A Descriptive Analysis of Air Medical Pediatric Rapid Sequence Intubation: Successes and Opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced airway management, including the use of rapid sequence intubation (RSI), is fundamental in resuscitation. However, the reported experience with pediatric airway management is limited because of the relatively low number of emergency RSI procedures in children. The aim of this study was to document the experience with pediatric RSI in a large air medical database and explore opportunities for improvement. METHODS: All pediatric patients (age < 18 years) undergoing RSI by air medical crews between 2015 and 2019 were included in this analysis. Subjects were divided a priori into 3 age subgroups (0-2 years, 3-8 years, and 9-17 years). The primary variables of interest included overall intubation success, first-attempt intubation success, and first-attempt intubation success without desaturation. The rates of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) use for preoxygenation and oxygen desaturation were also explored. RESULTS: A total of 1,091 pediatric RSI patients were included. The overall intubation success rate was 98% (0-2 years = 96%, 3-8 years = 97%, and 9-17 years = 98%), with 91% intubated on the first attempt (0-2 years = 86%, 3-8 years = 90%, and 9-17 years = 92%) and 87% intubated on the first attempt without oxygen desaturation (0-2 years = 80%, 3-8 years = 88%, and 9-17 years = 90%). A sharp decline in intubation success was observed with preoxygenation SpO2 values < 97% across all patients. Younger patients (0-2 years) had lower initial SpO2 values and decreased first-attempt success rates with and without desaturation. These patients were less likely to receive PPV during preoxygenation attempts and had lower use of video laryngoscopy or a bougie on the initial intubation attempt. CONCLUSION: In this study, we documented high success rates for air medical pediatric RSI. Higher target SpO2 values may be justified during preoxygenation. Intubation success, PPV use for preoxygenation, video laryngoscopy, and the use of a bougie were lower for younger patients.

Are Pediatric Manual Resuscitators Only Fit for Pediatric Use? A Comparison of Ventilation Volumes in a Moving Ambulance.

Background: The manual resuscitator device is the most common method of ventilating patients with respiratory failure, either with a facemask, or with an advanced airway such as an endotracheal tube (ETT). Barotrauma and gastric inflation from excessive ventilation volumes or pressure are concerning complications. Ventilating adult patients with pediatric manual resuscitator may provide more lung-protective tidal volumes based on stationary patient simulations. However, use of a pediatric manual resuscitator in mobile simulations contradictorily generates inadequate tidal volumes.Methods: Sixty-two emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians in a moving ambulance ventilated a manikin using pediatric and adult manual resuscitators in conjunction with oral-pharyngeal airway, i-gel, King LTS-D, or an endotracheal tube.Results: Oral-pharyngeal airway data were discarded due to EMS clinician inability to produce measurable tidal volumes. Mean ventilation volumes using the pediatric manual resuscitator were inadequate compared to those with the adult manual resuscitator on all other airway devices. In addition, i-gel, King LTS-D, and endotracheal tube volumes were statistically comparable. Paramedics ventilated larger volumes than emergency medical technicians.Conclusions: Using a pediatric manual resuscitator on adult patients is not supported by our findings.

Compliance and Attitudes of Critical Care Transport Providers Regarding a Prehospital Rapid Sequence Intubation Checklist.

Human factors engineering innovations, such as checklists, have been adopted in various acute care settings to improve safety with reasonable compliance and acceptance. In the air medical industry, checklists have been implemented by different teams for critical clinical procedures such as rapid sequence intubation. However, compliance and attitudes toward these human factors engineering innovations in the critical care transport setting are not well described. In this institutional review board-exempt, retrospective review of checklist usage, we assessed rapid sequence intubation checklist compliance and surveyed providers with 5 questions based on Rogers' theory of diffusion of innovation to examine why or why not there was compliance. Our results indicated that compliance with checklist implementation was excellent. The survey questions were consistent with process improvement factors that enhance the spread and acceptance of innovation.