and consideration of PK in patients with NP, who are often critically ill. These analyses also supported the European approval of ceftazidime-avibactam for adults with HAP, including VAP, before the completion of REPROVE. CONCLUSIONS: This work serves as a successful practical example of dosage design for a new antibacterial drug therapy in the indication of NP, including VAP, where previous drug therapies have failed, possibly as a result of evaluation of too few variables, thereby limiting the accuracy of pharmacodynamic predictions.

Dose Selection and Validation for Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Adults with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, and Nosocomial Pneumonia.

Avibactam is a non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections, and nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia. In Europe, ceftazidime-avibactam is also approved for the treatment of Gram-negative infections with limited treatment options. Selection and validation of the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen was guided by an iterative process of population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling, whereby population PK models for ceftazidime and avibactam were developed using PK data from clinical trials and updated periodically. These models were used in probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations using joint pharmacodynamic (PD) targets for ceftazidime and avibactam derived from preclinical data. Joint PTA was calculated based on the simultaneous achievement of the individual PK/PD targets (50% free time above the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC for ceftazidime and free time above a critical avibactam threshold concentration of 1 mg/liter for avibactam). The joint PTA analyses supported a ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2,000 + 500 mg every 8 h by 2-h intravenous infusion for patients with creatinine clearance (CLCR) >50 ml/min across all approved indications and modified dosage regimens for patients with CLCR ≤50 ml/min. Subgroup simulations for individual phase 3 patients showed that the dosage regimen was robust, with high target attainment (>95%) against MICs ≤8 mg/liter achieved regardless of older age, obesity, augmented renal clearance, or severity of infection. This review summarizes how the approved ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimens were developed and validated using PK/PD targets, population PK modeling, and PTA analyses.

Avibactam Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets.

Avibactam is a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor that has been approved in the United States and Europe for use in combination with ceftazidime. Combinations of avibactam with aztreonam or ceftaroline fosamil have also been clinically evaluated. Until recently, there has been very little precedence of which pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and magnitudes are appropriate to use for ß-lactamase inhibitors in population PK modeling for analyzing potential doses and susceptibility breakpoints. For avibactam, several preclinical studies using different in vitro and in vivo models have been conducted to identify the PK/PD index of avibactam and the magnitude of exposure necessary for effect in combination with ceftazidime, aztreonam, or ceftaroline fosamil. The PD driver of avibactam critical for restoring the activity of all three partner ß-lactams was found to be time dependent rather than concentration dependent and was defined as the time that the concentration of avibactam exceeded a critical concentration threshold (%fT>CT). The magnitude of the CT and the time that this threshold needed to be exceeded to elicit particular PD endpoints varied depending on the model and the partner ß-lactam. This review describes the preclinical studies used to determine the avibactam PK/PD target in combination with its ß-lactam partners.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Clinical susceptibility breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the ceftazidime-avibactam dosage regimen of 2,000/500 mg every 8 h (q8h) by 2-h intravenous infusion (adjusted for renal function) have been established by the FDA, CLSI, and EUCAST as susceptible (MIC, ≤8 mg/liter) and resistant (MIC, >8 mg/liter). The key supportive data from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses, in vitro surveillance, including molecular understanding of relevant resistance mechanisms, and efficacy in regulatory clinical trials are collated and analyzed here.

Selection of mutants with resistance or diminished susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam from ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Introduction: Difficult Gram-negative infections are increasingly treated with new ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations, e.g. ceftazidime/avibactam. Disturbingly, mutations in KPC carbapenemases can confer ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, which is sometimes selected during therapy. We explored whether this risk extended to AmpC and ESBL enzymes. Methods: Mutants were selected by plating AmpC-derepressed strains, ESBL producers and ceftazidime-susceptible controls on agar containing ceftazidime + avibactam (1 or 4 mg/L). MICs were determined by CLSI agar dilution; WGS was by Illumina methodology. Results: Using 2× MIC of ceftazidime + 1 mg/L avibactam, mutants were selected from all strain types at frequencies of 10-7-10-9. Rates diminished to <10-9 with 4 mg/L avibactam or higher MIC multiples, except with AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae. Characterized mutants (n = 10; MICs 4-64 mg/L) of AmpC-derepressed strains had modifications in ampC, variously giving Arg168Pro/His, Gly176Arg/Asp, Asn366Tyr or small deletions around positions 309-314. Mutants of ESBL producers (n = 19; MICs 0.5-16 mg/L) mostly had changes affecting permeability, efflux or ß-lactamase quantity; only one had an altered ß-lactamase, with an Asp182Tyr substitution in CTX-M-15, raising the ceftazidime/avibactam MIC, but abrogating other cephalosporin resistance. Mutants of ceftazidime-susceptible strains were not sequenced, but phenotypes suggested altered drug accumulation or, for Enterobacter cloacae only, AmpC derepression. In further experiments, avibactam reduced, but did not abolish, selection of AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae by ceftazidime. Conclusions: Most mutants of AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae had structural mutations in ampC; those of ESBL producers mostly had genetic modifications outside ß-lactamase genes, commonly affecting uptake, efflux, or ß-lactamase quantity. The clinical significance of these observations remains to be determined.

A mathematical model-based analysis of the time-kill kinetics of ceftazidime/avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Objectives: To characterize quantitatively the effect of avibactam in potentiating ceftazidime against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa by developing a mathematical model to describe the bacterial response to constant concentration time-kill information and validating it using both constant and time-varying concentration-effect data from in vitro and in vivo infection systems. Methods: The time course of the bacterial population dynamics in the presence of static concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam was modelled using a two-state pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model, consisting of active and resting states, to account for bactericidal activities, bacteria-mediated ceftazidime degradation and inhibition of degradation by avibactam. Ceftazidime's effect on the bacterial population was described as an enhancement of the death rate of the active population, with the effect of avibactam being to increase ceftazidime potency. Model validation was performed by comparing simulated time courses of bacterial responses with those from in vitro and in vivo experimental exposures of ceftazidime and avibactam that represented those predicted in an average patient dosed with 2 g/0.5 g ceftazidime/avibactam administered every 8 h as 2 h infusions. Results: The two-state model successfully described the bacterial population dynamics, ceftazidime degradation and its inhibition by avibactam. For external validation, the model correctly predicted the bacterial response of P. aeruginosa isolates evaluated in in vitro hollow-fibre and in vivo neutropenic mouse thigh and lung infection models. Conclusions: The PK/PD model and modelled strains successfully replicated the spread in activity when compared with a large selection of P. aeruginosa strains reported in the literature.

Modeling the Kinetics of the Permeation of Antibacterial Agents into Growing Bacteria and Its Interplay with Efflux.

A mathematical model of the passive permeation of a novel solute into bacteria that explicitly accounts for intracellular dilution through growth was developed. A bacterial cell envelope permeability coefficient of approximately >10-8 cm2 · s-1 is predicted to ensure passive permeation into rapidly replicating bacterial cells. The relative importance of the permeability coefficients of the cytoplasmic and outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria in determining the overall envelope permeability coefficient was analyzed quantitatively. A mathematical description of the balance between passive influx and active efflux was also developed and shows that bacterial expansion through growth can usually be neglected for compounds likely to be prepared in antibacterial drug discovery programs and the balance between passive inward permeation and active outwardly directed efflux predominates. A new parameter, efflux efficiency (η, where η is equal to k/P, in which k is the rate coefficient for the efflux pump and P is the permeability coefficient for the membrane across which the pump acts), is introduced, and the consequences for the efficiency of efflux pumping by a single pump, two pumps in parallel across either the cytoplasmic or the outer membrane, and two pumps in series, one across the cytoplasmic membrane and one across the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, are explored. The results, showing additive efficiency for two pumps acting across a single membrane and multiplicative efficiency for two pumps acting in series across the cytoplasmic and outer membranes, can be quantitatively related to the ratios between MICs measured against pump-sufficient and pump deletion strains and agree with those of previous experimental and theoretical studies.

AmpC ß-lactamase induction by avibactam and relebactam.

BACKGROUND: Diazabicyclooctanes, e.g. avibactam and relebactam, are a new class of ß-lactamase inhibitors. Their spectrum includes AmpC enzymes, but it is important to understand whether they also induce these enzymes. METHODS: Levels of ampC mRNA were measured by RT-PCR during 4 h of exposure of Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 5 strains per species) to avibactam, relebactam and cefoxitin at 0, 1, 4 and 32 mg/L. The method had low precision compared with conventional specific-activity-based induction assays, which are impracticable for inhibitors. Accordingly, induction was only considered to be significant if induction ratios >10 were found at two consecutive time intervals, with 'strong induction' if one or more of these ratios was >100. RESULTS: Cefoxitin, as expected, gave concentration-dependent induction for all strains, with strong induction for 13/15. At the other extreme, relebactam caused no significant induction for any strain. Avibactam gave strain-variable results, with strong concentration-dependent induction for 2/5 E. cloacae and 2/5 P. aeruginosa, but little or no induction for the other strains, including all the C. freundii strains. CONCLUSIONS: Avibactam, but not relebactam, had some strain-variable ability to induce AmpC enzymes, though at concentrations (32 mg/L) above those reached in the patient.

Potentiation of ceftazidime by avibactam against ß-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro infection model.

Objectives: This study evaluated the in vitro pharmacodynamics of combinations of ceftazidime and the non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor, avibactam, against ceftazidime-, piperacillin/tazobactam- and meropenem-multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a quantitative time-kill method. Methods: MICs of ceftazidime plus 0-16 mg/L avibactam were determined against eight isolates of P. aeruginosa . Single-compartment, 24 h time-kill kinetics were investigated for three isolates at 0-16 mg/L avibactam with ceftazidime at 0.25-4-fold the MIC as measured at the respective avibactam concentration. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS during the time-kill kinetic studies to evaluate drug degradation. Results: Avibactam alone displayed no antimicrobial activity. MICs of ceftazidime decreased by 8-16-fold in the presence of avibactam at 4 mg/L. The changes in log 10 cfu/mL at both the 10 h and 24 h timepoints (versus 0 h) revealed bacterial killing at ≥1-fold MIC. Significantly higher concentrations of ceftazidime alone, as compared with those of ceftazidime in combination, were required to produce any given kill. Without avibactam, ceftazidime degradation was significant (defined as degradation t 1/2 < 24 h), with as little as 19% ± 18% of the original concentration remaining at 8 h for the most resistant strain. In combination with avibactam, ceftazidime degradation at ≥ 1-fold MIC was negligible. Conclusion: The addition of avibactam protected ceftazidime from degradation in a dose-dependent manner and restored its cidal and static activity at concentrations in combination well below the MIC of ceftazidime alone.

Distinctive Binding of Avibactam to Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria.

Avibactam is a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor that covalently acylates a variety of ß-lactamases, causing inhibition. Although avibactam presents limited antibacterial activity, its acylation ability toward bacterial penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) was investigated. Staphylococcus aureus was of particular interest due to the reported ß-lactamase activity of PBP4. The binding of avibactam to PBPs was measured by adding increasing concentrations to membrane preparations of a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria prior to addition of the fluorescent reagent Bocillin FL. Relative binding (measured here as the 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50]) to PBPs was estimated by quantification of fluorescence after gel electrophoresis. Avibactam was found to selectively bind to some PBPs. In Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, and S. aureus, avibactam primarily bound to PBP2, with IC50s of 0.92, 1.1, 3.0, and 51 µg/ml, respectively, whereas binding to PBP3 was observed in Streptococcus pneumoniae (IC50, 8.1 µg/ml). Interestingly, avibactam was able to significantly enhance labeling of S. aureus PBP4 by Bocillin FL. In PBP competition assays with S. aureus, where avibactam was used at a fixed concentration in combination with varied amounts of ceftazidime, the apparent IC50 of ceftazidime was found to be very similar to that determined for ceftazidime when used alone. In conclusion, avibactam is able to covalently bind to some bacterial PBPs. Identification of those PBP targets may allow the development of new diazabicyclooctane derivatives with improved affinity for PBPs or new combination therapies that act on multiple PBP targets.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Global Surveillance Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam (INFORM 2012 to 2014).

Broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents against 7,062 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from 2012 to 2014 in four geographic regions (Europe, Asia/South Pacific, Latin America, Middle East/Africa) as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program. The majority of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, with the proportions susceptible differing marginally across the four regions (MIC90, 8 to 16 µg/ml; 88.7 to 93.2% susceptible), in contrast to lower susceptibilities to the following comparator ß-lactam agents: ceftazidime (MIC90, 32 to 64 µg/ml; 71.5 to 80.8% susceptible), meropenem (MIC90, >8 µg/ml; 64.9 to 77.4% susceptible), and piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC90, >128 µg/ml; 62.3 to 71.3% susceptible). Compared to the overall population, susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam of isolates that were nonsusceptible to ceftazidime (n = 1,627) was reduced to between 56.8% (Middle East/Africa; MIC90, 64 µg/ml) and 68.9% (Asia/South Pacific; MIC90, 128 µg/ml), but these percentages were higher than susceptibilities to other ß-lactam agents (0 to 44% susceptible, depending on region and agent; meropenem MIC90, >8 µg/ml; 26.5 to 43.9% susceptible). For this subset of isolates, susceptibilities to amikacin (MIC90, >32 µg/ml; 53.2 to 80.0% susceptible) and colistin (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 98.5 to 99.5% susceptible) were comparable to or higher than that of ceftazidime-avibactam. A similar observation was made with isolates that were nonsusceptible to meropenem (n = 1,926), with susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam between 67.8% (Middle East/Africa; MIC90, 64 µg/ml) and 74.2% (Europe; MIC90, 32 µg/ml) but again with reduced susceptibility to comparators except for amikacin (MIC90, >32 µg/ml; 56.8 to 78.7% susceptible) and colistin (MIC90, 1 µg/ml; 98.9 to 99.3% susceptible). Of the 8% of isolates not susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, the nonsusceptibility of half could be explained by their possession of genes encoding metallo-ß-lactamases. The data reported here are consistent with results from other country-specific and regional surveillance studies and show that ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrates in vitro activity against globally collected clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, including isolates that are resistant to ceftazidime and meropenem.

Pharmacodynamics of Ceftazidime and Avibactam in Neutropenic Mice with Thigh or Lung Infection.

Avibactam is a new non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor that shows promising restoration of ceftazidime activity against microorganisms producing Ambler class A extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases such as KPCs, class C ß-lactamases (AmpC), and some class D enzymes. To determine optimal dosing combinations of ceftazidime-avibactam for treating infections with ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pharmacodynamic responses were explored in murine neutropenic thigh and lung infection models. Exposure-response relationships for ceftazidime monotherapy were determined first. Subsequently, the efficacy of adding avibactam every 2 h (q2h) or q8h to a fixed q2h dose of ceftazidime was determined in lung infection for two strains. Dosing avibactam q2h was significantly more efficacious, reducing the avibactam daily dose for static effect by factors of 2.7 and 10.1, whereas the mean percentage of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the threshold concentration of 1 mg/liter (%fT>C(T) 1 mg/liter) yielding bacteriostasis was similar for both regimens, with mean values of 21.6 (q2h) and 18.5 (q8h). Dose fractionation studies of avibactam in both the thigh and lung models indicated that the effect of avibactam correlated well with %fT>C(T) 1 mg/liter. This parameter of avibactam was further explored for four P. aeruginosa strains in the lung model and six in the thigh model. Parameter estimates of %fT>C(T) 1 mg/liter for avibactam ranged from 0 to 21.4% in the lung model and from 14.1 to 62.5% in the thigh model to achieve stasis. In conclusion, addition of avibactam enhanced the effect of ceftazidime, which was more pronounced at frequent dosing and well related with %fT>C(T) 1 mg/liter. The thigh model appeared more stringent, with higher values, ranging up to 62.5% fT>C(T) 1 mg/liter, required for a static effect.

In Vitro Susceptibility to Ceftazidime-Avibactam of Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Collected during the INFORM Global Surveillance Study (2012 to 2014).

The activity of ceftazidime-avibactam was assessed against 961 isolates of meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae Most meropenem-nonsusceptible metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-negative isolates (97.7%) were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Isolates that carried KPC or OXA-48-like ß-lactamases, both alone and in combination with extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) and/or AmpC ß-lactamases, were 98.7% and 98.5% susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively. Meropenem-nonsusceptible, carbapenemase-negative isolates demonstrated 94.7% susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam. Ceftazidime-avibactam activity was compromised only in isolates for which carbapenem resistance was mediated through metallo-ß-lactamases.

Structural and sequence analysis of class A ß-lactamases with respect to avibactam inhibition: impact of Ω-loop variations.

