RESUMEN
Following a proposal to emend Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes with guidelines for the naming of genera after geographical locations, I here report the outcome of the ballot on this proposal by the members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and present the guidelines to be incorporated in Appendix 9.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) now includes the categories domain and kingdom. For the purpose of the valid publication of their names under the ICNP, we consider here the two known domains, 'Bacteria' and 'Archaea', as well as a number of taxa suitable for the rank of kingdom, based on previous phylogenetic and taxonomic studies. It is proposed to subdivide the domain Bacteria into the kingdoms Bacillati, Fusobacteriati, Pseudomonadati and Thermotogati. This arrangement reflects contemporary phylogenetic hypotheses as well as previous taxonomic proposals based on cell wall structure, including 'diderms' vs. 'monoderms', Gracilicutes vs. Firmicutes, 'Negibacteria' vs. 'Unibacteria', 'Hydrobacteria' vs. 'Terrabacteria', and 'Hydrobacterida' vs. 'Terrabacterida'. The domain Archaea is proposed to include the kingdoms Methanobacteriati, Nanobdellati and Thermoproteati, reflecting the previous division into 'Euryarchaeota', 'DPANN superphylum' and 'TACK superphylum'.
Asunto(s)
Archaea , Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/química , Archaea/genéticaRESUMEN
The prokaryotic generic name Shuttleworthia Downes et al. 2002 is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of the plant genus Shuttleworthia Meisner 1840 and the mollusk genus Shuttleworthia Baker 1941 (Principle 2 and Rule 51b(5) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes). We therefore propose the replacement generic name Shuttleworthella, with type species Shuttleworthella satelles comb. nov. The prokaryotic generic name Tetrasphaera Maszenan et al. 2000 is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of Tetrasphaera Popofsky 1913 (Protozoa, Radiolaria) and of Tetrasphaera Górka 1965 (a fossil dinoflagellate) (Rule 51b(4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes). We therefore propose the replacement generic name Nostocoides, with type species Nostocoides japonicum comb. nov.
Asunto(s)
Actinomycetales , Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/química , ClostridialesRESUMEN
The recently proposed genus Allomuricauda Deshmukh and Oren 2023 is illegitimate because it includes the type species of the genera Flagellimonas Bae et al. 2007 and Spongiibacterium Yoon and Oh 2012, contravening Rule 51b(1) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. As Flagellimonas Bae et al. 2007 is the earlier described genus, we here reclassify 36 species earlier described as belonging to the illegitimate genus Muricauda as species of Flagellimonas. We also present an emended description of the genus Flagellimonas.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
In 2014, it was reported that the bacterial genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 was illegitimate due to the priority of the cyanobacterial genus name Rhodococcus Hansgirg 1884. Since that time, the consequences of this conclusion have been largely ignored, whilst changes have been made to relevant Rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, including significant changes to the way in which the Code treats the names of members of Cyanobacteriota. Given the complexity of the nomenclatural issues, we request the opinion of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes as to whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Rhodococcus , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes serves to administer the rules of prokaryotic nomenclature via the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, ensures the publication of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, and works to represent the interests of the microbiological disciplines regarding prokaryotic nomenclature. The functions and mechanisms of operation of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) are defined in its Statutes, which were last revised in 2019. As members of the 2020-2023 and the 2023-2026 ICSP Executive Board and the Judicial Commission, we propose here some further revisions to help improve the clarity and functionality of the Statutes.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
Halophilic archaea of the class Halobacteria are the most salt-requiring prokaryotes within the domain Archaea. In 1997, minimal standards for the description of new taxa in the order Halobacteriales were proposed. From then on, the taxonomy of the class Halobacteria provides an excellent example of how changing concepts on prokaryote taxonomy and the development of new methods were implemented. The last decades have witnessed a rapid expansion of the number of described taxa within the class Halobacteria coinciding with the era of genome sequencing development. The current members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Halobacteria propose these revisions to the recommended minimal standards and encourage the use of advanced technologies in the taxonomic description of members of the Halobacteria. Most previously required and some recommended minimal standards for the description of new taxa in the class Halobacteria were retained in the present revision, but changes have been proposed in line with the new methodologies. In addition to the 16S rRNA gene, the rpoB' gene is an important molecular marker for the identification of members of the Halobacteria. Phylogenomic analysis based on concatenated conserved, single-copy marker genes is required to infer the taxonomic status of new taxa. The overall genome relatedness indexes have proven to be determinative in the classification of the taxa within the class Halobacteria. Average nucleotide identity, digital DNA-DNA hybridization, and average amino acid identity values should be calculated for rigorous comparison among close relatives.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Halobacteriales , Filogenia , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Ácidos Grasos/química , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Composición de BaseRESUMEN
Following an electronic discussion on proposals to emend Rules 8, 15, 22, 25a, 30(3)(b), 30(4), 34a, and Appendix 7 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, I here report the outcome of the ballot on these proposals by the members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
Following an electronic discussion on proposals to emend Principle 8, Rules 5b, 8, 15, 33a, and Appendix 7 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP), I here report the outcome of the ballot on these proposals by the members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. These emendations enact the addition of the categories of kingdom and domain to the ICNP.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Composición de Base , ADN Bacteriano/genética , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
Observations made after introduction of the phylum category into the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) indicate that the addition of a category should usually be conducted before informal names at that rank become widely used. It is thus investigated whether it would be beneficial to add further categories. An extrapolation from the number of names validly published under the ICNP at the distinct principal categories was conducted. This extrapolation indicated that two principal ranks above phylum rank would also harbour validly published names if the according categories were covered by the ICNP. The appropriate categories would be kingdom and domain, regarded as separate principal ranks. The benefit from introducing these ranks is confirmed by analysing the previous taxonomic activity above phylum level and the nomenclatural problems associated with this activity. An etymological examination of the way names of taxa above genus level are formed under distinct codes of nomenclature provides hints for implementing additional categories. According emendations of the ICNP are proposed to include kingdom and domain as a means of further stabilizing prokaryotic nomenclature.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The validation of the name of a prokaryotic taxon under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) is occasionally attempted although the original proposal of the name does not meet all requirements. The publication of a corrigendum is necessary in such a case but authors must ensure that the corrigendum contains the full description of the respective taxon. The modification of the original article is not compatible with the ICNP. One requirement for valid publication is that the effective publication of a taxon name constitutes a permanent record. Journals which modify articles after publication are not acceptable as a source of effective publications.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/química , ElectrónicaRESUMEN
The International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) now includes the phylum category. For the purpose of the valid publication of their names under the ICNP, we consider here four phyla. Slightly modified descriptions of 'Abditibacteriota' Tahon et al. 2018 and 'Desulfobacterota' Waite et al. 2020 are provided to meet the requirements of the ICNP for phylum names. Methanobacteriota is proposed as a substitute for 'Euryarchaeota' Garrity and Holt 2021, while Nanobdellota is proposed to replace 'Nanoarchaeota' Huber et al. 2002, based on the genus Nanobdella Kato et al. 2022.
Asunto(s)
Euryarchaeota , Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
Appendix 9, Section E of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes provides guidelines on how to form adjectival specific and subspecific epithets that reflect the geographical location where the organism was found or studied. It does not mention ways of naming genera after geographical locations. We here propose emendation of Appendix 9 with the recommendations on how to form such names. Comments on the implementation of the current wording of Appendix 9, Section E are also made.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Aprepitant , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The prokaryotic generic names Holzapfelia Zheng et al. 2020 and Litoricola Kim et al. 2007 are illegitimate because they are later homonyms of the names Holzapfelia Cossmann 1901, an extinct genus of molluscs (Neogastropoda) and Litoricola Woodward 1873, an extinct genus of crustaceans (Arthropoda), respectively (Principle 2 and Rule 51b(4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes). We therefore propose the replacement generic name Holzapfeliella with type species Holzapfeliella floricola comb. nov. and the replacement generic name Litorivicinus with replacement name Litorivicinus lipolyticus for the type species, the replacement name Litorivicinus marinus, and the family name Litorivicinaceae to replace the illegitimate name Litoricolaceae Kim et al. 2007.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Gammaproteobacteria , Animales , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The prokaryotic generic names Thalassobius Arahal et al. 2005 and Yangia Dai et al. 2006 are illegitimate because they are later homonyms of the genus names Thalassobius Solier 1849 (Coleoptera) and Yangia Zheng 1997 (fossil Rodentia), respectively Principle two and Rule 51b(4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes]. We therefore propose the replacement generic names Thalassovita and Alloyangia, with type species Thalassovita gelatinovora and Alloyangia pacifica, respectively.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Rhodobacteraceae , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The prokaryotic generic names Eoetvoesia Felföldi et al. 2014, Paludicola Li et al. 2017, Rivicola Sheu et al. 2014 and Sala Song et al. 2023 are illegitimate because they are later homonyms of the genus names Eoetvoesia Schulzer et al. 1866 (Ascomycota), Paludicola Wagler 1830 (Amphibia) and Paludicola Hodgson 1837 (Aves), Rivicola Fitzinger 1833 (Mollusca) and Sala Walker 1867 (Hemiptera) and the subgenus name Sala Ross 1937 (Hymenoptera), respectively (Principle 2 and Rule 51b(4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes). We therefore propose the replacement generic names Eoetvoesiella, Paludihabitans, Rivihabitans and Salella, with type species Eoetvoesiella caeni, Paludihabitans psychrotolerans, Rivihabitans pingtungensis and Sallella cibi, respectively.
Asunto(s)
Alcaligenaceae , Lactobacillales , Neisseriaceae , Filogenia , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The prokaryotic generic names Gramella Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005, Melitea Urios et al. 2008 and Nicolia Oliphant et al. 2022 are illegitimate because they are later homonyms of the names Gramella Kozur 1971, a genus of fossil ostracods, Melitea Péron and Lesueur 1810 (Scyphozoa, Cnidaria), Melitea Lamouroux 1812 (Anthozoa, Cnidaria), Nicolia Unger 1842, an extinct plant genus, and Nicolia Gibson-Smith and Gibson-Smith 1979 (Bivalvia, Mollusca), respectively (Principle 2 and Rule 51b(4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes). For Gramella, we therefore propose the replacement generic name Christiangramia with type species Christiangramia echinicola comb. nov. and we propose the reclassification of 18 other species of Gramella in the genus Christiangramia as new combinations. In addition, we propose the replacement generic names Neomelitea with type species Neomelitea salexigens comb. nov. and Nicoliella with type species Nicoliella spurrieriana comb. nov.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Gammaproteobacteria , Composición de Base , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Ácidos Grasos/química , Filogenia , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Técnicas de Tipificación BacterianaRESUMEN
The prokaryotic generic name Pseudospirillum Satomi et al. 2002 is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of Pseudospirillum Alexeieff 1917, a genus of uncertain affiliation, possibly belonging to the Mesomycetozoa (Principle 2 and Rule 51b(5) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes). We therefore propose the replacement generic name Allopseudospirillum, with type species Allopseudospirillum japonicum.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Oceanospirillaceae , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The prokaryotic generic names Muricauda Bruns et al. 2001 and Franklinella Bernard et al. 2022 are illegitimate because they are later homonyms of the genus names Muricauda Small 1903 (synonym of Arisaema; Tracheophyta - Liliopsida - Araceae) and Franklinella Stewart and Hendrix 1945 (a Devonian ostracod genus) and Franklinella Lenz 1973 (a Devonian brachiopod genus), respectively (Principle 2 and Rule 51b(4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes). We therefore propose the replacement generic names Allomuricauda and Allofranklinella, with type species Allomuricauda ruestringensis and Allofrankinella schreckenbergeri, respectively.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Grasos , Filogenia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Ácidos Grasos/químicaRESUMEN
The aim of this study is to analyse prokaryotic names which honour persons, eponyms, from a gender perspective. Data were retrieved from the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature. Excluding new combinations, the etymologies of 23â315 unique names at the rank of genus, species and subspecies were analysed. A total of 2018 (8.7â%) names honour persons (eponyms), for which the development of the female share over time was further investigated. Women started to be honoured very recently (1947) compared to men (1823). Moreover, only 14.8â% of all prokaryotic eponyms refer to females. This ratio has hardly improved since 1947, although the number of women whose contributions to microbiology could have been recognized has increased over time. In contrast, about 50â% of prokaryotic names derived from mythological characters refer to females. To reduce this gender gap, we encourage authors proposing new taxon names to honour female scientists who can serve as role models for new generations.