Chronic abdominal pain in inflammatory bowel disease: a practical guide.

Pain is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet many patients feel their pain is not addressed by healthcare professionals. Listening to a patient's concerns about pain, assessing symptoms and acknowledging the impact these have on daily life remain crucial steps in addressing pain in IBD. While acute pain may be effectively controlled by pain medication, chronic pain is more complex and often pharmacological therapies, particularly opioids, are ineffective. Low-dose tricyclic antidepressants and psychological approaches, including cognitive-behavioural therapy, have shown some promise in offering effective pain management while lifestyle changes such as a trial of low-fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols diet in those with overlapping irritable bowel syndrome may also reduce pain. Patients benefit from a long-term, trusting relationship with their healthcare professional to allow a holistic approach combining pharmacological, psychological, lifestyle and dietary approaches to chronic pain. We present a practical review to facilitate management of chronic abdominal pain in IBD.

Our Life Is a Rollercoaster! A Qualitative Phenomenological Study Exploring the Impact of IBD on Family Members.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) significantly impacts patients and their families. To provide support, understanding the effects on the wider family is crucial. However, limited research exists on the impact of IBD on family members of adults diagnosed with IBD. This study addresses this knowledge gap. METHODS: Underpinned by interpretive phenomenology, this study used in-depth, semi-structured online interviews to explore relatives' experiences. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three purposively selected interviewees comprising 17 people with IBD and 26 family members (parents, children, siblings, and partners) revealed 3 main themes: (1) "life is a rollercoaster," (2) "there have been a lot of bridges to cross along the way," and (3) "my life would be better if…" Participants highlighted that IBD has both positive and negative impacts on family members in terms of emotional well-being, relationship, roles and responsibilities, day-to-day burden, and sibling suffering. Some employed adaptive coping strategies such as creating social networks and open communication, while others relied on maladaptive coping strategies, such as avoidance and alcohol abuse. Family members expressed the need for proactive communication, information, and support from healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: IBD affects the emotional and psychosocial well-being of family members, eliciting both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Healthcare professionals need to adopt a holistic approach to managing IBD that considers the psychosocial and emotional challenges faced by individuals and their families.

Inflammatory bowel disease has a profound impact on the psychosocial and emotional well-being of family members, diminishing their quality of life. Family members seek guidance on coping strategies and interventions to bolster their psychological, social, and emotional well-being.

Managing patients' reports of abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms during quiescent inflammatory bowel disease: a role for shared sensemaking.

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often faced with distressing and confusing abdominal pain during remission. Some people respond adversely to healthcare professionals' (HCPs) suggestions that this pain and related symptoms are due to secondary irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Exploring how HCPs view, manage, and explain pain during quiescent disease may provide insights into how communication can be improved to increase understanding and mitigate negative responses. Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 IBD-nurses (n = 4) and gastroenterologists (n = 8) working in the United Kingdom or the Netherlands. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews. Results: Findings suggest that HCPs pay relatively little attention to pain when there is no underlying pathology and prefer to concentrate on objectifiable causes of symptoms and treating disease activity (Theme 1: Focus on disease activity, not pain and associated symptoms). Explanations of abdominal pain and IBS-like symptoms during remission were not standardised (Theme 2: Idiosyncratic and uncertain explanations for pain during remission). Processes of shared decision-making were outlined and shared sensemaking was reported as a strategy to enhance acceptance of IBS explanations (Theme 3: Shared decision making versus shared sensemaking). Conclusion: Future work should focus on establishing how pain during remission may be best defined, when to diagnose IBS in the context of IBD, and how to explain both to patients. The formulation of standardised explanations is recommended as they might help HCPs to adopt practices of shared sensemaking and shared decision-making. Explanations should be adaptable to specific symptom presentations and different health literacy levels.

Factors associated with chronic abdominal pain in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission: A pilot cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patients (20%-50%) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience chronic abdominal pain during remission. The clinical features of IBD patients with abdominal pain during remission remain poorly characterized. This cross-sectional pilot study aimed to assess patient recruitment, adherence, and feedback to optimize questionnaires for future use and to determine the clinical features that distinguish IBD patients in remission with and without abdominal pain. METHODS: Online validated questionnaires about disease activity, symptoms, and psychological factors were sent to participants of the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) IBD BioResource, which is a national research platform consisting of re-callable IBD patients designed to expedite research into Crohn's and colitis. Inclusion/exclusion criteria of the IBD BioResource main cohort were applied. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to participants in remission. p-values ≤0.01 were considered significant. KEY RESULTS: A total of 2050 patients were approached; 291 (14.2%) of these agreed to participate. In 35 patients, technical problems, length, and poor understanding of the relevance of some questionnaires affected completion as confirmed by feedback. In total, 244 patients were full responders with 122 (50%) in remission; 33 (27%) of these had chronic abdominal pain. Comparison of those with versus without (n = 89) chronic abdominal pain yielded higher scores in patients with pain for the following: somatization (p < 0.001); gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale score (p = <0.001); highly sensitive person scale (p = 0.007); catastrophizing score (p = 0.010). Trends were observed for azathioprine use (p = 0.021); coping resources inventory health in general (p = 0.046); neuroticism (p = 0.019); and poor sleep (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Differences in symptoms and psychological characteristics exist between IBD patients in remission with and without abdominal pain. Confirmation of findings in larger studies may facilitate development of personalized chronic pain treatments for IBD patients.

Development and preliminary evaluation of a suicidal risk assessment protocol in a randomised controlled trial using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

BACKGROUND: Participants in research trials often disclose severe depression symptoms, including thoughts of self-harm and suicidal ideation, in validated self-administered questionnaires such as the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). However, there is no standard protocol for responding to such disclosure, and the opportunity to support people at risk is potentially missed. We developed and evaluated a risk assessment protocol for the IBD-BOOST randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN71618461 09/09/2019). METHODS: Participants completed the PHQ-9 at baseline and 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. The trial database automatically alerted the research team to risk assess participants. Trial researchers, trained in the protocol, contacted participants by telephone, completed the risk assessment, and signposted participants to appropriate professional services. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty participants were randomised in the trial; 41 required risk assessment. One participant declined assessment, so 40 risk assessments were completed. Twenty-four participants were assessed as low-risk and 16 participants as medium-risk, with 12 declaring previous suicide attempts. None were rated as high-risk. Trial participants expressed appreciation for being contacted, and all except two wished to receive information about professional support services. Trial risk assessors reported positive experiences of conducting the risk assessment with suggestions for improvement, which resulted in minor modifications to the protocol. DISCUSSION: Our evaluation demonstrated that it was viable for a research trial team to successfully conduct a risk-assessment protocol for trial participants reporting thoughts of self-harm, with training and support from senior colleagues. Resources are required for training and delivery, but it is not unduly onerous. Trial participants appeared to find completing the assessment acceptable.

What Do We Know about Medication Adherence Interventions in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Purpose: Between 53% and 75% of people with inflammatory bowel disease, 30%-80% with rheumatoid arthritis, and up to 50% with multiple sclerosis do not take medications as prescribed to maintain remission. This scoping review aimed to identify effective adherence interventions for inflammatory bowel disease, but with few studies found, multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis were included to learn lessons from other conditions. Methods: Full and pilot randomised controlled trials testing medication adherence interventions for inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis conducted between 2012 and 2021 were identified in six electronic databases. Results: A total of 3024 participants were included from 24 randomised controlled trials: 10 pilot and 14 full studies. Eight investigated inflammatory bowel disease, 12 rheumatoid arthritis, and four multiple sclerosis. Nine studies (37.5%) reported significantly improved medication adherence, all involving tailored, personalised education, advice or counselling by trained health professionals, with five delivered face-to-face and 1:1. Quality of effective interventions was mixed: five rated high quality, two medium and two low quality. Interventions predominantly using technology were likely to be most effective. Secondary tools, such as diaries, calendars and advice sheets, were also efficient in increasing adherence. Only 10 interventions were based on an adherence theory, of which four significantly improved adherence. Conclusion: Tailored, face-to-face, 1:1 interactions with healthcare professionals were successful at providing personalised adherence support. Accessible, user-friendly technology-based tools supported by calendars and reminders effectively enhanced adherence. Key components of effective interventions should be evaluated and integrated further into clinical practice if viable, whilst being tailored to inflammatory conditions.