Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 72(3): 332-338, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31833332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frozen section analysis (FSA) is frequently performed during partial nephrectomy (PN). We investigate the utility of intraoperative FSA by evaluating its impact on final surgical margin (SM) status. METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 2005, a series of patients who were treated with open PN for renal cell carcinoma was prospectively analyzed. During PN, each patient underwent a FSA on renal parenchyma distal margin. If FSA was positive for infiltration a deeper excision was performed till obtaining a negative FSA. SM outcome of the FSA was compared with the final pathology report. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cost analysis on the FSA performed were analyzed. RESULTS: A total number of 373 patients were enrolled. FSA was performed in all the patients considered for PN. Fifteen patients had a conversion to radical nephrectomy. Positive SMs at the definitive pathological outcome were found in 36 patients (9.6%). FSA was positive in eight patients (2.1%). In that eight cases after a deeper excision the definitive pathological outcome on SM was still positive in two cases. FSA revealed just 14.3% of the positive SM. Patients with positive SM had a worse follow up considering RFS (P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that FSA did not considerably contribute to prevent recurrence (P=0.35). 1438 euros was the mean cost of performing a FSA during PN. CONCLUSIONS: FSA during PN does not reduce the risk of positive SMs. The use of FSA has also a higher cost related to the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Secciones por Congelación , Nefrectomía/métodos , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/economía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Femenino , Secciones por Congelación/economía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renales/economía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/economía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Nefrectomía/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Urology ; 90: 131-5, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26776562

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of penile Doppler ultrasound (PDU) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative diagnostic evaluation of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis on patients presenting with clinical diagnosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma from 6 different European hospitals between 2012 and 2014 was carried out. Each patient who had planned an organ sparing approach underwent an MRI and PDU both with an artificial erection with prostaglandin E 1. Age, evidence of MRI or PDU corpora cavernosa infiltration, frozen section examination report, definitive pathological report, and surgical approach used per patient were recorded. Accuracy, precision, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Outcomes were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 67.35 ± 15.45 (range 51-82). All of the patients were treated surgically. Of the 200 patients, 135 (67.5%) underwent a corpora sparing approach, whereas 65 had a partial penectomy because of the frozen section outcome. About corpora cavernosa infiltration, the definitive outcome confirmed the frozen section examination. PDU vs MRI accuracy was 96.5% vs 90.5%; precision was 92.6% vs 96%; sensitivity was 96.9% vs 73.8%, specificity was 96.2% vs 98.5%. Despite sensitivity (P <.05) no statistical evidence was found between ultrasound and MRI. CONCLUSION: PDU has a statistical similar outcome on detecting infiltration of corpora cavernosa and could be used as a less expensive tool to drive surgical strategy in patient with a diagnosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias del Pene/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Pene/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA