Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 171(7_Suppl): S38-S44, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569231

RESUMEN

Background: Many hospitals struggle to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Objective: To evaluate the effect of a multimodal initiative on CAUTI in hospitals with high burden of health care-associated infection (HAI). Design: Prospective, national, nonrandomized, clustered, externally facilitated, pre-post observational quality improvement initiative, for 3 cohorts active between November 2016 and May 2018. Setting: Acute care, long-term acute care, and critical access hospitals, including intensive care and non-intensive care wards. Participants: Target hospitals had a high burden of Clostridioides difficile infection plus central line-associated bloodstream infection, CAUTI, or hospital-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection, defined as cumulative attributable differences above the first tertile in the Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) strategy. Some additional nonrecruited hospitals also joined. Intervention: Multimodal intervention, including Practice Change Assessment tool to identify infection prevention and control (IPC) and HAI prevention gaps; Web-based, on-demand modules involving onboarding, foundational IPC practices, HAI-specific 2-tiered approach to prioritize and implement interventions, and TAP resources; monthly webinars; state partner-led in-person meetings; and feedback. State partners made site visits to at least 50% of their enrolled hospitals, to support self-assessments and coach. Measurements: Rates of CAUTI and urinary catheter device utilization ratio. Results: Of 387 participating hospitals from 23 states and the District of Columbia, 361 provided CAUTI data. Over the study period, the unadjusted CAUTI rate was low and relatively stable, decreasing slightly from 1.12 to 1.04 CAUTIs per 1000 catheter-days. Catheter utilization decreased from 21.46 to 19.83 catheter-days per 100 patient-days from the pre- to the postintervention period. Limitations: The intervention period was brief, with no assessment of fidelity. Baseline CAUTI rates were low. Patient characteristics were not assessed. Conclusion: This multimodal intervention yielded no substantial improvements in CAUTI or urinary catheter utilization. Primary Funding Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Hospitales/normas , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Catéteres Urinarios/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Retroalimentación Formativa , Administración Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 171(7_Suppl): S66-S72, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569232

RESUMEN

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains one of the most common causes of health care-associated infection (HAI). Objective: To evaluate the effect of education and a tiered, evidence-based infection prevention strategy on rates of hospital-onset MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI). Design: Prospective, national, nonrandomized, interventional, 12-month, multiple cohort, pre-post observational quality improvement project. Setting: Acute care, long-term acute care, and critical access hospitals with a disproportionate burden of HAI. Patients: All patients admitted to participating facilities during the project period. Intervention: A multimodal infection prevention intervention consisting of recommendations and tools for prioritizing and implementing evidence-based infection prevention strategies, on-demand educational videos, Internet-based live educational presentations, and access to content experts. Measurements: Rates of hospital-onset MRSA BSI, overall and stratified by hospital type, during 12-month baseline and postintervention periods. Variation in outcomes across hospital types was examined. Results: Between November 2016 and May 2018, 387 hospitals in 23 states and the District of Columbia participated, 353 (91%) submitted MRSA data, and 172 (49%) indicated that MRSA prevention was a priority. Unadjusted overall rates of hospital-onset MRSA BSI were 0.075 (95% CI, 0.065 to 0.085) and 0.071 (CI, 0.063 to 0.080) per 1000 patient-days in the baseline and postintervention periods, respectively. Limitations: The intervention period was short. Participation and adherence to recommended interventions were not fully assessed. Baseline rates of hospital-onset MRSA BSI were relatively low. Prevention of MRSA was a priority in a minority of participating hospitals. Patient characteristics and other MRSA risk factors were not assessed. Conclusion: In hospitals with a disproportionate burden of HAIs, access to tools to assist with implementation of evidence-based prevention strategies and education resources alone may not be sufficient to prevent MRSA BSI. Primary Funding Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Retroalimentación Formativa , Administración Hospitalaria , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Factores de Riesgo , Materiales de Enseñanza , Estados Unidos
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(3): 367-373, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877197

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of active, upper-room, germicidal ultraviolet (GUV) devices in reducing bacterial contamination in patient rooms in air and on surfaces as a supplement to the central heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) air handling unit (AHU) with MERV 14 filters and UV-C disinfection. METHODS: This study was conducted in an academic medical center, burn intensive care unit (BICU), for 4 months in 2022. Room occupancy was monitored and recorded. In total, 402 preinstallation and postinstallation bacterial air and non-high-touch surface samples were obtained from 10 BICU patient rooms. Airborne particle counts were measured in the rooms, and bacterial air samples were obtained from the patient-room supply air vents and outdoor air, before and after the intervention. After preintervention samples were obtained, an active, upper-room, GUV air disinfection system was deployed in each of the patient rooms in the BICU. RESULTS: The average levels of airborne bacteria of 395 CFU/m3 before GUV device installation and 37 CFU/m3 after installation indicated an 89% overall decrease (P < .0001). Levels of surface-borne bacteria were associated with a 69% decrease (P < .0001) after GUV device installation. Outdoor levels of airborne bacteria averaged 341 CFU/m3 in March before installation and 676 CFU/m3 in June after installation, but this increase was not significant (P = .517). CONCLUSIONS: Significant reductions in air and surface contamination occurred in all rooms and areas and were not associated with variations in outdoor air concentrations of bacteria. The significant decrease of surface bacteria is an unexpected benefit associated with in-room GUV air disinfection, which can potentially reduce overall bioburden.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Desinfección , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Aire Acondicionado , Rayos Ultravioleta , Microbiología del Aire
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(3): 355-376, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36751708

RESUMEN

The purpose of this document is to highlight practical recommendations to assist acute-care hospitals in prioritization and implementation of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals through Hand Hygiene, published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the American Hospital Association, and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Higiene de las Manos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 52(5): 654-61, 2011 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21292670

RESUMEN

Infections in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are common and result in frequent hospital transfers, functional decline, and death. Colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) - including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB) - is also increasingly prevalent in SNFs. Antimicrobial resistance among common bacteria can adversely affect clinical outcomes and increase health care costs. Recognizing a need for action, legislators, policy-makers, and consumer groups are advocating for surveillance cultures to identify asymptomatic patients with MDROs, particularly MRSA in hospitals and SNFs. Implementing this policy for all SNF residents may be costly, impractical, and ineffective. Such a policy may result in a large increase in the number of SNF residents placed in isolation precautions with the potential for reduced attention by health care workers, isolation, and functional decline. Detection of colonization and subsequent attempts to eradicate selected MDROs can also lead to more strains with drug resistance. We propose an alternative strategy that uses a focused multicomponent bundle approach that targets residents at a higher risk of colonization and infection with MDROs, specifically those who have an indwelling device. If this strategy is effective, similar strategies can be studied and implemented for other high-risk groups.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos
9.
Anesth Analg ; 113(6): 1416-21, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21965373

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Warm air released by forced-air covers could theoretically disturb laminar airflow in operating rooms. We thus tested the hypothesis that laminar flow performance remains well within rigorous and objective standards during forced-air warming. METHODS: We evaluated air quality in 2 laminar flow operating rooms using a volunteer "patient" and heated manikin "surgeons." Reduction in tracer background particle counts near the site of a putative surgical incision was evaluated as specified by the rigorous DIN 1946-4:2008-12 standard. Results were confirmed using smoke as a visual tracer. RESULTS: Background tracer particle concentrations were reduced 4 to 5 log by the laminar flow system, and there were no statistically significant or clinically important differences with a forced-air blower set to off, ambient air, and high temperature. All values remained well within the requirements of the DIN 1946-4:2008-12 standard. Activation of a forced-air warming system did not create an upward draft or interfere with normal and effective function of the laminar flow process. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, based on quantitative performance testing methods, indicate that forced-air warming does not reduce operating room air quality during laminar flow ventilation. Because there is no decrement in laminar flow performance, forced-air warming remains an appropriate intraoperative warming method when laminar flow is used.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Ambiente Controlado , Calefacción/normas , Quirófanos/normas , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Calefacción/efectos adversos , Calefacción/métodos , Humanos , Tamaño de la Partícula
10.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 35(3): 697-716, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34362539

RESUMEN

The built environment has been integral to response to the global pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In particular, engineering controls to mitigate risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and other newly emergent respiratory pathogens in the future will be important. Anticipating emergence from this pandemic, or at least adaptation given increasing administration of effective vaccines, and the safety of patients, personnel, and others in health care facilities remain the core goals. This article summarizes known risks and highlights prevention strategies for daily care as well as response to emergent infectious diseases and this parapandemic phase.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Defensa Civil , Instituciones de Salud/tendencias , Control de Infecciones , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Defensa Civil/métodos , Defensa Civil/organización & administración , Ambiente Controlado , Arquitectura y Construcción de Hospitales/métodos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(1): 103-105, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31493936

RESUMEN

Portable medical equipment (PME) can be an important reservoir of pathogens causing health care-associated infections. To address this, a novel, portable ultraviolet disinfection pod (UVDP) that allows for full 360-degree disinfection was developed. This investigation examined efficacy of the UVDP against microorganisms on clean, patient-ready PME. We found that the UVDP significantly reduced the number of recoverable bacteria on PME.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfección/instrumentación , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales/microbiología , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Carga Bacteriana , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Rayos Ultravioleta
12.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 35(9): 449-55, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19769204

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), a frequent health care-associated infection (HAI), is a costly and common condition resulting in patient discomfort, activity restriction, and hospital discharge delays. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) no longer reimburses hospitals for the extra cost of caring for patients who develop CAUTI. The Michigan Health and Hospital Association (MHA) Keystone Center for Patient Safety & Quality has initiated a statewide initiative, MHA Keystone HAI, to help ameliorate the burden of disease associated with indwelling catheterization. In addition, a long-term research project is being conducted to evaluate the current initiative and to identify practical strategies to ensure the effective use of proven infection prevention and patient safety practices. OVERVIEW OF THE BLADDER BUNDLE INITIATIVE IN MICHIGAN: The bladder bundle as conceived by MHA Keystone HAI focuses on preventing CAUTI by optimizing the use of urinary catheters with a specific emphasis on continual assessment and catheter removal as soon as possible, especially for patients without a clear indication. COLLABORATION BETWEEN RESEARChERS AND STATE WIDE PATIENT SAFETY ORGANIZATIONS: A synergistic collaboration between patient safety researchers and a statewide patient safety organization is aimed at identifying effective strategies to move evidence from peer-reviewed literature to the bedside. Practical strategies that facilitate implementation of the bundle will be developed and tested using mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. DISCUSSION: Simply disseminating scientific evidence is often ineffective in changing clinical practice. Therefore, learning how to implement these findings is critically important to promoting high-quality care and a safe health care environment.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Urinario/instrumentación , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Michigan , Innovación Organizacional , Transferencia de Tecnología
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 46(2): 243-50, 2008 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18171256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital-acquired infection in the United States, to our knowledge, no national data exist describing what hospitals in the United States are doing to prevent this patient safety problem. We conducted a national study to examine the current practices used by hospitals to prevent hospital-acquired UTI. METHODS: We mailed written surveys to infection control coordinators at a national random sample of nonfederal US hospitals with an intensive care unit and >or=50 hospital beds (n=600) and to all Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals (n=119). The survey asked about practices to prevent hospital-acquired UTI and other device-associated infections. RESULTS: The response rate was 72%. Overall, 56% of hospitals did not have a system for monitoring which patients had urinary catheters placed, and 74% did not monitor catheter duration. Thirty percent of hospitals reported regularly using antimicrobial urinary catheters and portable bladder scanners; 14% used condom catheters, and 9% used catheter reminders. VA hospitals were more likely than non-VA hospitals to use portable bladder scanners (49% vs. 29%; P=.001), condom catheters (46% vs. 12%; P=.001), and suprapubic catheters (22% vs. 9%; P=.001); non-VA hospitals were more likely to use antimicrobial urinary catheters (30% vs. 14%; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the strong link between urinary catheters and subsequent UTI, we found no strategy that appeared to be widely used to prevent hospital-acquired UTI. The most commonly used practices--bladder ultrasound and antimicrobial catheters--were each used in fewer than one-third of hospitals, and urinary catheter reminders, which have proven benefits, were used in <10% of US hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
14.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(11): 1202-1210, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29887164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infection Preventionists have varying levels of educational preparation. Many have no prior experience in IP. The diversity makes design of professional development programs challenging. Recent surveys suggest that only about half of practicing IPs are board certified. There is an urgent need to employ competent IP's to drive improvement in patient outcomes. METHODS: This is a project that utilized the APIC Competency Model to create a professional development program characterizing three career stages. Methods included a review of literature on professional development; a survey of IP competence; an assessment of job descriptions and performance evaluations; and a crosswalk of IP competencies. RESULTS: The professional development program includes competency - based IP job descriptions and performance evaluations for each career stage; a professional portfolio; and a toolkit for supervisors. DISCUSSION: Participants agreed that application of the model resulted in tools which are more closely aligned with current roles for IPs; and increased satisfaction and motivation with the new program. CONCLUSION: Competent and knowledgeable IP's are crucial to optimizing efficacy of IPC programs. A professional development program has the potential to guide staff orientation, improve satisfaction and retention, improve patient outcomes and promote a positive trajectory in advancing practice.


Asunto(s)
Profesionales para Control de Infecciones/educación , Competencia Profesional , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Sociedades Científicas/organización & administración , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/normas
15.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(9): 973-979, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30172338

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the postacute and long-term care setting, the practice of changing the indwelling urinary catheter large sterile drainage bag to a small-size leg drainage bag is intended to maintain a person's mobility, dignity, and comfort. There is scant evidence that assesses the impact of intermittent use of a leg bag on frequency of urinary tract infection since this breaks the closed urinary drainage system. METHODS: We reviewed research published between 1993 and 2014 for the answers to 20 practice questions developed by experts and long-term care clinicians on the risks and benefits, cleaning, connection, and storage of reusable leg bags. RESULTS: Seventeen of the 26 publications and studies provided varying advice on the risk of breaking the closed system and on practices for changing, disinfecting, and storing leg bags between uses. Thirteen of 20 practice questions were answered by ≥1 publications, few of which were evidence based. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the existence of low-level evidence that leg bags pose no evident, disproportionate risk of infection compared with maintaining a closed system. The lack of uniformity in evidence in the literature suggests aseptic technique should guide practice. Available evidence suggests that aseptic technique should guide practice.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Cateterismo Urinario/métodos , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos
16.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 82(6): 672-8, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17550746

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which US acute care hospitals have adopted recommended practices to prevent central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Between March 16, 2005, and August 1, 2005, a survey of infection control coordinators was conducted at a national random sample of nonfederal hospitals with an intensive care unit and more than 50 hospital beds (n=600) and at all Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (n=119). Primary outcomes were regular use of 5 specific practices and a composite approach for preventing CR-BSIs. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 72% (n=516). A higher percentage of VA compared to non-VA hospitals reported using maximal sterile barrier precautions (84% vs 71%; P=.01); chlorhexidine gluconate for insertion site antisepsis (91% vs 69%; P<.001); and a composite approach (62% vs 44%; P=.003) combining concurrent use of maximal sterile barrier precautions, chlorhexidine gluconate, and avoidance of routine central line changes. Those hospitals having a higher safety culture score, having a certified infection control professional, and participating in an infection prevention collaborative were more likely to use CR-BSI prevention practices. CONCLUSION: Most US hospitals are using maximal sterile barrier precautions and chlorhexidine gluconate, 2 of the most strongly recommended practices to prevent CR-BSIs. However, fewer than half of non-VA US hospitals reported concurrent use of maximal sterile barrier precautions, chlorhexidine gluconate, and avoidance of routine central line changes. Wider use of CR-BSI prevention practices by hospitals could be encouraged by fostering a culture of safety, participating in infection prevention collaboratives, and promoting infection control professional certification.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/etiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Modelos Logísticos , Estados Unidos
17.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 28(3): 249-60, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17326014

RESUMEN

Legislation aimed at controlling antimicrobial-resistant pathogens through the use of active surveillance cultures to screen hospitalized patients has been introduced in at least 2 US states. In response to the proposed legislation, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) have developed this joint position statement. Both organizations are dedicated to combating healthcare-associated infections with a wide array of methods, including the use of active surveillance cultures in appropriate circumstances. This position statement reviews the proposed legislation and the rationale for use of active surveillance cultures, examines the scientific evidence supporting the use of this strategy, and discusses a number of unresolved issues surrounding legislation mandating use of active surveillance cultures. The following 5 consensus points are offered. (1) Although reducing the burden of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), is of preeminent importance, APIC and SHEA do not support legislation to mandate use of active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA, VRE, or other antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. (2) SHEA and APIC support the continued development, validation, and application of efficacious and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other antimicrobial-resistant and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens. (3) APIC and SHEA welcome efforts by healthcare consumers, together with private, local, state, and federal policy makers, to focus attention on and formulate solutions for the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections. (4) SHEA and APIC support ongoing additional research to determine and optimize the appropriateness, utility, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of using active surveillance cultures to screen both lower-risk and high-risk populations. (5) APIC and SHEA support stronger collaboration between state and local public health authorities and institutional infection prevention and control experts.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Control de Infecciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Comités Consultivos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Medios de Cultivo , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Sociedades Científicas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
18.
Am J Infect Control ; 35(2): 73-85, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17327185

RESUMEN

Legislation aimed at controlling antimicrobial-resistant pathogens through the use of active surveillance cultures to screen hospitalized patients has been introduced in at least 2 US states. In response to the proposed legislation, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc., (APIC) have developed this joint position statement. Both organizations are dedicated to combating health care-associated infections with a wide array of methods, including the use of active surveillance cultures in appropriate circumstances. This position statement reviews the proposed legislation and the rationale for use of active surveillance cultures, examines the scientific evidence supporting the use of this strategy, and discusses a number of unresolved issues surrounding legislation mandating use of active surveillance cultures. The following 5 consensus points are offered. (1) Although reducing the burden of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), is of preeminent importance, the APIC and the SHEA do not support legislation to mandate use of active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA, VRE, or other antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. (2) The SHEA and the APIC support the continued development, validation, and application of efficacious and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other antimicrobial-resistant and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens. (3) The APIC and the SHEA welcome efforts by health care consumers, together with private, local, state, and federal policy makers, to focus attention on and formulate solutions for the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance and health care-associated infections. (4) The SHEA and the APIC support ongoing additional research to determine and optimize the appropriateness, utility, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of using active surveillance cultures to screen both lower-risk and high-risk populations. (5) The APIC and the SHEA support stronger collaboration between state and local public health authorities and institutional infection prevention and control experts.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Control de Infecciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Comités Consultivos , Medios de Cultivo , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Hospitalización , Humanos , Illinois , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Maryland , Sociedades Médicas , Sociedades Científicas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
19.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 26(3): 226-235, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27222593

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has funded national collaboratives using the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program to reduce rates of two catheter-associated infections-central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), using evidence-based intervention bundles to improve technical aspects of care and socioadaptive approaches to foster a culture of safety. OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between hospital units' results for the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) and catheter-associated infection rates. METHODS: We analysed data from two prospective cohort studies from acute-care intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICUs participating in the AHRQ CLABSI and CAUTI collaboratives. National Healthcare Safety Network catheter-associated infections per 1000 catheter-days were collected at baseline and quarterly postimplementation. The HSOPS was collected at baseline and again 1 year later. Infection rates were modelled using multilevel negative binomial models as a function of HSOPS components over time, adjusted for hospital-level characteristics. RESULTS: 1821 units from 1079 hospitals (CLABSI) and 1576 units from 949 hospitals (CAUTI) were included. Among responding units, infection rates declined over the project periods (by 47% for CLABSI, by 23% for CAUTI, unadjusted). No significant associations were found between CLABSI or CAUTI rates and HSOPS measures at baseline or over time. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between results of the HSOPS and catheter-associated infection rates when measured at baseline and postintervention in two successful large national collaboratives focused on prevention of CLABSI and CAUTI. These results suggest that it may be possible to improve CLABSI and CAUTI rates without making significant changes in safety culture, particularly as measured by instruments like HSOPS.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cultura Organizacional , Seguridad del Paciente , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
JAMA Intern Med ; 177(8): 1154-1162, 2017 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28525923

RESUMEN

Importance: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing home residents is a common cause of sepsis, hospital admission, and antimicrobial use leading to colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms. Objective: To develop, implement, and evaluate an intervention to reduce catheter-associated UTI. Design, Setting, and Participants: A large-scale prospective implementation project was conducted in community-based nursing homes participating in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Long-Term Care. Nursing homes across 48 states, Washington DC, and Puerto Rico participated. Implementation of the project was conducted between March 1, 2014, and August 31, 2016. Interventions: The project was implemented over 12-month cohorts and included a technical bundle: catheter removal, aseptic insertion, using regular assessments, training for catheter care, and incontinence care planning, as well as a socioadaptive bundle emphasizing leadership, resident and family engagement, and effective communication. Main Outcomes and Measures: Urinary catheter use and catheter-associated UTI rates using National Healthcare Safety Network definitions were collected. Facility-level urine culture order rates were also obtained. Random-effects negative binomial regression models were used to examine changes in catheter-associated UTI, catheter utilization, and urine cultures and adjusted for covariates including ownership, bed size, provision of subacute care, 5-star rating, presence of an infection control committee, and an infection preventionist. Results: In 4 cohorts over 30 months, 568 community-based nursing homes were recruited; 404 met inclusion criteria for analysis. The unadjusted catheter-associated UTI rates decreased from 6.78 to 2.63 infections per 1000 catheter-days. With use of the regression model and adjustment for facility characteristics, the rates decreased from 6.42 to 3.33 (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.58; P < .001). Catheter utilization was 4.5% at baseline and 4.9% at the end of the project. Catheter utilization remained unchanged (4.50 at baseline, 4.45 at conclusion of project; IRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.03; P = .26) in adjusted analyses. The number of urine cultures ordered for all residents decreased from 3.49 per 1000 resident-days to 3.08 per 1000 resident-days. Similarly, after adjustment, the rates were shown to decrease from 3.52 to 3.09 (IRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In a large-scale, national implementation project involving community-based nursing homes, combined technical and socioadaptive catheter-associated UTI prevention interventions successfully reduced the incidence of catheter-associated UTIs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Urinario , Catéteres Urinarios , Infecciones Urinarias , Anciano , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Masculino , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/métodos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/organización & administración , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Urinálisis/métodos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/métodos , Cateterismo Urinario/normas , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA