Comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography imaging and 99mTc-pyrophosphate in cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Pyrophosphate (PYP) scintigraphy provides high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis (CA). There has recently been emerging interest in using 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) for this application, yet its sensitivity has never been directly compared to that of PYP, the current molecular gold standard METHODS: Twelve subjects with ATTR-CA and 5 controls referred for PYP-SPECT were prospectively enrolled. 18F-NaF PET/CT scans were performed at 1 and 3 hours. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the images were performed, and the sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT and PYP-SPECT were compared RESULTS: Visual interpretation of NaF PET/CT yielded a sensitivity of 0.25 (95% CI 0.089 to 0.53) for the detection of ATTR-CA, which is significantly inferior to that of PYP-SPECT/CT (100%, P = .016). Visual interpretation at 3 hours yielded a similar sensitivity of 0.30 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.60, P = 1.00). There were no false-positive NaF PET studies. Mean target-to-background ratio (TBRmean) at 1h did not differ significantly (P = .21) in ATTR-CA subjects (0.83 ± 0.15) compared to controls (0.72 ± 0.15). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.69 ± 0.16 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.00, P = .23). CONCLUSION: With qualitative and quantitative analyses, sensitivity of NaF PET/CT is significantly inferior to that of PYP-SPECT for the diagnosis of ATTR-CA.

Association of recreational drug consumption, cardiac toxicity and heart transplantation

Summary: Cardiac toxicity from recreational drug use remains difficult to establish. We report the cases of 3 young patients who were hospitalized for cardiogenic shock. All were bridged to transplantation with implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). They underwent uneventful heart transplantation. The patients did not have any significant personal or family medical history, but all admitted consuming large quantities of recreational drugs daily. Histological examination of the native heart did not show any inflammation or infiltrative myocardial disease. In this series of young patients presenting in cardiogenic shock with minimal histologic findings on examination of the native hearts, the association between cardiac toxicity and active use of recreational drugs remains a strong possibility. The transplant community should be made aware of this possible association in the current era of legalization and social trivialization of drug consumption.

Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients Who Have Advanced Heart Failure: Results of a Multicenter Survey of Hospital-Based Cardiology Clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Conversations about goals of care in hospital are important to patients who have advanced heart failure (HF). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter survey of cardiology nurses, fellows, and cardiologists at 8 Canadian teaching hospitals. The primary outcome was the importance of barriers to goals-of-care discussions in hospital (1 = extremely unimportant; 7 = extremely important). We also elicited perspectives on roles of different practitioners in having these conversations. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 770/1024 (75.2%) eligible clinicians. The most important perceived barriers were: family members' and patients' difficulty in accepting a poor prognosis (mean [SD] score 5.9 [1.1] and 5.7 [1.2], respectively), family members' and patients' lack of understanding about the limitations and harms of life-sustaining treatments (5.8 [1.1] and 5.7 [1.2], respectively), and lack of agreement among family members about goals of care (5.8 [1.2]). Interprofessional team members were viewed as having different but important roles in goals-of-care discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiology clinicians perceive family and patient-related factors as the most important barriers to goals-of-care discussions in hospital. Many members of the interprofessional team were viewed as having important roles in addressing goals of care. These findings can inform the design of future interventions to improve communication about goals of care in advanced HF.

Clinical Heart fAilure Management Program: Changing the practice by partnering primary care and specialists (CHAMP-HF).

Background: While significant gains were made in the management of heart failure (HF), most patients are still diagnosed when they are acutely ill in hospital, often with advanced disease. Earlier diagnosis in the community could lead to improved outcomes. Whether a partnership and an educational program for primary care providers (PCP) increase HF awareness and management is unknown. Methods: We conducted an observational study between March 2019 and June 2020 during which HF specialists gave monthly HF conferences to PCP. Using a pre-post design, medical charts and administrative databases were reviewed and a questionnaire was completed by participating PCP. Primary and secondary endpoints included: 1) the number of patients diagnosed with HF, 2) implementation of GDMT for patients with HFrEF; 3) PCPs' experience and confidence. Results: Six PCP agreed to participate. Amongst the 11,909 patients of the clinic, 70 (0.59 %) patients met the criteria for HF. This number increased by 28.6 % (n = 90) after intervention. Increased use of GDMT for HFrEF patients at baseline (n = 35) was observed for all class of agents, with doubling of patients on triple therapies, from 8 (22.9 %) to 16 (45.7 %), p = 0.0047. Self-confidence on HF management was low (1, 16.7 %) but increased after the educational intervention of physicians (3, 50 %). Conclusion: An educational and collaborative approach between HF specialists and community PCP increased the number of new HF cases diagnosed, enhanced implementation of GDMT in patients with HFrEF and increase PCPs' confidence in treating HF, despite being conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Optimization of pharmacotherapies for ambulatory patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction is associated with improved outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In heart failure, specific target doses for each drug are recommended, but some patients receive suboptimal dosing, others are undertreated or remain chronically in a titration phase, despite having no apparent contraindication or intolerance. We assessed the association of different levels of adherence to guidelines with outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: Medical records of patients with HFrEF followed at our heart failure (HF) clinic for at least 6 months (n = 511) were reviewed and patients categorized as: 1) optimized (25.4%); 2) in-titration (29.0%); 3) undertreated (32.7%); and 4) intolerant/contraindicated (12.9%). Risk of mortality or HF events (hospitalization, emergency visit or ambulatory administration of intravenous diuretics) within one year was assessed using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Compared to optimized patients, those intolerant (HR: 4.60 [95%CI: 2.23-9.48]; p < 0.0001) had the highest risk of outcomes, followed by those undertreated (3.45 [1.78-6.67]; p = 0.0002) and in-titration (1.99 [0.97-4.06]; p = 0.0588). Overall predictors of outcomes included loop diuretics' use (4.54 [2.39-8.60]), undertreatment (2.38 [1.22-4.67]), intolerance/ contraindication to triple therapy (3.08 [1.47-6.42]), peripheral vascular disease (2.13 [1.29-3.50]) and NYHA class III-IV (1.89 [1.25-2.85]); all p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Level of adherence to guidelines is associated with outcomes, with intolerant/contraindicated patients having the worst prognosis and those undertreated and in-titration at intermediate risk compared to those optimized. Up-titration of therapy should be attempted whenever possible, considering patients' limitations, to potentially improve outcomes.

Thirty-year trends and outcome of isolated versus combined group 2 pulmonary hypertension after cardiac transplantation.

Aim: To investigate the effect of the new definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and new pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) thresholds on the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and events following cardiac transplantation (CTx) over 30 years. Methods: Patients who underwent CTx between 1983 and 2014 for whom invasive hemodynamic data was available were analyzed (n = 342). Patients transplanted between 1983 and 1998 were classified as early era and those transplanted between 1999 and 2014 were classified as recent era. Group 2 PH was diagnosed in the presence of a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > 15 mmHg. Isolated post capillary PH (Ipc-PH) was defined as PVR ≤ 2 wood units and combined pre and post capillary PH (Cpc-PH) was defined PVR > 2 wood units. Moderate to severe PH was defined as mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and long-term mortality according to type and severity of PH. Proportions were analyzed using the chi-square test, and survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the logrank test. Results: The prevalence of PH in patients transplanted in the early era was 89.1%, whilst 84.2% of patients transplanted in the recent era had PH (p = 0.3914). There was no difference in the prevalence of a pre-capillary component according to era (p = 0.4001), but severe PH was more common in the early era (51.1% [early] vs 38.0% [recent] p = 0.0151). Thirty-day and long-term  mortality  were  not  significantly  associated  with severity or type of PH. There was a trend toward increased 30-day mortality in mild PH (10.1%), compared to no PH (4.4%) and moderate to severe PH (6.6%; p = 0.0653). Long-term mortality did not differ according to the severity of PH (p = 0.1480). There were no significant differences in 30-day or long-term mortality in IpcPH compared to CpcPH (p = 0.3974 vs p = 0.5767, respectively). Conclusion: Over 30 years, PH has remained very prevalent before CTx. The presence, severity, and type (pre- vs post-capillary) of PH is not significantly associated with short- or long-term mortality.

Characteristics of Clinicians Are Associated With Their Beliefs About ICD Deactivation: Insight From the DECIDE-HF Study.

BACKGROUND: Discussing goals of care with heart failure patients is recommended but is not done systematically, due to factors such as time and personal beliefs. A recent survey showed that one-fifth of clinicians believe that implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation (ICDD) is unethical or constitutes physician-assisted suicide. We investigated whether individuals' characteristics are associated with these beliefs. METHODS: The Decision-Making About Goals of Care for Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure (DECIDE-HF) survey was given to healthcare providers at 9 hospitals to assess their perceived barriers to goals-of-care discussions. The association between respondent characteristics and their beliefs was examined using 2 adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: We included 760 clinicians (459 nurses, 94 fellows, and 207 cardiologists). The responses varied among professions, with the belief that ICDD is unethical considered to be important barrier by nurses (24%), fellows (10%), and staff (7%); P < 0.001). After adjusting for site, spirituality being more important in life (odds ratio [OR]: 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.37-3.56; P = 0.001, compared to less important), region of training (Asia [OR: 5.88; 95% CI: 2.12-16.31; P = 0.001] and Middle East [OR: 5.55; 95% CI:1.57-19.63; P = 0.008] compared to Canada), and years in practice (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.07-1.63; P = 0.01 per decade) influenced beliefs about ICDD being unethical, with similar results for the belief that ICDD represents physician-assisted suicide. CONCLUSIONS: Sociocultural factors, region of training, and profession influence clinicians' beliefs about ICDD being unethical and representing physician-assisted suicide. These factors and beliefs must be acknowledged when facing the delicate issue of end-of-life discussion.

CONTEXTE: Une discussion sur les objectifs de soins avec les patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque est recommandée, mais elle n'est pas systématiquement menée en raison de facteurs tels que les contraintes de temps et les croyances personnelles. Selon une enquête récente, un cinquième des cliniciens croient qu'une désactivation d'un défibrillateur cardioverteur implantable (DDCI) est contraire à l'éthique ou représente un suicide assisté par le médecin. Nous avons vérifié si des caractéristiques individuelles sont associées à ces croyances. MÉTHODOLOGIE: L'enquête DECIDE-HF ( Deci sion-Making About Goals of Care for Hospitalize d Pati e nts With H eart F ailure) a été réalisée chez des professionnels de la santé de neuf hôpitaux dans le but d'évaluer les obstacles qu'ils percevaient face à la discussion sur les objectifs de soins. Le lien entre les caractéristiques des répondants et leurs croyances a été analysé à l'aide de deux modèles ajustés de régression logistique. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons interrogé 760 cliniciens (459 infirmières, 94 médecins associés et 207 cardiologues). Les réponses ont varié d'une profession à l'autre, la croyance qu'une DDCI est contraire à l'éthique étant considérée comme un obstacle important par 24 % des infirmières, 10 % des médecins associés et 7 % des membres du personnel (p < 0,001). Après ajustement selon l'établissement, l'importance de la spiritualité dans la vie (très important [rapport de cotes {RC}] = 2,21; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 1,37-3,56; p = 0,001 comparativement à moins important), la région d'obtention du diplôme (Asie [RC = 5,88; IC à 95 % : 2,12-16,31; p = 0,001] et Moyen-Orient [RC = 5,55; IC à 95 % : 1,57-19,63; p = 0,008] comparativement au Canada) et le nombre d'années d'exercice (RC = 1,32; IC à 95 % : 1,07-1,63; p = 0,01 par tranche de 10 ans) ont influencé les croyances voulant qu'une DDCI soit contraire à l'éthique, et les résultats ont été similaires pour la croyance selon laquelle une DDCI représente un suicide assisté par le médecin. CONCLUSIONS: Des facteurs socioculturels, la région de formation et la profession influencent les croyances des cliniciens sur la DDCI et le fait qu'ils la considèrent comme étant une démarche contraire à l'éthique ou un suicide assisté par un médecin. Ces facteurs et croyances doivent être reconnus lorsque vient le temps d'aborder la délicate question de la discussion sur la fin de vie.

CCS/CHFS Heart Failure Guidelines Update: Defining a New Pharmacologic Standard of Care for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

In this update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure (HF) guidelines, we provide comprehensive recommendations and practical tips for the pharmacologic management of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Since the 2017 comprehensive update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of HF, substantial new evidence has emerged that has informed the care of these patients. In particular, we focus on the role of novel pharmacologic therapies for HFrEF including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sinus node inhibitors, sodium glucose transport 2 inhibitors, and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators in conjunction with other long established HFrEF therapies. Updated recommendations are also provided in the context of the clinical setting for which each of these agents might be prescribed; the potential value of each therapy is reviewed, where relevant, for chronic HF, new onset HF, and for HF hospitalization. We define a new standard of pharmacologic care for HFrEF that incorporates 4 key therapeutic drug classes as standard therapy for most patients: an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (as first-line therapy or after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker titration); a ß-blocker; a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; and a sodium glucose transport 2 inhibitor. Additionally, many patients with HFrEF will have clinical characteristics for which we recommended other key therapies to improve HF outcomes, including sinus node inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, hydralazine/nitrates in combination, and/or digoxin. Finally, an approach to management that integrates prioritized pharmacologic with nonpharmacologic and invasive therapies after a diagnosis of HFrEF is highlighted.

Care Gaps in Adherence to Heart Failure Guidelines: Clinical Inertia or Physiological Limitations?

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the impact of clinical and physiological factors limiting treatment optimization toward recommended medical therapy in heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Although guidelines aim to assist physicians in prescribing evidence-based therapies and to improve outcomes of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), gaps in clinical care persist. METHODS: Medical records of all patients with HFrEF followed for at least 6 months at the authors' HF clinic (n = 511) allowed for drug optimization and were reviewed regarding the prescription rates of recommended pharmacological agents and devices (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD] or cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT]). Then, an algorithm integrating clinical (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class, heart rate, blood pressure and biologic parameters (creatinine, serum potassium) based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria of landmark trials guiding these recommendations) was applied for each agent and device to identify potential explanations for treatment gaps. RESULTS: Gross prescription rates were high for beta-blockers (98.6%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) (93.4%), vasodilators (90.3%), ICDs (75.1%), and CRT (82.1%) among those eligible, except for ivabradine (46.3%, n = 41). However, achievement of target physiological doses was lower (beta-blockers, 67.5%; MRA, 58.9%; and vasodilators, 63.4%), and one-fifth of patient dosages were still being up-titrated. Suboptimal doses were associated with older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.221; p < 0.0001) and history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (no vs. yes, OR: 0.264; p = 0.0336). CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in adherence to guidelines exist in specialized HF setting and are mostly explained by limiting physiological factors rather than inertia. Older age and history of stroke/TIA, potential markers of frailty, are associated with suboptimal doses of guideline-directed medical therapy, suggesting that an individualized rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach may be required.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Failure Society Joint Position Statement on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Cardiac amyloidosis is an under-recognized and potentially fatal cause of heart failure and other cardiovascular manifestations. It is caused by deposition of misfolded precursor proteins as fibrillary amyloid deposits in cardiac tissues. The two primary subtypes of systemic amyloidosis causing cardiac involvement are immunoglobulin light chain (AL), a plasma cell dyscrasia, and transthyretin (ATTR), itself subdivided into a hereditary subtype caused by a gene mutation of the ATTR protein, and an age-related wild type, which occurs in the absence of a gene mutation. Clinical recognition requires a high index of suspicion, inclusive of the extracardiac manifestations of both subtypes. Diagnostic workup includes screening for serum and/or urine monoclonal protein suggestive of immunoglobulin light chains, along with serum cardiac biomarker measurement and performance of cardiac imaging for findings consistent with amyloid infiltration. Modern cardiac imaging techniques, including the use of nuclear scintigraphy with bone-seeking radiotracer to noninvasively diagnose ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, have reduced reliance on the gold standard endomyocardial biopsy. Disease-modifying therapeutic approaches have evolved significantly, particularly for ATTR, and pharmacologic therapies that slow or halt disease progression are becoming available. This Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Failure Society joint position statement provides evidence-based recommendations that support the early recognition and optimal diagnostic approach and management strategies for patients with cardiac amyloidosis. This includes recommendations for the symptomatic management of heart failure and other cardiovascular complications such as arrhythmia, risk stratification, follow-up surveillance, use of ATTR disease-modifying therapies, and optimal clinical care settings for patients with this complex multisystem disease.

The Status of Specialized Ambulatory Heart Failure Care in Canada: A Joint Canadian Heart Failure Society and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Guidelines Survey.

This joint Canadian Heart Failure Society and the CCS Heart Failure guidelines report has been developed to provide a pan-Canadian snapshot of the current state of clinic-based ambulatory heart failure (HF) care in Canada with specific reference to elements and processes of care associated with quality and high performing health systems. It includes the viewpoints of persons with lived experience, patient care providers, and administrators. It is imperative to build on the themes identified in this survey, through engaging all health care professionals, to develop integrated and shared care models that will allow better patient outcomes. Several patient and organizational barriers to care were identified in this survey, which must inform the development of regional care models and pragmatic solutions to improve transitions for this patient population. Unfortunately, we were unsuccessful in incorporating the perspectives of primary care providers and internal medicine specialists who provide the majority of HF care in Canada, which in turn limits our ability to comment on strategies for capacity building outside the HF clinic setting. These considerations must be taken into account when interpreting our findings. Engaging all HF care providers, to build on the themes identified in this survey, will be an important next step in developing integrated and shared care models known to improve patient outcomes.

Ce rapport conjoint des lignes directrices de la Société canadienne d'insuffisance cardiaque et de la Société canadienne de cardiologie (SCC) sur l'insuffisance cardiaque a été élaboré pour fournir un aperçu pancanadien de l'état actuel des soins ambulatoires de l'insuffisance cardiaque (IC) en clinique au Canada, en se référant spécifiquement aux éléments et aux processus de soins associés à des systèmes de santé très performants et de qualité. Il comprend les points de vue de personnes ayant une expérience vécue de l'IC, de prestataires de soins aux patients et d'administrateurs. Il est impératif de s'appuyer sur les thématiques identifiées dans cette enquête, en y engageant tous les professionnels de la santé, pour développer des modèles de soins intégrés et partagés qui permettront de meilleurs pronostics pour les patients. Plusieurs obstacles relatifs aux patients et organisationnels dont il faudra se soucier ont été identifiés dans cette enquête, qui doit servir de base à l'élaboration de modèles de soins régionaux et de solutions pragmatiques pour améliorer les transitions pour cette population de patients. Malheureusement, nous n'avons pas réussi à intégrer les points de vue des prestataires de soins primaires et des spécialistes en médecine interne qui fournissent la majorité des soins en IC au Canada, ce qui limite notre capacité à commenter les stratégies de renforcement des capacités en dehors du cadre des cliniques d'IC. Ces considérations doivent être prises en compte lors de l'interprétation de nos conclusions. L'engagement de tous les prestataires de soins de santé en IC à s'appuyer sur les thématiques identifiées dans cette enquête constituera une prochaine étape importante dans le développement de modèles de soins intégrés et partagés connus pour améliorer le pronostic des patients.

CCS/CHFS Heart Failure Guidelines: Clinical Trial Update on Functional Mitral Regurgitation, SGLT2 Inhibitors, ARNI in HFpEF, and Tafamidis in Amyloidosis.

In this update, we focus on selected topics of high clinical relevance for health care providers who treat patients with heart failure (HF), on the basis of clinical trials published after 2017. Our objective was to review the evidence, and provide recommendations and practical tips regarding the management of candidates for the following HF therapies: (1) transcatheter mitral valve repair in HF with reduced ejection fraction; (2) a novel treatment for transthyretin amyloidosis or transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis; (3) angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); and (4) sodium glucose cotransport inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of HF in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. We emphasize the roles of optimal guideline-directed medical therapy and of multidisciplinary teams when considering transcatheter mitral valve repair, to ensure excellent evaluation and care of those patients. In the presence of suggestive clinical indices, health care providers should consider the possibility of cardiac amyloidosis and proceed with proper investigation. Tafamidis is the first agent shown in a prospective study to alter outcomes in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Patient subgroups with HFpEF might benefit from use of sacubitril/valsartan, however, further data are needed to clarify the effect of this therapy in patients with HFpEF. Sodium glucose cotransport inhibitors reduce the risk of incident HF, HF-related hospitalizations, and cardiovascular death in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. A large clinical trial recently showed that dapagliflozin provides significant outcome benefits in well treated patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%), with or without type 2 diabetes.

An Unusual Presentation of a Cardiac Thrombus.

We describe the case of a patient with an evolving left atrial cardiac mass associated with pulmonary vein thrombosis. The patient presented no symptoms. Imaging follow-up revealed increase in size despite rivaroxaban therapy. Operative resection was performed, and pathological examination was compatible with pulmonary vein thrombus. This case illustrates an unusual presentation of cardiac thrombus.

Aortic regurgitation in patients with a left ventricular assist device: A contemporary review.

Aortic regurgitation (AR) developing while using a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) affects 25% to 30% of patients within the first year of implantation and is increasingly being recognized as a cause of recurrence of symptomatic heart failure (HF). The underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial, including changes in the leaflets of the aortic valve (AV), altered root biomechanics, and excessive left ventricular (LV) unloading, together promoting cusp remodeling and commissural fusion. Known risk factors for the development of AR while under support include advanced age, lower body surface area, systemic hypertension, large aortic root diameter, permanently closed AV, and duration of support. Further, variants in the anastomotic angle between the outflow graft and the ascending aorta have recently been recognized to induce structural changes in the aortic wall, contributing to the development and progression of AV disease. Nevertheless, it remains controversial as to whether AR on LVAD has an independent impact on prognosis, and no clear recommendation exists regarding its optimal diagnosis criteria and treatment. Herein we briefly review the literature and focus on the latest results regarding development of AR in patients supported with CF-LVADs. We also provide a structured echocardiographic approach for an accurate assessment of AV dysfunction in this challenging situation.

Understanding the patient perspective on research access to national health records databases for conduct of randomized registry trials.

BACKGROUND: Use of health administrative databases is proposed for screening and monitoring of participants in randomized registry trials. However, access to these databases raises privacy concerns. We assessed patient's preferences regarding use of personal information to link their research records with national health databases, as part of a hypothetical randomized registry trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiology patients were invited to complete an anonymous self-reported survey that ascertained preferences related to the concept of accessing government health databases for research, the type of personal identifiers to be shared and the type of follow-up preferred as participants in a hypothetical trial. A total of 590 responders completed the survey (90% response rate), the majority of which were Caucasians (90.4%), male (70.0%) with a median age of 65years (interquartile range, 8). The majority responders (80.3%) would grant researchers access to health administrative databases for screening and follow-up. To this end, responders endorsed the recording of their personal identifiers by researchers for future record linkage, including their name (90%), and health insurance number (83.9%), but fewer responders agreed with the recording of their social security number (61.4%, p<0.05 with date of birth as reference). Prior participation in a trial predicted agreement for granting researchers access to the administrative databases (OR: 1.69, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.90; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of Cardiology patients surveyed were supportive of use of their personal identifiers to access administrative health databases and conduct long-term monitoring in the context of a randomized registry trial.

Changes in Outcomes of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Over 30 Years Following Heart Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated temporal changes in the demographics and the prognosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) over 30 years following heart transplantation (HTx). BACKGROUND: Effects of the changing HTx demographics on CAV outcomes, based on International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) classification of CAV, have been incompletely investigated. METHODS: Patients who underwent HTx at the Montreal Heart Institute were classified according to the severity of CAV (CAV 0 is no presence of CAV; CAV 1 is mild, CAV 2 to 3 is moderate to severe) and era of HTx (early: 1983 to 1998; recent: 1999 to 2011). We compared the risk of progression, survival, and independent predictors of outcomes among the groups. RESULTS: A total of 298 patients were followed for 11.6 ± 6.6 years. Patients who received transplants in the early era exhibited a higher risk for progression from CAV 1 to a higher grade (adjusted odds ratio: 8.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 62.6). The presence of CAV was associated with a significantly increased risk for all-cause mortality in the early era (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.5) but not in the recent era (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.2 to 4.9). Regardless of the era, CAV classes 2 to 3 and CAV 1 were associated with a significantly increased risk for all-cause mortality compared to CAV 0 (HR: 6.5; 95% CI: 2.7 to 15.7; and HR: 1.750; 95% CI: 1.001 to 3.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The progression and prognosis of CAV have improved over 30 years. The ISHLT CAV classification accurately and independently predicts long-term outcome following HTx.

The unresolved issues with risk stratification and management of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing major vascular surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article, with a specific focus on patients undergoing vascular surgery, is to review controversial issues related to mechanisms of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery disease detection, and strategies to reduce perioperative complications. We propose explanations for the many conflicting results that have recently emerged in the literature.Source documents: We searched MEDLINE and reviewed all relevant manuscripts and scientific statements regarding management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Identification and prevention of ischemia in patients undergoing vascular surgery remains controversial. While the identification of preoperative ischemia is a marker of a higher perioperative risk, the value of identifying such ischemia has been questioned. We believe this may be, at least in part, due to our limited understanding of perioperative MI. Appropriate management of patients, based on the results of such testing, is likely the key to improving outcomes, and deserves further investigation. Efforts aimed at reducing the ischemic consequences of severe coronary plaques (by revascularization or beta-blocker therapy) have yielded conflicting results. The use of high doses of preoperative beta-blocker therapy may be harmful. Some studies suggest a promising role for statin therapy. Benefits of acetylsalicylic acid must be weighted against the risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Many questions remain unanswered about the impact of detecting inducible ischemia, and the role of revascularization or beta-blockers in patients undergoing vascular surgery. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of perioperative MI is critical, in order to identify the best approach to improve cardiac outcomes in these patients.