Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(7): e1507-e1517, 2021 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The development of novel broad-spectrum antibiotics, with efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, has the potential to enhance treatment options for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation intravenous cephalosporin with broad in vitro activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative pathogens. METHODS: TARGET was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 noninferiority study that compared ceftobiprole with vancomycin plus aztreonam. The Food and Drug Administration-defined primary efficacy endpoint was early clinical response 48-72 hours after treatment initiation in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the European Medicines Agency-defined primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical success at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Noninferiority was defined as the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in success rates (ceftobiprole minus vancomycin/aztreonam) >-10%. Safety was assessed through adverse event and laboratory data collection. RESULTS: In total, 679 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 335) or vancomycin/aztreonam (n = 344). Early clinical success rates were 91.3% and 88.1% in the ceftobiprole and vancomycin/aztreonam groups, respectively, and noninferiority was demonstrated (adjusted difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: -1.2, 7.8). Investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit was similar between the 2 groups, and noninferiority was demonstrated for both the ITT (90.1% vs 89.0%) and clinically evaluable (97.9% vs 95.2%) populations. Both treatment groups displayed similar microbiological success and safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: TARGET demonstrated that ceftobiprole is noninferior to vancomycin/aztreonam in the treatment of ABSSSIs, in terms of early clinical response and investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03137173.


Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Aztreonam/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Bacterias Grampositivas , Humanos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(3): 238-244, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33395210

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tedizolid phosphate is an oxazolidinone prodrug approved in 2014 for treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs); however, efficacy has not previously been evaluated in children. This study compared the safety and efficacy of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) with active antibacterial comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs in adolescents. METHODS: This was a randomized, assessor-blind, global phase 3 study of tedizolid versus active comparators for the treatment of Gram-positive ABSSSIs in adolescents (12 to <18 years of age; NCT02276482). Enrolled participants were stratified by region and randomized 3:1 to receive tedizolid phosphate 200 mg (oral and/or intravenous) once daily for 6 days or active comparator, selected by investigator from an allowed list per local standard of care, for 10 days. The primary endpoint was safety; blinded investigator's assessment of clinical success at the test-of-cure visit (18-25 days after the first dose) was a secondary efficacy endpoint. Statistical comparisons between treatment groups were not performed. RESULTS: Of the 121 participants enrolled, 120 were treated (tedizolid, n = 91; comparator, n = 29). Treatment-emergent adverse events were balanced between treatment groups (tedizolid, 14.3%; comparator, 10.3%). Overall, 3 participants (3.3%) in the tedizolid group and 1 (3.4%) in the comparator group experienced a single drug-related TEAE. Clinical success rates were high in both treatment groups: 96.7% and 93.1% at the test-of-cure visit for the tedizolid and comparator groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid demonstrated safety and efficacy similar to comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs in adolescents.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Infección de Heridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso/microbiología , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Salud Global , Humanos , Masculino , Oxazolidinonas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Tetrazoles/administración & dosificación , Infección de Heridas/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA