RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess predictors of length of stay for simple gastroschisis utilizing the NSQIP-Pediatric Database. METHODS: The NSQIP-P Participant Use Data File was queried to identify patients with simple gastroschisis. We defined short length of stay (LOS) as patients discharged home ≤ 30 days from birth. We compared patients with short LOS versus prolonged LOS > 30 days. Predictors and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 888 patients with simple gastroschisis identified. Half of patients had LOS ≤ 30 days. Patients with LOS ≤ 30 were younger at repair (median age 1 day vs. 3 days, p = 0.0001), had higher birth weight (median 2.5 kg vs. 2.4 kg, p = 0.0001), and were less premature (37 week vs. 36 weeks, p = 0.0001). However, only gestational age and weight at birth were significant predictors of LOS on multivariate analysis (p = 0.0001). Prolonged LOS patients had more instances of ventilation, oxygen supplementation, sepsis (n = 2/446 or 0.4% vs. n = 9/442 or 2%, p = 0.003), bleeding/transfusion (n = 7/446 or 1.6% vs. n = 43/442 or 9.7%, p = 0.0001), line infections (n = 1/446 or 0.2% vs. n = 12/442, p = 0.001), and reoperations (n = 9/446 or 2% vs. n = 26/442 or 5.9%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Prematurity and birth weight are significant predictors of length of stay in simple gastroschisis patients. Prenatal counseling should continue to be one of the main factors to improve the outcomes for patients with gastroschisis. Type of study Retrospective cohort study. Level of evidence Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Gastrosquisis , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Peso al Nacer , Niño , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate a complicated appendicitis clinical practice guideline at our institution. METHODS: Records were compared before and after protocol implementation. We standardized an ED consult pathway, antibiotic use and need for early appendectomy (EA) versus interval appendectomy (IA). We evaluated demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients with small abscess treated with IA pre-protocol versus similar patients treated by EA post-protocol. RESULTS: In total 246 patients were reviewed (Pre-protocol = 152, Post-protocol = 94). Pre-protocol early appendectomy rate was 51% versus 82% on post-protocol patients. There were no differences in demographics. Post-protocol the use of preoperative imaging significantly decreased (Pre 92% vs. 56%, p = 0.0001), as well as the use of discharge antibiotics (Pre 93% vs. Post 27%, p = 0.0001) with no change in abscess rate. Overall, post-protocol patients had fewer total CT scans performed (Pre 40% vs. Post 28%, p = 0.03) and decreased total length of stay (Pre 7.7 vs. Post 6.5 days, p = 0.049). On subgroup analysis, post-protocol EA with no or small abscess had lower median number of admissions, decreased total LOS (Pre IA 9 days vs. Post EA 5 days, p = 0.00001) and fewer complications (Pre IA 42% vs. EA 22%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The establishment of a standardized pediatric complicated appendicitis protocol may lead to improved outcomes and resource utilization. Patients presenting with no or small abscess may be the least likely to benefit from interval appendectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Absceso/complicaciones , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although literature is sparse, there are guidelines regarding optimal placement technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters in the pediatric population. Through this study, we sought to identify commonly used techniques among pediatric surgeons and identify areas for future work. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 16-question anonymous survey was emailed to American Pediatric Surgery Association members in September 2018 regarding routine practices for PD catheter placement. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. RESULTS: In all, there were 221 respondents, 6.8% of whom did not place PD catheters in their practice. Of the remaining 206, the majority have been in practice >15 y. PD catheter placement during fellowship training varied widely, with 6.5% reporting no fellowship experience to 6% reporting >25 placed during fellowship. Almost half (48%) reported placing catheters via laparoscopic approach (versus open or combined approach). Most (62%) respondents reported an annual practice volume of 1-5 catheters, with only 11% placing >10 per year. Exit-site sutures were placed "always" by 33% of participants and "never" by 49% of participants. There was no association between years in practice or fellowship experience and exit-site suture placement. However, there was a trend for "never" placement (72%) with more recent graduates. Omentectomy was performed by 91% of respondents, whereas 8.3% reported never performing omentectomy/omentopexy. Similarly, there was no association between practice and fellowship experience and omentectomy. In the setting of abdominal stoma, 96% reported placing the exit site on the opposite side of the abdomen. Fibrin glue was used along the tunnel by 21% of participants, ranging from "always" to "sometimes", whereas 79% "never" used it. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowship, posttraining experience, and techniques in PD catheter placement vary widely among American Pediatric Surgery Association member respondents. Despite guidelines, practices differ among providers without an association between the number of cases performed in fellowship and postfellowship volume.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Cateterismo/normas , Catéteres de Permanencia , Niño , Preescolar , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Epiplón/cirugía , Diálisis Peritoneal/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/normas , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between open versus laparoscopic gastrostomies in children aged ≤1 y. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database was reviewed between 2012 and 2017. Chi-square analysis was performed on children aged ≤1 y to compare complication rates between open and laparoscopic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 7940 patients were aged ≤1 y. Of which, 20% underwent open gastrostomy (OGT), and 80% received laparoscopic gastrostomy (LGT). There were no differences in sex or race. However, OGT patients were younger (119 d versus 134 d; P = 0.0001), smaller at birth (1.84 kg versus 1.85 kg; P = 0.03), and were smaller at operation (4.6 kg versus 5 kg; P = 0.0001). Also, patients were more likely to be inpatient at the time of surgery and had more congenital malformations. Complications (OGT 6% versus LGT 4%; P = 0.001) and mortality were significantly higher in the open group (OGT 2.3% versus LGT 0.6%; P = 0.001). However, matched control analysis demonstrated OGT patients have more complications. CONCLUSIONS: OGT patients are smaller and with more significant comorbidities in this data set. In fact, even after matched control analysis, these patients experience more complications.
Asunto(s)
Gastrostomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Gastrostomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Screening blood work after minor injuries is common in pediatric trauma. The risk of missed injuries versus diagnostic necessity in an asymptomatic patient remains an ongoing debate. We evaluated the clinical utility of screening blood work in carefully selected asymptomatic children after minor trauma. METHODS: Patients seen at a level 1 pediatric center with "minor trauma" for blunt trauma between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were age <4 of >18 years, a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <15, penetrating trauma, nonaccidental trauma, hemodynamic instability, abdominal findings (pain, distension, bruising, tenderness), hematuria, pelvic/femur fracture, multiple fractures, and operative intervention. Data abstraction included demographics, blood work, interventions, and disposition. RESULT: A total of 1308 patients were treated during the study period. Four hundred thirty-three (33%) met inclusion criteria. Mean ± SD age was 12.7 ± 4 years (range, 4-18 years), and 59% were male. Seventy-eight percent were discharged home from the emergency department. All patients had blood work. Twenty-eight percent had at least one abnormal laboratory value. The most common abnormal blood work was leukocytosis (16%). Thirty percent had an intervention, and none prompted by abnormal blood work. One patient had an intra-abdominal finding (psoas hematoma). CONCLUSION: When appropriately selected, screening laboratory testing in asymptomatic minor pediatric blunt trauma patients leads to unnecessary needle sticks without significant advantage.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja , Heridas no Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Purpose: Outcomes between primary gastrostomy tubes and buttons (G-tube and G-button) have not been established in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that primary G-tube have decreased complications when compared to G-button. Methods: A retrospective review of surgically placed gastrostomy devices from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, outcomes and 90-day complications. We divided the patients into primary G-tube and primary G-button. Results: Of 265 patients, 142 (53.6%) were male. Median age and weight at the time of surgery were 7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2-44 months) and 6.70 kg (IQR, 3.98-14.15 kg), respectively. Among the groups, G-tube had 80 patients (30.2%) while G-button 185 patients (69.8%). There were 153 patients with at least one overall complication within 90 days postoperative. There was no significant difference in overall complications between groups (G-tube 63.8% vs. G-button 55.7%, p=0.192). More importantly, there were no significant differences in major complications among the groups, G-tube vs. G-button (5% vs. 4%; p=0.455). Conclusion: Primary G-tube offers no significant advantage in overall, minor or major complications when compared to primary G-button.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate recurrence rates of gallstone pancreatitis in children undergoing early vs interval cholecystectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, retrospective review of pediatric patients admitted with gallstone pancreatitis from 2010 through 2017 was performed. Children were evaluated based on timing of cholecystectomy. Early cholecystectomy was defined as surgery during the index admission, whereas the delayed group was defined as no surgery or surgery after discharge. Outcomes, recurrence rates, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 246 patients from 6 centers with gallstone pancreatitis, 178 (72%) were female, with mean age 13.5 ± 3.2 years and a mean body mass index of 28.9 ± 15.2. Most (90%) patients were admitted with mild pancreatitis (Atlanta Classification). Early cholecystectomy was performed in 167 (68%) patients with no difference in early cholecystectomy rates across institutions. Delayed group patients weighed less (61 kg vs. 72 kg, p = 0.003) and were younger (12 vs. 14 years, p = 0.001) than those who underwent early cholecystectomy. However, there were no differences in clinical, radiological, or laboratory characteristics between groups. There were 4 (2%) episodes of postoperative recurrent pancreatitis in the early group compared with 22% in the delayed group. More importantly, when cholecystectomy was delayed more than 6 weeks from index discharge, recurrence approached 60%. There were no biliary complications in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Cholecystectomy during the index admission for children with gallstone pancreatitis reduces recurrent pancreatitis. Recurrence proportionally increases with time when patients are treated with a delayed approach.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Biliares , Pancreatitis , Adolescente , Niño , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Cálculos Biliares/complicaciones , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Recurrencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Primary Nocturnal Enuresis (PNE), obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are suggested to share a complex interaction whereby risk for PNE is increased when obesity and airway obstruction are present. We aimed to evaluate whether surgical or medical management of OSA in the treatment of patients with PNE and improves PNE outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Our institutions electronic medical record was queried for patients who underwent a pediatric diagnostic polysomnogram (PDPSG) for the complaint of PNE between October 2010 and September 2020 and were diagnosed with OSA. Retrospective chart review was performed of the 59 patients identified. Patients were divided based on therapy type for their OSA. Groups included those no therapy, any therapy which includes patients undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) and/or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and those who chose T&A. Primary outcome was to evaluate effects of treating OSA with T&A and effects on PNE outcome based on International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) definitions of complete, partial or no improvement. Separate grouping based on ICCS PNE outcome were also made for evaluation of variables associated with each group. Secondary outcome evaluated role of BMI in success of treatments of PNE. Chi-squared and one-way ANOVA tests were performed. RESULTS: 59 patients (64.4% male, mean age at diagnosis 8.8 years old) underwent a PDPSG for PNE. Monosymptomatic PNE was diagnosed in 40.7% while 32.2% had non-monosymptomatic PNE and the remainder were unknown. Patients were predominantly Caucasian (47.5%), with an average BMI of 20.6 kg/m2 25 patients underwent no therapy for their OSA while the remaining 34 received treatment. No statistically significant difference between those receiving and those forgoing therapy were noted in age, race, gender, BMI, type of PNE or Apnea-Hypopnea Index. There was also so significant difference in ICCS defined enuresis outcomes (p = 0.871) with over 60% in both groups experiencing resolution or improvement. Follow up was significantly different between cohorts, measured at 43 months for those receiving therapy for OSA and 29.1 months for those forgoing therapy. When considering only those who chose T&A as their therapy for PNE, there were once again, no significant differences between groups including ICCS enuresis outcome. Sub-grouping based on ICCS enuresis outcome revealed no associations between variables measured and improvement of PNE (p > 0.05), other than defining type of PNE (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In patients with OSA and PNE, surgical treatment of airway obstruction had no effect on resolution of PNE.
Asunto(s)
Enuresis Nocturna , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Tonsilectomía , Adenoidectomía , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enuresis Nocturna/diagnóstico , Enuresis Nocturna/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trisomy 18 is associated with a wide range of potentially fatal congenital conditions. Historically, clinical attitudes on treatment have been ambiguous, with palliative care as the standard of care. The aim of our study was to provide a descriptive analysis of surgical outcomes in patients with trisomy 18. STUDY DESIGN: We identified patients with trisomy 18 aged 0-18 years using the NSQIP-Pediatric database from 2012 to 2017 and analyzed demographics, surgery types, and perioperative characteristics of patients with trisomy 18 patients undergoing surgical intervention. Additionally, a case-match analysis was performed to assess surgical outcome differences. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients with trisomy 18 were identified. Thirty-one percent were >5 years of age and 73% were female. The most common surgical types were general surgery procedures (57.4%), followed by orthopedics (18.1%) and ENT (10.3%). Operations performed increased from 8% (2012) to 26% (2017), and only 23% of patients had previous cardiac surgery. Majority of patients had no prior history of malignancy (95%) and 5% had a tracheostomy placed. Discharge to home was achieved in 74% of patients, with a median total hospital length of stay of 5 days (IQR 17). Furthermore, 90% survived over 30 days from the operation. Thirty-two patients had readmissions and the most common reasons were dehydration, gastrostomy infection or malfunction. Surgical site infections occurred in <3% of patients. No differences in complications, length of stay, reoperations, and readmissions were identified by case-match analysis. CONCLUSION: In this data set, patients with trisomy 18 undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures experience excellent surgical outcomes with minimal morbidity and low mortality. Most patients more than a year of age will experience similar outcomes to patients without trisomy 18. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study (retrospective comparative study) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18 , Adolescente , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Síndrome de la Trisomía 18/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) treated with primary peritoneal drain versus primary laparotomy. METHODS: We performed a multi-institution retrospective review of infants with diagnosis of SIP from 2012 to 2016. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between infants treated with primary peritoneal drain vs infants treated with laparotomy. RESULTS: We identified 171 patients treated for SIP (drain nâ¯=â¯110 vs. laparotomy nâ¯=â¯61). There were no differences in maternal or prenatal characteristics. There were no clinically significant differences in vital signs, white blood cell or platelet measures, up to 48â¯h after intervention. Patients who were treated primarily with a drain were more premature (24.9 vs. 27.2â¯weeks, pâ¯<â¯0.001) and had lower median birth weight (710â¯g vs. 896â¯g, pâ¯<â¯0.001). No significant differences were found in complications, time to full feeds, length of stay (LOS) or mortality between the groups. Primary laparotomy group had more procedures (median number 1 vs. 2, pâ¯=â¯0.002). There were 32 (29%) primary drain failures whereby a laparotomy was ultimately needed. CONCLUSIONS: SIP treated with primary drain is successful in the majority of patients with no significant differences in outcomes when compared to laparotomy with stoma. THE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Laparotomía , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Masculino , Peritoneo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a known complication in patients with solid organ transplant. It can present as localized or disseminated tumor. The cornerstone of management consists of reduced immunosuppression (RI). In select cases, localized disease can potentially be curative with surgical excision. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Here we present a case of a 19-year-old female with orthotopic heart transplant with two episodes of recurrent PTLD. After the second episode she was found to have asymptomatic splenic lesions which were refractory to RI and chemotherapy. She subsequently underwent splenectomy that showed sterile necrotizing and non-necrotizing granulomas with no evidence of PTLD. DISCUSSION: Based on our literature search this is the first ever reported case of sterile granulomas in a patient with recurrent PTLD which could potentially be diagnosed with minimally invasive biopsy rather than diagnostic splenectomy. CONCLUSION: This report is an attempt to create awareness regarding potential for presence of sterile granulomas in patients with recurrent PTLD and discuss the use of percutaneous biopsy before splenectomy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a rare condition in children. Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU), a complication of PUD has an estimated mortality between 1.3% and 20%. We evaluate incidence and outcomes of PPU in children using an administrative database, perform a review of the literature, and report our technique for laparoscopic omental patch repair for PPU in two pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kids' inpatient database (KID's) was analyzed for demographics, incidence, and outcomes. Incidence for each year was calculated based on the reported pediatric population in the United States for 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 by the U.S. Census Bureau. Additionally, we present two PPU cases, accompanied by a comprehensive review of the literature. RESULTS: The annual number of primary discharge diagnosis of PPU in the KID was 178 cases for 2000, 252 for 2003, 255 for 2006, 299 for 2009, and 266 for 2012. An increase trend over time was noted between 2000 and 2009; however, it was not statistically significant (0.05). PPU appears to be more common in Caucasian teenage boys. The mean length of stay was 8.02 days and with a statistically significant increase in healthcare charges ($33,187 versus $78,142, P = .002) when comparing year 2000-2012. DISCUSSION: PPU is a rare cause of abdominal pain in children, but still a PUD complication that requires surgery. PPU should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain of uncertain etiology and pneumoperitoneum. Laparoscopy is both diagnostic and therapeutic. Laparoscopic omental patch repair is a safe and effective treatment for PPUs.
Asunto(s)
Epiplón/trasplante , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/economía , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etnología , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is the most common teratoma presenting at birth. Life-threatening bleeding is a major complication during tumor excision in children. In this study we demonstrate our technique for laparoscopic division of median sacral artery (MSA) during dissection of SCT in 2 pediatric patients as a safe technique to minimize risk of hemorrhage. METHODS: Two female infants diagnosed with types III and IV SCTs underwent preoperative evaluation in the postnatal period. The first patient was an 18-month-old girl who presented with metastatic type IV teratoma, resected after neoadjuvant therapy, and the second patient was a 6-day-old girl with prenatal diagnosis of cystic type III teratoma. Using laparoscopy in both patients, the presacral space was reached by opening the peritoneal reflection with blunt dissection and the MSA was identified. Then it was carefully isolated and divided with 3 or 5 mm sealing device. The pelvic components of the tumors were partially dissected using laparoscopy. The first patient's tumor resection was completed using a posterior sagittal approach and the second patient required a standard Chevron incision. Along with the description of our technique, a review of the current literature for the management of SCT and MSA was performed. RESULTS: Both patients underwent successful laparoscopic division of the MSA and resection of the SCTs without complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic MSA division before SCT excision offers a safe approach that can reduce the risk of hemorrhage during surgery.
Asunto(s)
Arterias/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Disección/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Teratoma/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Neoplasias Pélvicas/irrigación sanguínea , Región Sacrococcígea , Sacro/irrigación sanguínea , Teratoma/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To compare outcomes for complicated appendicitis treated with early versus interval appendectomy and to identify which patients would likely benefit from early appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of complicated appendicitis was performed from 2010 to 2015. Patients were divided into early (EA) versus interval appendectomy (IA) groups. We compared demographics, complications and outcomes. Pearson's Chi square analysis and Student's T test analysis were performed. RESULTS: We identified 316 patients (EA group 53% vs. IA group 47%). Interval appendectomy group had longer symptom duration [IA 3.8 vs. EA 2.3 days (p = 0.0001)], increased leukocytosis [IA 18.7 vs. EA 17.2 (p = 0.008)], more initial abscesses [IA 35% vs. EA 13% (p = 0.0001)], more complications [IA 30% vs. EA 19%, (p = 0.013) and prolonged total length of stay [(LOS), p = 0.009]. Subgroup analysis of all patients revealed 80% of patients presented with ≤3 cm abscess and duration of symptoms (DOS) ≤5 days. Interval appendectomy patients with DOS ≤5 days and or ≤3 cm abscess on admission had no differences in clinical presentation. However, these patients had prolonged total LOS (IA 7.7 vs. EA 6.3 days, p = 0.01) and increased complications (IA 29% vs. EA 19%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with complicated appendicitis in children present with small abscess (≤3 cm) and short symptom duration (≤5 days). This subset of patients might benefit from early appendectomy due to decreased LOS, resource utilization and reduced complications.
Asunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Absceso/diagnóstico por imagen , Absceso/patología , Algoritmos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Introduction: Although rare, major complications after gastrostomy tube placement are a significant source of morbidity in children. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of major complications in pediatric patients undergoing gastrostomy placement. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of surgically placed gastrostomy tubes from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, outcomes, and major complications. We divided the patients into no complications (Group 1) and major complications (Group 2). Excluded were minor complications and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedures. Results: Of 123 patients, 51.5% were males and 52% infants. Group 1 had 112 patients (91%), whereas Group 2 had 11 patients (9%). Of Group 2 patients, 3 required prolonged nil per os/total parenteral nutrition and 8 surgical reinterventions. Laparoscopy in 110 patients (89%), open surgery in 10 patients (8%), and 3 conversions to open. There were no significant differences in demographics or preoperative characteristics (albumin and comorbidities). We identified surgical approach (open: 6.3% versus 27.3%, P = .014), operative time (58 versus 85 minutes, P = .04), and use of preoperative antibiotics (63% versus 92%, P = .004) as predictors of outcomes. However, on multivariate analysis lack of preoperative antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 14.82 [confidence interval: 2.60-84.34], P = .002), and open procedure (aOR, 6.14 [1.01-37.24], P = .049) were independent predictors of major complications. Conclusion: Most patients with major complications after gastrostomy tube placement require surgical reintervention. Lack of preoperative antibiotics and open procedures are independent predictive factors for major complication in patients undergoing gastrostomy tube placement.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Gastrostomía , Intubación Gastrointestinal , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Intubación Gastrointestinal/métodos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
For decades, parenteral nutrition (PN) has been a successful method for intravenous delivery of nutrition and remains an essential therapy for individuals with intolerance of enteral feedings or impaired gut function. Although the benefits of PN are evident, its use does not come without a significant risk of complications. For instance, parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (PNALD)-a well-described cholestatic liver injury-and atrophic changes in the gut have both been described in patients receiving PN. Although several mechanisms for these changes have been postulated, data have revealed that the introduction of enteral nutrition may mitigate this injury. This observation has led to the hypothesis that gut-derived signals, originating in response to the presence of luminal contents, may contribute to a decrease in damage to the liver and gut. This review seeks to present the current knowledge regarding the modulation of what is known as the "gutâ»liver axis" and the gut-derived signals which play a role in PN-associated injury.