Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 67(4): 558-565, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery is a safe, effective practice in specific patients that can enhance the efficiency of enhanced recovery pathways. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive factors associated with success or failure of same-day discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from January 2020 to March 2023. SETTINGS: Tertiary colorectal center. PATIENTS: Adult patients eligible for same-day discharge with remote postdischarge follow-up included those with minimal comorbidities, residing near the hospital, having sufficient home support, and owning a mobile device. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were discharged on the day of surgery upon meeting specific criteria, including adequate pain control, tolerance of oral intake, independent mobility, urination, and the absence of complications. Successful same-day discharge was defined as discharge on the day of surgery without unplanned visits in the first 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with successful or failed same-day discharge after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients (85.3%) were discharged on the day of surgery, with 14 patients (8%) having an unplanned visit within 72 hours. Overall, 161 patients (78.5%) were categorized as same-day discharge success and 44 patients (21.5%) as same-day discharge failure. The same-day discharge failure group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.7 vs 2.8, p = 0.03). Mean length of stay (0.8 vs 3.0, p = 0.00), 30-day complications (10% vs 48%, p = 0.00), and readmissions (8% vs 27%, p = 0.00) were higher in the same-day discharge failure group. Regression analysis showed that failed same-day discharge was associated with higher comorbidities (OR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95) and prolonged postanesthesia care unit time (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). Individuals who received a regional nerve block (OR 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-14) and those who did not consume postoperative opioids (OR 4.6; 95% CI, 1-21) were more likely to have successful same-day discharge. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that comorbidities and prolonged postanesthesia care unit stays were associated with same-day discharge failure, whereas regional nerve blocks and minimal postoperative opioids were related to success. These factors may inform future research aiming to enhance colorectal surgery recovery protocols. See Video Abstract . FACTORES PREDICTIVOS PARA UN ALTA EXITOSA EL MISMO DA DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA MNIMAMENTE INVASIVA Y REVERSIN DEL ESTOMA: ANTECEDENTES:El alta el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva es una práctica segura y eficaz en pacientes específicos que puede mejorar la eficiencia de las vías de recuperación mejoradas.OBJETIVO:Identificar factores predictivos asociados con el éxito o fracaso del alta el mismo día.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospectivo del 01/2020 al 03/2023.AJUSTES:Centro colorrectal terciario.PACIENTES:Los pacientes adultos elegibles para el alta el mismo día con seguimiento remoto posterior al alta incluyeron aquellos con comorbilidades mínimas, que residían cerca del hospital, tenían suficiente apoyo en el hogar y poseían un dispositivo móvil.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía al cumplir con criterios específicos, incluido un control adecuado del dolor, tolerancia a la ingesta oral, movilidad independiente, micción y ausencia de complicaciones. El alta exitosa el mismo día se definió como el alta el día de la cirugía sin visitas no planificadas en las primeras 72 horas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Factores asociados con el alta exitosa o fallida el mismo día después de una cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva.RESULTADOS:Un total de 175 (85,3%) pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía y 14 (8%) pacientes tuvieron una visita no planificada dentro de las 72 horas. En total, 161 (78,5%) pacientes se clasificaron como éxito del alta el mismo día y 44 (21,5%) pacientes como fracaso del alta el mismo día. El grupo de fracaso del alta el mismo día tuvo un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson más alto (3,7, 2,8, p = 0,03). La duración media de la estancia hospitalaria (0,8, 3,0, p = 0,00), las complicaciones a los 30 días (10%, 48%, p = 0,00) y los reingresos (8%, 27%, p = 0,00) fueron mayores en el mismo día grupo de fallo de descarga. El análisis de regresión mostró que el alta fallida el mismo día se asoció con mayores comorbilidades (OR 0,79; IC del 95 %: 0,66; 0,95) y tiempo prolongado en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos (OR 0,99; IC del 95 %: 0,99; 0,99). Las personas que recibieron un bloqueo nervioso regional (OR 4,1; IC del 95 %: 1,2, 14) y aquellos que no consumieron opioides posoperatorios (OR 4,6, IC del 95 %: 1-21) tuvieron más probabilidades de tener éxito en el mismo día -descarga.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros hallazgos indican que las comorbilidades y las estancias prolongadas en la unidad de cuidados postanestésicos se asociaron con el fracaso del alta el mismo día, mientras que los bloqueos nerviosos regionales y los opioides postoperatorios mínimos se relacionaron con el éxito. Estos factores pueden informar investigaciones futuras destinadas a mejorar los protocolos de recuperación de la cirugía colorrectal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Alta del Paciente , Adulto , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Surg Endosc ; 38(3): 1548-1555, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38114879

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low patient activation (PA) is associated with worse postoperative outcomes, however, its impact on the effectiveness of digital health interventions is unknown. We sought to determine the impact of PA on the effectiveness of digital health application for remote post-discharge follow-up for patients undergoing elective colectomy. METHODS: Data analysis included a control cohort (CC) of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 10/2017 to 04/2018 without the digital health intervention and a digital application cohort (DAC) that received a smart phone application for remote post-discharge follow-up from 03/2021 to 08/2022, including a subset of same-day discharge (SDD) patients. PA was measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM; score 0-100) and categorized into low (< 55.1) and high (≥ 55.1). The PAM was administered 4-6 weeks before surgery in the DAC group and on postoperative day (POD) 1 in the CC group. The main outcome measure was 30-day emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included (89DAC with 50 SDD, 75CC), with no differences in patient characteristics other than more stoma closures in the DAC group. Overall, 77% of patients had high PA level, with no difference between CC and DAC (77% vs. 81%, p = 0.25). There was no difference in ED visits between CC and DAC (19% vs. 18%, p = 0.90). Overall, low PA was associated more ED visits (29% vs 14%, p = 0.04). In the SDD subgroup, low PA patients had more ED visits (38% vs. 7%, p = 0.015). PA level did not affect app usage metrics. On multiple regression, only low PA remained independently associated with ED visits (OR 3.42, 95%CI 1.27, 9.24). CONCLUSION: Low PA remains an important predictor of surgical outcomes after elective colorectal surgery regardless of the use of a digital health application for remote post-discharge follow-up. This suggests that improving PA levels may improve postoperative outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cuidados Posteriores , Salud Digital , Participación del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
3.
Ann Surg ; 270(3): 493-501, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31318793

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of prehabilitation on survival after colorectal cancer surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative multimodal exercise and nutritional programs (prehabilitation) improve functional capacity and recovery following colorectal surgery. Exercise may also affect cancer outcomes by mediating the systemic inflammatory response. The effect of prehabilitation on cancer outcomes is unknown. METHODS: Pooled data from 3 prehabilitation trials (2 randomized controlled trials, 1 cohort) in patients undergoing elective, biopsy-proven, primary non-metastatic colorectal cancer surgery from 2009 to 2014 within an enhanced recovery program were analyzed. Patients were grouped into +prehab or-prehab. The primary outcomes were 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). DFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multiple Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (+prehab 104, -prehab 98). Median prehabilitation duration was 29 days (interquartile range 20-40). Patient and tumor characteristics were well-balanced (33% stage III). Postoperative complications and time to adjuvant chemotherapy were similar. Mean duration of follow-up was 60.3 months (standard deviation 26.2). DFS was similar for the combined group of stage I-III patients (P = 0.244). For stage III patients, prehabilitation was associated with improved DFS (73.4% vs 50.9%, P = 0.044). There were no differences in OS (P = 0.226). Prehabilitation independently predicted improved DFS (hazard ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.93), adjusting for stage and other confounders. Prehabilitation did not independently predict OS. CONCLUSION: In this report, prehabilitation is associated with improved 5-year DFS in stage III colorectal cancer. This finding should be confirmed in future trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/rehabilitación , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Cirugía Colorrectal/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aptitud Física/fisiología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
World J Surg ; 43(12): 3044-3050, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31506714

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Management of the post-traumatic open abdomen (OA) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone is associated with low rates of primary fascial closure. The abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system exerts dynamic medial fascial traction and may work synergistically with NPWT to facilitate primary fascial closure. METHODS: Patients with an OA following trauma laparotomy between 2009 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients treated with ABRA in conjunction with NPWT (ABRA) versus NPWT alone (NPWT) were compared in terms of primary fascial closure rate, number of surgeries to closure, tracheostomy duration, length of stay and incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify predictors of tracheostomy duration. RESULTS: We identified 48 patients [ABRA, 12 and NPWT, 36]. The ABRA group was significantly younger (25 vs. 37 years, p = 0.027) and included a lower proportion of males (58% vs. 89%, p = 0.032). Groups were similar with respect to the incidence of hollow viscus injury, injury severity score and abdominal abbreviated injury score. Compared to the NPWT group, the ABRA group had a significantly higher rate of primary fascial closure (100% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), fewer surgeries to abdominal closure (2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.023) and shorter duration of tracheostomy (15.5 vs. 36 days, p = 0.008). There were no differences in length of stay or incidence of entero-atmospheric fistula. On multivariable linear regression, ABRA placement was an independent predictor of shorter tracheostomy duration, after adjusting for covariates (ß = - 0.294, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: For the post-traumatic OA, ABRA coupled with NPWT achieves a higher rate of primary fascial closure compared to NPWT alone, while requiring fewer surgeries and a shorter duration of tracheostomy.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Cavidad Abdominal/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Fasciotomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tracción/métodos , Adulto Joven
5.
World J Surg ; 43(8): 1880-1889, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953195

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5 billion people do not have access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical and anesthesia care, with this number disproportionately affecting those from low-middle-income countries (LMICs). Perioperative mortality rates (POMRs) have been identified by the World Health Organization as a potential health metric to monitor quality of surgical care provided. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate published reports of POMR and suggest recommendations for its appropriate use as a health metric. METHODS: The protocol was registered a priori with PROSPERO. A peer-reviewed search strategy was developed adhering with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant articles were identified through Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CDSR, LILACS, PubMed, BIOSIS, Global Health, Africa-Wide Information, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Two independent reviewers performed a primary screening analysis based on titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text screen. Studies describing POMRs of adult emergency abdominal surgeries in LMICs were included. RESULTS: A total of 7787 articles were screened of which 7466 were excluded based on title and abstract. Three hundred and twenty-one articles entered full-text screen of which 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. Variables including timing of POMR reporting, intraoperative mortality, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and disease severity score were collected. Complication rates were reported in 83% of studies and postoperative stay in 46% of studies. 40% of papers did not report the specific timing of POMR collection. 7% of papers reported on intraoperative death. Additionally, 46% of papers used a POMR timing specific to the duration of their study. Vital signs were discussed in 24% of articles, with disease severity score only mentioned in 20% of studies. CONCLUSION: POMR is an important health metric for quantifications of quality of care of surgical systems. Further validation and standardization are necessary to effectively use this health metric.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen Agudo/cirugía , Periodo Perioperatorio/mortalidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Abdomen Agudo/mortalidad , Anestesia/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Renta , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas
6.
Can J Surg ; 62(2): 142-144, 2019 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907995

RESUMEN

Summary: Noncompressible hemorrhagic control remains one of the most challenging areas in damage control medicine and continues to be a leading cause of preventable death. For decades, emergency thoracotomy or laparotomy and aortic cross clamping have remained the gold standard intervention. Recently, there has been a movement toward less invasive techniques for noncompressible hemorrhagic control, such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). The REBOA technique involves inflation of an endovascular balloon within the abdominal aorta proximal to the vascular injury to temporarily inhibit bleeding. Although the literature is robust on this new technique, skepticism remains about whether REBOA is superior to aortic cross clamping, as it has been associated with complications including organ and limb ischemia, limb amputation, femoral aneurysm, and thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Resucitación/métodos , Accidentes por Caídas , Aorta/cirugía , Oclusión con Balón/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Resucitación/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Can J Surg ; 62(6): E9-E12, 2019 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31782649

RESUMEN

Summary: The use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in penetrating injuries is an emerging adjunct in the civilian trauma surgeon's toolbox for the management of traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Furthermore, within the Canadian civilian context, little has been reported with regard to its use as an assisted damage-control measure in vascular reconstruction of the lower extremity. We report a case of penetrating gunshot injury of the lower extremity where the preoperative deployment of REBOA had a remarkable positive impact in the resuscitation phase and the intraoperative control of blood loss. A description of the procedure and the advantage gained from REBOA are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Aorta/cirugía , Oclusión con Balón , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/métodos , Muslo/lesiones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino
8.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 44(3): 273-278, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30638306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether outpatient treatment of periorbital cellulitis with daily administration of intravenous antibiotics and physician evaluation is an effective and safe alternative to admission. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review study of paediatric patients treated on an outpatient basis for periorbital cellulitis at a tertiary children's hospital between 2013 and 2015 was performed. Children were assessed day by a paediatrician to monitor for resolution of symptoms or complications. SETTING: The Montreal Children's hospital, a tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: Children diagnosed with an uncomplicated periorbital cellulitis secondary to an acute sinusitis or upper respiratory tract infection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of days of intravenous antibiotics, complications or need for subsequent admission. Complications were defined as formation of an abscess or phlegmon confirmed on computerised tomography scan, worsening or recurrent persistent cellulitis, failure to improve on intravenous antibiotics, and intracranial complications. RESULTS: Sixty-six children with a diagnosis of uncomplicated periorbital cellulitis secondary to sinusitis who received intravenous antibiotics via medical day hospital and who fit the inclusion criteria were identified. The mean duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy was 4.1 days. All children received ceftriaxone, with one patient also receiving cefuroxime. Two of 66 patients developed complications; one patient required admission for failure to improve/subperiosteal phlegmon and later underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and one patient developed an eyelid abscess that did not require admission. No patients developed severe neurological or visual deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient intravenous therapy with daily reassessment by a physician may be a safe alternative to admission in select cases of periorbital cellulitis without systemic signs of illness.


Asunto(s)
Celulitis Orbitaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Celulitis Orbitaria/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 24(6): 1392-1401, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32314233

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: C-reactive protein may predict anastomotic complications after colorectal surgery, but its predictive ability may differ between laparoscopic and open resection due to differences in stress response. Therefore, the objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic characteristics of C-reactive protein to detect anastomotic leaks and infectious complications after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA. Studies were included if they reported on the diagnostic characteristics of postoperative day 3-5 values of serum C-reactive protein to diagnose anastomotic leak or infectious complications specifically in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. The main outcome was a composite of anastomotic leak and infectious complications. A random-effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included (9 for laparoscopic surgery, 8 for open surgery). The pooled incidence of the composite outcome was 14.8% (95% CI 10.2-19.3) in laparoscopic studies and 21.0% (95% CI 11.9-30.0) for open. The pooled diagnostic accuracy characteristics were similar for open and laparoscopic studies. However, the C-reactive protein threshold cutoffs were lower in laparoscopic studies for postoperative days 3 and 4, but similar on day 5. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic characteristics of C-reactive protein in the early postoperative period to detect infectious complications and leaks are similar after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. However, thresholds are lower for laparoscopic surgery, suggesting that the interpretation of serum CRP values needs to be tailored based on operative approach.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Laparoscopía , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
11.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 24(1): 115-122, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31367895

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment delay may have detrimental effects on cancer outcomes. The impact of longer delays on colorectal cancer outcomes remains poorly described. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of delays to curative-intent surgical resection on survival in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: All adult patients undergoing elective resection of primary non-metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma from January 2009 to December 2014 were reviewed. Treatment delays were defined as the time from tissue diagnosis to definitive surgery, categorized as < 4, 4 to < 8, and ≥ 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients were included (83.2% colon;15.8% rectal) with a mean follow-up of 58.4 months (SD29.9). Fourteen percent (14.0%) of patients underwent resection < 4 weeks, 40.0% 4 to < 8 weeks, and 46.1% ≥ 8 weeks. More rectal cancer patients had treatment delay ≥ 8 weeks compared with colonic tumors (69.8% vs. 41.4%, p < 0.001). Cumulative 5-year DFS and OS were similar between groups (p = 0.558; p = 0.572). After adjusting for confounders, surgical delays were not independently associated with DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment delays > 4 weeks were not associated with worse oncologic outcomes. Delaying surgery to optimize patients can safely be considered without compromising survival.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
12.
BMJ Open ; 9(2): e027572, 2019 02 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782953

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Haemorrhage remains the leading cause of preventable death in trauma. Damage control measures applied to patients in extremis in order to control exsanguinating bleeding from non-compressible torso injuries use different techniques to limit blood flow from the aorta to the rest of the body. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is regaining momentum recently as an adjunct measure that can provide the same results using less invasive approaches. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the existing literature on REBOA. The objective is to analyse evidence and non-evidence-based medical reports and to describe current gaps in the literature about the best indication and implementation strategies for REBOA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using the five-stage framework of Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology as a guide, we will perform a systematic search in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, COCHRANE CENTRAL, PUBMED and SCOPUS from the earliest available publications. The aim is to identify diverse studies related to the topic of REBOA. For a comprehensive search, we will explore organisational websites, key journals and hand-search reference lists of key studies. Data will be charted and sorted using a descriptive analytical approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not necessary as the data are collected from publicly available sources and there will be no consultative phase. The results will be disseminated through presentations at local, national, clinical and medical education conferences and through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.


Asunto(s)
Aorta/cirugía , Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Aorta/lesiones , Oclusión con Balón/normas , Oclusión con Balón/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/normas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Resucitación/métodos , Resucitación/mortalidad , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia
13.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 4(1): e000262, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31245615

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is regaining popularity in the treatment of traumatic non-compressible torso bleeding. Advances in invasive radiology coupled with new damage control measures assisted in the refinement of the technique with promising outcomes. The literature continues to have substantial heterogeneity about REBOA indications, applications, and the challenges confronted when implementing the technique in a level I trauma center. Scoping reviews are excellent platforms to assess the diverse literature of a new technique. It is for the first time that a scoping review is adopted for this topic. Advances in invasive radiology coupled with new damage control measures assisted in the refinement of the technique with promising outcomes. The literature continues to have substantial heterogeneity about REBOA indications, applications, and the challenges confronted when implementing the technique in a level I trauma center. Scoping reviews are excellent platforms to assess the diverse literature of a new technique. It is for the first time that a scoping review is adopted for this topic. METHODS: Critical search from MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, COCHRANE CENTRAL, PUBMED and SCOPUS were conducted from the earliest available dates until March 2018. Evidence-based articles, as well as gray literature at large, were analyzed regardless of the quality of articles. RESULTS: We identified 1176 articles related to the topic from all available database sources and 57 reviews from the gray literature search. The final review yielded 105 articles. Quantitative and qualitative variables included patient demographics, study design, study objectives, methods of data collection, indications, REBOA protocol used, time to deployment, zone of deployment, occlusion time, complications, outcome, and the level of expertise at the concerned trauma center. CONCLUSION: Growing levels of evidence support the use of REBOA in selected indications. Our data analysis showed an advantage for its use in terms of morbidities and physiologic derangement in comparison to other resuscitation measures. Current challenges remain in the selective application, implementation, competency assessment, and credentialing for the use of REBOA in trauma settings. The identification of the proper indication, terms of use, and possible advantage of the prehospital and partial REBOA are topics for further research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

14.
Injury ; 49(12): 2100-2110, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30333086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma registries (TR) provide invaluable data, informing resource allocation and quality improvement. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify factors promoting and inhibiting successful TR implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: The protocol was registered a priori (CRD42017058586). With librarian oversight, a peer-reviewed search strategy was developed. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, two independent reviewers performed first-screen and full-text screening. Studies describing implementation of a TR in LMICs or reviewed the experience of registry users/implementers were included. Extracted data, focusing on publication, institution, registry and data factors, was summarized using descriptive statistics and subjected to thematic qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Out of 3842 screened references, 40 articles were included for analysis. Most registries were paper-based, implemented in single publicly-funded institutions within LMICs, benefited from funding, and were run by untrained house-staff with other clinical responsibilities. Constituent variables, injury scoring, outcome assessment, and quality assurance practices were very diverse. Principal obstacles to successful implementation were lack of funding, significant missing data, and insufficient resources. CONCLUSIONS: This work may contribute to the planning of future efforts towards TR implementation in LMICs, where better injury data has the potential to alleviate the morbidity and mortality associated with trauma through advocacy and quality-improvement.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo/economía , Implementación de Plan de Salud/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología
15.
Syst Rev ; 7(1): 33, 2018 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29467037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits of trauma registries have been well described. The crucial data they provide may guide injury prevention strategies, inform resource allocation, and support advocacy and policy. This has been shown to reduce trauma-related mortality in various settings. Trauma remains a leading cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, the implementation of trauma registries in LMICs can be challenging due to lack of funding, specialized personnel, and infrastructure. This study explores strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs. METHODS: The protocol was registered a priori (CRD42017058586). A peer-reviewed search strategy of multiple databases will be developed with a senior librarian. As per PRISMA guidelines, first screen of references based on abstract and title and subsequent full-text review will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Disagreements that cannot be resolved by discussion between reviewers shall be arbitrated by the principal investigator. Data extraction will be performed using a pre-defined data extraction sheet. Finally, bibliographies of included articles will be hand-searched. Studies of any design will be included if they describe or review development and implementation of a trauma registry in LMICs. No language or period restrictions will be applied. Summary statistics and qualitative meta-narrative analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION: The significant burden of trauma in LMIC environments presents unique challenges and limitations. Adapted strategies for deployment and maintenance of sustainable trauma registries are needed. Our methodology will systematically identify recommendations and strategies for successful trauma registry implementation in LMICs and describe threats and barriers to this endeavor. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews ( CRD42017058586 ).


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Implementación de Plan de Salud/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos
16.
Mol Neurobiol ; 55(4): 3451-3476, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28502044

RESUMEN

The cerebral accumulation and cytotoxicity of amyloid beta (Aß) is central to Alzheimer's pathogenesis. However, little is known about how the amyloid pathology affects the global expression of brain proteins at different disease stages. In order to identify genotype and time-dependent significant changes in protein expression, we employed quantitative proteomics analysis of hippocampal tissue from the McGill-R-Thy1-APP rat model of Alzheimer-like amyloid pathology. McGill transgenic rats were compared to wild-type rats at early and late pathology stages, i.e., when intraneuronal Aß amyloid burden is conspicuous and when extracellular amyloid plaques are abundant with more pronounced cognitive deficits. After correction for multiple testing, the expression levels of 64 proteins were found to be considerably different in transgenic versus wild-type rats at the pre-plaque stage (3 months), and 86 proteins in the post-plaque group (12 months), with only 9 differentially regulated proteins common to the 2 time-points. This minimal overlap supports the hypothesis that different molecular pathways are affected in the hippocampus at early and late stages of the amyloid pathology throughout its continuum. At early stages, disturbances in pathways related to cellular responses to stress, protein homeostasis, and neuronal structure are predominant, while disturbances in metabolic energy generation dominate at later stages. These results shed new light on the molecular pathways affected by the early accumulation of Aß and how the evolving amyloid pathology impacts other complex metabolic pathways.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/patología , Amiloide/metabolismo , Hipocampo/metabolismo , Proteómica , Adenosina Trifosfato/metabolismo , Precursor de Proteína beta-Amiloide/metabolismo , Animales , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Encéfalo/patología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Metabolismo Energético , Humanos , Factor 2 Relacionado con NF-E2/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo , Placa Amiloide/metabolismo , Placa Amiloide/patología , Ratas Transgénicas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estrés Fisiológico , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA