Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for cancer cachexia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia affects more than half of all cancer patients, reducing survival rates. Evidence-based approaches are urgently needed to optimize treatment. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacotherapies for cancer cachexia. Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for the period from January 1, 2000, to March 20, 2024. The netmeta package in R software was used to calculate the pooled effect, employing a random effects model. RESULTS: Seven placebo-controlled randomized trials involving 1421 patients were analyzed. Pairwise analysis showed that body weight increases were 4.6 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-8.37 kg) for olanzapine, 3.82 kg (95% CI 0.73-6.91 kg) for espindolol (20 mg), 2.36 kg (95% CI 1.84-2.89 kg) for anamorelin (100 mg), and 1.31 kg (95% CI 0.42-2.19 kg) for anamorelin (50 mg). In terms of safety profiles, olanzapine demonstrated the lowest odds ratio when compared to placebo, at 0.26 (95% CI 0.07-0.94), followed by anamorelin (50 mg) at 0.86 (95% CI 0.30-2.48), and anamorelin (100 mg) at 0.89 (95% CI 0.42-1.88). However, network meta-analysis could not confirm the superiority of olanzapine over anamorelin in terms of efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: Both olanzapine and anamorelin are useful in improving body weight in patients with cancer cachexia. Personalization may be helpful for different patients.

Effect of Adjuvant and Palliative Chemotherapy in Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subset of lung carcinoma with poor overall survival. METHODS: A systematic review following a meta-analysis of studies was performed to identify the effect of different selections of chemotherapy in LCNEC. Articles providing overall survival data for adjuvant chemotherapy or palliative chemotherapy for LCNEC were eligible. The odds ratio (OR) of mortality at one or two years after chemotherapy was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 16 reports were finally included in the quantitative synthesis, involving a total of 5916 LCNEC patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 1303 patients, and palliative chemotherapy was administered to 313 patients using either a small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regimen. The OR for adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 0.89, p = 0.002). The SCLC regimen showed an OR of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.11 to 2.38, p = 0.40) after one year, and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.89, p = 0.03) after two years, compared with the NSCLC regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy for pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma improved the outcome after surgery. The SCLC regimen showed better survival than the NSCLC regimen as palliative chemotherapy.

Effectiveness of Cell-Free and Concentrated Ascites Reinfusion Therapy in the Treatment of Malignancy-Related Ascites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malignancy-related ascites (MRA) is one of the symptoms causing discomfort in advanced cancer patients. Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is one of the palliative treatments widely conducted in Japan only. METHODS: A systematic review following a meta-analysis of CART was performed. The efficiency and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2567 patients and 6013 procedures of CART were identified in this study. The mean volume of MRA collected was 4.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47-5.11) L, and the volume reinfused after concentrating was 0.49 (95% CI 0.39-0.60) L. A total of 86.1 (95% CI 77.1-95.2) g protein and 42.9 (95% CI 36.0-50.0) g albumin was reinfused. The mean time to the next paracentesis was 20.7 (95% CI 15.6-25.8) days. The body weight was reduced by 3.38 (95% CI 1.90-4.86; p < 0.01) kg, and abdominal circumference was reduced by 7.86 (95% CI 6.58-9.14; p < 0.001) cm. Serum albumin increased an average of 0.14 (95% CI -0.01-0.28; p = 0.07) mg/dL the day after CART. Abdominal distension, dyspnea, and fatigue were alleviated by 6.0 (95% CI 5.59-6.51), 2.66 (95% CI 2.05-3.28), and 2.64 (95% CI 1.86-3.42) points using a numerical rating scale system ranging from 0 to 10. Overall, 17% (95% CI 0.03-0.31%) of patients had improved performance status after CART. Significant body temperature elevation was observed, at an average of 0.4 °C (95% CI 0.18-0.62 °C). CONCLUSIONS: CART might be a safe and effective palliative therapy in MRA and further clinical trials are necessary.