Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches for Immuno-Oncology: Adding Virtual Patients to the Development Paradigm.

Drug development in oncology commonly exploits the tools of molecular biology to gain therapeutic benefit through reprograming of cellular responses. In immuno-oncology (IO) the aim is to direct the patient's own immune system to fight cancer. After remarkable successes of antibodies targeting PD1/PD-L1 and CTLA4 receptors in targeted patient populations, the focus of further development has shifted toward combination therapies. However, the current drug-development approach of exploiting a vast number of possible combination targets and dosing regimens has proven to be challenging and is arguably inefficient. In particular, the unprecedented number of clinical trials testing different combinations may no longer be sustainable by the population of available patients. Further development in IO requires a step change in selection and validation of candidate therapies to decrease development attrition rate and limit the number of clinical trials. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) proposes to tackle this challenge through mechanistic modeling and simulation. Compounds' pharmacokinetics, target binding, and mechanisms of action as well as existing knowledge on the underlying tumor and immune system biology are described by quantitative, dynamic models aiming to predict clinical results for novel combinations. Here, we review the current QSP approaches, the legacy of mathematical models available to quantitative clinical pharmacologists describing interaction between tumor and immune system, and the recent development of IO QSP platform models. We argue that QSP and virtual patients can be integrated as a new tool in existing IO drug development approaches to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the search for novel combination therapies.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and bioavailability of the triazole antifungal agent voriconazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotype.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Pharmacokinetic variability of voriconazole is largely caused by CYP3A4- and CYP2C19-mediated metabolism. * Oral bioavailability of voriconazole has been claimed to be almost 100%, thus facilitating a change from intravenous to oral application without dose adjustment. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * For the first time voriconazole exposure after intravenous and oral administration in relation to CYP2C19 activity is reported. * In addition, the predominant metabolic pathway is the hydroxylation that seems to be influenced by the CYP2C19 genotype. * Enterohepatic circulation of both hydroxylated metabolites must be anticipated. AIMS: The aim was to determine the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole after a single oral dose in comparison with intravenous (i.v.) administration in healthy individuals stratified according to the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype. In addition, the possible metabolic pathways and their modulation according to CYP2C19 genotype were investigated after oral and i.v. administration of voriconazole. METHODS: In a single-centre, open-label, two-period crossover study 20 participants received single doses of 400 mg voriconazole orally and 400 mg voriconazole intravenously in randomized order. Blood and urine samples were collected up to 96 h post dose and the voriconazole and three major metabolites were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy. RESULTS: Absolute oral bioavailability of voriconazole was 82.6% (74.1, 91.0). It ranged from 94.4% (78.8, 109.9) in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers to 75.2% (62.9, 87.4) in extensive metabolizers. In contrast to voriconazole and its N-oxide, the plasma concentrations of both hydroxylated metabolites showed a large second peak after 24 h. Independent of the route of administration, voriconazole partial metabolic hydroxylation after i.v. administration was eightfold higher compared with N-oxidation [48.8 ml min(-1) (30.5, 67.1) vs. 6.1 ml min(-1) (4.1, 8.0)]. The formation of the metabolites was related to CYP2C19 activity. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of the route of administration, voriconazole exposure was three times higher in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers compared with extensive metabolizers. Voriconazole has a high bioavailability with no large differences between the CYP2C19 genotypes. The hydroxylation pathway of voriconazole elimination exceeded the N-oxidation, both influenced by the CYP2C19 genotype.

High absolute bioavailability of methylene blue given as an aqueous oral formulation.

PURPOSE: Methylene blue (MB) has recently been reevaluated for malaria treatment. With the aim of excluding treatment failures due to low bioavailability, we have investigated the absolute bioavailability of MB given as an aqueous oral formulation and its interaction with chloroquine (CQ). METHODS: A phase I study in 16 healthy individuals was performed as a monocenter prospective open randomized intra-individual cross-over comparison of MB single doses [50 mg intravenous (i.v.), 500 mg orally, separated by a 1-week wash-out]. After a second week, the group was split for a randomized parallel group comparison of CQ 750 mg administered orally alone or combined with 500 mg MB orally. RESULTS: Mean MB plasma area under the substrate concentration-time curve (AUC 0-infinity) was 7,639 +/- 3,384 ng/mL*h and 51,171 +/- 17,147 ng/mL*h after i.v. and oral administration, respectively (dosage 1:10), and 76,897 +/- 46,037 ng/mL*h after MB combined with CQ. The absolute bioavailability was 72.3 +/- 23.9%. Co-administration with CQ significantly increased MB plasma concentrations (p

Significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction of warfarin with the NO-independent sGC activator HMR1766.

HMR1766 is a new nitric oxide (NO)-independent activator of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) in development for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and chronic heart failure. A significant fraction of patients to be treated with HMR1766 is expected to be maintained on warfarin. Because HMR1766 is an inhibitor and warfarin a substrate of CYP2C9, the authors studied whether warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are influenced by HMR1766. Eighteen healthy males were to receive a single oral dose of 20 mg warfarin each under steady-state conditions of HMR1766 or placebo. Plasma concentrations of HMR1766, (R)- and (S)-warfarin, and its 7-hydroxy-metabolites were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography and prothrombin time, and the international standardized ratio was determined by the nephelometric method. (S)-Warfarin AUC(inf) and t(1/2) were 106,471 h x microg/L and 82.92 hours versus 33,148 h x microg/L under HMR1766 and 31.72 hours under placebo, and the maximum decrease in prothrombin time values after warfarin dosing was 58.75% versus 39.94%. These data demonstrate a CYP2C9-mediated pharmacokinetic interaction with pharmacodynamic, clinically relevant consequences, which might require warfarin dose adjustment.