Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 13: 116, 2012 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22748117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the self-reported outcomes in the first year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine factors influencing the quality of life (QoL) 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after TKA. METHODS: A cohort of patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA at two hospitals (a regional university hospital and a capital's metropolitan hospital) was prospectively followed for 12 months. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 4 postoperative time-points, with the use of self-reported measurements for pain, physical function and depression with the following evaluation tools: Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], Knee Society Scoring system [KSS], Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, [CES-D10] and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain). General linear modelling for repeated measures was used to evaluate the effect of each independent variable including clinical and sociodemographic data. Differences between groups at different time points were tested by the independent samples t-test. RESULTS: Of the 224 eligible patients, 204 (162 females, mean age 69.2) were included in the analysis. Response rate at one year was 90%. At 6 weeks after surgery, despite improvement in pain and alleviation of the depressive mood, the physical function remained less satisfactory. Females presented lower scores in terms of quality of life, both preoperatively and 6 weeks after TKA. Significant improvement was already experienced at 3 months postoperatively. According to WOMAC, KSS, CES-D10 and pain VAS scores the Qol was significantly improved 12 months after TKA (P < 0.001). CES-D10 score was positively correlated with WOMAC and pain VAS scores at all the time points assessed (P < 0.001). Age, body mass index (BMI), place of residence, level of education and social support were not significant predictors of QoL after TKA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experienced great improvement in their QoL after TKA in spite of a less satisfactory physical function in the first 6 weeks after surgery, with noticeable differences in the QoL among genders in the same time period. After that period all patients experienced significant improvement for all the measured parameters, until the third postoperative month with smaller changes thereafter.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/psicología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Grecia , Hospitales Universitarios , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Autoinforme , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18400126

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to perform a cost and outcome comparison between two alternative operative techniques (osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty) used in the treatment of elderly patients with unstable trochanteric hip fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-three trochanteric hip fracture patients were followed-up for 1 year after surgery. For each operative technique, hospital treatment's cost per patient was computed. Mortality and complication rate in-hospital and at specific time points after surgery were used as outcome measures. Patients' functional level before and after hip fracture was estimated according to their mobility and ability to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living. RESULTS: The cost for patients undergoing osteosynthesis reached euro 1,931 per case, whereas for those treated with hemiarthroplasty reached euro 3,719 per case (2001 rates). There was no statistically significant difference regarding in-hospital mortality and complication rate, as well as mortality and complication rate 1 year after surgery, between the two patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The quite similar performance of the two operative techniques suggests that cost could be the key factor for choosing between them. However, it is critical that many more randomized studies, with larger sample sizes and wider follow-up time periods should be conducted.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA