Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Rendezvous Technique for Failed Biliary Cannulation in Benign and Resectable Malignant Biliary Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique (EUS-RV) has emerged as an effective salvage method for unsuccessful biliary cannulation. However, its application for benign and resectable malignant biliary disorders has not been fully evaluated. AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-RV for benign and resectable malignant biliary disorders. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study from 12 Japanese referral centers. Patients who underwent EUS-RV after failed biliary cannulation for biliary disorder were candidates for this study. Inclusion criteria were unsuccessful biliary cannulation for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with benign and potentially resectable malignant biliary obstruction. Exclusion criteria included unresectable malignant biliary obstruction, inaccessible papillae due to surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy or duodenal stricture, and previous sphincterotomy and/or biliary stent placement. The primary outcome was the technical success rate of biliary cannulation; procedure time, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled. The overall technical success rate and median procedure time were 85% and 33 min, respectively. Guidewire manipulation using a 4-Fr tapered tip catheter contributed to the success in advancing the guidewire into the duodenum. Adverse events were identified in 15% patients, including 2 with biliary peritonitis and 1 mild pancreatitis. EUS-RV did not affect surgical maneuvers or complications associated with surgery, or postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RV may be a safe and feasible salvage method for unsuccessful biliary cannulation for benign or resectable malignant biliary disorders. Use of a 4-Fr tapered tip catheter may improve the overall EUS-RV success rate.

Multicenter prospective evaluation study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy combined with antegrade stenting (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is often indicated for advanced stage patients. Therefore it is important to prevent adverse events associated with EUS-HGS procedures and obtain long stent patency. EUS-guided antegrade stenting (AS) has been developed as an advanced technique. Thus, to prevent adverse events and achieve long stent patency, EUS-AS combined with EUS-HGS (EUS-HGAS) has been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and efficacy of EUS-HGAS in a multicenter, prospective study. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out at each hospital of the Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound Group. Primary endpoint of this multicenter prospective study was stent patency of EUS-HGAS. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were enrolled. Technical success rate of EUS-HGS was 95.9% (47/49). EUS-AS failed in five patients because the guidewire could not be advanced into the intestine across the bile duct obstruction site. Therefore, EUS-HGAS was successfully carried out in 40 patients (technical success rate: 85.7%). Median overall survival was 114 days. Median stent patency including stent dysfunction and patient death was 114 days. In contrast, mean stent patency was 320 days. Adverse events were seen in 10.2% (5/49) of cases. Hyperamylasemia was seen in four patients, and bleeding was seen in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to evaluate EUS-HGAS. EUS-HGAS has clinical benefit for obtaining long stent patency and avoiding adverse events, although the possibility of acute pancreatitis as a result of obstruction of the orifice of the pancreatic duct must be considered.

Experience-Related Factors in the Success of Beginner Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: A Multicenter Study.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has become comparable to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and is now considered a first-line intervention for certain biliary obstructions. Although analysis of experience-related factors may help achieve better outcomes and contribute to its wider adoption, no concrete evidence exists regarding the required operator or institutional experience levels. This study aimed to analyze experience-related factors at beginner multicenters. Patients who underwent EUS-BD using self-expandable metal stents and/or dedicated plastic stents during the study period (up to the first 25 cases since introducing the technique) were retrospectively enrolled from seven beginner institutions and operators. Overall, 90 successful (technical success without early adverse events) and 22 failed (technical failure and/or early adverse events) cases were compared. EUS-BD-related procedures conducted at the time of applicable EUS-BD by each institution/operator were evaluated. The number of institution-conducted EUS-BD procedures (≥7) and operator-conducted EUS screenings (≥436), EUS-guided fine-needle aspirations (FNA) (≥93), and EUS-guided drainages (≥13) significantly influenced improved EUS-BD outcomes (p = 0.022, odds ratio [OR], 3.0; p = 0.022, OR, 3.0; p = 0.022, OR, 3.0; and p = 0.028, OR, 2.9, respectively). Our threshold values, which significantly divided successful and failed cases, were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and may provide useful approximate indications for successful EUS-BD.

Rectal varix treated with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection therapy.

There is no established treatment for rectal varices. Although endoscopic cyanoacrylate (N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate) injection therapy is the standard treatment for gastric varices, there are few reports of its use for rectal varices. We present a case of rectal varix that was successfully treated with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection therapy. An 80-year-old man with cirrhosis was treated for rectal varices with interventional radiology 2 years earlier. At his current presentation, he underwent colonoscopy for hematochezia and anemia, which showed recurrence of rectal varix. We performed endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection therapy for the lesion. However, since we observed bleeding from the treated varix the next day, additional cyanoacrylate was injected. Thereafter, there was no re-bleeding and no recurrence was observed at the 3-year follow-up. According to the previous reports, interventional radiology (IVR), endoscopic sclerotherapy (EIS), and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) have been mainly used to treat rectal varices; however, there are few reports of endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection therapy. Our case suggests that endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection therapy might be a useful and safe treatment option for rectal varices.

Efficacy of vonoprazan for initial and maintenance therapy in reflux esophagitis, nonerosive esophagitis, and proton pump inhibitor-resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the first line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vonoprazan (VPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker for reflux esophagitis (RE), nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), and PPI-resistant GERD patients.An open-label, single-center, observational study in our hospital was performed from August 2016 to August 2017. All patients diagnosed with GERD were asked to self-report a questionnaire of frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) and rate their degree of satisfaction with the treatment of GERD during outpatient visit. A total of 200 (RE 47, NERD 49, PPI-resistant GERD 104) patients were included in the present study. The primary endpoint was the change of FSSG and the proportion of degree of satisfaction with the treatment at the end of the initial therapy. A percentage of improvement (improvement rate) and resolution (resolution rate) at the end of the initial therapy were evaluated. Secondary endpoint included the proportion of patients with symptomatic relapse in the 24-week maintenance phase.FSSG and the degree of satisfaction were significantly improved after the initial therapy in every group. Improvement and resolution rate after the initial therapy were 83.0% and 67.0% in RE, 66.7% and 60.4% in NERD, and 76.0% and 60.4% in PPI-resistant group. There was no significance between after the initial therapy and 24 weeks in improvement and resolution rate. Thirty-two of the total 48 patients did not take VPZ at 24 weeks. Total FSSG score in each group was 1.67 ±â€Š1.97, 2.71 ±â€Š4.91, and 4.0 ±â€Š4.93. The nonrelapse rate at 24 weeks in each group was 66.7%, 60.0%, and 50.0%. The resolution rate at 24 weeks in each group was 38.9%, 45.0%, and 30.0%.The VPZ therapy is effective for initial and maintenance therapy and improves heartburn and patient's satisfaction significantly in all 3 groups. Among patients who stopped taking VPZ during the maintenance period, 42.0% of RE and NERD group and 30% of PPI-resistant group experience complete remission from GERD at 24 weeks by introduction of VPZ.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction with surgically altered anatomy: a multicenter prospective registration study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in patients bearing surgically altered anatomy (SAA) is not well-established. Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as a new treatment option for MBO, limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in patients with SAA. We conducted a multicenter prospective registration study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in this population. METHODS: This study involved 10 referral centers in Japan. Patients with SAA who were scheduled to receive EUS-BD for unresectable MBO between May 2016 and September 2018 were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint was technical success and the secondary outcomes were clinical success, procedure time, procedure-related adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were prospectively enrolled. The surgical reconstruction methods were gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (47.5%), gastrectomy with Billroth-II reconstruction (15%), pancreaticoduodenectomy (27.5%), and hepaticojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (10%). EUS-BD was performed for primary biliary drainage in 31 patients and for rescue biliary drainage in nine patients. Transmural stenting alone (60%), antegrade stenting alone (5%), and a combination of the two techniques (35%) were selected for patients treated with EUS-BD. Technical and clinical success rates were 100% (95% confidence interval, 91.2-100.0%) and 95% (95% confidence interval, 83.1-99.4%), respectively. Mean procedure time was 36.5 min. Early AEs were noted in six patients (15%): three self-limited bile leak, one bile peritonitis, and two pneumoperitonea. Late AEs occurred in six patients (15%): one jejunal ulcer and five stent occlusions. Stent patency rate after 3 months of survival was 95.7% (22/23). Median overall survival was 96 days. CONCLUSION: EUS-BD for MBO in patients with SAA appears to be effective and safe not only as a rescue drainage technique after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiography but also as a primary drainage technique. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000022101.

The differential effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on microalbuminuria in relation to low-grade inflammation in metabolic hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: A dual angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker (ARB)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonist telmisartan may be more useful for microalbuminuria reduction than ARBs with no PPARgamma agonistic action. We investigated whether there is a difference between the effects of telmisartan and valsartan with respect to microalbuminuria reduction, and the association with improvement of metabolic features or suppression of the inflammatory state. METHODS: Fifty-three patients who had metabolic syndrome and had been taking valsartan were recruited. All of these patients were randomly assigned to replace valsartan by telmisartan (telmisartan group; n = 30) or to keep taking valsartan (control group; n = 21). Various parameters were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in blood pressure (BP), glucose, and lipid parameters between baseline and 12 weeks after randomization in either group. There was a significant increase in high molecular weight adiponectin in the telmisartan group (4.6 v 5.0 microg/mL, P = .024), whereas there was no significant change in the control group. The reductions of microalbuminuria and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were significant in the telmisartan group (28.1 v 18.9 mg/g.Cr and 0.77 v 0.60 mg/L, respectively, P = .001 and P = .022), whereas there was no significant change in the control group. The reductions of microalbuminuria and hs-CRP were significantly correlated with each other (gamma = 0.413, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The dual ARB/PPARgamma agonist telmisartan achieved more microalbuminuria reduction than an ARB with no PPARgamma agonistic action, possibly through suppression of the inflammatory state in metabolic hypertensive patients.