Successful multimodal treatment of intraoral salivary duct carcinoma in a patient with multiple lymph node metastases: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a high-grade salivary gland malignancy that is associated with an aggressive clinical behavior and poor prognosis. Herein, we report on a long surviving case of SDC of the minor salivary gland with multiple lymph node metastases (LNMs). CASE PRESENTATION: An 83-year-old woman presented with a history of lymphadenopathy in the right side of the neck and recent onset and rapid growth of a mass in the right buccal region. Clinical examinations and biopsy findings were suggestive of a salivary gland malignant tumor with regional LNMs. The patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor excision and ipsilateral radical neck dissection were performed, followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative histological examination revealed a tumor with irregular nests of atypical ductal epithelial cells, a cribriform growth pattern, and comedo-like central necrosis that lead to a final diagnosis of SDC. LNMs were observed in six lymph nodes of the right side of the neck. The patient underwent postoperative chemotherapy using single-agent cisplatin that was administered concurrently with radiotherapy (total, 65 Gy). There was no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis for >6 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although available data on treatment modalities for SDC remain limited, multimodal therapy may contribute to improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced intraoral SDC.

[A Retrospective Study Analyzing the Clinical Course of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Local or Systemic Therapy after Post-Operative Recurrence].

BACKGROUND: While systemic therapy is one of the therapeutic options available for post-operative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer, efficacy of local therapy for locoregional recurrence or limited metastatic lesions has also been reported. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical course of patients with post-operative recurrence(locoregional or limited metastatic lesion)after receiving local or systemic therapy. METHODS: Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and survival duration was compared using the logrank test. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were included. Median progression-free survival in patients receiving local therapy, systemic chemotherapy, or a combination of both therapies was 15.1 months, 6.3 months, and 13 months, respectively. Two patients receiving treatment with EGFR-TKI did not show disease progression at 41.3 months and 45.8 months(p=0.265). Median overall survivals in patients receiving local therapy, systemic chemotherapy, or a combination of both therapies were 26.5 months, 20 months, and 37.9 months, respectively(p=0.510). After the treatment, 6 patients showed regrowth of the recurrent lesion, 8 patients showed remote metastases, and 2 patients showed both regrowth of the recurrent lesion and remote metastases. CONCLUSION: Patients who received treatment including local therapy showed longer survival duration, but statistical significance was not detected. Our study suggested that regrowth of the recurrent lesion and remote metastases can be equally observed after treatment.

Early quality of life outcomes in patients with prostate cancer managed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer patients managed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 51 patients with cT1c-T3aN0M0 prostate cancer treated between July 2007 and January 2010 were included in this study. The average age was 69 years, and the average initial serum prostate-specific antigen was 10.98 ng/mL. A total of 25, 18 and eight patients were considered to be low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. All patients received one implant of Ir-192 and seven fractions of 6.5 Gy within 3.5 days for a total prescribed dose of 45.5 Gy. For high-risk prostate cancer, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was carried out for at least 6 months, and continued after high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Quality of life outcomes were measured by using the International Prostate Symptom Score, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate and the International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire. The oncological outcome was assessed by serum prostate-specific antigen and diagnostic imaging. Adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate scores decreased for a few months after high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and recovered to pretreatment condition thereafter. The International Prostate Symptom Score significantly increased 2 weeks after treatment for each of its items and their sum, and it returned to baseline after 12 weeks. Sexual function decreased at 2 and 4 weeks, and recovered after 12 weeks. Severe complications were rare. Within a median follow up of 17.2 months, two patients showed a prostate-specific antigen recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer is a feasible treatment modality with acceptable toxicity and only a limited impact on the quality of life.

Haplotype-based analysis of genes associated with risk of adverse skin reactions after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To identify haplotypes of single nucleotide polymorphism markers associated with the risk of early adverse skin reactions (EASRs) after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DNA was sampled from 399 Japanese breast cancer patients who qualified for breast-conserving radiotherapy. Using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria scoring system, version 2, the patients were grouped according to EASRs, defined as those occurring within 3 months of starting radiotherapy (Grade 1 or less, n = 290; Grade 2 or greater, n = 109). A total of 999 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 137 candidate genes for radiation susceptibility were genotyped, and the haplotype associations between groups were assessed. RESULTS: The global haplotype association analysis (p < 0.05 and false discovery rate < 0.05) indicated that estimated haplotypes in six loci were associated with EASR risk. A comparison of the risk haplotype with the most frequent haplotype in each locus showed haplotype GGTT in CD44 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.43) resulted in a significantly greater EASR risk. Five haplotypes, CG in MAD2L2 (OR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.87), GTTG in PTTG1 (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96), TCC (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.89) and CCG (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.92) in RAD9A, and GCT in LIG3 (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.93) were associated with a reduced EASR risk. No significant risk haplotype was observed in REV3L. CONCLUSION: Individual radiosensitivity can be partly determined by these haplotypes in multiple loci. Our findings may lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the genetic variation in radiation sensitivity and resistance among breast cancer patients.

Genetic variants of NPAT-ATM and AURKA are associated with an early adverse reaction in the gastrointestinal tract of patients with cervical cancer treated with pelvic radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: This study sought to associate polymorphisms in genes related to cell cycle regulation or genome maintenance with radiotherapy (RT)-induced an early adverse reaction (EAR) in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study enrolled 243 cervical cancer patients who were treated with pelvic RT. An early gastrointestinal reaction was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2. Clinical factors of the enrolled patients were analyzed, and 208 patients were grouped for genetic analysis according to their EAR (Grade ≤1, n = 150; Grade ≥2, n = 58). Genomic DNA was genotyped, and association with the risk of EAR for 44 functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of 19 candidate genes was assessed by single-locus, haplotype, and multilocus analyses. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed two haplotypes to be associated with an increased risk of EAR. The first, comprising rs625120C, rs189037T, rs228589A, and rs183460G, is located between the 5' ends of NPAT and ATM (OR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.21-2.87), whereas the second is located in the AURKA gene and comprises rs2273535A and rs1047972G (OR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.10-2.78). A third haplotype, rs2273535T and rs1047972A in AURKA, was associated with a reduced EAR risk (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.89). The risk of EAR was significantly higher among patients with both risk diplotypes than in those possessing the other diplotypes (OR = 3.24; 95% CI, 1.52-6.92). CONCLUSIONS: Individual radiosensitivity of intestine may be determined by haplotypes in the NPAT-ATM and AURKA genes. These variants should be explored in larger association studies in cervical cancer patients.