Identifying Risk Factors for Open Reduction in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) are the most common injuires of the elbow in children, often categorized by the Gartland classification. While type 1 and 2 fractures commonly managed conservatively, type 3 and 4 fractures typically require surgical treatment. Although closed reduction and percutaneous pinning have shown success, open reduction may be required in cases where adequate reduction cannot be achieved. This study aims to identify radiological and clinical risk factors associated with transitioning from closed reduction to open reduction in Gartland type 3 and 4 SCHF in children. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 159 patients operated on between 2014 and 2022 for Gartland type 3 and 4 SCHF. Parameters including age, gender, injury severity, time to surgery, neurovascular damage, medial spike angle, fracture-skin distance, medial-lateral deviation, rotation, fracture level, and Baumann angle were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 159 SCHF in children aged 3 to 12 years, classified as Gartland type 3 (106 patients, 66.6%) and type 4 (53 patients 33.4%), underwent surgical intervention. Notably, 46 patients (28.9%) initially managed with closed reduction exhibited failure, prompting the necessity for conversion to open reduction. Injury severity, lateral deviation, advanced age, low medial spike angle, and low fracture tip-to-skin distance were found to be factors that could potentially increase the need for open reduction (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the low medial spike angle, flexion type injury, and low fracture type increased the likelihood of open surgery (P<0.05). Sex, side, duration to surgery, and Baumann angle showed no significant associations. CONCLUSIONS: SCHF commonly necessitate surgical intervention in children. Although the risk factors for failed closed reduction and the need for open surgery have been discussed in the literature, there is no consensus. Preoperative planning, particularly for patients with specific factors like lateral deviation, advanced age, low medial spike angle, low fracture-to-skin distance and high injury severity, should consider potential open surgery requirements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Single Versus 3-incision Triple Pelvic Osteotomy: Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results.

BACKGROUND: Triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) is indicated when the anatomic and functional realignment of the hip joint is needed. Although the traditional approach for TPO involves a separate incision for ischial cut, there has been a trend for single-incision TPO in recent years. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiologic results of 2 different approaches. METHODS: Forty-two hips of 39 patients treated using TPO with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included in our cohort. Demographics, perioperative, and radiologic parameters were evaluated. Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool were used for clinical evaluation. RESULTS: A single anterolateral incision approach was used in 18 hips (17 patients), whereas a 3-incision approach was used in 24 hips (22 patients). The mean follow-up was 4.7 years in the 3-incision group and 3.8 years in the single-incision group ( P =0.43), with mean surgery age at 8.7 years (range, 5.4 to 12) for single-incision and 9.7 years (range, 7.7 to 11.7) for 3e-incision ( P =0.22). There were no significant differences observed between the 2 groups concerning radiographic measurements, complications, and functional scores. The mean surgical time was 118.6 minutes in the single-incision group and 97.9 minutes in 3-incision group ( P =0.036). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 181.7 ml in the single-incision group and 243.4 ml in 3-incision group ( P =0.028). Three-incision group demonstrated significantly higher intraoperative blood loss, leading to lower hemoglobin values ( P =0.042). CONCLUSION: The single-incision TPO demonstrated similar outcomes compared with the traditional 3-incision approach in terms of radiologic correction and functional improvement. The single-incision technique exhibited advantages such as reduced intraoperative blood loss and potential benefit of decreased pain due to fewer scars. However, it required a longer surgical time compared with the 3-incision approach. Surgeons should consider patient-specific factors and their expertise when selecting the most appropriate approach for each case. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative series.

Displaced sigmoid notch fracture and higher patient age are associated with distal radioulnar joint subluxation.

Background/aim: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are frequently associated with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the sigmoid notch and ulna styloid fracture types on DRUJ subluxation following closed reduction and casting of DRFs via calculating radioulnar ratio (RUR) on postreduction computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: In our study, postreduction CT images of 202 patients with distal radius fractures were evaluated retrospectively. CT images were evaluated for RUR, sigmoid notch fracture, and ulna styloid types. Sigmoid notch fractures were classified as nondisplaced in the sigmoid notch fractures (NDS) and displaced sigmoid notch (DS) fractures; ulna styloid fractures were grouped as the proximal half ulna styloid (PHUS) and distal half ulna styloid (DHUS) fractures. Results: The mean age of Rozental type 3b (62.8 years) was significantly higher among others. The mean RUR value was significantly higher in Rozental type 3a in compared to type 1a and type 2 fractures. PHUS fractures were more common with DS fractures than DHUS fractures. Conclusion: DS fractures and higher patient age are associated with DRUJ subluxation on postreduction CT images following DRFs. DS fractures are seen more commonly with PHUS fractures than DHUS. Patients with PHUS should be carefully assessed for sigmoid notch fractures and DRUJ congruency. These findings could be helpful for preoperative decision making in the treatment of DRFs.

Early results of a novel modular knee arthrodesis implant after uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications after non-fusion knee arthrodesis with a modular segmental intramedullary implant used for infected total knee arthroplasty revisions. METHODS: A retrospective review of the patients who had been surgically treated with a modular intramedullary arthrodesis implant for recurrent infection after revision TKA between January 2016 and February 2020 were included. The indications for arthrodesis were failed infected TKA with massive bone loss, deficient extensor mechanism and poor soft tissue coverage that precluded joint reconstruction with revision TKA implants. Clinical outcomes were assesed with visual analogue scale for pain (pVAS), Oxford knee score (OKS) and 12-item short form survey (SF-12). Full-length radiographs were used to verify limb length discrepancies (LLD). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (4 male and 10 female) patients with a mean age of 69.3 (range, 59 to 81) years at time of surgery were available for final follow-up at a mean of 28.8 months (range, 24-35 months). All clinical outcome scores improved at the final follow-up (pVAS, 8.5 to 2.6, p = .01; OKS, 12.6 to 33.8, p = .02; SF-12 physical, 22.9 to 32.1, p = .01 and SF-12 mental, 27.7 to 40.2, p = .01). The mean LLD was 1.0 cm (range, + 15 - 2.3 cm). Re-infection was detected in three patients (21.4%). Two patients were managed with suppressive antibiotic treatment and a third patient required repeat 2-stage revision procedure. In one patient, a periprosthetic femur fracture was observed and treated with plate osteosynthesis. CONCLUSION: Uncontrolled infection after total knee arthroplasty can be effectively treated with arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail and satisfactory functional results can be obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Retrospective cohort study.

Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems. OBJECTIVES: To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test-retest reliability were 0.904 (p < 0.05) for BPII 2.0 and 0.915 (p < 0.05) for NPI. There was a moderate correlation between the BPII 2.0 Turkish version and the Kujala score. There was a very high correlation between the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and Lysholm knee scores. An excellent negative correlation was found between Norwich and Kujala scores (r = -0.819, p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Norwich and Lysholm scores was -0.662, indicating a high negative correlation (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the Turkish version of BPII 2.0 and NPI were -0.533 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability.

Improving health-care planning for fracture patients in Türkiye: insights from a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The distribution of fractures may vary according to age and gender. In a country like Türkiye, which has high population density and covers a large geographical area, it is important to understand the regional variations in fractures and identify the health institutions in which patients seek treatment to plan new health-care investments effectively. The objective of our study was to investigate the distribution of fractures across the seven regions of Türkiye considering age, gender, and the level of health institutions the patients visited. METHODS: Between January 2021 and May 2023, the total number of fractures, locations of the fractures, patient age and gender, geographical regions, and levels of the health-care institutions to which the patients presented were examined through the e-Nabiz personal health record system. Age groups were divided into pediatric (0-19 years), adult (20-64 years), and geriatric (≥65 years) categories. Geographical regions included the Marmara, Central Anatolia, Black Sea, Eastern Anatolia, Aegean, Mediterranean, and Southeastern Anatolia regions. RESULTS: A total of 2,135,701 patients with 2,214,213 fractures were analyzed. Upper extremity fractures were the most common among all considered fracture groups (1,154,819 fractures, 52.2%). There were 643,547 fractures in the pediatric group, 1,191,364 fractures in the adult group, and 379,302 fractures in the geriatric group. While the total number of fractures was higher among men with 1,256,884 fractures (58.9%), the rate among women was higher in the geriatric group (67.2%). Geographically, the highest number of fractures was observed in the Marmara region (714,146 fractures), and 67.92% of all patients presented to secondary health-care institutions (1,500,780 fractures). The most commonly diagnosed fracture in the study population was distal radius fractures. The most common fracture in the geriatric group was femur fractures while distal radius fractures were the most common fractures in the adult and the pediatric groups. CONCLUSION: By understanding the distribution of fractures in Türkiye based on fracture site, geographical region, age, and gender, it becomes possible to improve the planning of patient access to health-care services. In regions with limited health resources, a more successful resource distribution can be achieved by considering fracture distributions and age groups.