Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(3): 867-870, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33512046

RESUMEN

Central venous occlusion is a common complication following transvenous lead or therapeutic catheter placement that can present either acutely or chronically.


Asunto(s)
Paclitaxel , Venas , Catéteres , Humanos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(10): 2729-2736, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34374160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with wire and catheter refractory venous occlusion are traditionally referred for pectoral transvenous lead extraction (TLE) to obtain venous access. TLE causes 1-2 mm circumferential mechanical or laser destruction of tissue surrounding the lead(s). This not only exposes the patient to the risk of major complications but also can damage nontargeted leads. We present a series of patients where retained wire femoral lead removal and fibroplasty was used to obtain venous access in patients with refractory obstruction. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2021, we identified 17 patients where retained wire lead removal followed by fibroplasty was used to retain venous access. Demographic and procedural data were obtained by retrospective review of patient charts. RESULTS: We were able to successfully obtain venous access in all 17 patients in whom this technique was attempted. In two patients the target lead was less than or equal to 1 year old. In the remaining 15 patients, the average dwell time of the target lead(s) was 6 years. There were no procedure-related complications, and no changes in the parameters of other leads were noted. CONCLUSION: Retained wire femoral lead removal and fibroplasty is safe and highly efficacious at obtaining venous access in patients with refractory venous occlusion. If the target lead(s) is less than or equal to 1 year old, this technique can help obtain venous access at the time of the initial surgery, hence avoiding the need for TLE. Furthermore, in patients referred for TLE to obtain venous access, this technique by avoiding the use of TLE tools spares the patient of the associated risks.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Marcapaso Artificial , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag ; 15(3): 5810-5812, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584746

RESUMEN

Multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions are a unique electrophysiological finding that can be characteristic of a rare sodium channelopathy. We describe the medical management of this rare channelopathy in a patient who was pregnant.

5.
Am J Cardiol ; 176: 105-111, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641348

RESUMEN

New-onset left bundle branch block (NLBBB) is the most common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Expert consensus recommends temporary transvenous pacemaker (TTVP) support for 24 hours in these patients. To date, no study has examined TTVP use during the index hospitalization in detail. Therefore, we aimed to assess TTVP use in patients with TAVI who developed NLBBB. In this prospective observational study, we performed a detailed analysis of 24-hour telemetry in patients who developed NLBBB during TAVI. Baseline characteristics and procedural and postprocedural data were recorded. The primary outcome was pacing by the TTVP. We evaluated inappropriate TTVP use, electrophysiology study findings, permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, and NLBBB resolution. A total of 83 patients (74.4 ± 8.7 years, 41% female) developed NLBBB during TAVI. During index hospitalization, 1 patient (1%) required TTVP because of complete heart block and received a PPM. Five of the 83 (6%) patients were inappropriately paced, and 1 patient (1%) had ventricular fibrillation, likely secondary to TTVP. A total of 34 patients (41%) underwent electrophysiology study during hospitalization, with 4 of 83 (5%) subsequently receiving a PPM. One (1%) patient died during hospitalization, and 9 patients were lost to follow-up because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the remaining 73 patients with a 30-day follow-up, NLBBB had resolved in 36 (49%) at 30 days, and 2 (3%) were readmitted with complete heart block and received PPM. In conclusion, in patients with TAVI who develop NLBBB, temporary pacing is rarely necessary, may carry additional risks to the patient, and prolong hospitalization time.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Bloqueo Atrioventricular , COVID-19 , Marcapaso Artificial , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/etiología , Bloqueo de Rama/epidemiología , Bloqueo de Rama/etiología , Bloqueo de Rama/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Pandemias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag ; 12(10): 4704-4709, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34712504

RESUMEN

Recently, there have been reports of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients presenting with multiple ineffective implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks. In such patients, the placement of an azygous vein coil by providing an alternative anteroposterior trajectory of the electrical shock vector can enable successful defibrillation. This review discusses a hands-on approach to azygous vein coil implantation. Additionally, we compare our tools and technique to those that have been previously described by other operators. From 2018 to 2021, eight patients were identified who underwent azygous vein coil implantation at MedStar Washington Hospital Center using a specific technique and tools. Demographic and procedural data were obtained by a retrospective review of patient charts, procedure logs, fluoroscopy, and venography performed during coil implantation. The indication for azygous vein coil implantation was ineffective ICD shocks in seven patients. The presenting rhythm was ventricular fibrillation in six (75%) cases and sustained ventricular tachycardia in two (25%) cases. Using the approach described, we were able to successfully implant an azygous vein coil in all eight (100%) patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Postimplantation, defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was successfully performed in six of eight (75%) patients. One patient failed DFT testing despite placement of an azygous vein coil. In another patient, DFT testing was not performed because the patient was in atrial fibrillation and was not systemically anticoagulated. In conclusion, the placement of an azygous vein coil in LVAD patients with failed ICD shocks using the tools and technique described in this report is safe and highly efficacious (successful in 100% of cases).

7.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag ; 12(11): 4756-4760, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34858668

RESUMEN

Leadless cardiac pacemakers such as the Micra™ transcatheter leadless pacing system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) are an alternative to traditional transvenous pacemakers. Implantation of leadless pacemakers, albeit safe, may be associated with complications, including cardiac tamponade; high capture thresholds; and, rarely, ventricular arrhythmias. We report a case of ventricular fibrillation arrest following the implantation of a Micra™ leadless pacemaker.

8.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag ; 12(11): 4780-4784, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34858672

RESUMEN

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide circulatory support to patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Many such patients have a pre-existing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) at the time of their LVAD surgery. LVAD implantation can alter the ICD lead parameters, including R-wave sensing, right ventricular capture threshold, and impedance. These changes can in turn affect the ability of the ICD to successfully treat malignant ventricular arrhythmias. In most patients who present with ineffective ICD shocks, the failed shock is assumed to be secondary to the patient's severe cardiomyopathy. Especially, the role of physical examination in such patients is often minimized. In our patient, a thorough history-taking and history-guided physical examination led us to the root cause of the failed ICD shocks. Our patient was noted to have a metal tongue piercing, which was the likely cause of his ineffective ICD shocks. Our case highlights the importance of a comprehensive history-taking and physical examination.

9.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag ; 12(12): 4806-4811, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34970470

RESUMEN

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) is the most important component of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and can be achieved by radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation (CBA). The CBA system has shown excellent efficacy and safety in a number of clinical trials and is independent of the PV anatomy. However, pneumonectomy can significantly alter the anatomy posing a challenge to CBA. Few cases of PVI accomplished by CBA have been described in patients with lobectomy, but none in the pneumonectomy population. We describe a case of successful CBA for paroxysmal AF in a patient with a left total pneumonectomy.

10.
Heart Rhythm ; 18(7): 1064-1073, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33971333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronary sinus (CS) ostial atresia/abnormalities prevent access to the CS from the right atrium (RA) for left ventricular (LV) lead implantation. Some patients with CS ostial abnormalities also have a small persistent left superior vena cava (sPLSVC). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe CS ostial abnormalities and sPLSVC as an opportunity for LV lead implantation and unrecognized source of stroke. METHODS: Twenty patients with CS ostial abnormalities and sPLSVC were identified. Clinical information, imaging methods, LV lead implantation techniques, and complications were summarized. RESULTS: Forty percent had at least 1 previously unsuccessful LV lead placement. In 70%, sPLSVC was identified by catheter manipulation and contrast injection in the left brachiocephalic vein, and in 30% by levophase CS venography. In 30%, sPLSVC was associated with drainage from the CS into the left atrium (LA). When associated with CS ostial abnormalities, the sPLSVC diameter averaged 5.6 ± 3 mm. sPLSVC was used for successful LV lead implantation in 90% of cases. In 80%, the LV lead was implanted down sPLSVC, and in 20%, sPLSVC was used to access the CS from the RA. Presumably because of unrecognized drainage from the CS to the LA, 1 patient had a stroke during implantation via sPLSVC. CONCLUSION: When CS ostial abnormalities prevent access to the CS from the RA, sPLSVC can be used to successfully implant LV leads. In some, the CS partially drains into the LA and stroke can occur spontaneously or during lead intervention. It is important to distinguish sPLSVC associated with CS ostial abnormalities from isolated PLSVC.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples , Seno Coronario/anomalías , Embolia Intracraneal/prevención & control , Marcapaso Artificial , Vena Cava Superior Izquierda Persistente/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Seno Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Embolia Intracraneal/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Cava Superior Izquierda Persistente/diagnóstico , Radiografía Torácica , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Cureus ; 12(8): e9761, 2020 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32944475

RESUMEN

Brugada phenocopies are interesting clinical entities with electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns indistinguishable from the inherited Brugada syndrome. In patients with Brugada phenocopies, these ECG patterns are expected to resolve with resolution of the underlying condition.

12.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 1(5): 336-340, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34113891

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been described to compromise implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) defibrillation threshold (DFT). Elevated DFT will have negative consequences and increases the risk of ineffective ICD shocks, morbidity, and mortality. DFT testing is not routinely performed in clinical practice, despite this fact. OBJECTIVE: We describe the clinical characteristics of 7 LVAD patients who presented with multiple ineffective ICD shocks, along with the management strategy in such patients. METHODS: Seven patients (5 male, mean age 52.2 ± 9 years, 85.7% nonischemic cardiomyopathy) with an ICD in situ who progressed to NYHA class IV, ACC/AHA stage D chronic systolic congestive heart failure who underwent successful LVAD implantation presented to our institution in the setting of ventricular tachyarrhythmia and ineffective ICD shocks. Six patients underwent implantation of azygos and subclavian coils with subsequent DFT testing. The remaining patient was made comfort care. RESULTS: Five patients had successful DFT testing with azygos (n = 4) and subclavian (n = 1) defibrillation coil implantation. One patient had unsuccessful DFT testing despite evaluation of multiple shock vectors. There were no major or minor vascular complications in any of the cases. There were no procedural-related deaths. CONCLUSION: This case series highlights the need for a systematic approach to management of ICDs and DFT testing in LVAD patients. The addition of new shock vectors with azygos and subclavian coil implantation may reduce DFT, shock burden, morbidity, and mortality.

13.
Int J Cardiol ; 82(1): 41-7, 2002 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11786156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that a wall motion score (WMS) of 16% (n=108), respectively, calculated from a preoperative RAO ventriculogram. There was no difference in EF between the two groups (26.5+/-5.5 vs. 27.8+/-5.3%, respectively). Eight (9.9%) versus three (2.8%) patients died perioperatively in the low versus the high WMS group, respectively. The relative risk for perioperative death in the low WMS group was 3.6 (P<0.04). Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative survival did not reveal any statistical difference between the two groups over 4 years (P=0.11). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a WMS of 16% were not significantly different, although subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a WMS

Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Isquemia Miocárdica/mortalidad , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Desfibriladores Implantables , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirugía , Ventriculografía con Radionúclidos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 109(10): 1466-71, 2012 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22356796

RESUMEN

Cardiac device infections (CDIs) represent a serious complication after the implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators. In addition to antimicrobials, complete hardware removal, mostly with percutaneous lead extraction (PLE), is necessary to limit recurrences. However, CDI diagnosis is often difficult and is sometimes delayed, and scarce data exist on how the timing of PLE may affect clinical outcomes. In this study, the in-hospital outcomes of 52 consecutive patients with CDIs who underwent PLE were retrospectively analyze. Co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and end-stage renal disease were highly prevalent in the study cohort. Patients were divided into group A (bacteremia or device endocarditis) and group B (localized pocket infection). In-hospital mortality was 29% in group A and 5% in group B (p = 0.02) and was due mostly to sepsis. Hospital stays were shorter in group B patients (5.7 vs 21.7 days, p <0.001). Presentation with hypotension was more commonly observed in group A patients and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, whereas pocket findings correlated with better survival. Postoperative courses after PLE were uneventful in most patients, and no fatal complications were observed. PLE was performed significantly earlier in group B patients (hospitalization day 1.3 vs 7.6, p <0.001). PLE performed within 3 hospitalization days was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (p = 0.01). In conclusion, PLE performed within 3 days from admission is associated with shorter hospitalization and better survival. A timely diagnosis is crucial, particularly in the absence of local findings, because early treatment with PLE is likely to prevent the catastrophic outcomes of unrelenting CDIs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantables/microbiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ecocardiografía , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA