Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Indian Dermatol Online J ; 11(4): 575-579, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32832445

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the absence of a standard protocol, several methods and devices have been used for preparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with varying platelet concentrations. METHODS: Venous blood sample from 20 patients was used for preparing PRP using two methods: a manual double-spin method (1st spin at 160 g × 10 min, 2nd spin at 400 g × 10 min), and using a commercially available automated device (DrPRP-Kit®, REMI Laboratory Instruments). Platelet, erythrocyte, and total leukocyte counts were calculated for each PRP sample and compared. RESULTS: Platelet count in the PRP prepared with the manual double-spin method (PRPm, 12.51 ± 5.89 × 105/µL) as well as with the automated device (PRPa, 7.25 ± 4.74 × 105/µL) had significantly higher mean platelet count than whole blood (2.58 ± 0.81 × 105/µL, P < 0.001). The mean platelet count in PRPm was statistically significantly higher than PRPa (P < 0.001). The platelet capture efficiency of the manual method (mean 47.11%, median 41.75%) was statistically significantly higher than that of the automated device (mean 31.89%, 29.51%, P = 0.012). Platelet counts in both PRPs were variable, but the counts were more dispersed in PRPa(coefficient of variation 65%) as compared to PRPm(coefficient of variation 47%). CONCLUSION: The manual double-spin method had a higher platelet capture efficiency resulting in a higher platelet concentration as compared to the automated device. Though there was a significant interindividual variation in the platelet yield in the PRPs produced by both methods, results were more consistent with the manual method.

2.
Int J Dermatol ; 58(4): 472-476, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30506679

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Noncultured epidermal cell suspension (NCES) is an effective surgical modality for stable vitiligo which involves transplantation of the basal layer of epidermal cells onto the dermabraded vitiliginous patch. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has growth factors which may stimulate melanocyte migration and proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts. The objective of this study was to compare the extent of repigmentation achieved by transplantation of NCES suspended in PRP with that of NCES suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). METHODS: Twenty-one patients of stable vitiligo with at least two lesions of comparable size were included. The two vitiligo patches were randomized to receive NCES suspended in PRP or PBS. Postoperatively after 1 week, patients were given heliotherapy for 15 minutes daily. RESULTS: At 6 months follow-up, mean repigmentation by area method in PRP arm was 75.6 ± 30% SD and in non-PRP arm was 65 ± 34% SD (P = 0.0036). Patient satisfaction by visual analogue scale at 6 months also showed better results in PRP arm (P = 0.001). Assessment by three independent observers showed better repigmentation in PRP side both at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Suspending NCES in PRP can result in significantly greater mean repigmentation and patient satisfaction than suspending in PBS.


Asunto(s)
Células Epidérmicas/trasplante , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Pigmentación de la Piel , Vitíligo/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Helioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Solución Salina , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA