Ultrasonographic modeling of diaphragm function: A novel approach to respiratory assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Bedside ultrasound techniques have the unique ability to produce instantaneous, dynamic images, and have demonstrated widespread utility in both emergency and critical care settings. The aim of this article is to introduce a novel application of this imaging modality by utilizing an ultrasound based mathematical model to assess respiratory function. With validation, the proposed models have the potential to predict pulmonary function in patients who cannot adequately participate in standard spirometric techniques (inability to form tight seal with mouthpiece, etc.). METHODS: Ultrasound was used to measure diaphragm thickness (Tdi) in a small population of healthy, adult males at various points of the respiratory cycle. Each measurement corresponded to a generated negative inspiratory force (NIF), determined by a handheld meter. The data was analyzed using mixed models to produce two representative mathematical models. RESULTS: Two mathematical models represented the relationship between Tdi and NIFmax, or maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), both of which were statistically significant with p-values <0.005: 1. log(NIF) = -1.32+4.02×log(Tdi); and 2. NIF = -8.19+(2.55 × Tdi)+(1.79×(Tdi2)). CONCLUSIONS: With validation, these models intend to provide a method of estimating MIP, by way of diaphragm ultrasound measurements, thereby allowing evaluation of respiratory function in patients who may be unable to reliably participate in standard spirometric tests.

Diaphragm ultrasound: A novel approach to assessing pulmonary function in patients with traumatic rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures following blunt trauma are a major cause of morbidity. Various factors have been used for risk stratification for complications. Ultrasound (US) measurements of diaphragm thickness (Tdi) and related measures such as thickening fraction (TF) have been verified for use in the evaluation of diaphragm function. In healthy individuals, Tdi by US is known to have a positive and direct relationship with lung volumes including inspiratory capacity (IC). However, TF has not been previously been described in, or used to assess, pulmonary function in rib fracture patients. We examined TF and IC to elucidate the association between acute rib fractures and respiratory function. We hypothesized that TF and IC were related. Secondarily, we examined the relationship of TF in rib fractures patients, in the context of values reported for healthy controls in the literature. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled adults with acute blunt traumatic rib fractures within 48 hours of admission to a level 1 trauma center. Patients requiring a chest tube or mechanical ventilation at time of consent were excluded. Inspiratory capacity was determined via incentive spirometry. Thickening fraction was determined by bedside US measurements of minimum and maximum Tdi during tidal breathing (TFtidal) or deep breathing (TFDB) was calculated (TF = [TdimaxTdi - TdiminTdi]/TdiminTdi). TFDB values were also compared with previously reported mean ± SD values of 2.04 ± 0.62 in healthy males and 1.70 ± 0.89 in females. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 41 subjects (58.5% male) with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53-77 years) were enrolled. Diaphragm US demonstrated a median TFtidal of 0.30 (IQR, 0.24-0.46). Median IC was 1,750 mL (IQR, 1,250-2,000 mL). As compared with previously reported controls, our mean ± SD TFDB in males 0.90 ± 0.51 and 0.88 ± 0.89 in females were significantly lower. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation (-0.439, p = 0.004) between TFtidal and IC, and no relationship between TFDB and IC. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of TF in rib fracture patients. The significant inverse association between TFtidal and IC, along with lower than normal TFDB ranges, suggests that, in the setting of rib fractures, there are alterations in the diaphragm-chest cage mechanics, whereby other muscles may play more prominent roles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic tests or criteria, Level III.