Tranexamic Acid for the Prevention of Blood Loss after Cesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid has been associated with reduced postpartum blood loss after cesarean delivery in several small trials, but evidence of its benefit in this clinical context remains inconclusive. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned women undergoing cesarean delivery before or during labor at 34 or more gestational weeks to receive an intravenously administered prophylactic uterotonic agent and either tranexamic acid (1 g) or placebo. The primary outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as a calculated estimated blood loss greater than 1000 ml or receipt of a red-cell transfusion within 2 days after delivery. Secondary outcomes included gravimetrically estimated blood loss, provider-assessed clinically significant postpartum hemorrhage, use of additional uterotonic agents, and postpartum blood transfusion. RESULTS: Of the 4551 women who underwent randomization, 4431 underwent cesarean delivery, 4153 (93.7%) of whom had primary outcome data available. The primary outcome occurred in 556 of 2086 women (26.7%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 653 of 2067 (31.6%) in the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.94; P = 0.003). There were no significant between-group differences in mean gravimetrically estimated blood loss or in the percentage of women with provider-assessed clinically significant postpartum hemorrhage, use of additional uterotonic agents, or postpartum blood transfusion. Thromboembolic events in the 3 months after delivery occurred in 0.4% of women (8 of 2049) who received tranexamic acid and in 0.1% of women (2 of 2056) who received placebo (adjusted risk ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 0.85 to 18.92; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Among women who underwent cesarean delivery and received prophylactic uterotonic agents, tranexamic acid treatment resulted in a significantly lower incidence of calculated estimated blood loss greater than 1000 ml or red-cell transfusion by day 2 than placebo, but it did not result in a lower incidence of hemorrhage-related secondary clinical outcomes. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; TRAAP2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03431805.).

Neonatal outcomes for women at risk of preterm delivery given half dose versus full dose of antenatal betamethasone: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal betamethasone is recommended before preterm delivery to accelerate fetal lung maturation. However, reports of growth and neurodevelopmental dose-related side-effects suggest that the current dose (12 mg plus 12 mg, 24 h apart) might be too high. We therefore investigated whether a half dose would be non-inferior to the current full dose for preventing respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: We designed a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial in 37 level 3 referral perinatal centres in France. Eligible participants were pregnant women aged 18 years or older with a singleton fetus at risk of preterm delivery and already treated with the first injection of antenatal betamethasone (11·4 mg) before 32 weeks' gestation. We used a computer-generated code producing permuted blocks of varying sizes to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive either a placebo (half-dose group) or a second 11·4 mg betamethasone injection (full-dose group) 24 h later. Randomisation was stratified by gestational age (before or after 28 weeks). Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the need for exogenous intratracheal surfactant within 48 h after birth. Non-inferiority would be shown if the higher limit of the 95% CI for the between-group difference between the half-dose and full-dose groups in the primary endpoint was less than 4 percentage points (corresponding to a maximum relative risk of 1·20). Four interim analyses monitoring the primary and the secondary safety outcomes were done during the study period, using a sequential data analysis method that provided futility and non-inferiority stopping rules and checked for type I and II errors. Interim analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02897076. FINDINGS: Between Jan 2, 2017, and Oct 9, 2019, 3244 women were randomly assigned to the half-dose (n=1620 [49·9%]) or the full-dose group (n=1624 [50·1%]); 48 women withdrew consent, 30 fetuses were stillborn, 16 neonates were lost to follow-up, and 9 neonates died before evaluation, so that 3141 neonates remained for analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 313 (20·0%) of 1567 neonates in the half-dose group and 276 (17·5%) of 1574 neonates in the full-dose group (risk difference 2·4%, 95% CI -0·3 to 5·2); thus non-inferiority was not shown. The per-protocol analysis also did not show non-inferiority (risk difference 2·2%, 95% CI -0·6 to 5·1). No between-group differences appeared in the rates of neonatal death, grade 3-4 intraventricular haemorrhage, stage ≥2 necrotising enterocolitis, severe retinopathy of prematurity, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. INTERPRETATION: Because non-inferiority of the half-dose compared with the full-dose regimen was not shown, our results do not support practice changes towards antenatal betamethasone dose reduction. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.

Alternative to intensive management of the active phase of the second stage of labor: a multicenter randomized trial (Phase Active du Second STade trial) among nulliparous women with an epidural.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on an optimal strategy for managing the active phase of the second stage of labor. Intensive pushing could not only reduce pushing duration, but also increase abnormal fetal heart rate because of cord compression and reduced placental perfusion and oxygenation resulting from the combination of uterine contractions and maternal expulsive forces. Therefore, it may increase the risk of neonatal acidosis and the need for operative vaginal delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of the management encouraging "moderate" pushing vs "intensive" pushing on neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial, including nulliparas in the second stage of labor with an epidural and a singleton cephalic fetus at term and with a normal fetal heart rate. Of note, 2 groups were defined: (1) the moderate pushing group, in which women had no time limit on pushing, pushed only twice during each contraction, and observed regular periods without pushing, and (2) the intensive pushing group, in which women pushed 3 times during each contraction and the midwife called an obstetrician after 30 minutes of pushing to discuss operative delivery (standard care). The primary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity criterion, including umbilical arterial pH of <7.15, base excess of >10 mmol/L, lactate levels of >6 mmol/L, 5-minute Apgar score of <7, and severe neonatal trauma. The secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, episiotomy, obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal satisfaction. RESULTS: The study included 1710 nulliparous women. The neonatal morbidity rate was 18.9% in the moderate pushing group and 20.6% in the intensive pushing group (P=.38). Pushing duration was longer in the moderate group than in the intensive group (38.8±26.4 vs 28.6±17.0 minutes; P<.001), and its rate of operative delivery was 21.1% in the moderate group compared with 24.8% in the intensive group (P=.08). The episiotomy rate was significantly lower in the moderate pushing group than in the intensive pushing group (13.5% vs 17.8%; P=.02). We found no significant difference for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, or maternal satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Moderate pushing has no effect on neonatal morbidity, but it may nonetheless have benefits, as it was associated with a lower episiotomy rate.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean among women with twins: a secondary analysis of the TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Although prophylactic tranexamic acid administration after cesarean delivery resulted in a lower incidence of calculated estimated blood loss of >1000 mL or red cell transfusion by day 2, its failure to reduce the incidence of hemorrhage-related secondary clinical outcomes (TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery trial) makes its use questionable. The magnitude of its effect may differ in women at higher risk of blood loss, including those with multiple pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of tranexamic acid vs placebo to prevent blood loss after cesarean delivery among women with multiple pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of the TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery trial data, a double-blind, randomized controlled trial from March 2018 to January 2020 in 27 French maternity hospitals, that included 319 women with multiple pregnancies. Women with a cesarean delivery before or during labor at ≥34 weeks of gestation were randomized to receive intravenously 1 g of tranexamic acid (n=160) or placebo (n=159), both with prophylactic uterotonics. The primary outcome was a calculated estimated blood loss of >1000 mL or a red blood cell transfusion by 2 days after delivery. The secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory blood loss measurements. RESULTS: Of the 4551 women randomized in this trial, 319 had a multiple pregnancy and cesarean delivery, and 298 (93.4%) had primary outcome data available. This outcome occurred in 62 of 147 women (42.2%) in the tranexamic acid group and 67 of 152 (44.1%) receiving placebo (adjusted risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.38; P=.86). No significant between-group differences occurred for any hemorrhage-related clinical outcomes: gravimetrically estimated blood loss, provider-assessed clinically significant hemorrhage, additional uterotonics, postpartum blood transfusion, arterial embolization, and emergency surgery (P>.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Among women with a multiple pregnancy and cesarean delivery, prophylactic tranexamic acid did not reduce the incidence of any blood loss-related outcomes.

Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged pregnancies are a frequent indication for induction of labour. When the cervix is unfavourable, cervical ripening before oxytocin administration is recommended to increase the likelihood of vaginal delivery, but no particular method is currently recommended for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies. This trial evaluates whether the use of mechanical cervical ripening with a silicone double balloon catheter for induction of labour in prolonged pregnancies reduces the cesarean section rate for nonreassuring fetal status compared with pharmacological cervical ripening by a vaginal pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a multicentre, superiority, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted in 15 French maternity units. Women with singleton pregnancies, a vertex presentation, ≥41+0 and ≤42+0 weeks' gestation, a Bishop score <6, intact membranes, and no history of cesarean delivery for whom induction of labour was decided were randomised to either mechanical cervical ripening with a Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon or pharmacological cervical ripening by a Propess vaginal pessary serving as a prostaglandin E2 slow-release system. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean for nonreassuring fetal status, with an independent endpoint adjudication committee determining whether the fetal heart rate was nonreassuring. Secondary outcomes included delivery (time from cervical ripening to delivery, number of patients requiring analgesics), maternal and neonatal outcomes. Between January 2017 and December 2018, 1,220 women were randomised in a 1:1 ratio, 610 allocated to a silicone double balloon catheter, and 610 to the Propess vaginal pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone. The mean age of women was 31 years old, and 80% of them were of white ethnicity. The cesarean rates for nonreassuring fetal status were 5.8% (35/607) in the mechanical ripening group and 5.3% (32/609) in the pharmacological ripening group (proportion difference: 0.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.1% to 3.1%, p = 0.70). Time from cervical ripening to delivery was shorter in the pharmacological ripening group (23 hours versus 32 hours, median difference 6.5 95% CI 5.0 to 7.9, p < 0.001), and fewer women required analgesics in the mechanical ripening group (27.5% versus 35.4%, difference in proportion -7.9%, 95% CI -13.2% to -2.7%, p = 0.003). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for other delivery, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. A limitation was a low observed rate of cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed no difference in the rates of cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status between mechanical ripening with a silicone double balloon catheter and pharmacological cervical ripening with a pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02907060.

A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA).

BACKGROUND: We aimed at developing a core outcome and variables of interest set to investigate the effects of mediolateral episiotomy on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) during and after operative delivery in nulliparous women in a large-scale one-year observational French study including 15,000 women (INSTRUMODA). METHODS: A list of outcomes and variables of interest was suggested to obstetricians participating in the INSTRUMODA study using online questionnaires divided into 7 categories: the woman's history and course of pregnancy, course of labor, modalities of operative delivery, episiotomy characteristics, immediate maternal morbidity, one-year maternal morbidity, immediate neonatal morbidity. We used a three-round DELPHI method to reach a consensus. In the first round, outcomes and variables considered as essential by 70% or more of obstetricians were included in the corpus whereas they were excluded when 70% rated them as "not important". In the second round, non-consensual outcomes and variables were reassessed and excluded or definitively included if considered as "not important" or essential by 50% or more of the obstetricians. During the first round, obstetricians were invited to suggest new outcomes and/or variables that were then assessed in the second and third round. We used the same method to develop a core outcome and variables of interest set in a population of women in the community recruited via an association of patients. At the end of the procedure the core outcome and variables of interest sets were merged to provide the final core outcome set for the INSTRUMODA study. RESULTS: Fifty-three obstetricians and 16 women filled out questionnaires. After the 3 rounds of Delphi procedure in each population, 74 outcomes and variables were consensually reported by obstetricians and 92 by women in the community. By mixing these two consensual corpora we reported a final consensual list of 114 variables of interest and outcomes for both obstetricians and women. CONCLUSION: We established a core outcome and variables of interest set among obstetricians and women in the community to investigate the association between mediolateral episiotomy and OASI during operative delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The INSTRUMODA study was registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov on June 25, 2020 ( NCT04446780 ).

Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of the sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio in Early-Onset Preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: Increased expression of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), associated with a decrease in placental growth factor (PlGF), plays a key role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia (PE). We evaluated the prognostic value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the onset of adverse maternofetal outcomes (AMFO) in case of early-onset PE with attempted expectant management. STUDY DESIGN: From October 2016 through November 2018, all singleton pregnancies complicated by early-onset PE (before 34 weeks of gestation) were included in a cohort study. The plasma levels of sFlt-1 and PlGF were blindly measured on admission. For the statistical analysis, we performed a bivariate analysis, a comparison of the receiving operating characteristic curves and a survival analysis estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 109 early PE, AMFO occurred in 87 pregnancies (79.8%), mainly hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome and severe fetal heart rate abnormalities requiring urgent delivery. The area under the curve (AUC) of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.88) for the risk of AMFO and the difference between the AUCs was significant for each separate standard parameter (p = 0.018 for initial diastolic blood pressure, p = 0.013 for alanine aminotransferase, p < 0.001 for uric acid). Pregnancies were best classified by a cutoff ratio of 293, with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 50%. With a ratio value less than 293, no pregnancy was complicated or had been stopped during the first 5 days. A ratio more than 293 was associated with an increased risk of AMFO onset (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.61; 95% CI: 2.13-6.10; p < 0.001) and had a significant association with the length of time between the diagnosis of PE and delivery (HR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.56-3.96; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is an additional tool in the prediction of AMFO in proven early-onset PE, which is likely to improve care by anticipating severe complications. KEY POINTS: · The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is associated with AMFO.. · It is an additional tool for physician.. · We proposed a 293 cutoff value for the ratio..

Aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction.

For the past decades, growing attention has been given to aspirin use during pregnancy. It favors placentation by its proangiogenic, antithrombotic, and anti-inflammatory effects. Therefore, low doses of aspirin are prescribed in the prevention of placenta-mediated complications, mainly preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. However, questions regarding its clinical application are still debated. Aspirin is effective in preventing preeclampsia in a high-risk population. Most guidelines recommend that risk stratification should rely on medical history. Nevertheless, screening performances dramatically improve if biochemical and biophysical markers are included. Concerning the appropriate timing and dose, latest studies suggest aspirin should be started before 16 weeks of pregnancy and at a daily dose of 100 mg or more. Further studies are needed to improve the identification of patients likely to benefit from prophylactic aspirin. Besides, the role of aspirin in the prevention of fetal growth restriction is still questioned.

Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional technique in peripartum hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of new bipolar vessel sealing system like LigaSure™ compared to the standard surgical technique (suture) during emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH). METHODS: A retrospective observational bicentric study was conducted from February 2005 to August 2018 in the maternity wards of the University Hospital of Toulouse and Angers. All EPHs performed up to 24 h after delivery were included. The main outcome was the total blood loss. Secondary outcomes were operating time, number of blood transfusions, per and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis was performed between hysterectomies performed in emergency and scheduled hysterectomies. RESULTS: Among 111,266 deliveries, 86 women (0.07%) underwent EPH, 29 were operated upon with LigaSure™, 57 with the traditional technique. In the LigaSure™ arm, there were statistically lower blood loss (3198 mL vs 4223 mL, p = 0.02), fewer blood transfusions (62.1% vs 94.7%, p = 0.0003, confirmed in subgroup analysis), and fewer perioperative complications (8.3% vs 45.5%, p = 0.04) for scheduled hysterectomies. CONCLUSION: Bipolar vessel sealing systems such as LigaSure™ are a surgical instrument, easy to use for the surgeon, with an interest in the management of EPH, particularly for total blood loss, transfusions, and intraoperative complications.

Spatulas for entrapment of the after-coming head during vaginal breech delivery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate spatulas for entrapment of the after-coming head (EAH) during vaginal breech delivery, in the setting of failed usual manoeuvres (Bracht or Mauriceau). METHODS: We led a retrospective cohort study in two tertiary referral hospital in France. From 2003 to 2018, we included all deliveries of live children requiring the use of spatulas (Thierry's and Teissier's) for EAH during vaginal breech delivery. RESULTS: Over the period, 59 breech deliveries with spatulas for EAH were enrolled (prevalence 2.3%). No vaginal delivery failures were found. The average term was 36 weeks of gestation. Mean maternal age was 29.4 years and median parity was 1. 50.8% of the foetuses presented as complete breech, 40.7% as frank breech, and 8.5% as footling breech. Maternal morbidity was low: no obstetrical lesions of the anal sphincter, 28% episiotomy (performed before application of instruments in most cases). There was no evidence of foetal over-morbidity. The average weight of the foetuses was 2635g. There was no serious trauma associated with the use of spatulas: only one case of skin lesion and a case of non-severe cephalhematoma could be attributed to the instrument. Mean arterial pH was 7.19, the median 5-min Apgar score was 10. CONCLUSION: In compliance with obstetrical mechanics, spatulas should be considered as an effective instrument during EAH with maternal and foetal safety. This is the first cohort describing the use of an instrument to manage EAH during vaginal breech delivery, while knowledge and mastery of this technique are essential to manage this situation.

Correction to: Safety considerations regarding Methotrexate of label use in tubal ectopic pregnancy.

In the original article publication, the authors given name and family name were interchanged.

Can early ßhCG change and baseline progesterone level predict treatment outcome in patients receiving single dose Methotrexate protocol for tubal ectopic pregnancy?

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of early ßhCG change and baseline progesterone level on treatment outcome among women receiving single dose Methotrexate protocol for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study involving all consecutive patients diagnosed with EP and receiving Methotrexate therapy form January 2015 to December 2016. Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to treatment outcome: success group (n = 66) involved women who displayed complete resolution of serum ßhCG levels following a single course of Methotrexate; failure group (n = 55) included patients who required repeated Methotrexate administration and/or surgical management. Predictive performances of baseline progesterone and ratio"ßhCG level on day 4/ ßhCG level on day 1″ (d4/d1) on treatment outcome were assessed using Receiving Operating Characteristics curves. RESULTS: The ratio d4/d1 displayed good performances in predicting treatment outcome (AUC = 0.826). A ratio ≤ 0.7 was associated with a success rate of 94% after 1 course of Methotrexate and 100% after 2 courses. In contrast, a ratio >1.7 was associated with a failure rate of 100%. Conversely, baseline progesterone showed poor performances (AUC = 0.611). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with extreme ßhCG changes (n = 33) on day 4 might benefit from a more personalized approach: simplified monitoring in those with a decline ≥30%, anticipated second course of treatment in those with an increase > 70%.

Operative vaginal delivery in case of persistent occiput posterior position after manual rotation failure: a 6-month follow-up on pelvic floor function.

PURPOSE: To compare the short- and long-term perineal consequences (at 6 months postpartum) and short-term neonatal consequences of instrumental rotation (IR) to those induced by assisted delivery (AD) in the occiput posterior (OP) position, in case of manual rotation failure. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study; tertiary referral hospital including all women presenting with persistent OP position who delivered vaginally after manual rotation failure with attempted IR or AD in OP position from September 2015 to October 2016. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of all attempted IR deliveries were compared with OP operative vaginal deliveries. Main outcomes measured were pelvic floor function at 6 months postpartum including Wexner score for anal incontinence and ICIQ-FLUTS for urinary symptoms. Perineal morbidity comprised severe perineal tears, corresponding to third and fourth degree lacerations. Fetal morbidity parameters comprised low neonatal Apgar scores, acidaemia, major and minor fetal injuries and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. RESULTS: Among 5265 women, 495 presented with persistent OP positions (9.4%) and 111 delivered after manual rotation failure followed by AD delivery: 58 in the IR group and 53 in the AD in OP group. The incidence of anal sphincter injuries was significantly reduced after IR attempt (1.7% vs. 24.5%; p < 0.001) without increasing neonatal morbidity. At 6 months postpartum, AD in OP position was associated with higher rate of anal incontinence (30% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.001) and with more urinary symptoms, dyspareunia and perineal pain. CONCLUSIONS: OP operative deliveries are associated with significant perineal morbidity and pelvic floor dysfunction at 6 months postpartum.

Pregnancy after kidney transplantation: outcome and anti-human leucocyte antigen alloimmunization risk.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation increases the chances for pregnancy and live birth for women with end-stage kidney disease. The aims of this study were to describe the outcomes of pregnancies in women with a kidney transplant and to evaluate the impact on anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alloimmunization. METHODS: We analysed 61 pregnancies that occurred in 46 patients after having excluded 10 miscarriages during the first trimester and 10 other pregnancies from which important data were missing. Anti-HLA antibodies were screened using the Luminex assay. RESULTS: Overall, the live birth rate was 83% (94% after exclusion of miscarriages during the first trimester). Pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes occurred in 26 and 21% of cases, respectively. The use of tacrolimus was an independent predictive factor for gestational diabetes. Twenty-four newborns (42%) were premature (<37 weeks). The median birth weight was 2720 (1040-3730) g. Nine newborns (15%) had low birth weights (<2.5 kg). At least one severe complication occurred in 56% of pregnancies. A high glomerular-filtration rate (GFR) before pregnancy was the sole independent protective factor that avoided a severe complication. Death-censored kidney-allograft survival was 80.4% at 6 years. De novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies were detected after only 5.9% of pregnancies: for two women, the father had the same HLA antigens as those from the deceased organ donor. The determination of the HLA of the father before pregnancy can better inform the woman about the possible impact of pregnancy on her kidney-allograft function. CONCLUSIONS: Despite many complications, the outcomes for pregnancy and kidney allografts are good. The risk of anti-HLA alloimmunization was low.

[French survey on the management strategy for placenta accreta spectrum]. / Enquête nationale sur la stratégie de prise en charge du placenta accreta en France.

OBJECTIVE: Placenta accreta belongs to placenta accreta spectrum and is defined by an adhesion or even invasion of the placental villi in the myometrium. The main risk factor is a history of cesarean section. Its incidence is increasing following an increase in the cesarean section rate in recent years and the cause of severe maternal morbidity (hemorrhage, transfusions, hysterectomy). Treatment can be radical by cesarean section-hysterectomy or conservative with an attempt at uterine preservation. American, English, Canadian and international recommendations have been established but there are no French recommendations to date. The objective of this study was to investigate management strategy for placenta accreta in type III maternity hospitals in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email to the obstetrics referents of the university hospital centers in France with type III maternity. RESULTS: Forty-eight centers were approached, with a participation rate of 77%. CONCLUSION: The management of placenta accreta spectrum in France is relatively heterogeneous on several points such as multidisciplinary management, evaluation by placental MRI, preoperative urological evaluation, treatment adopted as first-line, cesarean section-hysterectomy or conservative treatment, therapeutic strategy according to the placental invasion. However, the literature is currently poor, which may explain divergent treatment.