A weakly acidic solution containing deoxycholic acid induces esophageal epithelial apoptosis and impairs integrity in an in vivo perfusion rabbit model.

Impaired esophageal mucosal integrity may be an important contributor in the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Nevertheless, the effect of potentially harmful agents on epithelial integrity is mainly evaluated in vitro for a short period of time and the possible induction of epithelial apoptosis has been neglected. Our objective was to assess the effect of an acidic and weakly acidic solution containing deoxycholic acid (DCA) on the esophageal epithelium in an in vivo rabbit model of esophageal perfusion and to evaluate the role of the epithelial apoptosis. The esophagus of 55 anesthetized rabbits was perfused for 30 min with different solutions at pH 7.2, pH 5.0, pH 1.0, and pH 5.0 containing 200 and 500 µM DCA. Thereafter, animals were euthanized immediately or at 24 or 48 h after the perfusion. Transepithelial electrical resistance, epithelial dilated intercellular spaces, and apoptosis were assessed in Ussing chambers, by transmission electron microscopy, and by TUNEL staining, respectively. No macroscopic or major microscopic alterations were observed after the esophageal perfusions. The acidic and weakly acidic solution containing DCA induced similar long-lasting functional impairment of the epithelial integrity but different ultrastructural morphological changes. Only the solution containing DCA induced epithelial apoptosis in vivo and in vitro in rabbit and human tissue. In contrast to acid, a weakly acidic solution containing DCA induces epithelial apoptosis and a long-lasting impaired mucosal integrity. The presence of apoptotic cells in the esophageal epithelium may be used as a marker of impaired integrity and/or bile reflux exposure.

Impaired duodenal mucosal integrity and low-grade inflammation in functional dyspepsia.

OBJECTIVE: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is an extremely common functional gastrointestinal disorder, the pathophysiology of which is poorly understood. We hypothesised that impaired intestinal barrier function is involved in the onset and persistence of this disorder by inducing low-grade inflammation. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate duodenal mucosal integrity and low-grade inflammation in patients with FD. DESIGN: Duodenal biopsy specimens were obtained from 15 patients with FD fulfilling the Rome III criteria and 15 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and paracellular permeability were measured in Ussing chambers. Expression of cell-to-cell adhesion proteins was evaluated by real-time PCR, western blot and/or immunofluorescence. Numbers of mast cells, eosinophils and intraepithelial lymphocytes were assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Patients with FD displayed lower TEER and increased paracellular passage compared with healthy controls, which is indicative of impaired mucosal integrity. In addition, abnormal expression of cell-to-cell adhesion proteins at the level of tight junctions, adherens junctions and desmosomes was shown. Furthermore, patients were characterised by the presence of low-grade inflammation, as demonstrated by increased infiltration of mucosal mast cells and eosinophils. A significant association between the expression level of several cell-to-cell adhesion proteins, the extent of increased permeability and the severity of low-grade inflammation was found. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge the classical paradigm that patients with FD show no structural changes in the gastrointestinal tract. We suggest that impaired intestinal barrier function is a pathophysiological mechanism in FD. Thus, restoration of intestinal barrier integrity may be a potential therapeutic target for treating patients with FD.

A reduced esophageal epithelial integrity in a subgroup of healthy individuals increases with proton pump inhibitor therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 30% of healthy volunteers (HVs) show dilated intercellular spaces in the esophageal epithelium suggesting a functionally reduced epithelial integrity. We aimed to evaluate the presence of an altered epithelial integrity in HVs and whether physiological acid could explain such a difference. METHODS: Biopsies for Ussing chamber experiments were taken between 3 cm and 5 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction. Twenty-four-hour impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring was performed in the same 15 HVs. MII-pH tracings from 24 HVs before and after treatment with esomeprazole (40 mg b.i.d., two weeks), a proton pump inhibitor, were analyzed. Reflux parameters and impedance baseline (IB) at different levels of the esophagus were calculated. RESULTS: Epithelial integrity in the distal esophagus presents a large variability in vivo and in vitro (transepithelial electrical resistance 196.9 ± 16.27Ω. cm2; IB measurements 2022 ± 143.5Ω). Esomeprazole highly suppressed the total acid exposure time (AET) (1.9 (0.8-3.1) vs 0 (0-0)%, p < 0.0001). After splitting our participants into "high" and "low" IB, based on the median value, we observed only in the distal esophagus a higher total AET before (2.8 (1.6-4.8) vs 1.0 (0.5-2.2), p = 0.04) and increased IB values after esomeprazole (1620 (1347-1898) vs 2192 (1784-2503)Ω, p = 0.002) in the "low" IB group. CONCLUSION: A subgroup of HVs presents a low epithelial integrity in the distal esophagus probably due to the increased presence of physiological acid reflux. Whether these individuals have a higher chance to develop gastroesophageal reflux disease is unknown. The role of epithelial integrity in symptom perception needs to be further explored.