Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 51(4): 322-337, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343435

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To use expert consensus to inform the development of policy and guidelines for the treatment, management and monitoring of the physical health of people with an enduring psychotic illness. METHOD: The Delphi method was used. A systematic search of websites, books and journal articles was conducted to develop a 416-item survey containing strategies that health professionals should use to treat, manage and monitor the physical health of people with an enduring psychotic illness. Three panels of Australian experts (55 clinicians, 21 carers and 20 consumers) were recruited and independently rated the items over three rounds, with strategies reaching consensus on a priori-defined levels of importance written into the expert consensus statement. RESULTS: The participation rate for the clinicians across all three rounds was 65%, with consumers and carers only completing one round due to high endorsement rates. Finally, 386 strategies were endorsed as essential or important by one or all panels. The endorsed strategies provided information on engagement and collaborative partnerships; clinical governance; risk factors, morbidity and mortality in people with enduring psychotic illness; assessment, including initial and follow-up assessments; barriers to care; strategies to improve care of people with enduring psychotic illness; education and training; treatment recommendations; medication side effects; and the role of health professionals. CONCLUSION: The consensus statement is intended to be used by health professionals, people with an enduring psychotic illness and their families and carers. The next step needed is an implementation strategy by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists and other stakeholders.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Conducta Cooperativa , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Personal de Salud , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Adulto , Australia , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Depress Anxiety ; 27(4): 390-403, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20037919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although social anxiety disorder (SAD) is classified in the fourth edition of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) into generalized and non-generalized subtypes, community surveys in Western countries find no evidence of disjunctions in the dose-response relationship between number of social fears and outcomes to support this distinction. We aimed to determine whether this holds across a broader set of developed and developing countries, and whether subtyping according to number of performance versus interactional fears would be more useful. METHODS: The World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative undertook population epidemiological surveys in 11 developing and 9 developed countries, using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview to assess DSM-IV disorders. Fourteen performance and interactional fears were assessed. Associations between number of social fears in SAD and numerous outcomes (age-of-onset, persistence, severity, comorbidity, treatment) were examined. Additional analyses examined associations with number of performance fears versus number of interactional fears. RESULTS: Lifetime social fears are quite common in both developed (15.9%) and developing (14.3%) countries, but lifetime SAD is much more common in the former (6.1%) than latter (2.1%) countries. Among those with SAD, persistence, severity, comorbidity, and treatment have dose-response relationships with number of social fears, with no clear nonlinearity in relationships that would support a distinction between generalized and non-generalized SAD. The distinction between performance fears and interactional fears is generally not important in predicting these same outcomes. CONCLUSION: No evidence is found to support subtyping SAD on the basis of either number of social fears or number of performance fears versus number of interactional fears.


Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Países Desarrollados , Países en Desarrollo , Trastornos Fóbicos/clasificación , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Enfermedad Crónica , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Miedo , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Entrevista Psicológica , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Determinación de la Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Fóbicos/epidemiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Psicometría , Factores de Riesgo , Medio Social , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adulto Joven
3.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 44(8): 750-8, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20636197

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence, symptom severity, functional impairment and treatment of major depressive episodes in the New Zealand population, in light of recent criticism that depression is 'over-diagnosed', especially in community surveys. METHOD: Nationally representative cross-sectional household survey of 12 992 adults (aged 16+): The New Zealand Mental Health Survey 2003/4. 12-month major depressive episode measured in face-to-face interviews with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). RESULTS: The 12-month prevalence of major depressive episode (MDE) was 6.6% for the total population, with decreasing prevalence with increasing age, and higher prevalence in females (8.1% versus 4.9% in males). Fewer than 10% of 12-month episodes were classified on a symptom severity rating scale as mild, and 69% of all episodes were accompanied by severe impairment in at least one domain of functioning. Only a third of those with severe impairment received treatment in the mental health sector, and half saw a general medical practitioner. CONCLUSION: These results offer little support for the suggestion that depression is over-diagnosed and over-treated, and that current diagnostic thresholds allow the inclusion of too many mild episodes in community surveys.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/psicología , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales
4.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 44(4): 314-22, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20307164

