Older patients' perspectives toward lifestyle-related secondary cardiovascular prevention after a hospital admission-a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: lifestyle-related secondary prevention reduces cardiac events and is recommended irrespective of age. However, motivation may be influenced by age and disease progression. OBJECTIVE: to explore older cardiac patients' perspectives toward lifestyle-related secondary prevention after a hospital admission. METHODS: a generic qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were performed with cardiac patients ≥ 70 years within 3 months after a hospital admission. The interview guide was based on the Attitudes, Social influence and self-Efficacy (ASE) model. All interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: eight themes emerged which were linked to the determinants of the ASE-model. The three themes (i) Perspectives are determined by general health and habits, (ii) feeling the threat as a motivator and (iii) balancing between health benefits and quality of life (QoL), were linked to attitude. Regarding social influence, the themes (iv) feeling both encouraged and hindered by family members, and (v) the healthcare professional says so, were identified. For the self-efficacy determinant, (vi) experiences from previous lifestyle changes, (vii) integrating advice in daily life and (viii) feeling limited by functional impairments, emerged as themes. CONCLUSION: most older cardiac patients made no lifestyle modifications after the last hospital admission and balanced possible benefits against their QoL. Functional impairments frequently limit implementation, in particular of physical activity. Patients' preferences and patient-centred outcomes focusing on QoL and functional independence may be the starting point when healthcare professionals discuss lifestyle modification in older patients. The involvement of family members may help patients to integrate lifestyle-related secondary prevention in daily life.

Preoperative cardiac risk index predicts long-term mortality and health status.

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral arterial disease patients undergoing vascular surgery are known to be at risk for the occurrence of (late) cardiovascular events. Before surgery, the perioperative cardiac risk is commonly assessed using the Lee Risk Index score, a combination of 6 cardiac risk factors. This study assessed the predictive value of the Lee Risk Index for late mortality and long-term health status in patients after vascular surgery. METHODS: Between May and December 2004, data on 711 consecutive peripheral arterial disease patients undergoing vascular surgery were collected from 11 hospitals in the Netherlands. Before surgery, the Lee Risk Index was assessed in all patients. At 3-year follow-up, 149 patients died (21%) and the disease-specific Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) was completed in 84% (n=465) of the survivors. Impaired health status according to the PAQ was defined by the lowest tertile of the PAQ summary score. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic ability of the Lee Index for mortality and impaired health status at 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: The Lee Risk Index proved to be an independent prognostic factor for both late mortality (1 risk factor hazard ratio (HR)=2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.6; 2 risk factors HR=2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.0 and >or=3 risk factors HR=3.2; 95% CI, 1.7-6.2) and impaired health status at 3-year follow-up (1 risk factor odds ratio [OR]=2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5; 2 risk factors OR=2.9; 95% CI, 1.6-5.2 and >or=3 risk factors OR=3.2; 95% CI, 1.3-7.5). The predominant contributing factors associated with late mortality were cerebrovascular disease, insulin-dependent diabetes, and renal insufficiency. For impaired health status, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, insulin-dependent diabetes, and renal insufficiency were the prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative Lee Risk Index is not only an important prognostic factor for in-hospital outcome but also for late mortality and impaired health status in patients with peripheral arterial disease.