BACKGROUND: There exists a significant diversity among class A ß-lactamases and the proliferation of these enzymes is a significant medical concern due to the ability of some members to efficiently hydrolyse both extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems. Avibactam is a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor that, in combination with ceftazidime, has recently obtained regulatory approval in the USA. Although avibactam is known to efficiently inhibit key class A enzymes, the diversity of this enzyme family warranted a more complete investigation to understand the breadth of the potential spectrum of inhibition. METHODS: Using the known residues critical for avibactam binding, a thorough structural and sequence-based conservation analysis was performed across >650 class A enzymes. Several variations that had the potential to impact avibactam inhibition were observed and representative enzymes were cloned and expressed isogenically to evaluate the impact of these variations. RESULTS: The majority of the key residues involved in avibactam binding were well conserved across the different sub-families of class A ß-lactamases, although some differences were observed. The differences in the Ω-loop of PER enzymes were found to impact the ability of avibactam to effectively protect ß-lactams against hydrolysis. However, substitutions in a key hydrogen-bonding residue (N170) in some of the GES variants were found to not have a significant impact on avibactam inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the computational and experimental analyses suggest that the vast majority of class A ß-lactamases should be well inhibited by avibactam, although a very small number of outliers exist.

Role of the Outer Membrane and Porins in Susceptibility of ß-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae to Ceftazidime-Avibactam.

This study examined the activity of the novel antimicrobial combination ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae exhibiting different outer membrane permeability profiles, specifically with or without porins and with or without expression of the main efflux pump (AcrAB-TolC). The addition of the outer membrane permeabilizer polymyxin B nonapeptide increased the antibacterial activities of avibactam alone, ceftazidime alone, and ceftazidime-avibactam against the characterized clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. This enhancement of activities was mainly due to increased passive penetration of compounds since inhibition of efflux by the addition of phenylalanine-arginine ß-naphthylamide affected the MICs minimally. OmpF (OmpK35) or OmpC (OmpK36) pores were not the major route by which avibactam crossed the outer membranes of E. coli and K. pneumoniae. In contrast, Omp35 and Omp36 allowed diffusion of avibactam across the outer membrane of E. aerogenes, although other diffusion channels for avibactam were also present in that species. It was clear that outer membrane permeability and outer membrane pore-forming proteins play a key role in the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam. Nevertheless, the MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam (with 4 mg/liter avibactam) against the ceftazidime-resistant clinical isolates of the three species of Enterobacteriaceae studied were ≤ 8 mg/liter, regardless of outer membrane permeability changes resulting from an absence of defined porin proteins or upregulation of efflux.

In vitro selection of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Enterobacteriaceae with KPC-3 carbapenemase.

Ceftazidime-avibactam is active against most Enterobacteriaceae isolates with KPC carbapenemases. We investigated whether this activity could be compromised by mutation. Single-step and multistep selections were attempted using ceftazidime-avibactam (avibactam fixed at 1 or 4 µg/ml) versus two strains each of Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella pneumoniae, all with the KPC-3 enzyme. Mutant bla KPC alleles were sequenced, and their parentage was confirmed by typing. Ceftazidime-avibactam selected mutants at up to 16× MIC, with frequencies of ca. 10(-9). This contrasted with previous experience for ceftaroline-avibactam, where mutant frequencies under similar conditions were <10(-9). The MICs of ceftazidime with 1 µg/ml avibactam for the ceftazidime-avibactam-selected mutants rose from 1 to 8 µg/ml to 16 to >256 µg/ml and those of ceftazidime with 4 µg/ml avibactam from 0.25 to 1 µg/ml to 4 to 128 µg/ml; ceftaroline-avibactam MICs rose less, typically from 0.5 to 1 µg/ml to 1 to 8 µg/ml. The MICs of carbapenems and cephalosporins except ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam were reduced for many mutants. Sequencing of blaKPC revealed point and insertion changes in 12/13 mutants investigated, representing all four parents; one mutant lacked bla KPC changes and possibly had reduced permeability. Amino acid changes commonly involved Ω loop alterations or 1 to 6 amino acid insertions immediately C-terminal to this loop. The most frequent change, seen in four mutants from three strains, was Asp179Tyr, replacing a residue that ordinarily forms a salt bridge to stabilize the Ω loop. Since ceftaroline-avibactam was less affected than ceftazidime-avibactam, we postulate that these mutations increase ceftazidimase specificity rather than conferring avibactam resistance. The clinical relevance remains uncertain.