Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization among dental health care workers in Northern Germany (StaphDent study).

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can colonize dental patients and students, however, studies on the prevalence of MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) among dental health care workers (DHCW) including use of personal protective equipment (PPE) are scarce. We conducted an observational study (StaphDent study) to (I) determine the prevalence of MRSA and MSSA colonization in DHCW in the region of Mecklenburg Western-Pomerania, Germany, (II) resolve the S. aureus population structure to gain hints on possible transmission events between co-workers, and (III) clarify use of PPE. Nasal swabs were obtained from dentists (n = 149), dental assistants (n = 297) and other dental practice staff (n = 38). Clonal relatedness of MSSA isolates was investigated using spa typing and, in some cases, whole genome sequencing (WGS). PPE use was assessed by questionnaire. While 22.3% (108/485) of the participants were colonized with MSSA, MRSA was not detected. MSSA prevalence was not associated with size of dental practices, gender, age, or duration of employment. The identified 61 spa types grouped into 17 clonal complexes and four sequence types. Most spa types (n = 47) were identified only once. In ten dental practices one spa type occurred twice. WGS data analysis confirmed a close clonal relationship for 4/10 isolate pairs. PPE was regularly used by most dentists and assistants. To conclude, the failure to recover MRSA from DHCW reflects the low MRSA prevalence in this region. Widespread PPE use suggests adherence to routine hygiene protocols. Compared to other regional HCW MRSA rates the consequent usage of PPE seems to be protective.

Irritative potency of selected wound antiseptics in the hen's egg test on chorioallantoic membrane to predict their compatibility to wounds.

Antiseptics are being used for prevention of infections in acute wounds and for treatment of infections in acute and chronic wounds. However, some antiseptics' high tissue toxicity might delay the healing process. The aim of this study was to investigate the tissue toxicity of preferentially used wound antiseptics and the influence of antiphlogistic additives via the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM). The HET-CAM is a semi-in-vivo method testing the tissue tolerability of wound antiseptics by evaluating the blood vessel reaction of the chorioallantoic membrane in terms of hemorrhage, vessel lysis, and coagulation. For each test day, selected test substances were applied on the membranes of two to three eggs according to the test protocol. The overall irritation was then evaluated by referring to a calculated score. Normal distribution of the resulting scores was confirmed by D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus K2 test. Significant differences between the antiseptics were calculated by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Severe CAM reactions were observed after short-term application of octenidine based wound gel (0.05%) and chlorhexidine digluconate (0.5% solution), moderate reactions for octenidine (0.05%) in aqueous solution combined with dexpanthenol (1.34%) and allantoin (0.2%) or for hydrogen peroxide (1.5% and 0.5%) in aqueous solution, slight reactions were observed for hydrogen peroxide (1.5%) in aqueous solution in combination with sodium thiocyanate (0.698%) and for the combination of NaOCl/HOCl (each 0.004%). Polyhexanide (0.04%) in Ringer solution and polyhexanide (0.05%) in Lipofundin, the hemoglobin spray (10%), dexpanthenol, and allantoin showed no irritation. The HET-CAM qualifies as a primary screening test for tissue tolerance of wound antiseptics. Regarding local tolerability, polyhexanide and hypochlorite are superior to other antiseptics.

Consensus on Wound Antisepsis: Update 2018.

Wound antisepsis has undergone a renaissance due to the introduction of highly effective wound-compatible antimicrobial agents and the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). However, a strict indication must be set for the application of these agents. An infected or critically colonized wound must be treated antiseptically. In addition, systemic antibiotic therapy is required in case the infection spreads. If applied preventively, the Wounds-at-Risk Score allows an assessment of the risk for infection and thus appropriateness of the indication. The content of this updated consensus recommendation still largely consists of discussing properties of octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT), polihexanide, and iodophores. The evaluations of hypochlorite, taurolidine, and silver ions have been updated. For critically colonized and infected chronic wounds as well as for burns, polihexanide is classified as the active agent of choice. The combination 0.1% OCT/phenoxyethanol (PE) solution is suitable for acute, contaminated, and traumatic wounds, including MRSA-colonized wounds due to its deep action. For chronic wounds, preparations with 0.05% OCT are preferable. For bite, stab/puncture, and gunshot wounds, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-iodine is the first choice, while polihexanide and hypochlorite are superior to PVP-iodine for the treatment of contaminated acute and chronic wounds. For the decolonization of wounds colonized or infected with MDROs, the combination of OCT/PE is preferred. For peritoneal rinsing or rinsing of other cavities with a lack of drainage potential as well as the risk of central nervous system exposure, hypochlorite is the superior active agent. Silver-sulfadiazine is classified as dispensable, while dyes, organic mercury compounds, and hydrogen peroxide alone are classified as obsolete. As promising prospects, acetic acid, the combination of negative pressure wound therapy with the instillation of antiseptics (NPWTi), and cold atmospheric plasma are also subjects of this assessment.

Influence of Bio-sorb® Cream on Sweat Production and Efficacy of Surgical Hand Antisepsis Under Surgical Gloves.

Aim: Since the introduction of surgical gloves, one of the main challenges has been to improve donning and wearability. For the wearer, the formation of "glove juice" is problematic. To improve gliding properties for donning the gloves and absorbing sweat, in 1963 Bio-sorb® cream: sterile powder cream (Johnson & Johnson Medical, Gargrave, Skipton, United Kingdom) was introduced. Individuals subjectively reported a reduction of sweat production inside the glove, however, the actual effect on sweat accumulation and surgical hand antisepsis has not been examined. Methods: Twenty-six volunteers were used in a study designed to examine the effect of a sterile hand cream applied after surgical hand antisepsis on sweat accumulation inside surgical gloves. A woven cotton glove was worn underneath the surgical glove. Weight differences were used to determine the amount of sweat produced. The influence of Bio-sorb on the efficacy of surgical hand antisepsis was tested immediately and after 90 minutes of wear time by the sampling technique as per EN 12791 and by bacterial analysis of glove juice according to tentative final monograph 1994. Results and Discussion: The amount of sweat produced inside the glove was not reduced by the cream (1.07 ± 0.5 g versus control 1.03 ± 0.5 g; p = 0.75). Considering different skin conditions, it may be possible that some wearers might subjectively observe decreased sweat production after using Bio-sorb cream before donning surgical gloves, because sweat production did decrease in 10 of 26 test subjects. Bio-sorb cream did not affect the efficacy of surgical hand antisepsis either immediately or after 90 minutes. Conclusion: Because of possible risks of contamination of the surgical site with cornstarch from Bio-sorb cream in the case of a glove breach and the failed statistical proof of reduced sweat production, the use of Bio-sorb cream should not to be recommended.

Efficiency of Emulsified Particle-Associated Polyhexamethylenbiguanid-Hydrochlorid (Polihexanide) for Peritoneal Lavage in a Murine Sepsis Model.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal lavage is often used for peritonitis, however, the volume and type of lavage fluid varies. Saline or Ringer's solution are used most often and lavage is performed until the fluid is clear. However, at present there is no irrigation fluid for peritoneal lavage with residual antiseptic activity. Because the combination of aqueous polyhexamethylenbiguanid-hydrochlorid (PHMB) and egg phosphatidylcholine containing oil/water emulsions (Lipofundin® MCT 20%, B. Braun AG, Melsungen, Germany) protect mammalian cells without neutralizing the antiseptic effect of PHMB, it seemed promising to investigate such human cell protecting, yet antibacterial combination for peritoneal lavage in a murine sepsis model. METHODS: After induction of colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP) in mice, the foci were eradicated by re-laparotomy, followed by twofold lavage with 2 × 3 mL of the tested emulsion. The following lavage fluids were investigated blindly: 10% Lipofundin/0.05% PHMB, 100% Lipofundin, 0.05% PHMB, and 0.9% saline. After 24 hours the animals were euthanized and organs, blood, and lavage fluid were examined for cytokine levels (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interferon [IFN]-γ, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-10), liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma-glutamyltransferase [gamma-GT], glutamate dehydrogenase [GLDH]), creatinine, and bacterial density. RESULTS: Only the combination of Lipofundin/PHMB (n = 23) increased the survival rate. Compared with saline alone, PHMB alone decreased the survival rate. Twenty-four hours after induction of peritonitis, the lowest number of colony forming units (CFU) was observed after lavage with PHMB/Lipofundin in all examined organs, blood, and lavage fluid (p < 0.01). Alanine aminotransferase, AST, and creatinine levels were increased after lavage with PHMB compared with the other lavage fluids (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal lavage using 0.05% aqueous PHMB alone resulted in no survival benefit in a CASP murine model. The increase of liver enzymes and creatinine seem to be a toxic side effect of PHMB. However, an emulsion of 0.05% PHMB/10% Lipofundin decreased cytotoxicity while maintaining antiseptic efficiency. The advantage for survival was explained by decrease of bacterial load in organs, blood, and lavage fluid. The results provide a new option for the treatment of peritonitis using peritoneal lavage with the combination of PHMB/Lipofundin.