Efficacy of salvage therapies for advanced acral melanoma after anti-PD-1 monotherapy failure: a multicenter retrospective study of 108 Japanese patients.

Background: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy is one of the standard systemic therapies for advanced melanoma; however, the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies after PD-1 monotherapy failure (PD-1 MF), particularly in acral melanoma (AM), the main clinical melanoma type in Japanese patients, is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of salvage systemic therapies in Japanese patients with AM after PD-1 MF. Patients and methods: The study included 108 patients with advanced AM (palm and sole, 72; nail apparatus, 36) who underwent salvage systemic therapy at 24 Japanese institutions. We mainly assessed the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six (33%) patients received ipilimumab, 23 (21%) received nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo/ipi), 10 (9%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 4 (4%) received BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi), and the remaining 35 (32%) continued with PD-1 monotherapy after disease progression. The ORRs in the ipilimumab, nivo/ipi, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and BRAFi/MEKi groups were 8, 17, 0, and 100%, respectively. The nivo/ipi group showed the longest OS (median, 18.9 months); however, differences in ORR, PFS, and OS between the groups were insignificant. The OS in the nivo/ipi group was higher in the palm and sole groups than in the nail apparatus group (median: not reached vs. 8.7 months, p < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that nail apparatus melanoma independently predicted unfavorable PFS and OS (p = 0.006 and 0.001). The total OS (from PD-1 monotherapy initiation to death/last follow-up) was insignificant between the groups. Conclusion: Nivo/ipi was not more effective than cytotoxic chemotherapy and ipilimumab after PD-1 MF in patients with advanced AM. The prognosis after PD-1 MF would be poorer for nail apparatus melanoma than for palm and sole melanoma.

Efficacy comparison between anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy as first-line immunotherapy for advanced acral melanoma: A retrospective, multicenter study of 254 Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: Although anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy (PD-1) is commonly used to treat advanced acral melanoma (AM), its efficacy is limited. Further, data on the efficacy of PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibody (PD-1+CTLA-4) for the treatment of AM are limited. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of PD-1+CTLA-4 and PD-1 in the treatment of Japanese patients with advanced AM. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients with advanced AM who were treated with PD-1 or PD-1+CTLA-4 as first-line immunotherapy in 24 Japanese institutions between 2014 and 2020. Treatment efficacy focussing on the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 254 patients (palm and sole melanoma [PSM], n = 180; nail apparatus melanoma [NAM], n = 74) were included. Among the patients with PSM, the ORR (19% vs. 31%; P = 0.44), PFS (5.9 vs. 3.2 months; P = 0.74), and OS (23.1 vs. not reached; P = 0.55) did not differ significantly between the PD-1 and PD-1+CTLA-4 groups. Among the patients with NAM, the ORR (61% vs. 10%; P < 0.001) was significantly higher and PFS was longer (6.4 vs. 3.8 months; P = 0.10) in the PD-1+CTLA-4 group than in the PD-1 group. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that PD-1+CTLA-4 is an independent predictor of a favourable PFS in patients with NAM (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of PD-1+CTLA-4 is not superior to that of PD-1 for the treatment of advanced PSM. However, PD-1+CTLA-4 may be more efficacious than PD-1 for the treatment of advanced NAM.

Real-world efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody or combined anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, with or without radiotherapy, in advanced mucosal melanoma patients: A retrospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a lower efficacy in mucosal melanoma (MUM) than in cutaneous melanoma. The use of combination treatments with radiotherapy (RT) to improve the efficacy in MUM, however, requires further investigation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 225 advanced MUM patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD1; 115) or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy (PD1+CTLA4; 42) with or without RT (56 and 12, respectively). Treatment efficacy was estimated by determining the objective response rate (ORR) and survival rate with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics between the two groups in each ICI cohort were similar, except for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in the PD1 cohort. No significant differences in ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were observed between the PD1 alone and PD1+RT groups in the PD1 cohort (ORR 26% versus 27%, P > 0.99; median PFS 6.2 versus 6.8 months, P = 0.63; median OS 19.2 versus 23.1 months, P = 0.70) or between the PD1+CTLA alone and PD1+CTLA4+RT groups in the PD1+CTLA4 cohort (ORR 28% vs 25%, P = 0.62; median PFS 5.8 versus 3.5 months, P = 0.21; median OS 31.7 versus 19.8 months, P = 0.79). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that RT in addition to PD1 or PD1+CTLA4 did not have a positive impact on the PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged survival benefit with RT in combination with ICIs was not identified for advanced MUM patients, although RT may improve local control of the tumour and relieve local symptoms.