The Neurosurgical Atlas: advancing neurosurgical education in the digital age.

OBJECTIVE: The advent of the internet and the popularity of e-learning resources has promoted a shift in medical and surgical education today. The Neurosurgical Atlas has sought to capitalize on this shift by providing easily accessible video and online education to its users on an international scale. The rising popularity of social media has provided new avenues for expanding that global reach, and the Atlas has sought to do just that. In this study, the authors analyzed user demographics and web traffic patterns to quantify the international reach of the Atlas and examined the potential impact of social media platforms on the expansion of that reach. METHODS: Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram metrics were extracted using each respective service's analytics tool from the date of their creation through October 2019. Google Analytics was used to extract website traffic data from September 2018 to September 2019 and app data from January 2019 to October 2019. The metrics extracted included the number of platform users/followers, user demographic information, percentage of new versus returning visitors, and a number of platform-specific values. RESULTS: Since the authors' previous publication in 2017, annual website viewership has more than doubled to greater than 500,000 viewing sessions in the past year alone; international users accounted for more than 60% of the visits. The Atlas Twitter account, established in August 2012, has more than 12,000 followers, primarily hailing from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Saudi Arabia. The Atlas Facebook account, established in 2013, has just over 13,000 followers, primarily from India, Egypt, and Mexico. The Atlas Instagram account (established most recently, in December 2018) has more than 16,000 followers and the highest percentage (31%) of younger users (aged 18-24 years). The Atlas app was officially launched in May 2019, largely via promotion on the Atlas social media platforms, and has since recorded more than 60,000 viewing sessions, 80% of which were from users outside the United States. CONCLUSIONS: The Neurosurgical Atlas has attempted to leverage the many e-learning resources at its disposal to assist in spreading neurosurgical best practice on an international scale in a novel and comprehensive way. By incorporating multiple social media platforms into its repertoire, the Atlas is able to ensure awareness of and access to these resources regardless of the user's location or platform of preference. In so doing, the Atlas represents a novel way of advancing access to neurosurgical educational resources in the digital age.

Qualitative Methodology for Planning and Executing In-Person and Virtual Neurosurgery Educational Opportunities for Medical Students: Lessons Learned from Five Years of Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center Initiatives.

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing need for collaborative and broad-scale medical student neurosurgery educational initiatives. Here, we propose a comprehensive methodology and structure for hosting both in-person and virtual learning opportunities for early trainees interested in clinical neurosciences. METHODS: We conducted an internal review of educational courses hosted by Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center from 2017 to 2022. Inspired by the lessons learned from these activities, we examine the elements vital to the planning, production, funding, and execution of future programs. RESULTS: Six domains were deemed important for carrying out medical student neurosurgery educational opportunities: directorship, curriculum, logistics, faculty and instructor outreach, funding, and marketing. Each of these elements is discussed in detail for both in-person and web-based programs, as well as an examination of the advantages and disadvantages of various implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the Medical Student Neurosurgery Training Center experience, successful production and hosting of both in-person and virtual educational endeavors seems to be contingent on a collaborative effort by medical students, resident physicians, and neurosurgery faculty. Including medical students throughout the planning phase adds to the overall educational value of each experience and promotes program longevity and consumer engagement. Curricula should be guided by clear learning objectives and a variety of teaching modalities available to the organization. Finally, methods for assessing course outcomes are important, including institutional review board-approved data curation and analysis. Further investigation of neurosurgical learning outcome measurement is needed and has the potential to shape the future of medical student education and neurosurgery career preparation.

Efficacy of an opioid-sparing analgesic protocol in pain control after less invasive cranial neurosurgery.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid overuse in postoperative patients is a worrisome trend, and potential alternatives exist which warrant investigation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in treating postoperative cranial surgery pain has been hampered by concern for inadequate pain control and increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. A safe and effective alternative to opioid-based pain management is critical to improving postoperative care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether an NSAID-based opioid-sparing pain management protocol (OSP) is effective in analgesic control of less invasive cranial surgery patients at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperatively. Secondary aims included investigating differences in hemorrhagic complications. METHODS: Five hundred sixty-six consecutive patients who underwent cranial surgery before and after implementation of the celecoxib-based OSP were eligible. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in each cohort. RESULTS: The opioid-sparing cohort had lower pain scores at 6 hours (3.45 vs 4.19, P = 0.036), 12 hours (3.21 vs 4.00, P = 0.006), and 24 hours (2.90 vs 3.59, P = 0.010). Rates of postoperative hemorrhage were not significantly different (5% intervention vs 8% control, P = 0.527). The opioid-sparing pain management protocol provided comparable or better pain control in the first 24 hours after less invasive cranial surgery. Hemorrhage rates did not change with the use of an NSAID-based OSP. CONCLUSION: An effective alternative to the current standard opioid-based pain management is feasible for less invasive cranial surgery. Determinations of hemorrhage risk and more complex cranial surgery will require larger prospective randomized trials.

Neurosurgical implants and interactions of airport metal detectors: A review.

Intracranial and spinal implants are increasingly prevalent around the world, placed for a wide range of neurosurgical conditions. Patients with these devices, like many individuals, may have travel plans involving passage through metal detectors and other security screening devise. However, there are virtually no studies in the currently literature evaluating the safety and interaction of neurosurgical implants with these machines. This review of manufacturer information and existing literature serves as a compilation of this information, and our pre-travel recommendations for affected patients.