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare two versions of the Kessler 10-item scale (K10), as measures of population mental health status in New Zealand. METHOD: A nationwide household survey of residents aged > or = 16 years was carried out between 2003 and 2004. The World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0) was used to obtain DSM-IV diagnoses. Serious mental illness (SMI) was defined as for the World Mental Health Surveys Initiative and the USA National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Participants were randomly assigned to receive the 'past month' K10 or the 'worst month in the past 12 months' K10. There were 12 992 completed interviews; 7435 included the K10. The overall response rate was 73.3%. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the ability of both K10 versions to discriminate between CIDI 3.0 cases and non-cases, and to predict SMI. RESULTS: Scores on both versions of the K10 were higher for female subjects, younger people, people with fewer educational qualifications, people with lower household income and people resident in more socioeconomically deprived areas. Both versions of the K10 were effective in discriminating between CIDI 3.0 cases and non-cases for anxiety disorder, mood disorders and any study disorder. The worst month in the past 12 months K10 is a more effective predictor than the past 1 month K10 of SMI (area under the curve: 0.89 vs 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Either version of the K10 could be used in repeated health surveys to monitor the mental health status of the New Zealand population and to derive proxy prevalence estimates for SMI. The worst month in the past 12 months K10 may be the preferred version in such surveys, because it is a better predictor of SMI than the past month K10 and also has a more logical relationship to 12 month disorder and 12 month service use.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/etnología , Entrevista Psicológica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Curva ROC , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
5.
Australas Psychiatry ; 18(2): 134-41, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20059307

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aims were to describe the prevalence and treatment of depressive disorders among case-managed adolescents attending a regional Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS). METHOD: An observational study was conducted in a regional CAMHS over a 3-month period. Clinicians recorded treatment of their case-managed adolescents aged 12-18 years at the end of each calendar month. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) and Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were collected at the beginning of the study period or at entry into the service, and repeated at discharge from the service or at the conclusion of the study period. Adolescents also completed the Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale, 2nd edition. RESULTS: Depressive disorders were the most common clinician diagnosis reported (22%). There was no statistically significant difference in treatment for depressed compared to non-depressed adolescents. There was a statistically significant improvement in both the HoNOSCA scores (p <0.001) and CGAS scores (p <0.001) for the whole sample. CONCLUSION: Treatment appeared to be the same in type for depressed compared to non-depressed adolescents case managed within CAMHS.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Adolescente/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente/efectos de los fármacos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Psicoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 43(7): 594-605, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19530016

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To provide a description of the methods and key findings of the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. METHOD: A national face-to-face household survey of 8841 (60% response rate) community residents aged between 16 and 85 years was carried out using the World Mental Health Survey Initiative version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Diagnoses were made according to ICD-10. Key findings include the prevalence of mental disorder, sex and age distributions of mental disorders, severity of mental disorders, comorbidity among mental disorders, and the extent of disability and health service use associated with mental disorders. RESULTS: The prevalence of any lifetime mental disorder was 45.5%. The prevalence of any 12 month mental disorder was 20.0%, with anxiety disorders (14.4%) the most common class of mental disorder followed by affective disorders (6.2%) and substance use disorders (5.1%). Mental disorders, particularly affective disorders, were disabling. One in four people (25.4%) with 12 month mental disorders had more than one class of mental disorder. One-third (34.9%) of people with a mental disorder used health services for mental health problems in the 12 months prior to the interview. CONCLUSIONS: Mental disorders are common in Australia. Many people have more than one class of mental disorder. Mental disorders are associated with substantial disability, yet many people with mental disorders do not seek help for their mental health problems.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Australia/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Demografía , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adulto Joven
7.
J Psychosom Res ; 64(1): 97-105, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18158005

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate (i) the associations between mental disorders (in particular the anxiety disorders) and obesity in the general population and (ii) potential moderators of those associations (ethnicity, age, sex, and education). METHODS: A nationally representative face-to-face household survey was conducted in New Zealand with 12,992 participants 16 years and older, achieving a response rate of 73.3%. Ethnic subgroups (Maori and Pacific peoples) were oversampled. Mental disorders were measured with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). Height and weight were self-reported. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m(2) or greater. RESULTS: Obesity was significantly associated with any mood disorder (OR 1.23), major depressive disorder (OR 1.27), any anxiety disorder (OR 1.46), and most strongly with some individual anxiety disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (OR 2.64). Sociodemographic correlates moderated the association between obesity and mood disorders but were less influential in obesity-anxiety disorder associations. Adjustment for the comorbidity between anxiety and mood disorders made little difference to the relationship between obesity and anxiety disorders (OR 1.36) but rendered the association between obesity and mood disorders insignificant (OR 1.05). CONCLUSION: Stronger associations were observed between anxiety disorders and obesity than between mood disorders and obesity; the association between PTSD and obesity is a novel finding. These findings are interpreted in light of research on the role of anxiety in eating pathology, and deserve the further attention of researchers and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Etnicidad/psicología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Humor/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Trastornos del Humor/psicología , Nueva Zelanda , Obesidad/psicología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología
8.
Australas Psychiatry ; 16(3): 195-9, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18568626

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to describe the use of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS) in an outreach-based rehabilitation program in regional Victoria, Australia. METHOD: Routine outcome measures (ROM), including the HoNOS, were introduced in the Stepping Stones Recovery Program (SSRP) in 2002. HoNOS data routinely collected for 122 patients between 2003 and 2006 was examined for sensitivity in capturing clinical changes by using paired t-tests. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in total HoNOS scores as well as scores on subsets of 'impairment' and 'symptomatic problems'. HoNOS scores reflected positive changes in patients and were useful as a global overview, but did not tap into process issues that are more clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: The SSRP provided a wide range of interventions and promoted a structured collaborative approach which could be the main reason for the uptake of ROM in this service. There are significant hurdles in integrating ROM in routine clinical practice, such as feasibility issues and clinician attitudes, along with larger systemic issues that need to be addressed. The introduction of ROM in Australia has resulted in strongly polarized viewpoints. Suggestions for facilitating the administration and use of ROM in routine clinical practice are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Indicadores de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Salud Pública , Australia/epidemiología , Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Humanos
9.
Transcult Psychiatry ; 45(3): 439-54, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18799642

RESUMEN

This article briefly reviews the literature on the relationship between social network and mental health, and presents a theoretical framework outlining the role social networks may play in explaining the differential mental health service utilization rates between Maori and European people of New Zealand. By buffering individuals from the ill effects of stressful events, social networks may have a protective effect on people's mental health. In addition, social networks influence the way people with mental illnesses use mental health services. An inverse relationship between the size of an individual's social network and the rate of utilization of in-patient services has been reported. Despite having a larger and presumably more supportive social networks, Maori are over-represented in mental health service utilization statistics. Using the Maori example, we demonstrate that ethnic differences exist in the structure of social networks and the provision of social support to their members. Such differences may be based on the degree of emphasis placed on kinship or on individualism by cultures and on the receptivity or prejudice of the host community. We examine the sources of stress on Maori social networks that may adversely affect the network's ability to support its members experiencing mental illnesses. Caution must be exercised in using service utilization rates as measures of the mental health needs of different ethnic groups because of problems with help seeking and the detection of mental health issues in different ethnic groups.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos de Población/psicología , Apoyo Social , Aculturación , Desinstitucionalización , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Nueva Zelanda , Identificación Social , Aislamiento Social , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Schizophr Bull ; 42(4): 933-41, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27038468

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given the early age of onset (AOO) of psychotic disorders, it has been assumed that psychotic experiences (PEs) would have a similar early AOO. The aims of this study were to describe (a) the AOO distribution of PEs, (b) the projected lifetime risk of PEs, and (c) the associations of PE AOO with selected PE features. METHODS: Data came from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. A total of 31 261 adult respondents across 18 countries were assessed for lifetime prevalence of PE. Projected lifetime risk (at age 75 years) was estimated using a 2-part actuarial method. AOO distributions were described for the observed and projected estimates. We examined associations of AOO with PE type metric and annualized PE frequency. RESULTS: Projected lifetime risk for PEs was 7.8% (SE = 0.3), slightly higher than lifetime prevalence (5.8%, SE = 0.2). The median (interquartile range; IQR) AOO based on projected lifetime estimates was 26 (17-41) years, indicating that PEs commence across a wide age range. The AOO distributions for PEs did not differ by sex. Early AOO was positively associated with number of PE types (F = 14.1, P < .001) but negatively associated with annualized PE frequency rates (F = 8.0, P < .001). DISCUSSION: While most people with lifetime PEs have first onsets in adolescence or young adulthood, projected estimates indicate that nearly a quarter of first onsets occur after age 40 years. The extent to which late onset PEs are associated with (a) late onset mental disorders or (b) declining cognitive and/or sensory function need further research.


Asunto(s)
Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
11.
Biol Psychiatry ; 72(3): 228-37, 2012 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22521149

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Better information on the human capital costs of early-onset mental disorders could increase sensitivity of policy makers to the value of expanding initiatives for early detection and treatment. Data are presented on one important aspect of these costs: the associations of early-onset mental disorders with adult household income. METHODS: Data come from the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health Surveys in 11 high-income, five upper-middle income, and six low/lower-middle income countries. Information about 15 lifetime DSM-IV mental disorders as of age of completing education, retrospectively assessed with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview, was used to predict current household income among respondents aged 18 to 64 (n = 37,741) controlling for level of education. Gross associations were decomposed to evaluate mediating effects through major components of household income. RESULTS: Early-onset mental disorders are associated with significantly reduced household income in high and upper-middle income countries but not low/lower-middle income countries, with associations consistently stronger among women than men. Total associations are largely due to low personal earnings (increased unemployment, decreased earnings among the employed) and spouse earnings (decreased probabilities of marriage and, if married, spouse employment and low earnings of employed spouses). Individual-level effect sizes are equivalent to 16% to 33% of median within-country household income, and population-level effect sizes are in the range 1.0% to 1.4% of gross household income. CONCLUSIONS: Early mental disorders are associated with substantial decrements in income net of education at both individual and societal levels. Policy makers should take these associations into consideration in making health care research and treatment resource allocation decisions.


Asunto(s)
Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Países en Desarrollo , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Escolaridad , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Psicológicos , Población , Psicología del Adolescente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Desempleo , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adulto Joven
14.
J Affect Disord ; 126(1-2): 65-74, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20307906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid cycling bipolar disorder has been studied almost exclusively in clinical samples. METHODS: A national cross-sectional survey in 2003-2004 in New Zealand used the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0). Diagnosis was by DSM-IV. Depression severity was assessed with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS) and role impairment using Sheehan Scales. Complex survey analyses compared percentages and means, and used logistic regression and discrete-time survival analyses. Frequent mood episodes (FMEs) in the past 12 months (4+) were used as an indicator of rapid cycling. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of bipolar disorder (I + II) was 1.7%. Twelve-month prevalence was 1.0%: 0.3% with FME and 0.7% with No FME (1-3 episodes). Another 0.7% had no episodes in that period. Age of onset was earliest for FME (16.0 years versus 19.5 and 20.1, p<.05). In the past 12 months, weeks in episode, total days out of role and role impairment in the worst month were all worse for the FME group (p<.0001) but both the FME and No-FME groups experienced severe and impairing depression. Lifetime suicidal behaviours and comorbidity were high in all three bipolar groups but differed little between them. About three-quarters had ever received treatment but only half with twelve-month disorder made treatment contact. LIMITATIONS: Recall, not observation of episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the community the burden of bipolar disorder is high. Frequent mood episodes in bipolar disorder are associated with still more disruption of life than less frequent episodes. Treatment is underutilized and could moderate the distress and impairment experienced.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Afecto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
15.
Int J Ment Health Nurs ; 19(2): 75-82, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20367644

RESUMEN

Mental disorders are the second leading cause of disease burden among Australia's Indigenous people after cardiovascular disease. Yet Indigenous people do not access mental health services in proportion to their need. This paper explores the barriers and facilitators for Indigenous people seeking mental health services in Australia and identifies key elements in the development and maintenance of partnerships for improved service delivery and future research. The process of seeking help for mental illness has been conceptualized as four consecutive steps starting from recognizing that there is a problem to actually contacting the mental health service. We have attempted to explore the factors affecting each of these stages. While people in the general population experience barriers across all four stages of the process of seeking treatment for a mental disorder, there are many more barriers for Indigenous people at the stage of actually contacting a mental health service. These include a history of racism and discrimination and resultant lack of trust in mainstream services, misunderstandings due to cultural and language differences, and inadequate measures to reduce the stigma associated with mental illness. Further research is required to understand the mental health literacy of Indigenous people, their different perceptions of mental health and well-being, issues around stigma, and the natural history of mental illness among Indigenous people who do not access any form of professional help. Collaborations between mainstream mental health services and Aboriginal organizations have been promoted as a way to conduct research into developing appropriate services for Indigenous people.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Indígena , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental , Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Prejuicio , Adulto , Australia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/tendencias , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias
16.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 19 Suppl 1: 4-22, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20527002

RESUMEN

Data are reported on the background and performance of the K6 screening scale for serious mental illness (SMI) in the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. The K6 is a six-item scale developed to provide a brief valid screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) SMI based on the criteria in the US ADAMHA Reorganization Act. Although methodological studies have documented good K6 validity in a number of countries, optimal scoring rules have never been proposed. Such rules are presented here based on analysis of K6 data in nationally or regionally representative WMH surveys in 14 countries (combined N = 41,770 respondents). Twelve-month prevalence of DSM-IV SMI was assessed with the fully-structured WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Nested logistic regression analysis was used to generate estimates of the predicted probability of SMI for each respondent from K6 scores, taking into consideration the possibility of variable concordance as a function of respondent age, gender, education, and country. Concordance, assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was generally substantial (median 0.83; range 0.76-0.89; inter-quartile range 0.81-0.85). Based on this result, optimal scaling rules are presented for use by investigators working with the K6 scale in the countries studied.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Psicometría/métodos , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
17.
Biol Psychiatry ; 68(5): 465-73, 2010 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20599189

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the utility of DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A2 (A2): that exposure to a potentially traumatic experience (PTE; PTSD criterion A1) is accompanied by intense fear, helplessness, or horror. METHODS: Lifetime DSM-IV PTSD was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview in community surveys of 52,826 respondents across 21 countries in the World Mental Health Surveys. RESULTS: Of 28,490 representative PTEs reported by respondents, 37.6% met criterion A2, a proportion higher than the proportions meeting other criteria (B-F; 5.4%-9.6%). Conditional prevalence of meeting all other criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD given a PTE was significantly higher in the presence (9.7%) than absence (.1%) of A2. However, as only 1.4% of respondents who met all other criteria failed A2, the estimated prevalence of PTSD increased only slightly (from 3.64% to 3.69%) when A2 was not required for diagnosis. Posttraumatic stress disorder with or without criterion A2 did not differ in persistence or predicted consequences (subsequent suicidal ideation or secondary disorders) depending on presence-absence of A2. Furthermore, as A2 was by far the most commonly reported symptom of PTSD, initial assessment of A2 would be much less efficient than screening other criteria in quickly ruling out a large proportion of noncases. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of A2 from the DSM-IV criterion set would reduce the complexity of diagnosing PTSD, while not substantially increasing the number of people who qualify for diagnosis. Criterion A2 should consequently be reconceptualized as a risk factor for PTSD rather than as a diagnostic requirement.


Asunto(s)
Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Recolección de Datos , Emociones/fisiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Ideación Suicida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA