Pan-Canadian consensus recommendations for proton beam therapy access in Canada.

PURPOSE: Proton Beam Therapy (PBT)is a treatment option for select cancer patients. It is currently not available in Canada. Assessment and referral processes for out-of-country treatment for eligible patients vary by jurisdiction, leading to variability in access to this treatment for Canadian cancer patients. The purpose of this initiative was to develop a framework document to inform consistent and equitable PBT access for appropriate patients through the creation of pan-Canadian PBT access consensus recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified Delphiprocess was used to develop pan-Canadian recommendations with input from 22 PBT clinical and administrative experts across all provinces, external peer-review by provincial cancer and system partners, and feedback from a targeted community consultation. This was conducted by electronic survey and live discussion. Consensus threshold was set at 70% agreement. RESULTS: Fourconsensus rounds resulted in a final set of 27 recommendations divided into three categories: patient eligibility (n = 9); program level (n = 10); and system level (n = 8). Patient eligibility included: anatomic site (n = 4), patient characteristics (n = 3), clinical efficacy (n = 2). Program level included: regulatory and staff requirements (n = 5), equipment and technologies (n = 4), quality assurance (n = 1). System level included: referral process (n = 5), costing, budget impact and quality adjusted life years (n = 2), eligible patient estimates (n = 1). Recommendations were released nationally in June 2021 and distributed to all 43 cancer programs in Canada. CONCLUSION: A pan-Canadian consensus-building approach was successful in creating an evidence-based, peer-reviewed suite of recommendations thatsupportapplication of consistent clinical criteria to inform treatment options, facility set-up and access to high quality proton therapy.

Carbon footprint reduction associated with a surgical outreach clinic.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems generate substantial carbon footprints that may be targeted to decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Outreach clinics may represent tools to assist in this reduction by optimizing patient related travel. Therefore, we sought to estimate the carbon footprint savings associated with a head and neck surgery outreach clinic. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional survey of patient travel patterns to a surgical outreach clinic compared to a regional cancer treatment centre from December 2019 to February 2020. Participants completed a self-administered survey of 12 items eliciting travel distance, vehicle details, and ability to combine medical appointments. Canadian datasets of manufacturer provided vehicular efficiency were used to estimate carbon emissions for each participant. Geographic information systems were used for analyses. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were included for analysis. The majority of patients (85.8%) used their own personal vehicle to travel to the outreach clinic. The median distance to the clinic and regional centre were 29.0 km (IQR 6.0-51.9) and 327.0 km (IQR 309.0-337.0) respectively. The mean carbon emission reduction per person was therefore 117,495.4 g (SD: 29,040.0) to 143,570.9 g (SD: 40,236.0). This represents up to 2.5% of an average individual's yearly carbon footprint. Fewer than 10% of patients indicated they were able to carpool or group their appointments. CONCLUSION: Surgical outreach clinics decrease carbon footprints associated with patient travel compared to continued care at a regional centre. Further research is needed to determine possible interventions to further reduce carbon emissions associated with the surgical care of patients.

An Examination of the Relationship between Mental Distress, Functional and Psychosocial Quality of Life Indicators in a Population Based Sample of Prostate Cancer Survivors Who Received Curative Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Although survival rates are highest among prostate cancer survivors compared to any other forms of cancer, nearly 60% suffer from mental distress. Here we examine urinary function and psychosocial stressors and their association with poor mental health in a younger group of prostate cancer survivors who have undergone curative treatment. METHODS: The study includes 128 men (47 to 70 years old) who received active treatment for prostate cancer, and completed a survivorship online survey between 2017 and 2018. Psychological distress was assessed with Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. International Prostate Symptom Score subscales (incomplete urinary emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia) and number of current prostate cancer survivorship stressors were predictors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to fit the model while controlling for months of survivorship since diagnosis, the presence or absence of surgery, radiation or hormone therapy treatment, current medication for depression and demographics. RESULTS: A total of 19.5% of men scored positive for current mental health issues. Prostate cancer survivors who reported increased number of current survivorship stressors (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.09-2.01), had higher frequency of urination (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.15-3.64), history of radiation treatment (OR 7.15, 95% CI 1.02-50.35) and were currently on prescribed medication for depression (OR 33.47, 95% CI 3.80-294.87) had higher odds for screening positive for psychological distress compared with their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: These results corroborate recent findings showing an intersection between urological oncology and poor mental health during survivorship, and warrant the development of multidisciplinary teams in addressing survivorship issues in this population.

Ensuring high accuracy of data abstracted from patient charts: the use of a standardized medical record as a training tool.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The quality and integrity of information is pivotal to the validity and reliability of inferences drawn in research. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that standardized medical records can be used as a data abstraction training tool and a quality control measure to assess the validity of medical record data abstraction. METHODS: Sixteen hospitals participating in a large multicenter study completed standardized data abstraction forms for three representative patient charts, one in each of the clinical areas of postoperative critical care and trauma, cardiac surgery, and repair of hip fracture. The completed forms were then compared to an established gold standard. RESULTS: The mean level of accuracy of the completed data abstraction forms in each of the above three clinical areas were 91.8, 77.5, and 91.5%, respectively. Missing data accounted for 19% of all discrepancies between the abstracted information and the gold standard. If queries and amendments were made by the study's coordinating center, the mean level of accuracy increased to 94.5, 82.5, and 92.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study stressed the need for quality control measures in abstracting information from medical records to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the data abstracted.

Insufficiency fractures of the sacrum following stereotactic body radiotherapy for sacral tumors.

INTRODUCTION: There is little data on sacral insufficiency fracture(SIF) incidence following pelvic radiotherapy, with existing studies based on conventional fractionation. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), characterized by dose escalation with hypofractionation, may pose even greater risks to sacral integrity. This study aims to define SIF incidence and risk factors following SBRT. METHODS: Records of 43 consecutive patients who underwent sacral SBRT from September 2005-May 2009 were reviewed. Baseline patient information (age, gender, menopausal status, body mass index, use of bone-thinning agents, presence of osteoporosis), tumor characteristics (histology, lesion appearance and extent) and treatment parameters (dose/fractionation, prior radiation/surgery) were documented. Primary end-point was development of new fractures or progression of pre-existing fractures. Secondary end-points included pain scores, analgesic use, functional ability, and local tumor control. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 17months. Common histologies included sarcoma, renal cell, and prostate carcinoma; 47% of lesions were lytic, 37% sclerotic and the remainder mixed. Doses ranged from 18-24Gy/1fraction to 30Gy/5fractions with 45% receiving single fractions.14% had prior radiation (median dose: 30Gy/10fractions).Five patients developed SIF. In four, fractures occurred in the context of controlled local disease. Median time to SIF was 8.2months. Symptoms varied from minimal pain requiring no intervention to severe pain impacting on function. Two patients underwent sacroplasty due to intractable pain, with both obtaining good analgesia. Low event numbers precluded meaningful univariate/multivariate analyses. One-year local tumor control rates were excellent (91.7%). CONCLUSION: In this study, actuarial SIF incidence at one year was 8.2%, suggesting that SIF risk from sacral SBRT is low. However, larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed. In addition, novel therapies such as sacroplasty need further study to determine safety, efficacy and indications for use.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in locally advanced prostate cancer: secondary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 8610.

BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is a key element in solid-tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. VEGF is among the most potent angiogenic factor thus far detected. The aim of the present study is to explore the potential of VEGF (also known as VEGF-A) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker among men with locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: The analysis was performed using patients enrolled on RTOG 8610, a phase III randomized control trial of radiation therapy alone (Arm 1) versus short-term neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation and radiation therapy (Arm 2) in men with locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Tissue samples were obtained from the RTOG tissue repository. Hematoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed, and paraffin blocks were immunohistochemically stained for VEGF expression and graded by Intensity score (0-3). Cox or Fine and Gray's proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: Sufficient pathologic material was available from 103 (23%) of the 456 analyzable patients enrolled in the RTOG 8610 study. There were no statistically significant differences in the pre-treatment characteristics between the patient groups with and without VEGF intensity data. Median follow-up for all surviving patients with VEGF intensity data is 12.2 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated no statistically significant correlation between the intensity of VEGF expression and overall survival, distant metastasis, local progression, disease-free survival, or biochemical failure. VEGF expression was also not statistically significantly associated with any of the endpoints when analyzed by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no statistically significant prognostic or predictive value of VEGF expression for locally advanced prostate cancer. This analysis is among one of the largest sample bases with long-term follow-up in a well-characterized patient population. There is an urgent need to establish multidisciplinary initiatives for coordinating further research in the area of human prostate cancer biomarkers.